Standardisation ?
Thread Starter
Standardisation ?
How do you tackle the PPL holder who is adding further qualifications to his licence (eg night/imc rating) who has flown with several different organisations (including the UAS!) and seems to have every counter arguement imaginable when you make a comment on his operation.
Example:-
1. Starts to do the pre start chex from memory and when I ask him why he does not use the checklist tells me that a previous instructor/school had told him its safer to use memory. We than start with the fuel selector off and the engine stops as we start to taxi (I decided to let this scenario develop!). I then suggested it might have been better to use the checklist!
2.Taxing out to night fly at GA airfielfd with minimal apron/taxi lighting so he, quite rightly, uses the landing light but then leaves it on for the power check (I asked him to switch it off) and then wants to leave it on when at the holding point with an aircraft landing with potential to affect night vision of landing pilot. When I commented on his he told me that previous instructors had told him to leave the landing light on AT ALL TIMES.
Its not so much the specific issue of the landing light etc. but how you deal with issues such as this without appearing to be "nitpicking". Any ideas? How do you get pilots who seem very entrenched in one way of doing everything to use some original thought?
Example:-
1. Starts to do the pre start chex from memory and when I ask him why he does not use the checklist tells me that a previous instructor/school had told him its safer to use memory. We than start with the fuel selector off and the engine stops as we start to taxi (I decided to let this scenario develop!). I then suggested it might have been better to use the checklist!
2.Taxing out to night fly at GA airfielfd with minimal apron/taxi lighting so he, quite rightly, uses the landing light but then leaves it on for the power check (I asked him to switch it off) and then wants to leave it on when at the holding point with an aircraft landing with potential to affect night vision of landing pilot. When I commented on his he told me that previous instructors had told him to leave the landing light on AT ALL TIMES.
Its not so much the specific issue of the landing light etc. but how you deal with issues such as this without appearing to be "nitpicking". Any ideas? How do you get pilots who seem very entrenched in one way of doing everything to use some original thought?
Why do it if it's not fun?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I fly with someone else's student, I often find myself suggesting different ways of doing things. I always try to point out (at the time if appropriate, or else in the debrief) that my way isn't necessarilly better than the other way, it's just a different way..... the student, being an intelligent human being, can listen to my reasons, listen to other instructors' reasons, and make up his own mind which method suits him best.
Not sure how well this would work with your student, who sounds (from your description) to be obstinate, and who also appears to be plain wrong in both your examples. But it might seem less confrontational than simply telling him that he's plain wrong?
If that doesn't work, you could try the other extreme, and be more confrontational. When he is captain, he can run the flight the way he likes, but since you are captain for this flight, the flight will be done your way, and that includes using checklists and turning the landing light off whenever stationary.
Please let us know how this turns out - I'm interested!
FFF
-------------
Not sure how well this would work with your student, who sounds (from your description) to be obstinate, and who also appears to be plain wrong in both your examples. But it might seem less confrontational than simply telling him that he's plain wrong?
If that doesn't work, you could try the other extreme, and be more confrontational. When he is captain, he can run the flight the way he likes, but since you are captain for this flight, the flight will be done your way, and that includes using checklists and turning the landing light off whenever stationary.
Please let us know how this turns out - I'm interested!
FFF
-------------
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
1 Post
Ah but if students didn't argue with you how would you ever find out what your fellow instructors teach?
Standardisation = finding out how different you all are
Seriously though I find that when I come up with something that a student or PPL I'm flying with hasn't heard before, they're usually interested and appreciative.
Standardisation = finding out how different you all are
Seriously though I find that when I come up with something that a student or PPL I'm flying with hasn't heard before, they're usually interested and appreciative.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How can it be wrong to have the landing light on at the hold.
In 300odd hours of night flying i have always had the landing light on at the hold, it is all to easy not to notice the aircraft creeping forward because the brake has not been applied sufficiently by student. Next thing prop smacks a taxi light.
Even when on final i always found the airfield apron flood lights more of a distraction especially when chucking down with rain than the aircraft holding.
To get a point over demonstrate what happens if a particular procedure is not followed.
Have had many a Pa28 pilot, let alone student have simulated engine failure due to the elec. pump not being switched on!
In 300odd hours of night flying i have always had the landing light on at the hold, it is all to easy not to notice the aircraft creeping forward because the brake has not been applied sufficiently by student. Next thing prop smacks a taxi light.
