Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Abolish the RAF, says Col. Tim Collins

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Abolish the RAF, says Col. Tim Collins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th May 2006, 16:54
  #261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rafloo
Shame......However, the Royal Navy can...and so can the Army.
Err...what?
Days Like These is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 17:36
  #262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SE490618
Age: 64
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive seen many USAF aircraft embarked in Ships being refuelled. I've also witmessed USAF aircraft being refuelled by Army Bowsers. Im stumped as to why the statement would read that the RAF cannot refuel USAF aircraft.

Perhaps he meant to say that the RAF couldn't conduct AAR with USAF aircraft.... Its funny how the press seem to always get the wrong end of the stick.


Col Collins is absolutely right. Remember, there was a reason the RAF were given JPA first, wasn't there !!!!

Last edited by rafloo; 18th May 2006 at 18:08.
rafloo is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 19:00
  #263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im stumped as to why the statement would read that the RAF cannot refuel USAF aircraft.
Maybe it's because Col Collins doesn't actually have a clue what he's talking about? Just a thought...

Trust me, the RAF is quite capable of refuelling USAF jets on the ground.
Days Like These is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 20:09
  #264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SE490618
Age: 64
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite possibly.....But I wouldn't allow the TSW to get anywhere near an aircraft requiring refuelling...they'd miss it.
rafloo is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 20:31
  #265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reading
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rafloo, I do hope you're joking.
Having been on Chinooks for nearly 10 years I only wish the rest of the British Military displayed the same 'can do' attitude and welcoming smiles in the middle of nowhere as the boys and girls from Stafford.

I am very saddened by the tone of many of the posts on this thread. PPRUNE was once a place to gossip and to find out how best to screw the Service for allowances. It now appears to have become a site for outrageous posts designed to incite friction.

We all know that the Army couldn't possibly take on the SH fleet nor the Navy our fixed wing assets; nor could the RAF succesfully manage a fleet of warships. Maybe PPRUNE could close it's military wing and the 3 Services could operate individual sites. The civvys must think we're idiots.
iPodder is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 20:34
  #266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, I thought this was already the RAF forum.
grunt@dhfs.org is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 20:42
  #267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Birmingham
Age: 50
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Days Like These
Maybe it's because Col Collins doesn't actually have a clue what he's talking about? Just a thought...

Trust me, the RAF is quite capable of refuelling USAF jets on the ground.
The RAF an also refuel USAF aircraft in the air...

VC-10(RAF) and EA-6 Prowler(USAF)

I hope the Army know what I mean
dazjs is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 20:57
  #268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dazjs
The RAF an also refuel USAF aircraft in the air...

VC-10(RAF) and EA-6 Prowler(USAF)

I hope the Army know what I mean
Yes, the Army know that EA-6 are operated by the USN and USMC. Know what I mean?
grunt@dhfs.org is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 21:01
  #269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Birmingham
Age: 50
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Yes, the Army know that EA-6 are operated by the USN and USMC. Know what I mean?
Well what sort of refuelling method is used?
dazjs is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 21:04
  #270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does it matter? They're not USAF. The reason that crabair can refuel them is that USN/USMC also use drogue. I think this was covered 12,452 posts ago, do keep up.
grunt@dhfs.org is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 21:09
  #271 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,412
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
Can we help it if they retired the A-7.....
ORAC is online now  
Old 18th May 2006, 23:01
  #272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mellchetts

Originally Posted by Chainkicker
And presumably more Melchetts than Regiments nowadays ???
seems that way, there will be soon enough top brass of air rank to command every flight in the RAF let alone squadron , station, etc, what we want is realistic leaders , who are willing to say "this is ****e and it doesn't work" so get us something that does
stinger779 is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 00:08
  #273 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brickhistory
?Que? Canada likes us? Hmmm, not by what I see in their press.
Stop robbing our softwood lumber money and give us back all $5bn US of it (not $4bn - and at the exchange rate it was levied at) and maybe we'd like you better. Or at least not make our distaste so obvious. Oh, and while you're building a border fence, could it keep your deserters in too?
MarkD is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 06:22
  #274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
The White House needs burning everynow and then....sometimes with the occupants still inside the thing.
Yeah....some victory that.....kinda like the one down near New Orleans. Care to remind us how that one turned out?
The Brits and Germans have a lot in common besides Kings and Queens....we beat you both twice each.
Actually the first time you beat yourselves. As you were British subjects it was in fact your first civil war.

Of course the assistance of the French came in handy, strange how short the memories are about your countries founding when it comes to throwing labels at the French for being surrender monkeys.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 06:33
  #275 (permalink)  

TAC Int Bloke
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be fair Stacker the French are a bunch of surrender monkeys.

The so called” war of Independence” was won by Englishmen against Germans - so we won again!

Ah no, wait, I'm getting a message......it was Mel Gibson again wasn't it
Maple 01 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.