FO's paying to fly?
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Ive waded into this before, and for those of you who dont know, I am very much against the idea of the SSTR, personally I believe its the thin end of the wedge.
The problem as I see it is the expectation of leaving training, and then sliding seamlessly into a nice shiney Jet; not only is that an unrealistic expectation, its proving to be far from the reality in the vast majority of cases.
What we need here is a reality check..am I wrong in noticing that a large proportion of wannabes on here seem to think its perfectly reasonable to hop on a complex type without any further experience?
If you think it is..go ask some of the Easy guys about flying and line training some of the low hour cadets they employ, you'll find the reality is far removed from the hype.
In many ways today has never been a better time to be a low-timer, plenty of entry level and Lo-Co's are recruiting and a heck of a lot of them are bonding crews, rather than offering cash upfront, better yet turbo-prop operators are back in vogue, which is a far better road to gaining experience..than going straight into the deep-end on a 60 tonne jet.
To all of you who think Im talking from a position of being fat dumb and happy with my Jet job...think about this,
3yrs flying SE piston
2yrs flying multi-piston
2yrs flying multi-turbine
Currently flying a jet........I havent parted with a penny to pay for any training on any aircraft, and Im no intergrated/modular student..just a bit of hard graft.
Oh and debt free
The arguement of lawyers and doctors carries no weight, put simply both of these professions (as well as many others) junior professionals have to serve their time before they can progress i.e. to partnerships/private practice etc..etc..most of the guys on SSTR courses want to skip this step out of a mixture of impatience, expectation, and desperation.
The problem as I see it is the expectation of leaving training, and then sliding seamlessly into a nice shiney Jet; not only is that an unrealistic expectation, its proving to be far from the reality in the vast majority of cases.
What we need here is a reality check..am I wrong in noticing that a large proportion of wannabes on here seem to think its perfectly reasonable to hop on a complex type without any further experience?
If you think it is..go ask some of the Easy guys about flying and line training some of the low hour cadets they employ, you'll find the reality is far removed from the hype.
In many ways today has never been a better time to be a low-timer, plenty of entry level and Lo-Co's are recruiting and a heck of a lot of them are bonding crews, rather than offering cash upfront, better yet turbo-prop operators are back in vogue, which is a far better road to gaining experience..than going straight into the deep-end on a 60 tonne jet.
To all of you who think Im talking from a position of being fat dumb and happy with my Jet job...think about this,
3yrs flying SE piston
2yrs flying multi-piston
2yrs flying multi-turbine
Currently flying a jet........I havent parted with a penny to pay for any training on any aircraft, and Im no intergrated/modular student..just a bit of hard graft.
Oh and debt free
The arguement of lawyers and doctors carries no weight, put simply both of these professions (as well as many others) junior professionals have to serve their time before they can progress i.e. to partnerships/private practice etc..etc..most of the guys on SSTR courses want to skip this step out of a mixture of impatience, expectation, and desperation.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South of BCN
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't believe the things I read on here sometimes!
If this continues I might go buy a simulator and make a fortune doing type ratings!!
I will give you all my opinion since I am not from the UK but fly here. I started in Canada and that is where I gained all my commercial experience....now over there most people don't seem to jump to conclusions of what they want to fly until they have over 1500+ hours. Most people joining the aviation industry here in the UK seem that soon as they are done and have accumulated there 250 hours are now ready to fly the jets! Where did this ever come from??!?!?! 250 hours??
You shouldn't be allowed to fly 25NM from an airport with that time! You need to instruct! INSTRUCT INSTRUCT INSTRUCT!!! get 1000TT, and then maybe you could be able to fly a charter or cargo Piston twin....that s how to gain hours.
The CAA need to become involved as well...I think there is a serious problem over here and the airlines are all taking advantage of this situation. I have heard that they had a scheme years ago where a pilot required 700TT to have his CPL issued?!?
If that is the case, why did they change that?
Most operators in America or Canada require 500Multi PIC before you can fly as captain on a multi engine piston aircraft...and that sounds about right to have that kind of experience to be allowed to fly an aircraft of that sort.
I am sorry to say this, but people in the UK that I have met need to realize that Instructing is the way to build hours, not paying for a type rating! and i know a lot of people with type ratings and 100 line training that don't even get a response from their CV's.
250TT > Instruct 1000TT> Charter 1500TT> Regional 3000TT> Airlines
don't try jumping too far before you can walk!
don't pay for type ratings, its not your job to pay for it!
Good luck
If this continues I might go buy a simulator and make a fortune doing type ratings!!
