ISK Superbase!
As it always seems that the airfield having the most money spent on it is normally the one most likely to close
(Thank you Gainesy)
the answer must be to think laterally and look for the airfield that has had the least spent on it as the one most likely to stay open.
May I therefore suggest Chetwynd as the most likely candidate (although the man that cuts the grass is an ongoing expense). I look forward to seeing all ISK assets operating out of there!
PS Just watch out for the soft bit at the South Western end - it still hasn't recovered from the attentions of the Herc that tried to plough it up
As others have pointed out, spending lots of dosh is not an indication of retention. cf Acklington, Stradishall, Finn, Chiv etc, etc.
the answer must be to think laterally and look for the airfield that has had the least spent on it as the one most likely to stay open.
May I therefore suggest Chetwynd as the most likely candidate (although the man that cuts the grass is an ongoing expense). I look forward to seeing all ISK assets operating out of there!
PS Just watch out for the soft bit at the South Western end - it still hasn't recovered from the attentions of the Herc that tried to plough it up
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lincs
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SandyPit,
I don't think that your source is quite as good as you think. It makes no sense whatsoever to move the ISTAR fleets up to Kinloss.
Firstly, investment in Waddo over the last 5 years (let alone 10!) totally outstrips that at Kinloss. We also have had a new Sgt & WOs Mess, gym, Hive (oops sorry, I mean 'Integrated Welfare Facility'!), MT and taxiway refurbishment. Additionally however, there has been major investment for Sentinel involving building the huge 5 Sqn HQ, Sentinel sim building and refurbishing hangars. Currently, there is also an Officers' Mess extension going up to accomodate the Sentinel guys.
Going back 10 years, AWC, EWAD and EWOSE have all had large and extremely expensive buildings produced. The former also includes the 51 Sqn HQ and EROSS.
Additionally, whilst we can easily operate out of Kinloss in an E-3D, your teeny weeny runway places some endurance limitations on us, despite what Trap One suggests.
Accordingly, I would suggest it very unlikely that anything will happen to Waddo. Indeed (for what it matters) we've been told as much by several 'star' ranks lately. And they would never tell porkies would they?!!!
If I were a betting man I'd say that there is a strong likelyhood that Scampton will be reborn. Nimrod MR2s (although you may need a runway stretch?), 1ACC, TCW, a CRC have all been linked to that unit.
Here's my prediction of what the RAF will look like in 2010:
Benson: Chinook, Merlin.
Coningsby: Typhoon.
Marham: GR4 (+ Global Hawk?).
Waddington: E-3D, Sentinel, Nimrod R1.
Scampton: Nimrod MR2.4 (+Predator?), Reds, TCW, 1 ACC etc.
Brize: A330, C-17, C-130J, A400M.
Cranwell: MFTS.
Shawbury: DHFS.
Cottesmore: GR9.
Leuchars: Typhoon.
Lossie: GR4.
Valley: Hawk.
I certainly envisage huge real estate sales by the MoD in the next 5 years.
And before all you Nimrod types go into Silverback, Alfa male mode and start accusing me of Kipper bashing again, when the E-3D first started at waddo 13 years ago, I actually rekoned that we'd have been better up at Lossie or Kinloss. This was due to the large amount of Nav and AEO wasters whose only motivation to get onto the E-3D was to get away from Scotland and who did no credit to the aircrew branches. I'm BLOODY glad we're not in Scotland now mind!
Regards,
M2
I don't think that your source is quite as good as you think. It makes no sense whatsoever to move the ISTAR fleets up to Kinloss.
Firstly, investment in Waddo over the last 5 years (let alone 10!) totally outstrips that at Kinloss. We also have had a new Sgt & WOs Mess, gym, Hive (oops sorry, I mean 'Integrated Welfare Facility'!), MT and taxiway refurbishment. Additionally however, there has been major investment for Sentinel involving building the huge 5 Sqn HQ, Sentinel sim building and refurbishing hangars. Currently, there is also an Officers' Mess extension going up to accomodate the Sentinel guys.
Going back 10 years, AWC, EWAD and EWOSE have all had large and extremely expensive buildings produced. The former also includes the 51 Sqn HQ and EROSS.
