Loganair
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Liege
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No matter what you say to people, there will still be some who will pay for a TR. You can't beat the system, but you can break it. That's why I think it's up to pilots to protect the Ts & Cs for new recruits.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Liege
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd like to add that, as a young person myself, I think that one of the greatest qualities that we lack is patience (I must sound like I'm 65!). What's the rush? If you start flying in your twenties, you'll hopefully have at least 40 years flying planes. Why spend them all using an autopilot? If you don't get an airline job after training, have some fun doing other types of flying.
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Age: 61
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some interesting and worldly comments justifying a recruitment policy based on financial considerations. Now consider this: Given that Loganair's problem is not in attracting F/Os but in keeping experienced captains and training captains, and that a significant proportion of training captains have left because of lifestyle/workload issues, how does a recruitment policy based not on suitability but on ability/gullibilty/willingness to pay for your own training help matters? I agree that training costs have to be contained and I have to say I personally look with some disdain upon those who leave before their bond/loan period is over (old fashioned I know but there we are), however I cannot see how there is any incentive for those who have taken on an even bigger loan to pay for their training than normal to do anything but leave at the earliest opportunity for a higher paying job in order to pay that loan off faster. I suppose that when people realise that not only do you have to pay for your own training but when you do get a job you will be paid a relatively low salary and only fly 4-500 hours a year rather than 900 then applications will slow down but that will only make the initial screening of CVs easier, it won't keep pilots on once they are able to leave. Maybe a non-reducing bond would, but I really don't see how paying for your TR will. What it may well do is increase the burden on the training department to such an extent that more training captains will think enough is enough and give up the struggle for an easier life elsewhere 
. I hope I'm wrong but I can't see how.
. I hope I'm wrong but I can't see how.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: herts
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by On speed on profile
Loganair has made the call to only accept type rated pilots and then bond them for a stupid amount for line training. That is a commercial decision that has sound backing when talking to the beancounters
I know I harped on about it before, but they would be far better to use their links to BA and act as a feeder to them. If people could see a BA job at the end of 3 yrs this would be an interesting career path.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Liege
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
elevengflyer,
Great idea! But do you think BA mainstream should still take on low-hour pilots as well as using Loganair as a feeder? I don't know if it would work unless BA recruited only from non-mainstream feeder airlines, or pilots with considerable experience. I know someone will give me stick over this, but we could take a leaf from the Americans book, by adopting a feeder system. A bit closer to home, BritAir act as a feeder airline to Air France. However, this won't affect the current system of paying for type ratings to work for low-cost carriers.
Great idea! But do you think BA mainstream should still take on low-hour pilots as well as using Loganair as a feeder? I don't know if it would work unless BA recruited only from non-mainstream feeder airlines, or pilots with considerable experience. I know someone will give me stick over this, but we could take a leaf from the Americans book, by adopting a feeder system. A bit closer to home, BritAir act as a feeder airline to Air France. However, this won't affect the current system of paying for type ratings to work for low-cost carriers.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The situation with Loganair tells us one very important thing: we as pilots and prospective employees have the power to change things. In this case, the change was very much to for the worse. Two pilots offered themselves to the company with their type ratings alread complete and effectively jumped the queue (of non-type rated but talented British instructors/charter pilots/newly qualified youngsters). The company (or the company accountant) then made a decision purely based on the financial benefits, which if observed in isolation look pretty good. However, I believe that it will be the intangible effects (such as loss of morale/reputation in the industry/attracting the wrong type of recruit) that will be felt in 6 months/a year if this deal remains the norm. In the long term, these intangibles will start to have an impact on the bottom line. .
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BOGOF,
If by this (and I think you do) you mean that he/she approves of taking on type rated pilots to save the company money then they have seriously underestimated their business plan and are not looking far enough ahead. When you keep chopping at the foundations of a business, it will eventually fall. The foundations of any airline are happy content pilots and cabin crew who want to go that extra mile for the company but without that, the future state of any business will be in doubt.
This reminds me of a colleague who told me his company director tried to make three post holders redundant without actually realising that they were needed for the AOC and without them, the CAA would have pulled the AOC. There are some serious amateurs out there!
As the main investor owns 70%, he will have approved of the changes in the first place.
This reminds me of a colleague who told me his company director tried to make three post holders redundant without actually realising that they were needed for the AOC and without them, the CAA would have pulled the AOC. There are some serious amateurs out there!
Last edited by On speed on profile; 16th Aug 2006 at 21:23.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: herts
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by On speed on profile
The foundations of any airline are happy content pilots and cabin crew who want to go that extra mile for the company but without that, the future state of any business will be in doubt.
When I tell people I am a qualified ATPL they still treat you with a small amount of respect - it is a shame that the industry does not treat the qualification in the same manner.