I will give you all my opinion since I am not from the UK but fly here. I started in Canada and that is where I gained all my commercial experience....now over there most people don't seem to jump to conclusions of what they want to fly until they have over 1500+ hours. Most people joining the aviation industry here in the UK seem that soon as they are done and have accumulated there 250 hours are now ready to fly the jets! Where did this ever come from??!?!?! 250 hours??
You shouldn't be allowed to fly 25NM from an airport with that time! You need to instruct! INSTRUCT INSTRUCT INSTRUCT!!! get 1000TT, and then maybe you could be able to fly a charter or cargo Piston twin....that s how to gain hours.
The CAA need to become involved as well...I think there is a serious problem over here and the airlines are all taking advantage of this situation. I have heard that they had a scheme years ago where a pilot required 700TT to have his CPL issued?!?
If that is the case, why did they change that?
Most operators in America or Canada require 500Multi PIC before you can fly as captain on a multi engine piston aircraft...and that sounds about right to have that kind of experience to be allowed to fly an aircraft of that sort.
I am sorry to say this, but people in the UK that I have met need to realize that Instructing is the way to build hours, not paying for a type rating! and i know a lot of people with type ratings and 100 line training that don't even get a response from their CV's.
250TT > Instruct 1000TT> Charter 1500TT> Regional 3000TT> Airlines
don't try jumping too far before you can walk!
don't pay for type ratings, its not your job to pay for it!
Good luck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
People are always asking, if I don't pay, then what else can I do? The answer is simple, apply only to companies you would like to work for who don't have the ridiculous requirement of being already type rated!
So many people say that SSTR's are the reality, and we just have to accept it. Well we don't because there are still decent airlines out there - I have recently been assessed by BACX, Flybe, Thomsonfly and Cityjet, all of whom asked to interview me despite me not being type rated, and I'm sure there are many others out there.
Ok, you might say, I applied to those companies and wasn't successful. Well in that case take the advice of the previous couple of posters and work your way up in the industry, taking things one step at a time rather than feeling the need to be in the RHS of a jet yesterday....
So many people say that SSTR's are the reality, and we just have to accept it. Well we don't because there are still decent airlines out there - I have recently been assessed by BACX, Flybe, Thomsonfly and Cityjet, all of whom asked to interview me despite me not being type rated, and I'm sure there are many others out there.
Ok, you might say, I applied to those companies and wasn't successful. Well in that case take the advice of the previous couple of posters and work your way up in the industry, taking things one step at a time rather than feeling the need to be in the RHS of a jet yesterday....
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
YYZ Instructor Unfortunately, you are wasting your time pining for days of old! You might wish that things were different (do I detect a bit of trans-Atlantic jealousy, perhaps?), but they are not. The airline industry in UK is in excellent health, unlike that in North America, and it needs new people - lots of them.
However, there has developed an expectation among baby pilots here that 250 hours' flying (not training) is all they need to acquire to be 'owed' a jet job, and certain organisations have capitalised on that over the past couple of years - Ryanair in particular, but others as well. The Solid-Airline lot that BAP refers to look to be a prize example of a scam perpetrated on impressionable wannabes - avoid!
However, the airline industry here could not afford all the new guys to go off into flying instruction, however valuable such flying might be, and there is no intrinsic reason why a 250-hour pilot cannot enter TR and line training and thereafter (with around 350 hours) perform adequately as a co-pilot on an airliner. Most modern airliners require far less skill and thought to fly (at a basic level) than your average piston twin! Most military organisations put their new pilots in charge of far more complex equipent at a similar number of (far higher quality) hours, so it's not a non-sequitor.
The SSTR argument is a distraction from the issue; SSTRs are a legitimate training device offered by many bona-fide training orgainisations and aimed at a wide variety of pilots who, for whatever reason, wish to equip themselves with a type rating to make themselves more attractive in the marketplace. The real issue is operators like Ryanair that have contracted people to fly for them while either paying to do so or while not being paid. That is where the immorality lies, not with SSTRs which are no more immoral than a CPL/IR.
Scroggs
However, there has developed an expectation among baby pilots here that 250 hours' flying (not training) is all they need to acquire to be 'owed' a jet job, and certain organisations have capitalised on that over the past couple of years - Ryanair in particular, but others as well. The Solid-Airline lot that BAP refers to look to be a prize example of a scam perpetrated on impressionable wannabes - avoid!
However, the airline industry here could not afford all the new guys to go off into flying instruction, however valuable such flying might be, and there is no intrinsic reason why a 250-hour pilot cannot enter TR and line training and thereafter (with around 350 hours) perform adequately as a co-pilot on an airliner. Most modern airliners require far less skill and thought to fly (at a basic level) than your average piston twin! Most military organisations put their new pilots in charge of far more complex equipent at a similar number of (far higher quality) hours, so it's not a non-sequitor.
