|
Originally Posted by fire wall
(Post 11686997)
zero impact?
airframe utilisation at record lows. airframe replacement slowed airframe age increasing = tax depreciation schedule deminishing Aircrew head count >1200 less than precovid. (senior crew ie experience levels) Airbus crew doing 100 hrs/ month , some with 3 months off a year as a result route structure at same levels serviced in 2008 in most areas. Group daily pax numbers at 2008 levels CX stock price at $7.99, last time that was seen was seen was 30 April 2009 These figures are readily available so why do you bother ? They didnt just commit a ungodly act of the goose that laid the golden egg, they then plucked it, cut it's bloody head off and dropped it in a pot of boiling water just to make sure the plucker was dead. yeah and terrible financial performance to boot. Oh wait….. |
Originally Posted by fire wall
(Post 11686997)
zero impact?
airframe utilisation at record lows. airframe replacement slowed airframe age increasing = tax depreciation schedule deminishing Aircrew head count >1200 less than precovid. (senior crew ie experience levels) Airbus crew doing 100 hrs/ month , some with 3 months off a year as a result route structure at same levels serviced in 2008 in most areas. Group daily pax numbers at 2008 levels CX stock price at $7.99, last time that was seen was seen was 30 April 2009 These figures are readily available so why do you bother ? They didnt just commit a ungodly act of the goose that laid the golden egg, they then plucked it, cut it's bloody head off and dropped it in a pot of boiling water just to make sure the plucker was dead. |
Originally Posted by cadetjockey
(Post 11687478)
yeah and terrible financial performance to boot. Oh wait…..
hedging, anyone? |
Completely maxing out guys on hours, pay isn’t keeping up with cost rises . Calls on days off , all of their own making
|
Originally Posted by Babyjet_dododo
(Post 11687872)
Rostering must not like me as I’ve reached the limit and getting calls from CC saying I must not depart before this particular time or throw me in at an outport for days on end.
odd that CC would call you when you told us you already left…. |
Originally Posted by cadetjockey
(Post 11689038)
odd that CC would call you when you told us you already left….
|
Originally Posted by cadetjockey
(Post 11689038)
odd that CC would call you when you told us you already left….
|
Any day now that implosion is coming…
Hong Kong’s Cathay Pacific to buy back HK$9.7 billion worth of preference shares from government as part of its bailout package
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...res-government |
Originally Posted by Climbpowder
(Post 11689203)
You dont understand, CC is so desperate that keeps calling people who left already... :}
|
|
|
Numbers are on the table. Care to elaborate?
|
Originally Posted by Sisiphos
(Post 11775840)
Numbers are on the table. Care to elaborate?
|
Whatever lets you sleep at night…..
Meanwhile, in reality, it’s a shell of its former self that now exists as a low cost carrier and a cautionary tale to corporate mismanagement and greed. A once great name reduced in stature to a stepping stone for inexperienced pilots within the airline industry. |
Come on ladies, be a good sport and accept defeat gracefully. You were wrong, it's obvious by now.
|
Cathay started imploding as far as Ts & Cs go, back in 1993 when B scales were allowed to be introduced.
Not that there was much choice. But look back - that’s when the rot set in. Everything we see now in CX can be traced back to decisions made then. Even back then the management style was pretty toxic. Sounds like it’s got worse. |
Originally Posted by Sisiphos
(Post 11775840)
Numbers are on the table. Care to elaborate?
Every CX pilot knows it is. |
Sisiphos:
I previously asked what numbers are on the table? Various media reports claim the Cathay GROUP (including HK Express) will reach 100% of its pre-pandemic "flight capacity" by January, implying things will be back to "normal". However, the monthly traffic figures for Cathay Pacific (the airline) show there's another side to the story. Cathay Pacific traffic figures for Oct 2024 (available on its website and also released by the HK Stock Exchange) show the available capacity to/from Europe was 60% of the pre-pandemic (ie Oct 2019) capacity. For North America the capacity was 73%, South West Pacific (ie Australia, New Zealand) 89%, and South Asia/Middle East/Africa 63%. The GROUP might well operate 100% of the NUMBER of pre-pandemic flights by January, but long-haul capacity is still well down on pre-pandemic levels. The airline is clearly not "imploding" as some have speculated, but the data shows that full recovery is still some way off. |
Fair point
|
I have a feeling this is just a way to retaliate back on the Airport CEO's comment, in reality, CX is no where near pre-pandemic level by next Jan / H1 2025. Will see.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:19. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.