Additionally, whilst we can easily operate out of Kinloss in an E-3D, your teeny weeny runway places some endurance limitations on us, despite what Trap One suggests.
Accordingly, I would suggest it very unlikely that anything will happen to Waddo. Indeed (for what it matters) we've been told as much by several 'star' ranks lately. And they would never tell porkies would they?!!!
If I were a betting man I'd say that there is a strong likelyhood that Scampton will be reborn. Nimrod MR2s (although you may need a runway stretch?), 1ACC, TCW, a CRC have all been linked to that unit.
Here's my prediction of what the RAF will look like in 2010:
Benson: Chinook, Merlin.
Coningsby: Typhoon.
Marham: GR4 (+ Global Hawk?).
Waddington: E-3D, Sentinel, Nimrod R1.
Scampton: Nimrod MR2.4 (+Predator?), Reds, TCW, 1 ACC etc.
Brize: A330, C-17, C-130J, A400M.
Cranwell: MFTS.
Shawbury: DHFS.
Cottesmore: GR9.
Leuchars: Typhoon.
Lossie: GR4.
Valley: Hawk.
I certainly envisage huge real estate sales by the MoD in the next 5 years.
And before all you Nimrod types go into Silverback, Alfa male mode and start accusing me of Kipper bashing again, when the E-3D first started at waddo 13 years ago, I actually rekoned that we'd have been better up at Lossie or Kinloss. This was due to the large amount of Nav and AEO wasters whose only motivation to get onto the E-3D was to get away from Scotland and who did no credit to the aircrew branches. I'm BLOODY glad we're not in Scotland now mind!
Regards,
M2
Last edited by Magic Mushroom; 19th Feb 2004 at 06:38.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: A 1/2 World away from Ice Statio Kilo
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M2
Believe that is still the case for most of your operators, if they cant cut it on the frontline we send them to the rear with the gear.
If they did move the ISTAR assets north I reckon I could hear the PVRs being scribbled from the EX 42 mob from here.
Couldn't resist cause I'm weak
Charlie sends
Believe that is still the case for most of your operators, if they cant cut it on the frontline we send them to the rear with the gear.
If they did move the ISTAR assets north I reckon I could hear the PVRs being scribbled from the EX 42 mob from here.
Couldn't resist cause I'm weak
Charlie sends
MM .......as has been said here before, spending is no defence against political considerations.
My opinion is that neither Waddo or ISK have the space to maintain all the capabilities that the future RAF will require so they are probably both safe.
As for your 2010 predictions ..do you have an inside track? TCW at Scampton is a strong rumour, although I'm not sure what Lincoln council and the locals would think of increased noise, especially if there are no pretty patterns in the sky.
St Mawgan will never be home to loud a/c again. Tourism will see to that.
All we know is "nothing is certain."
My opinion is that neither Waddo or ISK have the space to maintain all the capabilities that the future RAF will require so they are probably both safe.
As for your 2010 predictions ..do you have an inside track? TCW at Scampton is a strong rumour, although I'm not sure what Lincoln council and the locals would think of increased noise, especially if there are no pretty patterns in the sky.
St Mawgan will never be home to loud a/c again. Tourism will see to that.
All we know is "nothing is certain."
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lincs
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Charlie,
In the early days of the E-3D, it was very clear that a large amount of dead wood had been offloaded from the Nimrod fleet onto Shacks. And boy did it show when they tried to convert.
Thankfully, with a few notable exceptions, that is now no longer the case. As a result, most adapt to the additional operational demands of serving on fleets with a purpose! They all do find the amount of radios and intercoms that we have a bit of a challenge mind.
Insty,
Agree ref the money thing, but the buildings (especially that of AWC) are so specialised that it would cost hundreds of millions to upsticks and move.
As far as my inside track goes, it is partly based on various snippets from Air Officers' speeches during recent visits, but mainly on sensible predictions on what the Service will need and can afford. Thankfully, Lincolnshire is extremely pro-RAF and the initial press leaks about the re-birth of Scampton were generally well received. They just think of the investment in the local economy! It also makes sense to move the MR2.4s down south so that they can fulfill a useful role as spares for the R1s!!!
However, good old DHE are still flogging the MQs at Scampton!! No doubt that we'll be buying them back at double the price soon!