The SSTR argument is a distraction from the issue; SSTRs are a legitimate training device offered by many bona-fide training orgainisations and aimed at a wide variety of pilots who, for whatever reason, wish to equip themselves with a type rating to make themselves more attractive in the marketplace. The real issue is operators like Ryanair that have contracted people to fly for them while either paying to do so or while not being paid. That is where the immorality lies, not with SSTRs which are no more immoral than a CPL/IR.
Scroggs
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some of you reading this may find this thread I started a couple of months ago useful. Oddly it followed a similar pattern to this, question posed, abuse, then some useful advice and an informed debate.
Link to Buying a Type Rating Thread
I hope it is of some use as I did some maths and thought about the whole process without emotion as a pure business decision. Some otheres added some pertinent information that I think all low hour pilots should at least consider when deciding on that first step after attaining the CPL. My next six months is mapped out with a mixture of ATPL study with Bristol and my JAA Multi CPL/IR conversion combined with networking and finding out which nightclub the personnel manager at Virgin Atlantic's daughter frequents.
Stephen
Link to Buying a Type Rating Thread
I hope it is of some use as I did some maths and thought about the whole process without emotion as a pure business decision. Some otheres added some pertinent information that I think all low hour pilots should at least consider when deciding on that first step after attaining the CPL. My next six months is mapped out with a mixture of ATPL study with Bristol and my JAA Multi CPL/IR conversion combined with networking and finding out which nightclub the personnel manager at Virgin Atlantic's daughter frequents.
Stephen
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Domaine de la Romanee-Conti
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Guys it's not worth arguing about
This whole ball game is going to change beyond recognition in a few short months when the JAA multi pilot licence is set upon us, and EVERY SINGLE STUDENT coming out of the big UK and European flying schools has had a type rating of their choice, thrown in as part of their ab initio training.
Have a think about how that's going to skew the playing field ... especially if you're 200 hours and unemployed in the current market
There's hopefully going to still be scope for a few old multi-thousand hour turboprop lags like me to get into a decent job without paying for it - but the rest of you low timers, if I was you I'd take a collective deep breath, bend over & spread 'em for your bank manager a.s.a.p.
This whole ball game is going to change beyond recognition in a few short months when the JAA multi pilot licence is set upon us, and EVERY SINGLE STUDENT coming out of the big UK and European flying schools has had a type rating of their choice, thrown in as part of their ab initio training.
Have a think about how that's going to skew the playing field ... especially if you're 200 hours and unemployed in the current market
There's hopefully going to still be scope for a few old multi-thousand hour turboprop lags like me to get into a decent job without paying for it - but the rest of you low timers, if I was you I'd take a collective deep breath, bend over & spread 'em for your bank manager a.s.a.p.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: blank
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mainly to BAP
Hi BAP
I find your posts really interesting as it highlights your mindset extremely clearly and hence your conclusion of buying a rating. Lets see if I can get everything said in a positively critical manner.
I agree with you on the way the market has moved and now type ratings are becoming a neccesary evil - at least in the eyes of low hour wannabees. Let me be candid and honest - I am a low hour wannabee seeking employment as well. However, I have to disagree wholeheartedly on you assumptions that wannabees and airlines are not to blame, yet experienced pilots, advanced in their careers, are. Yes, it would seem a great concept for experienced pilots to demand that their company hires only the highest calibre cadets rather than the wealthiest, but that is not the role of those pilots or, I imagine, within their capabilities to make such demands.
Who is to blame? In my eyes we are. Yes, wannabees. We are making this bed for ourselves as we are readily paying training as it would appear there are no other options now. We have created the direct-to-airline route by not being willing to gain experience by any other means to the point that now your argument is correct - there actually are fewer other options now as not paying to go to the airlines leaves you open to spending years in the wilderness whilst other wannabees willing to pay fill the airlines requirements. I know several instructors who have simply become too "old" to enter airlines and have an extremely slim chance of jumping across to airlines. Are airlines to blame for capitalising on this? I would love to paint them black, but truthfully I think we have done this to ourselves. As you state, it's business. Furthermore - you state yourself that airlines are now requiring hours due to the sheer volume of potential candidates with self funded type ratings, and use this as a justification for paying to "work" whilst building hours.
As you state, the industry should only train the number of pilots it requires and those be of the highest calibre. I can assure you that if it was left to airline accountants then this would be the case in a world where wannabees didn't try to buy experience or an opportunity to gain employment. What can we assume from this? That those not possesing the required talent, skills, etc... bought type ratings? Perhaps in the past, but as you say it is now the only way; standing out as a perfect candidate without a type rating amongst the flood of newbs running to hand over vast sums of money is next to impossible.