Even when on final i always found the airfield apron flood lights more of a distraction especially when chucking down with rain than the aircraft holding.
To get a point over demonstrate what happens if a particular procedure is not followed.
Have had many a Pa28 pilot, let alone student have simulated engine failure due to the elec. pump not being switched on!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 26000 to 28,000 lightyears from the galatic centre
Age: 77
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BEB
Depends on where you are mate!
Have you ever landed at night at a small strip such as Andrewsfield or Elmset? places like that do not have apron lights,
unlike say Southend or Norwich which you can see 40 miles away.
At the small strip you have the basic runway lights, Red /Green end/ threshold lights, VASI(maybe) and the airfield beacon only. (and that’s on a good day when its all servicable)
Its a hard job even to see the runway from downwind.
A landing or taxi light pointing up the approach can be very distracting and the other night caused me to goaround from the round out as I was blinded by a taxiing C152.
I try and teach a 'common sense' approach and awareness to what is going on around you. At small strips the taxiway can be very close to the active runway, so any A/c taxiing to the hold will need his lights on as we do not have lit taxiways. However then its good manners to stop and switch the main lights off when a landing aircraft is on short finals or to turn away from the approach line. The approaching A/C can see your nav lights/beacon and you have 2 way radio contact so there is no risk.
Depends on where you are mate!
Have you ever landed at night at a small strip such as Andrewsfield or Elmset? places like that do not have apron lights,
unlike say Southend or Norwich which you can see 40 miles away.
At the small strip you have the basic runway lights, Red /Green end/ threshold lights, VASI(maybe) and the airfield beacon only. (and that’s on a good day when its all servicable)
Its a hard job even to see the runway from downwind.
A landing or taxi light pointing up the approach can be very distracting and the other night caused me to goaround from the round out as I was blinded by a taxiing C152.
I try and teach a 'common sense' approach and awareness to what is going on around you. At small strips the taxiway can be very close to the active runway, so any A/c taxiing to the hold will need his lights on as we do not have lit taxiways. However then its good manners to stop and switch the main lights off when a landing aircraft is on short finals or to turn away from the approach line. The approaching A/C can see your nav lights/beacon and you have 2 way radio contact so there is no risk.
FFB, I think your specific problem lies with the fact that there is not only is a lack of standardisation in training organisations, there is also a lack of standardisation amongst the students! Sounds like you are trying to teach a smart@rse.
They pop up occaisionally, even in heavily standardised organisations like the RAF. Letting him make mistakes after he's told you what others have tought him is the best policy IMHO. After a while, his slow progress will hurt his wallet and he may decide to follow your advice.
There is of course the danger that he may give up. Some may throw up their hands in horror at this notion, but in my experience this level of 'smart@rsedness' goes hand in hand with overconfidence. I had experience of once chap like this. We persevered with him and got him through his training, and eventually he joined out aircraft syndicate - despite my protestations. He subsequently proved me correct by crashing our aeroplane!
They pop up occaisionally, even in heavily standardised organisations like the RAF. Letting him make mistakes after he's told you what others have tought him is the best policy IMHO. After a while, his slow progress will hurt his wallet and he may decide to follow your advice.
There is of course the danger that he may give up. Some may throw up their hands in horror at this notion, but in my experience this level of 'smart@rsedness' goes hand in hand with overconfidence. I had experience of once chap like this. We persevered with him and got him through his training, and eventually he joined out aircraft syndicate - despite my protestations. He subsequently proved me correct by crashing our aeroplane!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: notts
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Standards
FireflyBob
I'm sure that you have raised this issue and now shortstripper has raised the use of checklists but on another thread the use of flaps in turns is argued - sum up to be not right or wrongs but part of the need for 'teaching' and not simply 'instructing'.
What are we teaching in all of this - I would hope an awareness of safety.
A standard is not always the best way in every situation but will always work and keep you out of trouble. As with the 'Standard Stall Recovery', not always the correct method for a 'type' but will work on just about all. The recovery technique for a particular type may mean disaster if applied to another different aeroplane.
Similarly the use of lights at night comes under 'good airmanship' and fireflybob is correct in my opinion and the best reasons have been amplified by orionsbelt. All professions have their standards which save a lot of wasted time and allow everyone to get on with the job without circular arguements - such as; "this what I do". "another Instructor told me something else", however in my experience very rarely true when you bottom it, it can often be what they prefer to remember was said - usually requiring the least amount of effort. So, don't fall for it!
