Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

fo/fo's sacked?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Dec 2006, 02:33
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a bunch of Hypocrites
Here we have the GMA and ex CP777 openly boasting about renting for the full housing allowance (68K ++) off a shelf company they own whilst at the same time the company goes and sacks two senior F/O's one who is renting and the other with a mortgage. Just unbelievable!!
When will the company get over this whole housing fiasco and just let the pilots get on with their jobs without fear and intimidation? Surely since this is paid as a cash allowance, taxed as a cash allowance it sould be just that, a CASH allowance.
To go and fire two pilots with a new born and a two year old right before christmas, both with good flying records for how they live their lives after they hang up their uniforms is just outragous.
You may try and control every facet of our professional lives but for god sake leave pilots personal lives out of it.
Fed Up

Last edited by SOUTHPAC; 10th Dec 2006 at 04:13.
SOUTHPAC is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 04:12
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gweriniaeth Cymru
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To go back to the main debate:

"Eligible employees who own a residential accommodation in Hong Kong for self-occupation are considered as home owner-occupiers. They are eligible for housing assistance under the specified terms and conditions.......will form part of the employees’ total taxable income."

Back in the real world the practice of purchasing a property that you don't live in, and to rent it out for personal gain might be considered 'fraudulent' under CX policy. This behaviour would perhaps be classified akin to gross misconduct, rather than - There, there, you didn't understand all the big words like "owner-occupiers", so we'll let you off. Get real!
N1 Vibes is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 04:17
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
N1 Vibes, i dont really get your gist, she NEVER rented a property out that CX was paying for, she just chose to spend most of her time with her boyfriend whilst maintain some sort of security for herself
SOUTHPAC is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 04:21
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gweriniaeth Cymru
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ACMS
I've just flown with friends of the sacked FO's
They were warned around a year ago through a letter to all crew from the GMA regarding this exact situation "not being acceptable and any person doing it could face the sack" ( or words to those effect ). They chose to ignore it saying "it doesn't effect us"
They lived together and had a family together.( as proved by a private investigator the company hired )
I believe the male FO rented a place which CX paid for, in which they all lived.
The female bought a place which CX paid the mortgage on, then they rented it out. tripple dipping it seems?
I feel really sorry for them being sacked, maybe a bit harsh? They could have paid the money back as in another case earlier.
But they were warned by the GMA and their friends but chose to keep there heads in the sand.
I hope they get atleast one job back on appeal.
Good luck to them
Cheers.
SOUTHPAC,

I guess this guy and his 3 colleagues must all be wrong. My mistake!
N1 Vibes is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 04:28
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
N1 Vibes, You know what the CX rumour mill is like!!, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that she never rented her place out whilst CX was paying for it. As I mentioned earlier she was never even accused of that by management.

If she did, like you I would have no sympathy, but she didnt so lets put that rumour to rest
SOUTHPAC is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 04:49
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SOUTHPAC
What a bunch of Hypocrites
Here we have the GMA and ex CP777 openly boasting about renting for the full housing allowance (68K ++) off a shelf company they own whilst at the same time the company goes and sacks two senior F/O's one who is renting and the other with a mortgage. Just unbelievable!!
When will the company get over this whole housing fiasco and just let the pilots get on with their jobs without fear and intimidation? Surely since this is paid as a cash allowance, taxed as a cash allowance it sould be just that, a CASH allowance.
To go and fire two pilots with a new born and a two year old right before christmas, both with good flying records for how they live their lives after they hang up their uniforms is just outragous.
You may try and control every facet of our professional lives but for god sake leave pilots personal lives out of it.
Fed Up
Nice job, CX They will be better off ultimately. I just hope that any future prospective employers realise being sacked by CX should be a badge of honor; this place never ceases to amaze me. Bravo! What do you do for an encore... on second thought, forget I asked!
hog tied is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 13:09
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: asia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This would be almost funny if you guys weren't so pathetic.
49er is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2006, 09:23
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Standby--- the fire works on this one are about to go off

Last edited by SOUTHPAC; 18th Dec 2006 at 02:42.
SOUTHPAC is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2006, 10:54
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sweden
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Worlds Most Admired Airline"