We did this to ourselves and I'm not sure which I find more difficult to believe ; that there is little or no hope of reversing this trend now; or that we think there are no other options to gaining hours and ultimately airline employment. The latter is perfectly highlighted in your arguments which justify your reasons for buying a type and your current desperate situation where you have a type rating and now need hours to stand out before it expires.
This post is not meant to be offensive, or negatively critical, I just don't agree with you that anyone is to blame but us - and it appears to me that you're looking for anyone else to blame but yourself.
Hear that? World's smallest violin playing just for you.
Yes, you BAP, so don't say 'someone'. You clearly state all the arguments and the damage that paying for type rating is doing to the industry yet are still unable to acknowledge that you are part of that without stating how helpless you are. You made these decisions, now please, have the courage of conviction to not blame other wannabes, 'comfortable' career pilots, the industry. That's probably what grated me most about your post, and I don't feel you're alone in this - in fact you're one of a large number of wannabes (...again).
Good luck, hope it all pans out okay and hopefully I should be up there one day if I can impress an airline enough with my skills.
M80
I find your posts really interesting as it highlights your mindset extremely clearly and hence your conclusion of buying a rating. Lets see if I can get everything said in a positively critical manner.
I agree with you on the way the market has moved and now type ratings are becoming a neccesary evil - at least in the eyes of low hour wannabees. Let me be candid and honest - I am a low hour wannabee seeking employment as well. However, I have to disagree wholeheartedly on you assumptions that wannabees and airlines are not to blame, yet experienced pilots, advanced in their careers, are. Yes, it would seem a great concept for experienced pilots to demand that their company hires only the highest calibre cadets rather than the wealthiest, but that is not the role of those pilots or, I imagine, within their capabilities to make such demands.
Who is to blame? In my eyes we are. Yes, wannabees. We are making this bed for ourselves as we are readily paying training as it would appear there are no other options now. We have created the direct-to-airline route by not being willing to gain experience by any other means to the point that now your argument is correct - there actually are fewer other options now as not paying to go to the airlines leaves you open to spending years in the wilderness whilst other wannabees willing to pay fill the airlines requirements. I know several instructors who have simply become too "old" to enter airlines and have an extremely slim chance of jumping across to airlines. Are airlines to blame for capitalising on this? I would love to paint them black, but truthfully I think we have done this to ourselves. As you state, it's business. Furthermore - you state yourself that airlines are now requiring hours due to the sheer volume of potential candidates with self funded type ratings, and use this as a justification for paying to "work" whilst building hours.
As you state, the industry should only train the number of pilots it requires and those be of the highest calibre. I can assure you that if it was left to airline accountants then this would be the case in a world where wannabees didn't try to buy experience or an opportunity to gain employment. What can we assume from this? That those not possesing the required talent, skills, etc... bought type ratings? Perhaps in the past, but as you say it is now the only way; standing out as a perfect candidate without a type rating amongst the flood of newbs running to hand over vast sums of money is next to impossible.
We did this to ourselves and I'm not sure which I find more difficult to believe ; that there is little or no hope of reversing this trend now; or that we think there are no other options to gaining hours and ultimately airline employment. The latter is perfectly highlighted in your arguments which justify your reasons for buying a type and your current desperate situation where you have a type rating and now need hours to stand out before it expires.
This post is not meant to be offensive, or negatively critical, I just don't agree with you that anyone is to blame but us - and it appears to me that you're looking for anyone else to blame but yourself.
I am not making the rules I am just following them. Who has made the rules?? - The experienced pilots/Airlines, not me, I am new in the business!
And again - don’t say that the low timers just have to stop paying, because there will always be someone who is willing to do so if he or she sees a job in the other end…
Good luck, hope it all pans out okay and hopefully I should be up there one day if I can impress an airline enough with my skills.
M80
Last edited by M80; 12th Dec 2005 at 11:16.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: up there some where!
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi M80.
Thanks for your point of you.
I do see your point, yet I don’t agree with it.
Yes you are right, I made the decision to buy a rating - because that was the only way I could see myself reaching my goal – To fly for a living.
Am I to blame or the low timers?? Yes we could stop paying, and then everything would be just fine again.