There are currently no passenger carrying UAV's - without pilots NO planes will leave the ground - please note Mr Beancounter!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Some dusty outpost in the ME
Age: 45
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to agree with Lee Frost. I find the decision which Loganair have adopted mind boggling…….
I’m Scottish, with family living on the Islands and very aware of the role this company plays in these communities. I’ve always looked to Loganair as an operator where I could have a very rewarding career both as an FO and as a Captain, but with the new scheme in place, I’m sorry, but I won’t be pursuing employment – their loss I say!!
Why can’t a non reducing bond be used instead, such as the scheme Flybe appear to be adopting? Surely this would be far better for Logan…
I met a Captain on a flight from Islay to Glasgow back in late April and he said they're always on the look out for good pilots who want to work for the company. I just wonder how many good pilots they will continue to see through their doors and how many of those will want to be there??
- Time will tell.
I’m Scottish, with family living on the Islands and very aware of the role this company plays in these communities. I’ve always looked to Loganair as an operator where I could have a very rewarding career both as an FO and as a Captain, but with the new scheme in place, I’m sorry, but I won’t be pursuing employment – their loss I say!!
Why can’t a non reducing bond be used instead, such as the scheme Flybe appear to be adopting? Surely this would be far better for Logan…
I met a Captain on a flight from Islay to Glasgow back in late April and he said they're always on the look out for good pilots who want to work for the company. I just wonder how many good pilots they will continue to see through their doors and how many of those will want to be there??
- Time will tell.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funkie, Sadly, Logan did have a very good reducing bond scheme which many pilots are currently on but I was told the same thing and it now appears you can change "good" to "cheap" and when told the conditions of employment, I politely told them I would not be self funding my type rating.
One positive note to come out of this is that there seem to be a number of you in need of an f/o position who have told Logan the same thing!
Let me be the first to say you deserve to be commended with a standing ovation.
Well done all of you and best of luck with future employment. Lets just hope they and others like them get the message and that your fellow colleagues will do the same!!
One positive note to come out of this is that there seem to be a number of you in need of an f/o position who have told Logan the same thing!
Let me be the first to say you deserve to be commended with a standing ovation.
Well done all of you and best of luck with future employment. Lets just hope they and others like them get the message and that your fellow colleagues will do the same!!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, but it takes a bit of courage to say "Im not going to be shafted thank you very much" when you dont have a job lined up and the debts are mounting! Im just saying what every pilot both trained and employed or not should be saying!
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Age: 61
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now let me see......do I find another £18,000 from somewhere, £12,000 of which I will not see again, to buy a type rating on a fairly old turboprop so that I might get a job paying about £22,000 a year flying about 400 hours, or do I buy a type rating on a jet for a similar amount with a similar chance of a job but paying rather more and flying rather more, or do I spend £6,000 on an instructor rating and get some experience and some money coming in or........? Life is full of decisions, Grasshopper, but some are easier than others 
.
.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Domaine de la Romanee-Conti
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Hear hear DB6
It wasn't that long ago that I was in the hunt for the first turboprop job (3 years ago to be precise) and the standard deal on offer for jobs at Logan, Eastern, Flybe, Highland, Scotairways etc was a 2-year reducing bond of between £6 and £9K. No cash up front or any outrageous nonsense like that.
What I find most disgusting is the crass profit margin they're taking. If any of you guys decide to go impersonate an airline manager, and ring up Saab to get a quote for training some new pilots (or BAE or any other European turboprop training provider, there's not a huge price difference for any turboprop rating really) you will find that the general wholesale cost to the airline customer including ground school and LST, for TWO pilots to be trained together as sim partners, is around £12 - £14K total, or £6 - 7K each. As for charging for line training - AARRGGHHH don't even get me started, lets just say I can start to see where A320rider is coming from! I'm not so naive though as to think that shedloads of wannabes STILL won't queue up to do it and I'm pretty much through wasting my breath on pprune about how bad these deals are.
I just hope and pray that Logan get what they deserve from it, which is that their crew take the piss out of them to the same extent they are dishing it out - that ultimately every single one of their FO's extends two fingers and bails out to a real job as soon as they've got 1000 hours, that their captain shortage reaches even bigger crisis levels real soon, the last few remaining training captains bail out, the whole schedule comes unstuck, then BA audit them and sack the entire ops management team for such crass mismanagement of their crewing levels and they are replaced with someone who's got a clue about long term management strategy.
It wasn't that long ago that I was in the hunt for the first turboprop job (3 years ago to be precise) and the standard deal on offer for jobs at Logan, Eastern, Flybe, Highland, Scotairways etc was a 2-year reducing bond of between £6 and £9K. No cash up front or any outrageous nonsense like that.
