Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

EK fuel letter

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

EK fuel letter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Oct 2010, 20:40
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shaky Ass,

How many times. Don't drink and post....
atiuta is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2010, 22:55
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can someone please confirm Emirates' policy regarding alternates?

I recently had a conversation with a captain from another locally based operator who stated that they declare the second dubai runway as an alternate. Boy was he surprised when he found out that, in the event of an accident, BOTH would be closed! (picture the landcruisers/patrols/mercs with blacked out windows, all over the airport).
Guy D'ageradar is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2010, 23:33
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Trader and White Knight. Make the call to OPS and tell them their options.

By the way, does anybody know the error margings on the fuel indicators of a B 777.

On the 747 it is 1800 kg. So 3000 kg could be 1200 kg or 4800 kg.

So planning to go to an altn with 30 min isn't really an option.
Pitch Up Authority is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2010, 05:50
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: dubai
Age: 39
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sheikmyarse

please can i have some of whatever it is that youre smoking?
dubaicrew is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2010, 06:52
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: camelshitcity
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I normally smoke Skydrol
sheikmyarse is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2010, 07:23
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Accuracy on the 777

Pitch Up Authority....According to Boeing, the FQIS on the 777 which supplies info to the totalizer (ie fuel gauges) has a maximum error of +/- 1% with full tanks, improving to +/- 0.5% for a near empty tank.

The fuel flow transmitters, supplying FMC info, have an error of less than 0.5% during cruise conditions. (this info in EK FAQ doc)

777 FCOM also states that displayed totalizer quantity at the start of the flight can be between 99% and 101% of the actual fuel. Calculated is set equal to totalizer fuel before engine start. (therefore, while calculated is supposedly more accurate throughout the flight, it is only as accurate as it was at the start..with totalizer's 1% error rate.)

At the end of the day, I'm not about to put on an extra tonne of gas just because the gauges may be underreading by 1,000kg. It does however open up an interesting debate about which fuel figure you should use towards the end of the flight if there is a discrepancy.
Kamelchaser is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2010, 18:18
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Springfield
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep in mind that when you commit to DXB, what do you think most of the other EK jets are doing....?

Reality is that a large chunk of the airline are committing to the same destination at the same time, could get exciting.......
Praise Jebus is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2010, 11:26
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: i'm in the parking lot
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+1 vote totalizer

i'm just sayin'
The Turtle is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2010, 12:02
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guy D'ageradar

Which reduced landing separation is that then? We still work to the same vortex wake spacings which, in fact, means it's getting worse now as the 380s arrive, especially as they fly so much slower than everyone else! (I don't think I've EVER had one tell me they couldn't fly the standard speeds though)
Ok the 380 probably has the slowest min clean speed but can well and truly match all the other types at whatever speed required. All you have to do is ask. 180 till 10 and 160 till 4 is not a problem.
kimoki is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2010, 13:16
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All you have to do is ask. 180 till 10 and 160 till 4 is not a problem.
We do, as I'm sure you well know.

The problem is that, on all too regular a basis, these speeds are not complied with. Almost every shift that I have done recently, at least one a380, having read back the aforementiond speed requirement, is found to be doing 135 knots or so, 6 or 7 miles out (asked and confirmed, not just observed groundspeed). Furthermore, no-one seems to think it's worth telling the poor atco who is about to be suspended for losing separation!

I've said it many times on these forums and I'll repeat it again - if you can't comply with the speeds, PLEASE at least let us know. That way, we'll make allowances with the guy behind. Otherwise, someone is going around and I really don't see why it should be the guy who IS flying the speeds.
Guy D'ageradar is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2010, 18:01
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: East Anglia
Age: 83
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does E.K. and their controlling Caa....have a robust system in place that records, publishes, and analyses in great detail all the "arrival" on chocks fuel?
Departure fuel always concerns the company the most...and...arrival fuel always concerns the pilots and passengers the most!
I expect the correct answer to the 20 minutes fuel confusion will be provided by the legal profession... eventually... when they sue the butt of the concerned Captain if he is still alive...and all available if he is not.

Last edited by 40&80; 26th Oct 2010 at 18:14.
40&80 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2010, 11:32
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in the kitchen
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best I have seen so far is a guy adding an extra ton from Melbourne of which only 400 Kgs would have been left on arrival.
yes and no. if your azfw went down at least 1 ton from the ezfw then, upon arrival in dxb, you had your full ton or more.

mad
maddog62 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2010, 13:17
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really doesn't matter a rats ass, just take the fuel that you think you need for the situation you're in. Then circle WX and ATC on the copy of the Flight Log. (OFP)'"

Job Done!!!
puff m'call is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2010, 17:09
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kamelchaser, that's my point ..... it counts at the end.
Pitch Up Authority is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2010, 20:53
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: East Anglia
Age: 83
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "experts" who introduced the minimum C.F.P policy at Gulf Air told me they accepted and expected up to 5% of flights thus fuelled to divert due to a low fuel state.
They upped their fuel loads when they found it not cost effective in real life. They found they had irate passengers sometimes stuck for hours in all sorts of strange hotels and airports.
They then issued figures to Captains showing the cost of these diversions due fuel and their urgent request that Captains should always seek to avoid a low fuel diversion.
That is how they became... experts.
When asked on a Command interview to describe the Gulf Air fuel policy a F/O
said,... The G.F. fuel policy is very important... I think it is with Norwich Union or possibly Standard Life...he passed.
40&80 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2010, 16:05
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gulf playing Golf
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you divert with a low fuel state doesnt mean you will land safely at this sometimes rural airport... I personally prefer to have options. I think I will have a longer life after retirement with less stress during my work life..
Payscale is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2010, 21:06
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: In Fresh Air
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And that, Payscale, says it all. Period, the end. The final analysis, don't put the stress on yourself.
Panther 88 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2010, 21:14
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: East Anglia
Age: 83
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Otherwise you may have to go fatigued...and save them a few tons of fuel by not flying.
40&80 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.