Sadly, I also agree on St Mawgan.
Regards,
M2
In the early days of the E-3D, it was very clear that a large amount of dead wood had been offloaded from the Nimrod fleet onto Shacks. And boy did it show when they tried to convert.
Thankfully, with a few notable exceptions, that is now no longer the case. As a result, most adapt to the additional operational demands of serving on fleets with a purpose! They all do find the amount of radios and intercoms that we have a bit of a challenge mind.
Insty,
Agree ref the money thing, but the buildings (especially that of AWC) are so specialised that it would cost hundreds of millions to upsticks and move.
As far as my inside track goes, it is partly based on various snippets from Air Officers' speeches during recent visits, but mainly on sensible predictions on what the Service will need and can afford. Thankfully, Lincolnshire is extremely pro-RAF and the initial press leaks about the re-birth of Scampton were generally well received. They just think of the investment in the local economy! It also makes sense to move the MR2.4s down south so that they can fulfill a useful role as spares for the R1s!!!
However, good old DHE are still flogging the MQs at Scampton!! No doubt that we'll be buying them back at double the price soon!
Sadly, I also agree on St Mawgan.
Regards,
M2
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Next door
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M2
I think you will find that alot of the deadwood stopped briefly in the Nimrod world, having been paid off by the demise of the Vulcans and Victors. They couldn't hack it there so found a safe office in the sky where you are treated like kids ( a hang over from our American cousins) "you must sit down in your seat now we are approaching 10,000ft and will be landing in 30 minutes"
It seemed to me that the majority of deadwood you had in the E3 world were ageing Flt Lts and Sqn Ldrs taking seats in the back 2 rows that much more able and cost efficient AE's should have done. Still that whole debacle shows just how much lack of support the AE branch were given from their lordships, and the extent of the ignorance they had of the role of the AEOp.
I still believe to this day that 50% of the Air Officers think that AE stands for Air Engineer, and there is some firm quotes to back that up to an extent.
You have to be 100% behind someone to stab them in the back
I think you will find that alot of the deadwood stopped briefly in the Nimrod world, having been paid off by the demise of the Vulcans and Victors. They couldn't hack it there so found a safe office in the sky where you are treated like kids ( a hang over from our American cousins) "you must sit down in your seat now we are approaching 10,000ft and will be landing in 30 minutes"
It seemed to me that the majority of deadwood you had in the E3 world were ageing Flt Lts and Sqn Ldrs taking seats in the back 2 rows that much more able and cost efficient AE's should have done. Still that whole debacle shows just how much lack of support the AE branch were given from their lordships, and the extent of the ignorance they had of the role of the AEOp.
I still believe to this day that 50% of the Air Officers think that AE stands for Air Engineer, and there is some firm quotes to back that up to an extent.
You have to be 100% behind someone to stab them in the back
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK, sometimes!
Age: 74
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a result, most adapt to the additional operational demands of serving on fleets with a purpose!
MadMark!!!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: england
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M2
Why is it that when ever anybody speaks of moving the RAF's biggest kipper wastebin anywhere north of the Humber you always go on the defensive?? It's a well known fact that those who can't hack MR2's get the cushy position on the E-3. It is a resting ground for the old and retiring, when there are more able guys stuck north of the bordder that deserve the chance to spread their wings and do something different for a while. Where are you guys now, probably scratching your arses in Italy, whilst the MR2 is still in theatre carrying out a much needed task.
Is the reason you get all defensive because you fall into said "wastebin"??????
Why is it that when ever anybody speaks of moving the RAF's biggest kipper wastebin anywhere north of the Humber you always go on the defensive?? It's a well known fact that those who can't hack MR2's get the cushy position on the E-3. It is a resting ground for the old and retiring, when there are more able guys stuck north of the bordder that deserve the chance to spread their wings and do something different for a while. Where are you guys now, probably scratching your arses in Italy, whilst the MR2 is still in theatre carrying out a much needed task.
Is the reason you get all defensive because you fall into said "wastebin"??????
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: somewhere quite near Brize Norton
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi All,
Interesting to see Magic Mushroom and others predicting the demise of Wittering & Leeming - we shall see!
