PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Fragrant Harbour (https://www.pprune.org/fragrant-harbour-19/)
-   -   Direct Entry FO (https://www.pprune.org/fragrant-harbour/592464-direct-entry-fo.html)

Luggage 16th Apr 2017 03:10


Originally Posted by mrfox (Post 9741730)
No, you sound exactly like how we imagine a RJ pilot would sound. Good job.

At least an RJ pilot has flying skills, unlike your lot, proven failures when it comes to hand flying. Children of the magenta. Good job.:D

SkewedFlaps 16th Apr 2017 03:41

Luggage a.k.a sky god

You are a mess.

pfvspnf 16th Apr 2017 05:37

Ok last one before I stop feeding the troll ..

You go on about how good your hand flying is , do you really think the rest of us have passed our OPCs , recurrent sims, command interviews and any other evaluations by not being able to fly the jet raw data ?

These are serious attitude problems that a psychometric test can easily weed out !

Do yourself a favour, take a breath, calm the **c* down and get off the high horse as soon as possible, it won't do you any good , not in Cx not anywhere!

Trafalgar 16th Apr 2017 05:48

No, let him stew in his own juices. Latest candidate for the aviation Darwin Award.

cxorcist 16th Apr 2017 05:50


Originally Posted by pfvspnf (Post 9741922)
Ok last one before I stop feeding the troll ..

You go on about how good your hand flying is , do you really think the rest of us have passed our OPCs , recurrent sims, command interviews and any other evaluations by not being able to fly the jet raw data ?

These are serious attitude problems that a psychometric test can easily weed out !

Do yourself a favour, take a breath, calm the **c* down and get off the high horse as soon as possible, it won't do you any good , not in Cx not anywhere!

You're ridiculous! The standards on raw data flying for CX SOs is almost zero. Why would you need to be able to do that? You don't sit in the seat for takeoff and landing. Shut the **c* up. You sound ridiculous. Truly!

pfvspnf 16th Apr 2017 06:17

So there's another one ? What's your beef ? Fired ?

I can't comment on Cx SOs and their training program. I'm sure they do just fine whilst upgrading and being check to line.

For the rest of us , most of us fly manual sims, hell I've done visual approaches and auto thrust off many many times, what are you trying to prove ? That you can fly ? In an emergency you are the type of people I certainly don't want flying the jet .

Trafalgar 16th Apr 2017 06:28

handbags at dawn.....

Natca 16th Apr 2017 14:02


Originally Posted by cxorcist (Post 9741931)
You're ridiculous! The standards on raw data flying for CX SOs is almost zero. Why would you need to be able to do that? You don't sit in the seat for takeoff and landing. Shut the **c* up. You sound ridiculous. Truly!

I agree actually with this post, the standards from the cad and some individuals have zero hand flying ability, yes. However the cx program and grading scale usually will catch up and gobble these stagglerd up somewhere before their ql. Just depends on how willing cx is to push these people through. There is quite a wash out rate towards the end of adelaide, some habe been washing out in the first 6 months aswell. After that the issues pop up around the ql mark. Still the let them fly its just how long.

Luggage 16th Apr 2017 16:57


Originally Posted by pfvspnf (Post 9741941)
So there's another one ? What's your beef ? Fired ?

I can't comment on Cx SOs and their training program. I'm sure they do just fine whilst upgrading and being check to line.

For the rest of us , most of us fly manual sims, hell I've done visual approaches and auto thrust off many many times, what are you trying to prove ? That you can fly ? In an emergency you are the type of people I certainly don't want flying the jet .

Hahahahha told!!! People working there saying how rubbish you guys are.

You and Mr Fox as well as AFDUS and co really need to stop talking now.

Hahahahahahha

Luggage 16th Apr 2017 17:00


Originally Posted by pfvspnf (Post 9741922)
Ok last one before I stop feeding the troll ..

You go on about how good your hand flying is , do you really think the rest of us have passed our OPCs , recurrent sims, command interviews and any other evaluations by not being able to fly the jet raw data ?

These are serious attitude problems that a psychometric test can easily weed out !

Do yourself a favour, take a breath, calm the **c* down and get off the high horse as soon as possible, it won't do you any good , not in Cx not anywhere!

Yeah Im sure you are a regular top gun. Psychometric testing...please give it a rest you whinging crybaby.