I would have been the first one to say, ”okay, we don’t buy our own ratings” But I would only have done that if there was a guarantee that no one did buy it, otherwise I would just have been sitting back now with no hope of being employed…
So that’s why, I say that I am just following the rules. And I can’t change them; because it is impossible to say that low timers should stop paying for there own rating. It would only work if everybody stopped, which is naïve to believe, and maybe I am the “Someone”, but that is because an airline would hire me…
Okay you are right, if everybody said the same as I do now, it would never be possible to get low timers to stop paying. So in that context, I am guilty, but that’s simply because I weigh my career higher than how the business is developing. Selfish - Yes very. But to be honest, I don’t believe that you or anybody else would be any different if you had just won a million in the lottery.
Not that I have won anything, unfortunately
Okay of course some low timers, did make the bed for us, but that’s many years ago now, and I have no part in that. I just have to sleep in it. Okay I am not exactly helping, but I still believe that the only ones who can stop this are the experienced pilots, because they are the ones who have the power through the pilots union.
Unfortunately as you also said; it is properly irreversible now, and even though the experienced pilots would like to stop this, it might be too late now.
What I believe made me to post my opinion in first place, was that a lot of pilots blame pilots like me, for paying my way forward in the business, but maybe they should look around and see that there are not a lot of options left. The truth is, that if I have had the option of flying as an instructor, GA pilot etc. I would have done it. And I am still trying to find these jobs, even though I am rated on a B737.
But right now I know A LOT of ex-instructors who has decided to pay there way forward in the business, even though they had many hours on both SEP and MEP. So to everybody who just believe that the old career path still exists, please look again.
But anyway, I wish you all the best and I hope that both of us, and anybody else who is waiting for the phone call, will soon find our self smiling above the clouds
/BAP
Thanks for your point of you.
I do see your point, yet I don’t agree with it.
Yes you are right, I made the decision to buy a rating - because that was the only way I could see myself reaching my goal – To fly for a living.
Am I to blame or the low timers?? Yes we could stop paying, and then everything would be just fine again.
I would have been the first one to say, ”okay, we don’t buy our own ratings” But I would only have done that if there was a guarantee that no one did buy it, otherwise I would just have been sitting back now with no hope of being employed…
So that’s why, I say that I am just following the rules. And I can’t change them; because it is impossible to say that low timers should stop paying for there own rating. It would only work if everybody stopped, which is naïve to believe, and maybe I am the “Someone”, but that is because an airline would hire me…
Okay you are right, if everybody said the same as I do now, it would never be possible to get low timers to stop paying. So in that context, I am guilty, but that’s simply because I weigh my career higher than how the business is developing. Selfish - Yes very. But to be honest, I don’t believe that you or anybody else would be any different if you had just won a million in the lottery.
Not that I have won anything, unfortunately
Okay of course some low timers, did make the bed for us, but that’s many years ago now, and I have no part in that. I just have to sleep in it. Okay I am not exactly helping, but I still believe that the only ones who can stop this are the experienced pilots, because they are the ones who have the power through the pilots union.
Unfortunately as you also said; it is properly irreversible now, and even though the experienced pilots would like to stop this, it might be too late now.
What I believe made me to post my opinion in first place, was that a lot of pilots blame pilots like me, for paying my way forward in the business, but maybe they should look around and see that there are not a lot of options left. The truth is, that if I have had the option of flying as an instructor, GA pilot etc. I would have done it. And I am still trying to find these jobs, even though I am rated on a B737.
But right now I know A LOT of ex-instructors who has decided to pay there way forward in the business, even though they had many hours on both SEP and MEP. So to everybody who just believe that the old career path still exists, please look again.
But anyway, I wish you all the best and I hope that both of us, and anybody else who is waiting for the phone call, will soon find our self smiling above the clouds
/BAP
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
YYZ Instructor,
I also did my flight training and the instructor rating in Canada but I have decided to pay for my A320 rating and then my 300 hrs line training on type. I had 300 hours TT when I started to fly the A320. Most of my friends are still instructing with more than 2000 hrs TT and they are not able to find a job even on a Navajo!
After I got my instructor rating, an airline told me: ''we want actual IFR, instuctor time does not count as you are not flying, you're just watching a student turning around the airport..'' that's why I have decided to go for a TR and that was a good decision for me.
I really think that the logical way to become an instrcutor is to gain a great flying experience and then share your experience. Most instructors want to build flight time which is leading to a poor training.
I have been waiting for 1 year after completion of my TR before joining the line training, you can't imagine how many guys are paying for their experience. It's sad but true.
Good luck and enjoy instructing!
I also did my flight training and the instructor rating in Canada but I have decided to pay for my A320 rating and then my 300 hrs line training on type. I had 300 hours TT when I started to fly the A320. Most of my friends are still instructing with more than 2000 hrs TT and they are not able to find a job even on a Navajo!