For everyone else who disagrees - re-invent the wheel at your peril!
I'm sure that you have raised this issue and now shortstripper has raised the use of checklists but on another thread the use of flaps in turns is argued - sum up to be not right or wrongs but part of the need for 'teaching' and not simply 'instructing'.
What are we teaching in all of this - I would hope an awareness of safety.
A standard is not always the best way in every situation but will always work and keep you out of trouble. As with the 'Standard Stall Recovery', not always the correct method for a 'type' but will work on just about all. The recovery technique for a particular type may mean disaster if applied to another different aeroplane.
Similarly the use of lights at night comes under 'good airmanship' and fireflybob is correct in my opinion and the best reasons have been amplified by orionsbelt. All professions have their standards which save a lot of wasted time and allow everyone to get on with the job without circular arguements - such as; "this what I do". "another Instructor told me something else", however in my experience very rarely true when you bottom it, it can often be what they prefer to remember was said - usually requiring the least amount of effort. So, don't fall for it!
For everyone else who disagrees - re-invent the wheel at your peril!
Why do it if it's not fun?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I said, of FFB's student:
Well, if nothing else, I've learnt never to make such sweeping statements, because now others have come to the defence of the student in both scenarios - BigEndBob agrees with him re use of the landing light, and ShortStripper agrees re use of the checklist! 
Well, I will do exactly what I'd like my students to do - take on board all opinions, and then decide which works best for me. I still maintain that lights should be off when not moving (especially if heads are inside the aircraft, e.g. for power checks, when you are not looking outside to see who you are blinding), and that checklists should be used when on the ground because the benefits (less chance of missing something) far outweight the downsides (practically none, except maybe a few extra seconds and an extra piece of paper to carry with you), but you guys are quite entitled to your opinions too!
FFF
--------------
appears to be plain wrong in both your examples
Well, I will do exactly what I'd like my students to do - take on board all opinions, and then decide which works best for me. I still maintain that lights should be off when not moving (especially if heads are inside the aircraft, e.g. for power checks, when you are not looking outside to see who you are blinding), and that checklists should be used when on the ground because the benefits (less chance of missing something) far outweight the downsides (practically none, except maybe a few extra seconds and an extra piece of paper to carry with you), but you guys are quite entitled to your opinions too!
FFF
--------------
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Norfolk, England
Age: 58
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FFF,
I'm not against checklists as such ... just sweeping statements
However, on checklists .... I always seem to miss things when using a checklist that I don't when I ... well, don't! I have two hands, one holds the checklist, and the other donates a finger to mark progress down the list. The problem is that when said finger is removed to switch a switch or something, it invariable looses its place when it comes back to the list? Probably just me ... but it shows a checklist is not beyond the realms of missed items. In a simple aircraft, you can work around the cockpit, use mnemonics or just remember. I personally think checklists are best suited to two pilot operations where one reads and one checks. Mind you, I've not flown more complex types and I can see a checklist might be useful until familiar.
SS
I'm not against checklists as such ... just sweeping statements
However, on checklists .... I always seem to miss things when using a checklist that I don't when I ... well, don't! I have two hands, one holds the checklist, and the other donates a finger to mark progress down the list. The problem is that when said finger is removed to switch a switch or something, it invariable looses its place when it comes back to the list? Probably just me ... but it shows a checklist is not beyond the realms of missed items. In a simple aircraft, you can work around the cockpit, use mnemonics or just remember. I personally think checklists are best suited to two pilot operations where one reads and one checks. Mind you, I've not flown more complex types and I can see a checklist might be useful until familiar.
SS
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: notts
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Standards
There you go!
A Check List is just that. not a jobs list.
One massive advantage of checks by memory is that you do not know what you haven't checked and therefore a euphoric sense of a job well done remains.
You should complete a section then refer to the CHECK list for that section to ensure all is done.
A sloppy approach to the use of a standard does not undermine the value of it.
A Check List is just that. not a jobs list.
One massive advantage of checks by memory is that you do not know what you haven't checked and therefore a euphoric sense of a job well done remains.
You should complete a section then refer to the CHECK list for that section to ensure all is done.
