Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

EK Green PR/SFO Threads Merged

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

EK Green PR/SFO Threads Merged

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Dec 2008, 10:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jew-Buy Mate
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK Green PR/SFO Threads Merged

Gulfnews: Emirates plans longest 'green flight' from Dubai to San Fransisco

Shouldn't we be concentrating our efforts closer to home. All the negotiation with external ATC and agencies across the world for one flight when every EK flight arriving into DXB has to enter the UAE FIR at FL270 or below.

Depending on the runway in use in DXB this restriction puts each aircraft between 5000 and 10000 ft below optimum profile.This alone burns between 500 & 2000kg of additional fuel with the associated carbon and noise emissions. All this is before the arbitrary speed restricted high drag +- 150 track miles of vectors.

Poor airspace management, regional willy waving and antiquated procedures in UAE need to be addressed before we embark on telling the world how clever and environmentally friendly EK is.

Emirates has the clout to do it but does not seem to have the faintest idea of where to start. Hell, we even have a VP environmental affairs who's only contribution to date has been to introduce a paper recycling effort and produce a glossy brochure attacking other airlines and putting out a PR smokescreen to cover EK inefficiencies.

To the ATC guys don't take this the wrong way most of us know that you are doing the best you can with what you have. You know the problems and so do we pilots yet it is impossible to get the people who could actually do something about this to get of their arses and act. It is far easier to use the already well honed PR machine to do the work.

As with all things EK and UAE it only has to look good who cares if it works?
Gulf News is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2008, 15:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: united arab emirates
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This all while they fly around in thier corporate 747,s.
fourgolds is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2008, 19:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Among camels and dunes
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK "Green Flight" to SFO!!!

Dubai: Emirates, which has one of the world's youngest fleets, will try a new fuel-saving programme as it conducts the longest green journey on December 15 with its Dubai-San Francisco flight.
Emirates said it worked closely with government agencies in Dubai, Russia, Iceland, Canada, the United States and other countries to plot what it called the 'Environment Flight'.
The flight has been described as "the most environmentally-sophisticated route and trip possible to help save an estimated 2,000 gallons of fuel and 30,000 pounds of carbon emissions on the 16-hour non-stop service."
The airline will use the new Boeing 777-200LR to service the San Francisco-Dubai route as part of the airline's multi-billion dollar investment in economic and environmental efficiencies.


The programme will represent the world's first cross-polar green flight, Emirates said in a statement.
"After months of planning, Emirates' environment flight is a best-practice trial of how airlines, governments, manufacturers, technology providers and airports can work together to be as eco-efficient as possible," said Shaikh Ahmad Bin Saeed Al Maktoum, President of Dubai Civil Aviation Authority and Chairman and CEO of Emirates Group.
The inaugural green flight will demonstrate multiple fuel and emission-saving measures.
The new 777-200LR will be specially washed before the flight to minimise drag, and it will use electrical power on the ground in Dubai rather than its auxiliary power unit.
Dubai Air Traffic Control will give the plane priority clearance for both taxiing and departure.
A pre-planned priority departure route out of Dubai will provide an unimpeded climb through to cruise altitude, allowing the plane to reach optimum cruise altitude as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Global cooperation
Recent negotiations with the Russian government will allow for a preferred route over Russian and Canadian airspace for the most efficient path, taking into account prevailing winds and the aircraft's weight.
Real time updates of current weather and wind conditions will allow the flight crew to modify their flight path enroute.
The aircraft will use minimal thrust on landing and a single-engine taxi to its gate.
All onboard glass, newspapers, aluminium and paper will be collected for recycling.
Shaikh Ahmad said the inaugural San Francisco flight would be a dual milestone and would also demonstrate Emirates' competency in environmental efficiency.
"We have made a multi-billion-dollar investment in new state-of-the-art eco-efficient aircraft, and the flight will help us to further improve our environmental performance," Shaikh Ahmad said.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




All airlines try the shortest route and fuel burn, but for the obvious reason, COST! EK is no different! But then again, we don't get priority to taxi and take-off!!! And you can only fly thru Iran as fast as the slow A340 ahead!
Ground power, now theres a thing! Its been around for a long time and still nobody uses it here in the Middle-east, except to SFO!

It seems like EK are trying to camouflage a 16 hour flight under a green umbrella!
Jetjock330 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2008, 20:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Among camels and dunes
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can see the next airline will shut one engine down at top of descent!

