RAF Boulmer closure to be reviewed
Thread Starter
RAF Boulmer closure to be reviewed
BBC Look North tonight at 6.30pm. John Reid has written to Alan Beith (Lib Dem and local MP) to say that the closure of RAF Boulmer is now subject to review due to the excessive costs of moving existing ASACS units (School of Fighter Control and CRC).
So, closing a unit that has just been refurbished with state of the art equipment and moving it to a second world war station with limited infrastructure and under the thumb of English Heritage is expensive is it? Could have told them that two years ago before this shambles started.
Stand by for the mother of all fudges. No change on the decision to close but it will 'move right' and then 'move right' again. I really hope someones (2* or 3*) Gonads are roasting over an open fire this christmas.
So, closing a unit that has just been refurbished with state of the art equipment and moving it to a second world war station with limited infrastructure and under the thumb of English Heritage is expensive is it? Could have told them that two years ago before this shambles started.
Stand by for the mother of all fudges. No change on the decision to close but it will 'move right' and then 'move right' again. I really hope someones (2* or 3*) Gonads are roasting over an open fire this christmas.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up North
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That'll p!ss off the STC and PTC bean-cutters, sorry counters! The RAF Lincoln commuters will be even more upset!
I was at the happy place when the Command Secretary visited the other year and only regret that I wasn't in the position to express my views with regard to the stupidity of the move.
The fact that the station had the Officers' Mess with the finest standards in the UK Armed Forces is another issue....long may it continue!
I was at the happy place when the Command Secretary visited the other year and only regret that I wasn't in the position to express my views with regard to the stupidity of the move.
The fact that the station had the Officers' Mess with the finest standards in the UK Armed Forces is another issue....long may it continue!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sure that this is not the first time that this has been suggested. But it would be rather amusing if it came true...
Let's just forget this whole Scampton c**k up and move TCW to Coltishall where there is loads of space and a sound infrastructure. Suprisingly, there is a ready made FC facility near by that just needs a refit.
Full circle, me thinks...
GB
Let's just forget this whole Scampton c**k up and move TCW to Coltishall where there is loads of space and a sound infrastructure. Suprisingly, there is a ready made FC facility near by that just needs a refit.
Full circle, me thinks...
GB
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very sensible considering Boulmer is undergoing major refurbishment and has just had millions spent on it.
Boulmer is ine of the few RAF Bases in the north, along with Leeming and Linton on Ouse.
Hopefully a future use can also be found for Leeming.
Boulmer is ine of the few RAF Bases in the north, along with Leeming and Linton on Ouse.
Hopefully a future use can also be found for Leeming.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Biggin Hill
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wyler
Surely this is not news? The review of the plan to install the A6 Hub at Scampton will presumably look at 2 options - TCW & ERAS will go either to Leeming or Scampton as per the original plan. A review of the position of Boulmer falls naturally out of this. I am suspicious of Beith's motives in releasing this news - is he just trying to show the local populace what an effective MP he is? Nothing he has done will make any difference to the eventual outcome.
The long-term aspirations of our lords and masters (one CRC at Scampton with another at a FJ MOB beginning with C nearby) do not stand up if the CRC at Scampton has a life of 5-7 (or 15???) years until NATO ACCS comes in (and anyone wanting to look at a gigantic waste of money should compare that with UCCS!). That being the case, the CRC at Boulmer will need to continue for the foreseeable future, but it's a pretty bl00dy miserable and cramped setup now that the Group Staff 'rustication' is forcing many more people underground and putting the squeeze on the SFC.
I am told by those that have visited the new CRC at Scampton that it is pretty impressive considering it's a converted Airmen's Mess - hard to believe that it may be closed inside 10 years, but it may be unsustainable without the rest of the base around it? And what will happen to 1 ACC? Back up the A1 to Boulmer?
I also wonder whether the final decision will be heavily influenced by whether HQ Land (?) has a requirement for Leeming - this would presumably put paid to plans for TCW/ERAS to locate there for anything other than an interim period.