Seems strange in these times of tight purse strings that Honnington stands empty of aircraft. I know that it is the home to the RAF Regiment and has 'recently' hosted boltholes from the UASFE and RAF - but why were the Tornado's moved out in the first place? I'm nudging towards the Lossie squadrons coming down south (but losing a GR.4 sqn in the process) . .
Cheers.
Elderforest.
Interesting to see Magic Mushroom and others predicting the demise of Wittering & Leeming - we shall see!
Seems strange in these times of tight purse strings that Honnington stands empty of aircraft. I know that it is the home to the RAF Regiment and has 'recently' hosted boltholes from the UASFE and RAF - but why were the Tornado's moved out in the first place? I'm nudging towards the Lossie squadrons coming down south (but losing a GR.4 sqn in the process) . .
Cheers.
Elderforest.
Can't see ISK becoming a 'superbase', but I can see Lossiemouth closing. Some GR4 Sqns being "mothballed" (i.e cut!!), others relocating down south, so all Strike Attack assets are located close to each other. The one exception being the GR4 OCU which will move to Kinloss, so they can still practice all that low level flying in the Scottish Highlands!!
Why spend money on upgrading Scampton to move MR2s there when Kinloss is already fully functional!!
As for MM, he had the nerve to have a pop at me on another thread for daring to suggest that he had an "E-3Ds can do everything attitude"!!! Consider this MM, the E-3D was procured for the cold war as an Air Defence AEW asset, which I understand it does bu**er all of these days, as we only fight guys we already have air superiority over!! However, it has evolved into more of a C&C platform, and various other roles. Has MM not considered then that perhaps the MR2 has also evolved into a variety of roles other than its most obvious ones, which believe it or not do have a purpose!
If MM manages to convince MOD that MR2s 'don't have a purpose' perhaps all my mates on the Kipper fleet can stop going away to a variety of places, including some that are hot and sandy!! Are there any E-3Ds still flying in the Gulf, or have they served their 'purpose' and gone home for tea and medals, while various other RAF fleets carry on with the job??!!!!!
Why spend money on upgrading Scampton to move MR2s there when Kinloss is already fully functional!!
As for MM, he had the nerve to have a pop at me on another thread for daring to suggest that he had an "E-3Ds can do everything attitude"!!! Consider this MM, the E-3D was procured for the cold war as an Air Defence AEW asset, which I understand it does bu**er all of these days, as we only fight guys we already have air superiority over!! However, it has evolved into more of a C&C platform, and various other roles. Has MM not considered then that perhaps the MR2 has also evolved into a variety of roles other than its most obvious ones, which believe it or not do have a purpose!
If MM manages to convince MOD that MR2s 'don't have a purpose' perhaps all my mates on the Kipper fleet can stop going away to a variety of places, including some that are hot and sandy!! Are there any E-3Ds still flying in the Gulf, or have they served their 'purpose' and gone home for tea and medals, while various other RAF fleets carry on with the job??!!!!!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lincs
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mad Mark, Straight Flush, Biggus,
When I put a or other such symbol at the end of a sentance, it means that it is BANTER and not meant seriously! Charlie Lurcher gave a bit of banter out, so I bantered back. No offense was intended.
I would also suggest that it is just a tad arrogant to suggest that only individuals who can't hack Nimrod MR2s get posted to The E-3D. The AEOps that we get on the E-3D are mostly very experienced guys from your own or other fleets who have done perfectly well previously (as evidence by their F5250s). Although we've had one or 2 weak ab initios from Cranwell, most are well up the course and at least one came top.
As far as age goes, the average is certainly higher than the Nimrod fleet, mainly because until recently, PMA have not posted ab initios to the jet. In particular, I would agree that the CO posting was indeed seen as a 'final tour' option by PMA. Thankfully, that policy is now changing due to the problems it created within the E-3D fleet.
As I've said many times before on the MRA4 thread, I am more than aware that very little of what the Nimrod MR2 fleet does these days is maritime orientated. I don't doubt that the majority of what you currently do is important. I do believe however that a few roles of the MR2 could possibly be migrated to other fleets or UAVs; my comments on the MRA4 thread were an attempt to have an intelligent debate on the subject. Similarly, I've said many times that the MRA4 is potentially an excellent and versatile bit of kit.