How about shutting both down and using minimal APU power for the approach! Now that's saving green house gases!!!


Everything in this article is no different to any other airline's day to day operation for that matter. It's amazing how someone can put a spin on a normal airline operation!
Jetjock330 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2008, 22:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pity they never mention the "Flight Dispatchers" that actually calculate and optimize the best routings and saves the company millions every year.
sbh684b is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2008, 22:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: way down south
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What happened to EK infamous PR dept? I guess they ran out of ideas & had to copy a PR stunt from Qantas.
Mephistopheles is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 00:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dubai
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know why they are touting it as the longest journey as Dubai-Los Angeles is further??

Must be all the greenies living in SFO.
Bypass ratio is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 02:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near water
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have said this before and I will say it again.

...antiquated procedures in UAE..
Come now Gulf News, you all arrive at the same time at the same spot and then stand flabbergasted when you have to hold for twenty minutes or be vectored for "150 miles". And it's not as if you get surprised by it. It happens every night at twelve and every morning at five. So why not ask your airline to amend the schedules so as to avoid this. Space them out over a three hour period instead of an hour and a half. If "hub-and-spoke" is the response then you must suffer the consequences.

Same goes for the departures. Ask your management to allow a slot system to be introduced at DXB. Think about it, less taxi time, less waiting at the holding point, optimum cruising levels after departure. But mention the "F" or "S" word to anybody at EK management and you are in a world of $hit.

As I have said before on this forum, EK can only blame themselves for their misery. EK must get rid of their own antiquated procedures before it starts pointing fingers at other agencies' shortcomings.

Please don't take this as a personal attack but rather an attack on the system, which unfortunately is being perpetuated by Emirates Airlines itself.

Structured flow management won't solve everything but it's a step in the right direction.

P.S.
"F" = Flow control and "S" = Slots
BlueSkye is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 03:33
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: i don't know
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't we just love the "preferential" treatment of some people that seem to be more equal on Dubais roads or courts already?
Now they are creating this on the tarmac and in the air.
This might sound a little overreactive, but if they start to favour the SFO, then the LAX, then the direct BNE and so on, it leaves the poor MCT, BAH, DOH buggers in the air/ground penalty box that much little longer. They subsequently will have to add some juice to cover for that and, bingo, the savings go out the other window. This perfectly reflects ME planning we encounter on a daily base. No progress, just pretentious talk.

I concurr with some posters that only a comprehensive flow management, coordinated with the GCC States and Iran will serve the saving purpose.
GMDS is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 07:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Over Graz
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Green flight? What? Are they going to paint the airplanes in green now?
Thylakoid is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 08:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having landed in DXB on 30L a number of times in the past few weeks and had to turn left off the rwy and pass/cross 2 active rwys to get to the E's to park I have grave doubts about DXB's "green" planning!!
BusyB is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 10:23
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jew-Buy Mate
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blue Sky

My point entirely. My post was aimed at EK higher ups who are not doing what they should be to improve things in our home airspace. Changes appear to be too hard to accomplish so instead we get this "green airline" drivel from the company PR department. In a nutshell if as much effort was put into adressing problems as painting over them it could make a real difference.

We all know it is going to be a goat fu*k arriving and departing at the times you mentioned so as a result anyone who has been around more than a day carries additional fuel which increases enroute fuel burn and blows the environmentally friendly concept further out of the water.

The ATC proceedures thing has been done to death on this forum so I won't reignite the debate other than to say that if we are honest with ourselves we can all see areas where things could be vastly improved.
Gulf News is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 11:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Middle East
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In seven years and I don't know how many midnight and 5 am arrivals I have never had to hold more than 25 minutes. Eighty percent of the time I have no holding and minimal vectors, in fact track shortening is common.
Although I occasionally carry extra fuel into Dubai I have never even come close to needing it.
Who are you guys?
NO LAND 3 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 11:42
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: i don't know
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was recently 1 guy who gave his misadventure on a ASR (ldg bel min res) and I once came close.
There is basically no problem with that, the early warning system (ops ctl) however, when it starts to pile up or when some unforseen fog sets in is not entirely up to speed.