I am expecting the final announcement any time in the next 12 to 18 months! Apparently ERAS are planning to move to RAF Woodvale until the decision is made.
BA
Surely this is not news? The review of the plan to install the A6 Hub at Scampton will presumably look at 2 options - TCW & ERAS will go either to Leeming or Scampton as per the original plan. A review of the position of Boulmer falls naturally out of this. I am suspicious of Beith's motives in releasing this news - is he just trying to show the local populace what an effective MP he is? Nothing he has done will make any difference to the eventual outcome.
The long-term aspirations of our lords and masters (one CRC at Scampton with another at a FJ MOB beginning with C nearby) do not stand up if the CRC at Scampton has a life of 5-7 (or 15???) years until NATO ACCS comes in (and anyone wanting to look at a gigantic waste of money should compare that with UCCS!). That being the case, the CRC at Boulmer will need to continue for the foreseeable future, but it's a pretty bl00dy miserable and cramped setup now that the Group Staff 'rustication' is forcing many more people underground and putting the squeeze on the SFC.
I am told by those that have visited the new CRC at Scampton that it is pretty impressive considering it's a converted Airmen's Mess - hard to believe that it may be closed inside 10 years, but it may be unsustainable without the rest of the base around it? And what will happen to 1 ACC? Back up the A1 to Boulmer?
I also wonder whether the final decision will be heavily influenced by whether HQ Land (?) has a requirement for Leeming - this would presumably put paid to plans for TCW/ERAS to locate there for anything other than an interim period.
I am expecting the final announcement any time in the next 12 to 18 months! Apparently ERAS are planning to move to RAF Woodvale until the decision is made.
BA
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAF base closure to be 'reviewed'
BBC News
14th December 2005
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/4525486.stm
Plans to relocate a Northumberland RAF base with the loss of 700 jobs are to be reviewed, it has been revealed.
The jobs which are under threat are within the Air Combat Service Support unit at RAF Boulmer.
But the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has written to Liberal Democrat MP for Berwick, Alan Beith, saying plans were being reviewed because of cost worries.
Mr Beith said he now hoped the move would be scrapped and is hoping to meet Armed Forces Minister Adam Ingram.
Best value
But in his letter, Mr Ingram said: "In light of increased site preparation cost estimates at RAF Scampton, we have decided to review whether this location remains the best value for money option for all the units concerned and are considering possible alternative locations."
Northumberland County Council and Alnwick District Council have been lobbying the government for a package of support measures to help minimise the consequences claiming the move would deprive the county of £18m a year.
Mr Beith said: "The best value for money option is to keep RAF Boulmer as it is, following the multi-million pound refurbishment which has just been carried out there.
"I always believed the plans to move would start to unravel once the costs became clear and real money had to be found."
The proposed wind down of the base and transfer was planned to take place between 2009 and 2012.
BBC News
14th December 2005
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/4525486.stm
Plans to relocate a Northumberland RAF base with the loss of 700 jobs are to be reviewed, it has been revealed.
The jobs which are under threat are within the Air Combat Service Support unit at RAF Boulmer.
But the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has written to Liberal Democrat MP for Berwick, Alan Beith, saying plans were being reviewed because of cost worries.
Mr Beith said he now hoped the move would be scrapped and is hoping to meet Armed Forces Minister Adam Ingram.
Best value
But in his letter, Mr Ingram said: "In light of increased site preparation cost estimates at RAF Scampton, we have decided to review whether this location remains the best value for money option for all the units concerned and are considering possible alternative locations."
Northumberland County Council and Alnwick District Council have been lobbying the government for a package of support measures to help minimise the consequences claiming the move would deprive the county of £18m a year.
Mr Beith said: "The best value for money option is to keep RAF Boulmer as it is, following the multi-million pound refurbishment which has just been carried out there.
"I always believed the plans to move would start to unravel once the costs became clear and real money had to be found."
The proposed wind down of the base and transfer was planned to take place between 2009 and 2012.
Thread Starter
BA
As you can see from the above, it is news. Until yesterday there was plenty of rumour but no substance to this review. From a 'definite' to a maybe is a seed change in thinking (and not before time).