And once again, Biggus, nowhere have I ever suggested that an E-3D can 'do everything'.
Small Spinner,
Very much agree with your comments ref the ex V bomber guys in the early days of the E-3D. Generally, the ex Vulcan and Shack aircrew (don't believe that we ever had any ex Victor guys down the back of our jet) were very poor. It was an ideal opportunity for the NCA world to have made their mark in 1991 on a new and high profile ac.
The AEOps we get on the jet these days in the surveillance role are mostly excellent and I for one would rather have them than the TG12 guys. I was present at one of the notorious 3* rank, 'so is the Air Eng job interesting on the E-3D?' comments to a MAEOp. His initials were DH, and he's now in DIS. If you know the guy, you can imagine the sarcasm that the 3* got back!!
Now, to get back to the original subject of this thread...
Sandy Pit,
The reason that I mention AWC was that you suggested that 51 Sqn could move up to Kinloss. Much of the AWC EWAD and EWOSE facilities are related to 51 Sqn support. IMHO that would be a considerable disincentive to moving the R1's up north.
Biggus,
Perhaps in my assessment of what airbases will remain in 2010, I should have said Kinloss or Lossie. I agree, some of the GR4s will go, and it may well be Lossie that closes rather than Kinloss. But I can't see both surviving. As you say, the GR4s like Lossie due to it's proximity to the Highland OTAs, so I rekon it'll be more than just XV(R) that'll remain.
As far as Scampton goes, it appears that there will be considerable investment there anyway. I'm not sure whether the MR2/MRA4 would require a runway extension or not, and that may not be possible anyway. However, it may be attractive to locate all the ISTAR fleets at Waddo/Scampton. At the end of the day, Lyneham is fully functional. However, it didn't stop that getting the chop and investment having to be pumped into Brize. I do acknowledge however that the specialised support required for Nimrod is far great than that for the AT guys.
Regards,
M2
When I put a
or other such symbol at the end of a sentance, it means that it is BANTER and not meant seriously! Charlie Lurcher gave a bit of banter out, so I bantered back. No offense was intended. I would also suggest that it is just a tad arrogant to suggest that only individuals who can't hack Nimrod MR2s get posted to The E-3D. The AEOps that we get on the E-3D are mostly very experienced guys from your own or other fleets who have done perfectly well previously (as evidence by their F5250s). Although we've had one or 2 weak ab initios from Cranwell, most are well up the course and at least one came top.
As far as age goes, the average is certainly higher than the Nimrod fleet, mainly because until recently, PMA have not posted ab initios to the jet. In particular, I would agree that the CO posting was indeed seen as a 'final tour' option by PMA. Thankfully, that policy is now changing due to the problems it created within the E-3D fleet.
As I've said many times before on the MRA4 thread, I am more than aware that very little of what the Nimrod MR2 fleet does these days is maritime orientated. I don't doubt that the majority of what you currently do is important. I do believe however that a few roles of the MR2 could possibly be migrated to other fleets or UAVs; my comments on the MRA4 thread were an attempt to have an intelligent debate on the subject. Similarly, I've said many times that the MRA4 is potentially an excellent and versatile bit of kit.
And once again, Biggus, nowhere have I ever suggested that an E-3D can 'do everything'.
Small Spinner,
Very much agree with your comments ref the ex V bomber guys in the early days of the E-3D. Generally, the ex Vulcan and Shack aircrew (don't believe that we ever had any ex Victor guys down the back of our jet) were very poor. It was an ideal opportunity for the NCA world to have made their mark in 1991 on a new and high profile ac.
The AEOps we get on the jet these days in the surveillance role are mostly excellent and I for one would rather have them than the TG12 guys. I was present at one of the notorious 3* rank, 'so is the Air Eng job interesting on the E-3D?' comments to a MAEOp. His initials were DH, and he's now in DIS. If you know the guy, you can imagine the sarcasm that the 3* got back!!
Now, to get back to the original subject of this thread...
Sandy Pit,
The reason that I mention AWC was that you suggested that 51 Sqn could move up to Kinloss. Much of the AWC EWAD and EWOSE facilities are related to 51 Sqn support. IMHO that would be a considerable disincentive to moving the R1's up north.
