Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

FedEx buys TNT Express

Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

FedEx buys TNT Express

Old 7th Oct 2016, 17:30
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Globally where the money takes me
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you will find these are operating due to scheduled MX of the TNT/ASL 747s.
old freightdog is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2016, 00:25
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Globally
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really hope it will turn out well. I ve worked for TNT on the 747 fleet and i must admit it was one of the best jobs i ve ever had. Great people.
SkyHawk1985 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2016, 13:57
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OO-THB is back.
there was 3 round trip LGG-JFK with fedex 777, charters then
... so nothing is changed
Acid-drop is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2016, 13:24
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Belgium
Age: 57
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old Freightdog is right, it's because of scheduled MX on the wide body fleet and ASL could not refuse Fedex aircraft which were offered. it created a lot of problems as Fedex would not take grooms on these flights, all horses offloaded.
Bob the Dog is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2016, 18:06
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Globally where the money takes me
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that policy for US operated A/C not to take jumpseaters? Oh well, at the least the poor horses had a great time at `Horse Hotel´ at LGG; whilst the poor groomers probably drowned at the Park Inn :o)
old freightdog is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2016, 10:22
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by old freightdog
Is that policy for US operated A/C not to take jumpseaters? Oh well, at the least the poor horses had a great time at `Horse Hotel´ at LGG; whilst the poor groomers probably drowned at the Park Inn :o)
In FedEx that's a long and complicated story, trust me! I suspect the issue here was the fact the B777 does not have a fortified cockpit door unlike the other fleet types.
Flightmech is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2016, 10:33
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kopavogur
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the grooms are on the General Declaration, no need for fortified doors on a freighter. at least not on EASA registered aircraft. But then again, some airlines have completely succombed to paranoia and xenofobism.
Icelanta is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2016, 08:12
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Globally where the money takes me
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Fedex just anounced massive expansion at CDG, what does that mean for LGG? Same question applies for CGN, where FX only plays second fiddle to UPS and always suffers as a result. With the Paris expansion, I doubt CGN will have much of a future (at least no further expansion) , except as a primary gateway for Germany perhaps.
But what about LGG with the expansion in Paris? Will it still be there in 11 years?
old freightdog is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2016, 08:26
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It smels very bad for CGN and bad enough (but) for LGG ...
Apparently, With the TNT merge, they promissed to keep LGG as a "significant operation" for 10-years while “avoid significant job reductions" (so they promissed that on behalf of ASL ?)
but on long term ... it's all about politics

(btw, now is THE time for the carex project, using high speed trains between LGG and CDG)
EURO CAREX : Cargo Rail Express

Last edited by Acid-drop; 19th Oct 2016 at 08:42.
Acid-drop is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2016, 09:23
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Globally where the money takes me
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Acid-drop
It smels very bad for CGN and bad enough (but) for LGG ...
Apparently, With the TNT merge, they promissed to keep LGG as a "significant operation" for 10-years while “avoid significant job reductions" (so they promissed that on behalf of ASL ?)
but on long term ... it's all about politics

(btw, now is THE time for the carex project, using high speed trains between LGG and CDG)
EURO CAREX : Cargo Rail Express
Haha, I like that one, I remember NT years ago had a picture of the train with a TNT logo on the front in his office...... What goes around comes around. I think there is a future for LGG with FX, but perhaps focused on longhaul. Now how you get the freight there is another subject (Train perhaps, but I doubt it): but on the other hand, FX flies tripples from CGN to CDG, so why not to LGG at 8K FT.
old freightdog is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2018, 07:17
  #111 (permalink)  
gtf
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Here today, elsewhere tomorrow
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't have a crystal ball, can't predict the future, but under FedEx the past has been good for LGG. Since taking over, FedEx spent €100 million renovating/upgrading the sort, employment, routes, and fleet have gone up. Also LGG is a stop on the West-bound RTW (MEM-SEA-ANC-PVG-LGG-MEM). Rumors are West Atlantic has a contract to add 4 B378s (first one is confirmed/onsite), and FedEx is to work with the airport to expand the apron. Last year, FedEx announced the goal is LGG the highest performing Euro sort, so maybe year 11 could be good. Otoh FedEx still trucking from CGN US-origin containers...
gtf is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.