Until a few weeks ago any talk of a possible reprieve for Boulmer was dismissed out of hand by the powers that be. I just think this whole debacle could have been avoided. Seems to me we (the RAF) could do with slowing down this race for off loading real estate and take something other than a knee jerk approach to forward planning.
Perhaps we could start by taking measures to ensure there are LESS Air Ranking Officers than aircraft.....
As you can see from the above, it is news. Until yesterday there was plenty of rumour but no substance to this review. From a 'definite' to a maybe is a seed change in thinking (and not before time).
Until a few weeks ago any talk of a possible reprieve for Boulmer was dismissed out of hand by the powers that be. I just think this whole debacle could have been avoided. Seems to me we (the RAF) could do with slowing down this race for off loading real estate and take something other than a knee jerk approach to forward planning.
Perhaps we could start by taking measures to ensure there are LESS Air Ranking Officers than aircraft.....
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Marham
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I may be wrong however, aren't CRCs paid for from the coffers at NATO? If this is the case, then I believe that a review of Boulmer's future is probably based purely on a lack of funding to sort out the accomodation at Scampton/RAF Kirton in Lindsey, which will prevent CRC Scampton from ever becoming a 24 hr CRC due to a lack of bodies.
Why keep Boulmer open long term? Bunkers are very expensive to maintain and as costs spiral, I think the FC branch may be forced to work above ground at a Typhoon base not far from Scampton!
How about a 24 hr CRC with NATO ACCS (or whatever it's called) at Conningsby supported by CRC Scampton during the day or whenever flying is at its busiest?
One thing is for sure, CRC Scampton will not close in the near future, the NATO accountants will not tolerate that surely!!!
B55
Why keep Boulmer open long term? Bunkers are very expensive to maintain and as costs spiral, I think the FC branch may be forced to work above ground at a Typhoon base not far from Scampton!
How about a 24 hr CRC with NATO ACCS (or whatever it's called) at Conningsby supported by CRC Scampton during the day or whenever flying is at its busiest?
One thing is for sure, CRC Scampton will not close in the near future, the NATO accountants will not tolerate that surely!!!
B55
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HAHAHAHAHA
B55 you make I laugh - NATO accountants not tolerate a total waste of money? They're tolerating a new NATO HQ aren't they? Oh, I forgot - that gets them shiney new offices and stuff - silly me.
B55 you make I laugh - NATO accountants not tolerate a total waste of money? They're tolerating a new NATO HQ aren't they? Oh, I forgot - that gets them shiney new offices and stuff - silly me.
Thread Starter
B55
We have had this discussion before...
Agree that going above ground is the way ahead and we have a limited capability to do just that now at Boulmer.
Don't give a t*ss where the Typhoons/F3's/Tankers etc are, we are not role dependant. From a technology point of view, we can already be anywhere we want.
We have had this discussion before...
Agree that going above ground is the way ahead and we have a limited capability to do just that now at Boulmer.
Don't give a t*ss where the Typhoons/F3's/Tankers etc are, we are not role dependant. From a technology point of view, we can already be anywhere we want.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clouseau's apartment block
Age: 57
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Collocation with ISTAR would have been a very good idea - and I don't mean on the other side of Lincoln. Unfortunately there was not enough room, I gather. Failing that, siting on an MOB would have been a step forward too - although I share Wyler's views to an extent regarding my emotional attachment to Northumberland. Also, I believe that the RAF will be the long term loser if we abandon our footprint in the NE of England. Losing Leeming as well would have left a big black holebetween Linton and Leuchars. The Services are losing their bonds with the community and grouping (just about) everyone in Lincs & Scotland would not help matters one jot.
It was a very silly idea to put a brand spanking new state of the art airC2 ops facility on a site with no viable infrastructure.
Net result: no decent accommodation at Scampton, 1ACC on a knackered site that was neglected by the Army and also planning blight at Boulmer. For example, because of the planned closure of the latter, the project SLAM was cancelled and the troops are in temporary accommodation. We have already lost some good people at the cpl and SNCO level who voted with their feet and I hope we do not lose any more of our talent because of this.