After I got my instructor rating, an airline told me: ''we want actual IFR, instuctor time does not count as you are not flying, you're just watching a student turning around the airport..'' that's why I have decided to go for a TR and that was a good decision for me.
I really think that the logical way to become an instrcutor is to gain a great flying experience and then share your experience. Most instructors want to build flight time which is leading to a poor training.
I have been waiting for 1 year after completion of my TR before joining the line training, you can't imagine how many guys are paying for their experience. It's sad but true.
Good luck and enjoy instructing!
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Salop
Age: 57
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote 'I have been waiting for 1 year after completion of my TR before joining the line training, you can't imagine how many guys are paying for their experience It's sad but true.
I guess I can ...... an inevitable extension of the how the abuse escalates once certain airlines realise that there are people out there willing to do anything to get that all important airline job ! I have actually come across a person who said that they were prepared to work for free. As you can imagine, me as someone who actually needs money to live, pay mortgage, feed family etc, didn't take to kindly to this POV.
Perhaps this is what the doctor down at Gatwick was eluding to two and a half years ago during my initial when he said it is becoming a cut throat industry to work in and why he had chosen to remain flying privately !!
I guess I can ...... an inevitable extension of the how the abuse escalates once certain airlines realise that there are people out there willing to do anything to get that all important airline job ! I have actually come across a person who said that they were prepared to work for free. As you can imagine, me as someone who actually needs money to live, pay mortgage, feed family etc, didn't take to kindly to this POV.
Perhaps this is what the doctor down at Gatwick was eluding to two and a half years ago during my initial when he said it is becoming a cut throat industry to work in and why he had chosen to remain flying privately !!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South of BCN
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ACP,
I am not getting to you or others about paying for ratings....I it is up to you if you want to pay or not...not me. I do have the money to pay, but I am not willing to pay for that. I am currently flying commercially and not instructing....yet I have never spent more than $1 more than was required to get a CPL/IR. If everyone continues to pay right after flight training there will be no job satisfaction for anyone! Soon it will escalate from paying for a TR to pay to fly the sectors as well!?!?!? no??
What if you had to pay as much as a passenger to sit up there? Would you pay for that? What if they required pilots to pay for the approach fees? Landing fees? Would that be ging to far?
Maybe to you....or others it would, but others after you would.....
Its just another snowball effect!
I am not trying to say what you did is wrong....and I am not trying to get back at Scroggs or anyone on here, I just want to point out that there really is no end to it!
I am not getting to you or others about paying for ratings....I it is up to you if you want to pay or not...not me. I do have the money to pay, but I am not willing to pay for that. I am currently flying commercially and not instructing....yet I have never spent more than $1 more than was required to get a CPL/IR. If everyone continues to pay right after flight training there will be no job satisfaction for anyone! Soon it will escalate from paying for a TR to pay to fly the sectors as well!?!?!? no??
What if you had to pay as much as a passenger to sit up there? Would you pay for that? What if they required pilots to pay for the approach fees? Landing fees? Would that be ging to far?
Maybe to you....or others it would, but others after you would.....
Its just another snowball effect!
I am not trying to say what you did is wrong....and I am not trying to get back at Scroggs or anyone on here, I just want to point out that there really is no end to it!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: FOREST OF DEAN
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TWIT-TWOO!!
This thread is the most depressing I've ever read.
The "profession" is getting more like the Georgian and Victorian Officer Class of the British Empire.
It will soon be case of the "profession" purchasing a "commission" in the "Airline", just for the pleasure of saying at the spring dances -
"Captain Blackadder, just back from India - BA210 this morning, it was tough but managed to get Father to wire some money to pay for the sector. It was touch and go but the Red Cap managed to square it."
"Oh Daaarling! , It must of been frightfull" Georgina says, with a resentful sigh knowing that if they did marry, they could never buy a house. "
I was going to quote "charge of the light brigade" but thought that would be too close a call.
In the next decade the only people who will be training are the people with too much money. There will be an almighty **** up. The industry will then decide to take away the pilot and use a computer. So that will be the end of that!!
Accountancy is looking pretty good at the moment!!
TWIT-TWOO!!
This thread is the most depressing I've ever read.
The "profession" is getting more like the Georgian and Victorian Officer Class of the British Empire.
It will soon be case of the "profession" purchasing a "commission" in the "Airline", just for the pleasure of saying at the spring dances -
"Captain Blackadder, just back from India - BA210 this morning, it was tough but managed to get Father to wire some money to pay for the sector. It was touch and go but the Red Cap managed to square it."
"Oh Daaarling! , It must of been frightfull" Georgina says, with a resentful sigh knowing that if they did marry, they could never buy a house. "
I was going to quote "charge of the light brigade" but thought that would be too close a call.
