Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Is Gulf Air being taken for another ride ?

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Is Gulf Air being taken for another ride ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Apr 2007, 17:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Near Iranian Border
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is Gulf Air being taken for another ride ?

The word amongst the Bahraini staff is that AD is going to line his and his mates pockets the same way as JH did.
Rumour has it that he's on BD40,000pm + housing + other allowances (I bet if JH is reading this he'll be fuming as he was on less !!!).
Also, leaked from Finance, is that within days of AD's arrival, out went the S-class Merc that JH had and in came a BD35,000 top of the range Range Rover imported from Qatar. Well I checked out the range rover story, and yes its parked in the PCE spot, along with the S-class.

Too add to this, his former consulting firm Roland Berger is doing a lot of work at GF and guess what, these consultants are getting paid a fortune - $1M a month.

COO (or EVPO), another mate of AD, is on BD20,000 pm + allowances, and this is before you include the like of Chris Walton (Chief Restructuring Officer) and the other hangar-ons.
I suppose the only good thing is that at least these hangar ons are better than JHs'.

So hundreds of jobs are going to be cut to make this company profitable but surely AD should lead by example ? Give back the range rover and drive a Japanese car like the rest of us.

Do I see another Swiss Airlines in the making ?
left_to_first_class is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 03:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: China
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Waking UP

At Last people are starting to wake up to reality.
Yes it is true a gud CEO should have his own people but why do they have to live in all this luxury.?
Anybody who tought the new CEO will do all this as Charity for the love of GF is wrong.
No clue what package he is on.Mind you if he can manage to make Profit than he deserves it .
Sim Building for Sale?? couple of millions for the books.
Gf will again have to find for Sim slots .Renting a bed in my own Home.interestng,
bus787 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 06:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: "como todo buen piloto... mujeriego y borracho"
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with bus787. However, if Mr. Dosé reaches the stated objective of a profitable airline within 3 years with 5% annual return (and I don't mean through voodoo bookkeeping or selling family jewels), then I will say "he deserves it."
Panama Jack is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 08:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have no problem with people being rewarded hansomely for turning round a company, but those rewards should come when they achieve their targets, not before. I'd rather Mr Dose have a smaller salary and a generous bonus or other form of PRP.
Fool 'n' Tameez is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 09:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere nice and warm
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok so let us do some math here. if AD is getting 40k, and the coo another 20k, those two are equivalent to 120 local employees (assuming 500/month salary) and this does not even include all the other allowances and cars, and all the other guys he still did not get that he will pay very high salaries. So no big difference between him and JH. Frankly, if you are trying to cut costs and show everyone that you are trying to make a profitable company, this is not the way to do it (esp if u are planning to cut 40% of your workforce). Looks like more money down the drain for GF. What's new?
boiler is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 10:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Intentionally Left Blank
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Couldn't agree LESS!
AD et-al only need to cut operating losses by a little over 3% to pay their way. Geting rid of the large loss making routes (US$80M) rather than letting one's ego run wild and maintain them will inevitably produce that and more anyway - it's about time GF faced up the the harsh realities of running a succesful business and took the very difficult decisions required to do so.

It's been a long time coming and thank goodness it has finally arrived.
Icarus is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 10:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hell
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

The ball is rolling. Tough times for corrupt personnel to come. Way to go AD!!!!!
Desert_Storm is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 16:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere nice and warm
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AD et-al only need to cut operating losses by a little over 3% to pay their way.
I am interested in how you got to that conclusion. Can u please post how you managed to calculate that given GF lost 135M last year?

Geting rid of the large loss making routes (US$80M) rather than letting one's ego run wild and maintain them will inevitably produce that
I think it is always the easiest thing in the world to blame network, and not the way finances are done in a company. Let me give an example.

Let us take the SYD route which the last I heard was making 10M loss. Now, in the airline business, revenue on such a route is pro-rated. i.e., revenue is split between this route and all the other routes it feeds. This is called network benefit. If SYD is giving 9M to all other routes (network benefit) it is feeding, then canceling SYD will not mean u are saving the 10M. If fact, you will save only 1M. This is because while u are saving the 10M in cost, u are also losing the 9M revenue of the network benefit.

GF have the Sabre forecasting tools, and I assume you will easily see how SYD helps your network and what effects it will have when it is removed. Looking simply at the the P/L by leg may not give u the entire picture and could make a lot of (incorrect) decisions based on incomplete info.

Just my 2 cents. Nothing personal here guys, I am only interested a good honest conversation.
boiler is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 18:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 951
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Never in the history of time has any CEO produced a good performance when he's paid in advance for doing that. Incentive is the word; "If and when you succeed, you'll get paid". I am not holding my breath for M Dose to do that.

Incidentally, the last really competent CEO Gulf had was the great Alan Bodger, back in the mists of time. An accountant who could fly and knew how to deal with the shareholders. Gulf made a good profit in his day, and has never done that since.

He remarked one day, puffing hard on his cigar to keep it going properly as he rotated the F27 he was flying at the time on a scheduled service, having replaced the sick Captain at 5 minutes notice, "Remind me where we're going".

It was a phrase we often used as the lunatics took over the asylum after he quit/was pushed, and as far as I can see they are still there.
old,not bold is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 20:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: pomme....pomme !
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
40000 BD how much is that in € or US $ ?
rduarte is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 23:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somehwere on the planet
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Around 106 000 USD/month must be nice, that'd sort a few of my issues out
tbaylx is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 05:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abu Dhabi
Age: 52
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What often happens on this thread is people forget to look at the complete picture, boilermaker is right in terms of finances but what does it matter what AD makes, if at the end of the day he gets the company back on track.

bodger was right for his time being pushed away is simply what would be expected with all interests involved though I am not saying right.