Achievements for 2006

No profit share
2 * Female pilots sacked after their second pregnancy
1 * attempted suicide after a line check with MFL
25 * US pilots resigned to go back to US carriers
A couple fired for having kids without CX approva
Another South African married couple leaving because of CX intrusion in their personal lives
Un-Lawfull dismissal declared by "the House of Lords"
And only five years ago sacked 49 guys for "no particular reason"

Whats next

"Nick Rhodes awarded nobel peace prize"???????
svengoren is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2006, 13:46
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....this just in...."Nick Rhodes awarded nobel peace prize"!
When will people learn...you are not an employee but merely a contract worker who they can terminate at anytime. They are fantastic business managers who have not a clue when it comes to people. It will catch up to them shortly!
cpdude is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2006, 15:46
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone remember the scene in "Dances with Wolves" where a Col who was obviously nuts (presumably wielding power over many suboordinates, yet completely unbalanced and unchecked) sends Costner to a remote unmanned post? As Costner carries on his orders he hears the muffled shot from inside that turns out to be said Col shooting himself in the head.

That Col is not unlike many of the powers that be in CX. Don't understand the connection? Watch the movie, and then work for CX for awhile and you will.
hog tied is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2006, 04:57
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gweriniaeth Cymru
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this about the principle or the money?

If it's about the principle, then those of you here who have worked for CX for some time will realise that they are in business for profit, therefore CX won't change.

If it's about the money, then the right honourable gentleman/lady should refer to the answer given some moments ago!

If you have already written your letter of resignation in disgust at the treatment of these people we could class you as a 'giver'

If you've been working for CX for years and not made any individual moves to defend perceived injustices in a public forum then we could class you as 'taker's'?

Reflect.
N1 Vibes is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2006, 16:58
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dunno

Wa ? Ten characters worth
Five Green is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2007, 11:16
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NC:
You and I have been around a long time. You know our COS is not worth the paper it is written on. So to have it in our COS means nothing.
We are supposed to have a D&G procedure in our COS. How many times have it been followed? Does peanut throwing warrant a D&G?
Two pilots just got fired over some housing fiasco. They got one letter sayin they were fired. Then underneath the first letter were two more letters. The 2nd letter was his first appeal with the decision still to be terminated. The 3rd letter was his second appeal already written out with the same decision. They got all the letters at one time.
The Conditions of Service at Cathay Pacific is worth Sh!tt

Bloggs,
Thanks for mentioning the two pilots fired recently, its a shame we can forget it so quickly. You are right their D&G, appeal, Final appeal was an absolute joke but you heard it first here there is about to be some major headlines on this one!, Standby

Just to show you how the company is sticking to your COS Mr Rhodes proudly anounced at a C & T meeting ( I was there) two weeks before JR's final appeal that he was fired. Natural Justice I dont think so!!
Last edited by SOUTHPAC : Today at 11:57.
SOUTHPAC is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2007, 11:32
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Mr. R, what a human. Still sleeps at night though. Does not take any responsibility in the deaths of England and Bennett (two of our 49ers).

It’s what real Swire Princes are made of. Glad to see Swire Pacific hires the best.

I am sure his family is proud. Ask him at the next command dinner.
Mr. Bloggs is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 12:55
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GC Paradise
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
In the old days the company had a Policy called Leave Flatting.

This meant that when you were on leave or otherwise and not using your house, you rented it out and put the rent money in your pocket.

The company's Housing Section facilitated this process and not only found temporary tenants for you, they also collected the rent and gave it to you. All the time you also collected your normal CX housing allowance.

My how times have changed...
FlexibleResponse is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 13:44
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

It all because some Swire Prince heard someone in a bar saying they were doing this deal.

Like I said, Swire Pacific hires the best. A real compassionate group.

Last edited by Mr. Bloggs; 16th Jan 2007 at 00:03.
Mr. Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 06:43
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, The same little Swine that was placed by his sidekick rhodes strategically next to JR at his command dinner to try and illicit more information.

Beware of this little prick, he's not the gentleman his old man was and lacks his intelligence so in typical swine fashion is climbing the ladder by ruthlessly screwing peoples lives

SOUTHPAC
SOUTHPAC is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2007, 09:09
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sweden
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didnt take long for the vulchar to get his reward did it, nice cushy job as aircrew recruitment manager
svengoren is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.