It was a very silly idea to put a brand spanking new state of the art airC2 ops facility on a site with no viable infrastructure.
Net result: no decent accommodation at Scampton, 1ACC on a knackered site that was neglected by the Army and also planning blight at Boulmer. For example, because of the planned closure of the latter, the project SLAM was cancelled and the troops are in temporary accommodation. We have already lost some good people at the cpl and SNCO level who voted with their feet and I hope we do not lose any more of our talent because of this.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Much-Binding-in-the-Marsh
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A couple of small points of order.
In the ACCS era the CRCs will not be NATO funded but paid for by the nation as they become the highest level of national control. The only bit that NATO will pay for is the CIS connectivity from CRC upwards to CAOC.
The new NATO HQ will indeed be a costly affair but if you've visited the current location you'll know it is falling apart and may not last the 10 years expected before the new building is ready. Oh and the new building will be funded from the NATO Civil Budget and hence the UK share will be paid for by the FCO. Thus it is not in competition for funds with any other NATO infrastructure projects.
In the ACCS era the CRCs will not be NATO funded but paid for by the nation as they become the highest level of national control. The only bit that NATO will pay for is the CIS connectivity from CRC upwards to CAOC.
The new NATO HQ will indeed be a costly affair but if you've visited the current location you'll know it is falling apart and may not last the 10 years expected before the new building is ready. Oh and the new building will be funded from the NATO Civil Budget and hence the UK share will be paid for by the FCO. Thus it is not in competition for funds with any other NATO infrastructure projects.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Impiger
Fair enough on the HQ funding coming from another Department - but it's still a waste of money.
As for the CRCs not being paid for by NATO, I'm afraid you're wrong there - they will be majority funded (75%) by NATO. Where they are going - now that's another matter entirely.
Fair enough on the HQ funding coming from another Department - but it's still a waste of money.
As for the CRCs not being paid for by NATO, I'm afraid you're wrong there - they will be majority funded (75%) by NATO. Where they are going - now that's another matter entirely.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Marham
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wyler,
you may not give a t*ss about where the air assets are based however, I can't believe for a second that the weapons side of your branch would not rather co locate with the AD aircrews.
I have plenty of mates on the F3 fleet (bless them) and they do suggest that there is a huge divide between the controllers and the aircrew in terms of understanding what is required of GCI. Surely, if you were at the same unit, you would be able to become more effective from the weapons point of view.
I completely understand you point of view about technology allowing you to work from any unit from a surv point of view however, why not a flying unit?
Merry Christmas to you all,
B55
you may not give a t*ss about where the air assets are based however, I can't believe for a second that the weapons side of your branch would not rather co locate with the AD aircrews.
I have plenty of mates on the F3 fleet (bless them) and they do suggest that there is a huge divide between the controllers and the aircrew in terms of understanding what is required of GCI. Surely, if you were at the same unit, you would be able to become more effective from the weapons point of view.
I completely understand you point of view about technology allowing you to work from any unit from a surv point of view however, why not a flying unit?
Merry Christmas to you all,
B55
Thread Starter
Brit 55
Yes, there is definite mileage in being togehter but the advantage, IMHO, is so small that it does not merit a huge investment like that. In the course of a normal working week the weapons team work with F15's, F3's, Typhoon, Hawk, GR4, GR7, KC135, VC10, FRA, Dutch F16's, French Mirage etc etc. All have different requirements and all think they are the most important.
My point is we carry out a huge range of control tasks and, therefore, we do not/cannot specialise to that extent. The E3D force is now heavily involved in CAS and a lot of other stuff. Being at every Typhoon brief/debrief is not going to significantly impact on our (corporate) perfomance.
Unfortunately, some of the F3 fleet do not understand what we do or what our scope is. They think we are here purely to serve them and them alone so they get frustrated when we do not provide exactly what they want when they want. Ask one of your 'mates' when he last visited a CRC? No easy answer.
The other suggestion is to put a controller on each squadron as a SME or POC. But., as you know, they will want a pretty 20 something to impress and drive their MT.