Millenial snowflake generation are we!!

Luggage 16th Apr 2017 17:07


Originally Posted by pfvspnf (Post 9741941)
So there's another one ? What's your beef ? Fired ?

I can't comment on Cx SOs and their training program. I'm sure they do just fine whilst upgrading and being check to line.

For the rest of us , most of us fly manual sims, hell I've done visual approaches and auto thrust off many many times, what are you trying to prove ? That you can fly ? In an emergency you are the type of people I certainly don't want flying the jet .

Errr yes, flying is the whole point unlike you magenta boy!! The whole point of an emergency when the plane is broken is too fly it safely to the ground and land, manually if necessary when the AP is on the frity and nothing works

Wow you are the last person who should be behind the controls of a jet, especially with people on board.

Emergencies dont always go according to CX SOP genius, you might have to FLY!!!

MACH.88 16th Apr 2017 20:21

You guys are wasting my bandwidth!

MACH.88 :cool:

Callsign Kilo 16th Apr 2017 20:58

Good God, grow up. Willy waving at its finest. Who cares if you can 'hand fly the jet?' It's a pre-requisite. What about why CX is going down the sh1t pan?

Ace Man 17th Apr 2017 07:53

Reading the trash right here is why CX is going the direction it is - self righteous, self entitled pr!cks having a d!ck measuring contest. Exactly the right recipe for cockpit CRM.

crwkunt roll 17th Apr 2017 10:08


Just depends on how willing cx is to push these people through.
It's not hard to pass a QL these days. I have read a few recent QL check reports which did not recommend a "pass", yet Bloggs has been released.

JayTee777300 4th May 2017 17:49

.............https://samesidessupportforstraights...tedquickly.jpg

badge 12th May 2017 14:58

Anyone have information on the DEFO assessment?? :)

flybywire73747 20th May 2017 14:05

I've been through the DEFO process if anyone wants to pm questions

cxorcist 20th May 2017 18:31

How generous! Please let everyone know how cut in front of our SOs and simultaneously help solve CX's problems with regard to the training ban. I'm sure everyone is going to welcome you with open arms to CX. Have a nice career in HK!

altiplano 20th May 2017 19:51

Wow seems like a nice bunch...

Average Fool 20th May 2017 20:17


Originally Posted by cxorcist (Post 9777119)
How generous! Please let everyone know how cut in front of our SOs and simultaneously help solve CX's problems with regard to the training ban. I'm sure everyone is going to welcome you with open arms to CX. Have a nice career in HK!

Dont flame him. This pilot group allowed this to happen. Rolled over like a _______

Just like B scale
Just like the 49ers
Just like DECs
Just like HKPA
Just like _______

"I doesn't affect me, why should I care"

cxorcist 20th May 2017 21:02


Originally Posted by Average Fool (Post 9777190)
Dont flame him. This pilot group allowed this to happen. Rolled over like a _______

Just like B scale
Just like the 49ers
Just like DECs
Just like HKPA
Just like _______

"I doesn't affect me, why should I care"

Fair enough, but don't expect me to role out the red carpet. These guys get sectors sparingly, the worst rest, and the privilege of juniority forever.

Types? A330 regional grind or 747F hodgepodge of two-man middle of the night crap with massive disruption. Bases? Forget about it. Never going to happen for #3200+ on HKPA. Package? Attractive on paper, but if you're not factoring in the cost of living in HK, you are IMC in the cockpit. It's simply not enough unless you are single, married with a working wife sans kids, or you can live with your parents at their place in HK.

But by all means, join! Being a part of the solution to CX's industrial problems will feel great, especially after you have been sufficiently screwed over and realize how much CX actually despises you for being a pilot.

altiplano 20th May 2017 21:45

Good luck.

Trafalgar 20th May 2017 23:47

..."we all can get jaded".... Oh, I assure you, you will. :ugh:

altiplano 21st May 2017 03:22

. . . . . . .

betpump5 21st May 2017 19:17


Bottom line is I'm trying to get an understanding of how my current employer really compares. .
And you haven't got that yet from any of the threads written on this forum in the last 5 years?