In the next decade the only people who will be training are the people with too much money. There will be an almighty **** up. The industry will then decide to take away the pilot and use a computer. So that will be the end of that!!
Accountancy is looking pretty good at the moment!!
TWIT-TWOO!!
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The computer-flown aircraft is already here - at least to a limited degree! However, they aren't going to replace you and me for many years yet - at least untill the 777-200LR, 787, 747-8, A350 and A380 are out of service, which is probably 40 years away.
One of the problems with a forum like this is that people can tend to focus on the negative and forget about the positive. In the same way as the interminable integrated/modular debate seems to suggest that you need to be an integrated graduate to get a job, the SSTR debate tends to suggest that you also need to have a jet rating with line training to get a job, especially if you're not an integrated garduate! Neither argument is true, believe me.
If you really must get into a 737 flightdeck at the earliest opportunity, then there may be some - but not much - merit in these arguments. If you are prepared to wait and go a less direct route, there is no reason why you should pay for any of your training post-fATPL. There is no shame in going the night freight/TP route - it's the way the majority of current (non ex-mil) jet pilots went. In any case, what's so good about a 737 versus an ATR? Even my A346 is just a flying office; there's little or no fun involved in the air - that's all on the ground these days! For fun, I'd far rather fly a small TP. At 50, my mortgage and kids won't permit me - but you don't (or shouldn't) have those responsibilities; you should be aiming to enjoy yourselves and learn all you can on your way to eventual longhaul dinosaur-hood!
Remember, if it's not fun you're not doing it right.
Scroggs
One of the problems with a forum like this is that people can tend to focus on the negative and forget about the positive. In the same way as the interminable integrated/modular debate seems to suggest that you need to be an integrated graduate to get a job, the SSTR debate tends to suggest that you also need to have a jet rating with line training to get a job, especially if you're not an integrated garduate! Neither argument is true, believe me.
If you really must get into a 737 flightdeck at the earliest opportunity, then there may be some - but not much - merit in these arguments. If you are prepared to wait and go a less direct route, there is no reason why you should pay for any of your training post-fATPL. There is no shame in going the night freight/TP route - it's the way the majority of current (non ex-mil) jet pilots went. In any case, what's so good about a 737 versus an ATR? Even my A346 is just a flying office; there's little or no fun involved in the air - that's all on the ground these days! For fun, I'd far rather fly a small TP. At 50, my mortgage and kids won't permit me - but you don't (or shouldn't) have those responsibilities; you should be aiming to enjoy yourselves and learn all you can on your way to eventual longhaul dinosaur-hood!
Remember, if it's not fun you're not doing it right.
Scroggs
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scroggs, thanks for the wise words.
I certainly don't think that it needs to be a 737/320 right seat or nothing. Don't get me wrong, I'll gladly take one if it's offered to me! The bit I find hard (just graduated fATPL) is to bridge the hours gap for TP or even Navajo/Seneca/Chieftain etc. Most places seem to want 700 hours for those jobs. So I (and many others, I assume) need to bridge the gap from 250 or so to 700. I have ruled out FI for now, because it's expensive and a lot of chief captains don't seem to think that watching someone else flying a C152 around the circuit is going to be too beneficial. Which pretty much leaves para-dropping and aerial photography. Have any other bright ideas?
Thx for the good work on the forums
P
PS
All instructors out there, don't jump on me for the FI comment. I actually believe it would make me a better pilot, but my words were based on what I have heard from the horse's mouth.
I certainly don't think that it needs to be a 737/320 right seat or nothing. Don't get me wrong, I'll gladly take one if it's offered to me! The bit I find hard (just graduated fATPL) is to bridge the hours gap for TP or even Navajo/Seneca/Chieftain etc. Most places seem to want 700 hours for those jobs. So I (and many others, I assume) need to bridge the gap from 250 or so to 700. I have ruled out FI for now, because it's expensive and a lot of chief captains don't seem to think that watching someone else flying a C152 around the circuit is going to be too beneficial. Which pretty much leaves para-dropping and aerial photography. Have any other bright ideas?
Thx for the good work on the forums
P
PS
All instructors out there, don't jump on me for the FI comment. I actually believe it would make me a better pilot, but my words were based on what I have heard from the horse's mouth.
How I see it, its just the thin edge of a wedge, and it benefits those that can afford it.
In no other profession do you pay for practicing your profession, which is what you are doing in effect when flying those passengers in that 737. You are being used as CHEAP LABOR. You might not feel that way, but the airline isn't a charity - thats exactly what you are doing - being used.
Those that condone this should really think about the situation. It's all fine for some to say "100 hours is OK" but "500hrs is too much" - sounds like desperate justification to me.
