Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Lebanon Operations, Strikes, and Evacuation Discussions (Merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Lebanon Operations, Strikes, and Evacuation Discussions (Merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jul 2006, 22:41
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
As usual we send a carrier because its the best unit for the job, despite there being an RAF base only a few hundred miles away. Yet more evidence as to why carriers are essential in the modern world.

Ain't it great- we can sit offshore and support, while the RAF is unable to land at the airport with its much vaunted 24/7 capability due to it being bombed. Red faces in Strike perchance?
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 23:21
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jimlad1
As usual we send a carrier because its the best unit for the job, despite there being an RAF base only a few hundred miles away. Yet more evidence as to why carriers are essential in the modern world.

Ain't it great- we can sit offshore and support, while the RAF is unable to land at the airport with its much vaunted 24/7 capability due to it being bombed. Red faces in Strike perchance?

What is this as usual. I am trying to think about the last time we used a carrier for a NEO (not in the last 20 years anyway). Last one was Ivory Coast (no carrier), Sierra Leone (no carrier for the NEO - albeit one turned up later), Eritrea (no carrier), Democratic Republic of Congo (3 deployents, no actual evacuation - no carrier (albeit that Kinshasa is c400km from the sea).
Climebear is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 23:24
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Age: 37
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think i read on here that 3 RAF Chinooks were seen at nice airport refueling maybe there heading out to cyprus or meeting the Bulwark on the way.

Bulwarks got 500 marines embarked at the moment.
lukeylad is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 00:15
  #44 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jimlad1
Ain't it great- we can sit offshore and support, while the RAF is unable to land at the airport with its much vaunted 24/7 capability due to it being bombed. Red faces in Strike perchance?
Maybe the holes in the runway might have something to do with it and the fact that the aircraft are busy elsewhere...................
movadinkampa747 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 02:58
  #45 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
RN to Lebanon

Here

Hopefully it won't be needed.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 07:05
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RN to Eastern Med

In terms what we have serviceable and available to send , have we sent A carrier or THE carrier?
A2QFI is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 08:26
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Illustriuos & Albion = 1.5 carriers

Or did I mean Illustrious & Bulwark

Giving my age away now, lets think about what we once had...

Ark Royal Eagle Hermes Albion Bulwark Fearless Intrepid

Phantom Buccaneer Gannet Wessex

SLR (proper rifle)

Ok, Ok, I will stop there as I'm probably making some of you feel even older
microlight AV8R is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 08:38
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
"Maybe the holes in the runway might have something to do with it and the fact that the aircraft are busy elsewhere..................."

Exactly my point, we keep hearing on this board about how vulnerable CVF is and why its a waste of time. We never hear any mention of just how vulnerable fixed land airbases are, and as seen here, if we didnt have a carrier right now we'd be struggling to do anything. Once more the case for CVF is strengthened.
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 09:18
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What no one mentions is that it will be almost a week before the ships could get there..... slllooooowww these boats.

Saw some bird on news 24 saying - hopefully the navy will evacuate us in a couple of days I'm sure they are just waiting for clearance.... and perhaps a set of hydrofoils - carrier size.

Illustrious is in Gib, Bulwark in Barcelona thats about 1800 miles sailing?
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 09:39
  #50 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
The CVF is flag waving. If we wanted AD or CAS a far far better job could be done from Akrotiri, along with E3D, AAR and all other required support. The CVF is not needed against the Lebanese/Hizbollah and would have no chance against the Israelis.

HMS Bulwark provides the required amphibious landing capability and C2, the Chinooks providing the needed helo lift, the evacuees can then be ferried to Akrotiri. All the CVF will provide is extra deck space for more helos.

Pragmatically, I'd fly off the fixed wing assets to Akro and offer the deck space to the French, Italian or any other nation who need somewhere to stage their helos through. It would free up more space on board and they can operate from a proper airfield....
ORAC is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 09:59
  #51 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Illustrious is in Gib, Bulwark in Barcelona thats about 1800 miles sailing?
1800nm at 25 kts is 72 hours, or they could do it at 12.5 kts and take six days...I guess that they have some RFA support with them?
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 10:08
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Age: 37
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by airborne_artist
1800nm at 25 kts is 72 hours, or they could do it at 12.5 kts and take six days...I guess that they have some RFA support with them?
I think theres a tanker in the med already with NATO.
lukeylad is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 11:08
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah RFAs.. Just because the CVS can do 25 Kts can the RFA? To that point can Bulwark do anywhere near that speed in the Med in mid summer too?

As for the no host nation support required line... Where is the RFA going to find all the Avter and Diesel (for Bulwark) Not the WSBA by any chance?
Guernsey Girl II is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 11:23
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember that in 83 the Chinooks could reach Beirut from Akrotiri without too much trouble.
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 11:33
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes the Chinooks did the supply run from Akrotiri and also cas-evac I believe when we did the peacekeeping stuff out there.

The likely scenario is probably to use Chinooks and other choppers to shuttle people to a nice big deck sitting off shore at a safe distance.

The whole operation would take a lot longer if each flight had to go all the way to Akrotiri.

Shame we haven't got a few Buccs on QRA at Akrotiri for top cover this time. Harriers likely, but not quite the same
microlight AV8R is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 11:47
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Age: 37
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shame theres no buccs to show the flag like in 83. Rumour has it the buccs departed between the bulidings.
lukeylad is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 11:49
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lepus flares, anyone?
AllTrimDoubt is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 11:51
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Left Koinelli on friday and there were at least two types of pointy wooshy fast things there on excercise so there's your top cover

all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced
Always_broken_in_wilts is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 11:58
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by movadinkampa747
Yes sure they sailed there weeks ago because the Briitsih government knew what was going to happen............
Exactly.... I think that the spooks at the FCO have done a good job on this occasion...Well done you lot.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 12:22
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Abroad
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes you wonder what all these UK citizens were doing out in the Lebanon...they can't all be on holiday can they?
maxy101 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.