Biggus,
Perhaps in my assessment of what airbases will remain in 2010, I should have said Kinloss or Lossie. I agree, some of the GR4s will go, and it may well be Lossie that closes rather than Kinloss. But I can't see both surviving. As you say, the GR4s like Lossie due to it's proximity to the Highland OTAs, so I rekon it'll be more than just XV(R) that'll remain.
As far as Scampton goes, it appears that there will be considerable investment there anyway. I'm not sure whether the MR2/MRA4 would require a runway extension or not, and that may not be possible anyway. However, it may be attractive to locate all the ISTAR fleets at Waddo/Scampton. At the end of the day, Lyneham is fully functional. However, it didn't stop that getting the chop and investment having to be pumped into Brize. I do acknowledge however that the specialised support required for Nimrod is far great than that for the AT guys.
Regards,
M2
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: A 1/2 World away from Ice Statio Kilo
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M2 once again you have me misunderstood offense was intended
If it is the old and fossilised DH agree if it is the young DH well he was sort of ok when on Maritime but last time I met him he had gone all E3 .
M2 have you had a hand in the MRA4 thread being suppressed and pushed off the page
Finally were you chopped/streamed off maritime
Yes I am still weak and after a few bottle of cheapo vino it is funny to me
Charlie sends
If it is the old and fossilised DH agree if it is the young DH well he was sort of ok when on Maritime but last time I met him he had gone all E3
.M2 have you had a hand in the MRA4 thread being suppressed and pushed off the page
Finally were you chopped/streamed off maritime
Yes I am still weak and after a few bottle of cheapo vino it is funny to me
Charlie sends
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Middle East
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi All
Just to let you know that the whole topic of this thread was indeed a wind-up. Can I thank you all for participating, and especially MM, who gave our crew a much needed laugh while we're stuck here in the sand!
Sby for next week.
Just to let you know that the whole topic of this thread was indeed a wind-up. Can I thank you all for participating, and especially MM, who gave our crew a much needed laugh while we're stuck here in the sand!
Sby for next week.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: the far side of the moon
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been reading this thread with interest but find it impossible to follow some people’s logic.
I understand most people serving in England can't see much further than their own cushy lifes' but the rationale for closing Lossie and Kinloss escapes me.
The Airspace on the East coast of England is becoming more and more cramped, the opening of Finingley as a civil airport the expansion of Leeds Bradford, Teeside and Newcastle, new runways at Stanstead and the ever increasing traffic levels at Luton will soon drive Civil ATC to yet again increase the amount of CAS. The RAF wont be able to fight it as the decision for expansion has already been made in the UK Aviation White paper; the military white paper however proposes cuts in the amount of service aircraft.
That only leaves the remoter stations with any hope of safeguarding the airspace around them for military operations.
At a recent DART brief (sorry I don’t know what it stands for) these factors were blatantly obvious, equally the recent court case where the owners of an ancestral home won a vast settlement from the MOD because of noise pollution, has also sharpened the mind.
Furthermore, access to ideal training areas without the need to AAR before entry is again a factor.
All these combined; leave Lossie and Kinloss as well as Valley and Culdrose ideally situated. Yes, they are along way from RAF Lincolnshire or London but that is exactly their appeal.
The GR4 is a ground attack ac by definition, so why then when Lossie is so close to Tain range, Garvie island and the HRA as well as the Grampian mountains is it considered at risk of closure. Surely, when all is considered Marham is in a far more fragile position. Granted it’s in England but unless we intend to bomb the **** out of Holland, I mean act as a force for good, it’s about as much use as tits on a fish.
At said DART brief, some revelations came out, namely: The closure of Lyneham (already announced) Then, Coltishaw, Leeming, and possibly Cottesmore and Whitering. The re-sitting of GR9 to Yeovilton and St Mawgan and the possible re-opening of Macrahanish.
These all follow a common theme, downsizing in the East where it is busy and moving to remoter locations where it is not.
This may piss the people that are already serving off, but the decisions made now are based on expected requirements in 2020 not because you have had it nice and cushy along the A1 for years.
I understand most people serving in England can't see much further than their own cushy lifes' but the rationale for closing Lossie and Kinloss escapes me.