Or just couldnt be arsed to read back? Either way if join, your D.O.J will be known to everyone. Don't expect to gain many friends when you join during a training ban and with relations with the company at an all time low. Previous guys who joined during the recruiting ban still living under the stigma.

cxorcist 21st May 2017 19:27

betpump,

Why do we even bother? It's like we are speaking different languages. These guys will turn the job into whatever they want it to be in their minds, only to be the next round of bitter and disenfranchised HKAOA pilots. The cost of HK living cannot be fully appreciated until it has been experienced. Perception is reality, and to many HK and CX still represent a decades old legacy of pilot glamour and affluence. The allure is wearing off fast for those with open eyes, but for those who are wanting to believe, it just doesn't matter. Maybe Islam and 70 virgins will be attractive for them in the future as well.

altiplano 22nd May 2017 17:03

Little children with no substance.

Pathetic.

Springbok614 26th May 2017 13:52

Confirm a current SO has higher seniority than a DEFO?

TurningFinalRWY36 26th May 2017 14:33


Originally Posted by Springbok614 (Post 9783433)
Confirm a current SO has higher seniority than a DEFO?

Yes. All based on DOJ. Seniority is what matters for command

AQIS Boigu 26th May 2017 19:54


Originally Posted by Springbok614 (Post 9783433)
Confirm a current SO has higher seniority than a DEFO?

Yes and so he/she should!!!

For anyone thinking about joining - you will have about 1700 (!!!) pilots ahead of you if you join today. Do the numbers...(not just time to upgrade but also your household budget).

Springbok614 26th May 2017 21:09


Originally Posted by AQIS Boigu (Post 9783754)
Yes and so he/she should!!!

For anyone thinking about joining - you will have about 1700 (!!!) pilots ahead of you if you join today. Do the numbers...(not just time to upgrade but also your household budget).

It is an absolute no brainer to not go there as an experienced airline pilot...

The idea years ago to join the TT programme as a pilot with actual experience and be on the level with Ab-initio- and Advanced Cadets did not sit well either.

DOJ is the measure though and I feel for the SOs waiting in line in turn while DEFO are hired.

The Visionary 27th May 2017 03:48

S/Os are being bypassed for upgrades as well as F/Os. Seniority means absolutely nothing at this place. Tons of people in the Cat D/B status and with loads of experience. Go have a look at the list and see what dates of hire some F/Os have. It will shock you. The company uses upgrades/promotions as a tool against its crews. The assesment is biased and totally ridiculous. It's also lucky whom you get but we have standards right-RUBBISH.

I hate to say this, we do have some really switched on people, but we also have a lot of "F" tards in the left, well all, seats. Training here is embarrasing at best and God help you if you get a writer or a sim instructor who thinks he's a checker! Concorde boy, now on 777, is a real doozy and more so his boss who had to explain himself in Oz for doing bizzare things.

Look, this Fragrant forum is full of what this place is now. It's FUBAR-period. It's not even fun anymore. We used to say "get away from Hong Kong" but now the stench is everywhere. Like Emirates, people are leaving just to get away from the dysfunction and inbreeding.

Hong Kong is also being overrun by cockroaches and it will get on your nerves. It's also, expensive, polluted and THE EFFING NOSIEST PLACE ON THE PLANET!

Time to leave.

FU CAD

CCA 27th May 2017 08:53

Have any direct entry FOs actually joined CX yet?

AQIS Boigu 27th May 2017 11:41

There is any easy way to keep an eye on it. Last time round CX hired DEFOs (10-11 years ago) about 20% got the sack during the training - this should improve since the Rottweiler didn't get extended.

744drv 27th May 2017 14:15

Just take a look at the last seniority list: there are at least a dozen FOs in the 'SO territory'. There are even a couple of FOs on the last page of the seniority list. Some are sufficiently green to not hide their names from the list!

Sqwak7700 27th May 2017 20:05


Some are sufficiently green to not hide their names from the list!
Why do they need to hide?

betpump5 27th May 2017 20:38


Originally Posted by Sqwak7700 (Post 9784703)
Why do they need to hide?

If I had joined the company as a DEFO during a time when it was globally known that relations with the company is at an all time low, and that the concept of DEFO is to get around CC/TB I would certainly want to hide.

Captain Dart 27th May 2017 21:53

I want to know because I doubt the mental competence of anyone who would join this outfit at the current time and under the conditions on offer.

Natca 27th May 2017 22:25


Originally Posted by CCA (Post 9784132)
Have any direct entry FOs actually joined CX yet?

There have been 5 to date including one re-hire


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:11.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.