The problems GF faced for many years with so many deciding is that PCEs were always chosen on a compromise hence the results that followed.

for the first time in it's history since the bodger days GF has a PCE who was not chosen out of compromise and who is given clear directives to sort it out, let us just hope he can and pulls it through.

Tired of the whining of Expats and locals alike and this political placement of incompetent buggers who do f all.

Gf needs effective competent and focused staff with one common vision, corruption needs rooting out and further any malpractice when found prosecuted.

Forward facing staff needs to be made accountable for their actions and audited on a regular basis, dismissal for theft abuse and misbehaviour should be put into practice. Let us see heads roll.
awss2 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 05:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it's a ride we're being taken on, then it's a long over due one..lets hope it builds to the "brand enhancing" successes of our former CEO I'm confident that the Sabre info has been properly acted on...lets wait and see...
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2007, 17:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Intentionally Left Blank
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BoilerMaker - shame your friends in Network never read Charles Dickens.

"Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery."

Let's now put that another way..
" Annual network contribution 9M cost of operation 8M, result happiness. Annual network contribution 9M cost of operation 10M, result misery!"

i.e. Gulf Air as it is today!" Losing US$1M a day! Thank heaven AD et-al addressed the network first. Perhaps you might be kind enough to ask your buddies in Network to start looking for a job elsewhere - GF needs people with at least a modicum of business/common sense if they are to survive!

My math?

Assuming as posted..
AD US$1.2M BN US$0.6M Consultants US$12M per annum = US13.8M
And as..
GF loses US$1M per day or US$365M per annum. 3% is almost US$11M

Therefore, if AD et al were to reduce losses a little over 3% - granted nothing gets better - but net cash flow stays the same; i.e. they pay their way.

Which is clearly more than your friends in Network are doing!

As for SABRE APM - you can have all the tools in the world, but if you don't know how to get the best out of them you may as well not have them. GF never have used that particular application very well at all, assuming it actually can do what it is marketed as being able to do - something that particular company are good at (marketing) but are not very good at delivering what is marketed.
Icarus is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2007, 18:13
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Magic Kingdom
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what you are saying is that you have to hire someone at $1.2MM p.a. to figure out the company is losing $365MM p.a. and because of that high salary he will take the right steps to stop the losses.

JH must have been paid only Sharwarma money then as he obviously didn't realize the magnitude of the loss or knew the right steps to stop the losses

This kind of reminds me of the old CEO of US Airways who's salary just about surpased the combine salaries of all the CEO's of the other major US airlines and at the same time the US Airways CASM just about equaled the combined CASM of all the other major US airlines (Note: This is an exageration to make the point). He had a solution alright, sell the airline to United

Running an airline is not rocket science, its all about CASM. RASM is pretty well fixed, even for the ME, so you have to reduce CASM as much as you can while still being able to attract the punters to fill the seats. You need, clean and fresh looking planes.

As for AD's salary, who can blame him. The shelf life or a CEO in a company losing $365MM p.a. must be pretty short.
Desert Diner is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2007, 19:30
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere nice and warm
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Say what want Icarus, it was never a network problem in the first place, rather, how finances and cost allocations are done, idiots at various departments who are getting very high salaries and are good for nothing, not to mention all the other people robbing GF blind. As I said in the beginning, it is so easy to blame network for everything. Time will tell I was right. Also remember that GF was always under pressure from the BAH and MCT governments to operate flights whether they like it or not to certain destinations (regardless of profitability). All hell would break loose if one tried to switch a flight from MCT to BAH for example even though it is very obvious that having most flights from BAH is more logical and better to begin with. AD now has a carte-blanche as BAH is now planning to take over 80% and later 100%, and this is something the network people never had. As far as I know, GF hired numerous consultants for advice on network and not one was able to find anything wrong with the way it was scheduled (given the constraints that they were under). As I also mentioned before, unless u have ample experience in networking and its finances and intimate knowledge of passenger traffic flows, you will be easily be misled when looking at simple the p/l of separate flight legs, and your post has proven that.

Last edited by boiler; 29th Apr 2007 at 19:52.
boiler is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2007, 05:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Back of beyond
Posts: 793
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
One truth is constant: a fool with a tool is still a fool
RevMan2 is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2007, 08:04
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: South of North
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You only have to look at their new wave system to realize that they are designing a sked that fits the realities of the world. This is a departure from the old system where the sked was designed politically.

Not only are they consolidating routes by dropping unprofitable ones but the new sked is about 5 aircraft light (at least in comparison to previous skeds) to allow for substiting due to maintenamce and mechanicals. Something unheard of here in the past!!
Trader is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2007, 13:24
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere nice and warm
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trader,

I am not sure I understood you post. Do u mean to say that they will be keeping these 5 a/c as stand-by, or will the reduced fleet be flown less?

From what I heard, there may be a bigger problem with the new wave system proposed by the consultants. Half the connections are at 40 minutes. This seems to be a very tight schedule. The GF fleet is unreliable and cannot perform well enough to sustain such low connecting times.
boiler is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2007, 14:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Intentionally Left Blank
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DesertM - No, I am not justifying anybody's salary; simply responding to Boilermakers request in respect of my math.

Boilermaker - "..you will easily see how SYD helps your network.." Yes! Losing BD1M p/a - not the sort of help I think we need right now. Cutting that route alone pays the CEO's salary - good start!

The 'wave' system is no different to that proposed and recommended by SH&E some 5 years or so ago - it is the only way forward now just as it was then; shame it was ignored at the time.

The only issues are Bahrain Airport and facilitating the transfer process effectively (passengers baggage) NOT the aircraft. Get that resolved and GF will succeed without a doubt.
Icarus is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.