The airspace and tarmac management needs to be revamped. Everything is based on that and not on shiny PR gags.
GMDS is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 14:06
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poor airspace management, regional willy waving and antiquated procedures in UAE need to be addressed before we embark on telling the world how clever and environmentally friendly EK is.
Cart before horse alert.

Absolutely, without doubt, nothing-even-comes-close, hands down THE SINGLE BIGGEST THING that could affect "the green footprint" of EK is in EK's hands. schedule for minimal delays I dont know how many times it has to be said before someone gets the message, but ANYTHING you do after that is just dealing with symptoms.

Scheduling, say, 45 arrivals an hour for 4 hours a day at an airport with capacity for 30 arrivals an hour, is just Guaranteeing (capital G) that during those 4 hours, delay management tools will be employed. Now, you can bitch and moan about the delay management tools, but as the people who have the power to schedule away most delays is EK, it sounds pretty stupid. Just whisper in the scheduler's ear that no more than 30 arrivals per hour may be scheduled and- poof, like magic!- 90% of delays will vanish. Imagine what the PR machine could make of that!!

You sound like homeowners lighting fires at your own houses then leaning on the fence and bitching about what bad jobs the firemen are doing.*







*It has often been mentioned on these boards that the chief fireman is the great dane who makes the firemen use water pistols made in Copenhagen in 1976 instead of firehoses; but he knows best- just ask him. But lets not go there....
ferris is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 17:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HKT
Age: 64
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ GMDS

"When it starts to pile up or when there is unforseen fog" its too late for the "early warning system"!!! What do you want?? Inflight refueling????
Schibulsky is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 17:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near water
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It comes straight from the Sheik's mouth that EK are not allowed to be delayed on the ground (where fuel burn is least or non-existent). He is also the one blocking inbound ATM and departures slots from DXB. Remember, he sits on the board of EK, DXB CAA and GCAA.

If I may give some free advice to Etihad. Don't go down that road. The company is still young and maybe sanity will prevail. Look at EK's schedule and avoid their times. I can practically guarantee you will get optimum cruising levels to Europe. Same goes for inbounds, profile descent with a straight in approach or a short downwind. Well, most of the time.
BlueSkye is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2008, 18:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's an idea. How about someone grasp the nettle and actually be an innovator: I have long been told that airlines put the people on the plane, fly to the destination, then hold and accept a previously known delay (and associated cost) because "that's what the punter wants". I can fully understand the desire to 'get underway'. But how about someone actually tries an innovation- INFORM the punters? Personally, if I KNEW that I could take the delay on the ground pre-departure, either in the lounge or on the aircraft, and then have no holding at arrival, I would be happy. In fact, premium pax may even prefer to sit in the lounge and do some work/drink/get "massaged" etc. and would appreciate the info and time management options such a system may offer?

Maybe if someone, somewhere, started treating people like they had half a brain, they may start acting like it. Maybe we could move on from the mentality that engenders pax to leap from their seats as the aircraft taxis in so that they can rush off as quickly as possible and stand at the baggage carousel. To wait, yet again.

It's not like the technology isnt available. Maybe $150 oil for a bit longer might have forced such innovation? Maybe we ARE just too stupid to help ourselves?
ferris is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2008, 12:19
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: KUL
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
below min reserve

GMDS,

EK has not had a single landing with fuel below CMR since the start of Fuelmon recording - and that's at least eight years. I just won't make any statements about the period before that, because I couldn't back it up with raw data. Don't start broadcasting such min fuel B/S. Commitment to stay is best industry practice and has nothing to do with CMR.
MrMachfivepointfive is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2008, 02:13
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: i don't know
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ GMDS
"When it starts to pile up or when there is unforseen fog" its too late for the "early warning system"!!! What do you want?? Inflight refueling????
No. But if contrary to the TAF fog suddenly sets in (happened in NOV), then a acars to all inbound would be nice (was somewhat standard practice at my former airline, so it's possible). Second, if one or more surrounding alternates runs out of space, again such info is valuable if received early. All this is called ACTIVE Flight Watch.



EK has not had a single landing with fuel below CMR since the start of Fuelmon recording
and now to our beloved Mr. Mach 0.5: If you managed to creep out of your pityfull armchair and would actually read what's up at EK, then you wouldn't have missed the latest Weekly. But I guess either you're so far away from EK that you should shut up, or you're so obsessed to creep into dark holes that you display the same ignorance to daily matters as the holes.
GMDS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.