Merry Xmas
Yes, there is definite mileage in being togehter but the advantage, IMHO, is so small that it does not merit a huge investment like that. In the course of a normal working week the weapons team work with F15's, F3's, Typhoon, Hawk, GR4, GR7, KC135, VC10, FRA, Dutch F16's, French Mirage etc etc. All have different requirements and all think they are the most important.
My point is we carry out a huge range of control tasks and, therefore, we do not/cannot specialise to that extent. The E3D force is now heavily involved in CAS and a lot of other stuff. Being at every Typhoon brief/debrief is not going to significantly impact on our (corporate) perfomance.
Unfortunately, some of the F3 fleet do not understand what we do or what our scope is. They think we are here purely to serve them and them alone so they get frustrated when we do not provide exactly what they want when they want. Ask one of your 'mates' when he last visited a CRC? No easy answer.
The other suggestion is to put a controller on each squadron as a SME or POC. But., as you know, they will want a pretty 20 something to impress and drive their MT.
Merry Xmas
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clouseau's apartment block
Age: 57
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wyler,
Concur completely. There's a lot more to AirC2 than GCI with one particular type of fast jet. On the subject of ignorance, my particular favourite a few years ago was when an F3 nav asked me if my radar worked in TWIS!
Concur completely. There's a lot more to AirC2 than GCI with one particular type of fast jet. On the subject of ignorance, my particular favourite a few years ago was when an F3 nav asked me if my radar worked in TWIS!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: England
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
During my time in the Falklands Controllers were required to attend all briefs and debriefs with the 1435 flt and when appropriate 1312 aircrew as well. Often the FA and MC would attend as well. It was a very succesful procedure. Junior controllers rubbed shoulders with aircrew and learnt a great deal some good and some bad. Likewise junior aircrew were exposed to our line of business and again, I believe, learnt some good stuff. Agreed the FI was a somewhat sterile environment but colocation of some WCs at MOBs would enhance both the Fighter Control branch and the host stn.
As for which bases should close and which to stay open. Wouldn't it be nice just to relax and stay as we are just for a little while..................
As for which bases should close and which to stay open. Wouldn't it be nice just to relax and stay as we are just for a little while..................
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Marham
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wyler,
fair point about the variety of assets you guys look after, I'm not in any way trying to put your branch down at all, it's relevance will only increase as the AD drivers go back into single seaters (a mistake IMHO).
I just find it VERY frustrating that I rarely get the chance to give feedback to the WC after a sortie. They often fail to grasp what we are setting out to achieve and it would be nice to be able to offer you guys in for a coffee post sortie and get some LI's out into our communities. I have an understanding of GCI that is not acceptable IMHO however, how do I get to improve it without debriefing?
Incidentely the E3 guys are generally much more approachable and seem to have more of an understanding about the importance of debriefing however, that is probably down to the fact that they deploy on a regular basis.
I'm just clutching at straws here however, should Boulmer close, what option could possibly be better than moving to an MOB?
Your comments about the F3 community are spot on, they have their own agenda and everybody else is expected to adhere to it, hence why we often kiss off affil sorties as the training value is often limited to say the least!
fair point about the variety of assets you guys look after, I'm not in any way trying to put your branch down at all, it's relevance will only increase as the AD drivers go back into single seaters (a mistake IMHO).
I just find it VERY frustrating that I rarely get the chance to give feedback to the WC after a sortie. They often fail to grasp what we are setting out to achieve and it would be nice to be able to offer you guys in for a coffee post sortie and get some LI's out into our communities. I have an understanding of GCI that is not acceptable IMHO however, how do I get to improve it without debriefing?
Incidentely the E3 guys are generally much more approachable and seem to have more of an understanding about the importance of debriefing however, that is probably down to the fact that they deploy on a regular basis.
I'm just clutching at straws here however, should Boulmer close, what option could possibly be better than moving to an MOB?
Your comments about the F3 community are spot on, they have their own agenda and everybody else is expected to adhere to it, hence why we often kiss off affil sorties as the training value is often limited to say the least!