The Airspace on the East coast of England is becoming more and more cramped, the opening of Finingley as a civil airport the expansion of Leeds Bradford, Teeside and Newcastle, new runways at Stanstead and the ever increasing traffic levels at Luton will soon drive Civil ATC to yet again increase the amount of CAS. The RAF wont be able to fight it as the decision for expansion has already been made in the UK Aviation White paper; the military white paper however proposes cuts in the amount of service aircraft.
That only leaves the remoter stations with any hope of safeguarding the airspace around them for military operations.
At a recent DART brief (sorry I don’t know what it stands for) these factors were blatantly obvious, equally the recent court case where the owners of an ancestral home won a vast settlement from the MOD because of noise pollution, has also sharpened the mind.
Furthermore, access to ideal training areas without the need to AAR before entry is again a factor.
All these combined; leave Lossie and Kinloss as well as Valley and Culdrose ideally situated. Yes, they are along way from RAF Lincolnshire or London but that is exactly their appeal.
The GR4 is a ground attack ac by definition, so why then when Lossie is so close to Tain range, Garvie island and the HRA as well as the Grampian mountains is it considered at risk of closure. Surely, when all is considered Marham is in a far more fragile position. Granted it’s in England but unless we intend to bomb the **** out of Holland, I mean act as a force for good, it’s about as much use as tits on a fish.
At said DART brief, some revelations came out, namely: The closure of Lyneham (already announced) Then, Coltishaw, Leeming, and possibly Cottesmore and Whitering. The re-sitting of GR9 to Yeovilton and St Mawgan and the possible re-opening of Macrahanish.
These all follow a common theme, downsizing in the East where it is busy and moving to remoter locations where it is not.
This may piss the people that are already serving off, but the decisions made now are based on expected requirements in 2020 not because you have had it nice and cushy along the A1 for years.
j-o
You weren't reading to close else you'd have spotted SandyPits last post.
As for your deductions well, The only reason, I believe, you see all the signs pointing to the east closing down is your present location, quite close to somewhere I believe.
Just to be picky it's Coltishall and Wittering and Marham is no where near the A1 but it is closer than Lossie is to it
You weren't reading to close else you'd have spotted SandyPits last post.
As for your deductions well, The only reason, I believe, you see all the signs pointing to the east closing down is your present location, quite close to somewhere I believe.
Just to be picky it's Coltishall and Wittering and Marham is no where near the A1 but it is closer than Lossie is to it
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hiq et Ubique
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice wind up Sandy!!
Glad to see all the old Kinloss/Waddo banter back on the forum.
You boys should take up fishing, people rise to your bait so well, althogh where you are there's not a lot of water!!
As for some of you schmucks who took the bait, I think that it's Kinloss 1, Waddo 0!!
Take care of your sorry ass Sandy, don't hurry back 'cos it's pants back here- 1330hrs SAR handover- nice one CXX!!
See you all soon
118-118- got your number!!
ps, just thought you should know that the new Ops portakabin is built, just waiting on Douggie T's office to be finished!!
Glad to see all the old Kinloss/Waddo banter back on the forum.
You boys should take up fishing, people rise to your bait so well, althogh where you are there's not a lot of water!!
As for some of you schmucks who took the bait, I think that it's Kinloss 1, Waddo 0!!
Take care of your sorry ass Sandy, don't hurry back 'cos it's pants back here- 1330hrs SAR handover- nice one CXX!!
See you all soon
118-118- got your number!!
ps, just thought you should know that the new Ops portakabin is built, just waiting on Douggie T's office to be finished!!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: somewhere quite near Brize Norton
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SandyPit,
All your wishes are to come true . . .
Kinloss is taking the Lossie Tornado's when they bolthole due to runway work . .
plus Waddington is also due for runway resurfacing and the E-3's have got to go somewhere . .
I like a happy ending.
Elderforest.
All your wishes are to come true . . .
Kinloss is taking the Lossie Tornado's when they bolthole due to runway work . .
plus Waddington is also due for runway resurfacing and the E-3's have got to go somewhere . .
I like a happy ending.
Elderforest.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ice station kilo
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But the E3D couldn’t operate from ISK. We just haven’t got all the correct hues of highlighters to mark the MSS briefs so that the spoon feed FC master race don’t pick up the wrong one