What I find most disgusting is the crass profit margin they're taking. If any of you guys decide to go impersonate an airline manager, and ring up Saab to get a quote for training some new pilots (or BAE or any other European turboprop training provider, there's not a huge price difference for any turboprop rating really) you will find that the general wholesale cost to the airline customer including ground school and LST, for TWO pilots to be trained together as sim partners, is around £12 - £14K total, or £6 - 7K each. As for charging for line training - AARRGGHHH don't even get me started, lets just say I can start to see where A320rider is coming from! I'm not so naive though as to think that shedloads of wannabes STILL won't queue up to do it and I'm pretty much through wasting my breath on pprune about how bad these deals are.
I just hope and pray that Logan get what they deserve from it, which is that their crew take the piss out of them to the same extent they are dishing it out - that ultimately every single one of their FO's extends two fingers and bails out to a real job as soon as they've got 1000 hours, that their captain shortage reaches even bigger crisis levels real soon, the last few remaining training captains bail out, the whole schedule comes unstuck, then BA audit them and sack the entire ops management team for such crass mismanagement of their crewing levels and they are replaced with someone who's got a clue about long term management strategy.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: U and K
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone know how the bond works ?
Do you provide the £8000 or whatever it is, and then the company pays back a little every month ?
Or do the company provide it, but in your name, and they pay it monthly ?
Cheers
Do you provide the £8000 or whatever it is, and then the company pays back a little every month ?
Or do the company provide it, but in your name, and they pay it monthly ?
Cheers
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloud Cookoo Land
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When a bad deal ain't so bad for some
This is all a real shame, it just draws another major disappointment in the airline recruitment industry where the size of the wallet speaks loudest! Living in Glasgow and currently in commercial training myself, I had banked a lot on Loganair and hoped that one day it may provide me with a first job, keeping me in Glasgow where I am married and own property. I probably would have been happy to remain there for quite some time as it kept me close to home.
Now it looks like I may as well forget it. I knew the odds in 'getting in' to Logan were already stacked against me (I am of a modular background), however this current arrangment makes sure that the odds are non-existant!
The thing that really gets my back up (as it has already been stated by others) is that Logan's pound saving exercise will not create a shortage of candidates (especially for those looking for their first job). There is still a lot of people out there who consider money as being 'no object' when it comes to securing the right hand seat. Loganair are banking on this, having it seen work for so many other carriers ie Ryanair etc.
It is a sad state of affairs, but airlines are very lean businesses which I think believe that consistent short term performance is more important than setting up long term objectives? Managers regard crew as just another cog in the wheel that gets the airline through each day. And if they can save money of this cog (or even make money out of it), then they look wonderful! It isn't anything new and so what if it pisses people off! I'm sure they will sleep at night if money is saved, living under the probably accurate assumption that there is always some mug which will come along and pay up 18K in order to work for them!
Now it looks like I may as well forget it. I knew the odds in 'getting in' to Logan were already stacked against me (I am of a modular background), however this current arrangment makes sure that the odds are non-existant!
The thing that really gets my back up (as it has already been stated by others) is that Logan's pound saving exercise will not create a shortage of candidates (especially for those looking for their first job). There is still a lot of people out there who consider money as being 'no object' when it comes to securing the right hand seat. Loganair are banking on this, having it seen work for so many other carriers ie Ryanair etc.
It is a sad state of affairs, but airlines are very lean businesses which I think believe that consistent short term performance is more important than setting up long term objectives? Managers regard crew as just another cog in the wheel that gets the airline through each day. And if they can save money of this cog (or even make money out of it), then they look wonderful! It isn't anything new and so what if it pisses people off! I'm sure they will sleep at night if money is saved, living under the probably accurate assumption that there is always some mug which will come along and pay up 18K in order to work for them!
day`s
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloud Cookoo Land
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im not so sure about that Pipertommy, Ryanair's intial pay for a new cadet is WORSE than Logan's by quite a margin. Plus you don't see any £'s until your Line training is over!
Another big factor is that at least with Logan you know you will be in Scotland, with Ryanair they can punt you anywhere in Europe and expect you to live on nothing!
Another big factor is that at least with Logan you know you will be in Scotland, with Ryanair they can punt you anywhere in Europe and expect you to live on nothing!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Live near Cardiff (from Scotland)
Age: 47
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fair point
i was`nt that clear sorry,in the future with them your wage will grow to a respectful income,against Logan`s.Not that is my driving force for a job.Could`nt think of a better job than Loganair`s flying
i was`nt that clear sorry,in the future with them your wage will grow to a respectful income,against Logan`s.Not that is my driving force for a job.Could`nt think of a better job than Loganair`s flying
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloud Cookoo Land
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not to worry, the common ground with both airlines is that the cadet is taken for a ride! However it is obvious that there are plenty of people out there that are willing to take that ride in order to get into the RHS. They obviously want no quality of life, have no financial worries or think that being in a massive amount of debt is something not worth concerning themselves about! 