And I came up "the old way".
In no other profession do you pay for practicing your profession, which is what you are doing in effect when flying those passengers in that 737. You are being used as CHEAP LABOR. You might not feel that way, but the airline isn't a charity - thats exactly what you are doing - being used.
Those that condone this should really think about the situation. It's all fine for some to say "100 hours is OK" but "500hrs is too much" - sounds like desperate justification to me.
And I came up "the old way".
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: europe
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hello,
another problem I can see in this "pay to work"nasty scam, in the case of a commercial/airliners involved in an accident, a crash....
If they find out that the copilot was still paying to log hours, it means he is a student and not a fully first officer responsible of his acts, and in this case the company will be held responsible to let "student" pilots fly on commercial aircrafts.
personaly, if you are "hiring"a student copilot.I would stop immediately.
I have heared that the FAA , for the same reason, has not authorized student pilots to fly charter's aircrafts in the USA.What about Canada?
if I was working for the CAA, for this only one good reason, I will not authorized pilots to act as a "student pilot" on aircraft with hundred of soul.
I do not say that a pilot paying is less"good" than a pilot fully paid, but a pilot paying is still a student and in this case can not be held responsible.
another problem I can see in this "pay to work"nasty scam, in the case of a commercial/airliners involved in an accident, a crash....
If they find out that the copilot was still paying to log hours, it means he is a student and not a fully first officer responsible of his acts, and in this case the company will be held responsible to let "student" pilots fly on commercial aircrafts.
personaly, if you are "hiring"a student copilot.I would stop immediately.
I have heared that the FAA , for the same reason, has not authorized student pilots to fly charter's aircrafts in the USA.What about Canada?
if I was working for the CAA, for this only one good reason, I will not authorized pilots to act as a "student pilot" on aircraft with hundred of soul.
I do not say that a pilot paying is less"good" than a pilot fully paid, but a pilot paying is still a student and in this case can not be held responsible.
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the student pilot has the relevant type rating, he or she is fully legal to fly the aircraft with passengers on board. You'll have to try harder than that, A320rider!
Scroggs
Scroggs
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: europe
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
scrogg, I agree with you, but If a pilot survive in a crash, I bet with you, he will turn his hat from pilot to student.
as a proof, you are not fully employed by an airline if you pay for your hours, and in this case, the CAA/ operator can be held responsible.
It is a concept hard to understand for a novice, but if you are sued by your passengers, you can say:" well guys, I am paying to fly, what do you expect?if you want fly with a good airline, why do not you fly with a company who do not hire students?if you have a problem with that, sue the CAA or the director of my "flight school" but not me, I have no income anyway, and I am fully in debt!!!"
all I can see: they have turned (with the help of the CAA)a company with multimillions $ aircraft to an flight school, with one captain and one student on board paying for his hours, and in the back 200-300 pax.
for me, this is totally illegal, and this kind of operation should be banned from our EU sky like the FAA did on their territory.
secondly, a copilot paying to log hours on a plane with PAX,does not act as a commercial pilot.Commercial license give the privilege to be paid.If you are not paid, you are acting as a privat pilot or as a student pilot and again this is not legal under CAA rules.
legally, you can not even log your hours!
as a proof, you are not fully employed by an airline if you pay for your hours, and in this case, the CAA/ operator can be held responsible.
It is a concept hard to understand for a novice, but if you are sued by your passengers, you can say:" well guys, I am paying to fly, what do you expect?if you want fly with a good airline, why do not you fly with a company who do not hire students?if you have a problem with that, sue the CAA or the director of my "flight school" but not me, I have no income anyway, and I am fully in debt!!!"
all I can see: they have turned (with the help of the CAA)a company with multimillions $ aircraft to an flight school, with one captain and one student on board paying for his hours, and in the back 200-300 pax.
for me, this is totally illegal, and this kind of operation should be banned from our EU sky like the FAA did on their territory.
secondly, a copilot paying to log hours on a plane with PAX,does not act as a commercial pilot.Commercial license give the privilege to be paid.If you are not paid, you are acting as a privat pilot or as a student pilot and again this is not legal under CAA rules.
legally, you can not even log your hours!
Last edited by A320rider; 17th Dec 2005 at 16:10.
Educated Hillbilly
While all complaining about paying for type ratings, the biggest contributory factor to why an SSTR seems so enticing is the fact instructors pay is so low. I traditionally objected to the idea of paying for a type rating; but for a good number of people, when you consider the pay cut you need to take to instruct full time, over the span of one year that is more than the price of a type rating. Furthermore alot of instructors still end up paying for a rating.