A sloppy approach to the use of a standard does not undermine the value of it.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At my club we advocate the use of mnemonics for checks as there is little room in a typical GA trainer for a checklist, and we believe that it is better for the student to know his checks rather than to try and follow a checklist. Even in a bigger aircraft there is minimal room, and such aircraft are usually always 2-crew. How would the single pilot fare? In the RAF single crew always had to learn the checks. Comments?
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Norfolk, England
Age: 58
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for that Homeguard 
Nice to know it's just that I'm sloppy. Better remember that there is only ONE way to do things right and that's to follow what's written on a bit of paper. The great thing about following a checklist is the euphoric sense of a job well done when you've completed it but missed something obvious that wasn't actually listed.
At least I'm happy to accept that one thing works for some and another for others ... but perhaps that is just undermining the value of individual intelligence ... Oh well, time for bed.
Night all
SS
Nice to know it's just that I'm sloppy. Better remember that there is only ONE way to do things right and that's to follow what's written on a bit of paper. The great thing about following a checklist is the euphoric sense of a job well done when you've completed it but missed something obvious that wasn't actually listed.
At least I'm happy to accept that one thing works for some and another for others ... but perhaps that is just undermining the value of individual intelligence ... Oh well, time for bed.
Night all
SS
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: U.K.
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I learned many years ago that the time you knock off your landing/taxy lights is when you are on a well lit apron and may run the risk of dazzling a marshaller if you don't. When training, it is just as important for students to learn what it is like to taxy without the aid of land/taxy lights as it is to land the a/c without them for the same reasons.
With regard to checklists the attitude these days seems to be that you use these highly detailed lists as "do lists". I believe this stems from the requirements to use such lists in commercial licence flying tests - to get students used to the use of big check lists like some big aircraft have. I have always advocated learning a checklist off by heart in a little A/C - for reasons stated above. Then if you really want to do the job correctly, you get the check list out and thumb through it quickly to ensure that you didn't forget anything. The list is then being used as a 'check' list, not a 'do' list. Forgetting an item is then much less likely.
Only one man's opinion of course. May the debate continue!
P.P.
With regard to checklists the attitude these days seems to be that you use these highly detailed lists as "do lists". I believe this stems from the requirements to use such lists in commercial licence flying tests - to get students used to the use of big check lists like some big aircraft have. I have always advocated learning a checklist off by heart in a little A/C - for reasons stated above. Then if you really want to do the job correctly, you get the check list out and thumb through it quickly to ensure that you didn't forget anything. The list is then being used as a 'check' list, not a 'do' list. Forgetting an item is then much less likely.
Only one man's opinion of course. May the debate continue!
P.P.
The Original Whirly
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have any of you looked at this from the student's point of view?
For those who don't know, I'm a rotary FI(R), and have also held a PPL(A) for some years. This means I fly with f/w instructors now and then, for check rides etc. What happens? Having been doing certain things quite safely for years, I get told: "DON'T pull the carb heat there", or "You turn downwind there, not where you just did".
Now, I don't in the least mind if it's a safety issue, or even some different way of doing something that I don't know about; I'm happy to learn. But more often than not - sorry, but it's true - the instructor is on an ego trip and wants things done HIS WAY. I ask for a reason; I get told, "Because that's how it's done". Which doesn't help anybody! And I get annoyed, and disinclined to listen. And I suspect that I'm fairly normal and average in that way.
So try treating students with respect. It's not what you say, but how you say it, and even more importantly, the attitude behind it, that makes all the difference. If you say, or imply, that you're a complete know-all and God's gift to aviation and your every word should be taken as gospel, of course the student will react badly. If you just give advice, or even say, "To keep it simple, do it my way for this lesson, but I fully accept that mine may not be the only way", you might find you get a better response.
I'd now better go out and practice what I preach with the next know-all helicopter student who comes along.
For those who don't know, I'm a rotary FI(R), and have also held a PPL(A) for some years. This means I fly with f/w instructors now and then, for check rides etc. What happens? Having been doing certain things quite safely for years, I get told: "DON'T pull the carb heat there", or "You turn downwind there, not where you just did".
Now, I don't in the least mind if it's a safety issue, or even some different way of doing something that I don't know about; I'm happy to learn. But more often than not - sorry, but it's true - the instructor is on an ego trip and wants things done HIS WAY. I ask for a reason; I get told, "Because that's how it's done". Which doesn't help anybody! And I get annoyed, and disinclined to listen. And I suspect that I'm fairly normal and average in that way.
So try treating students with respect. It's not what you say, but how you say it, and even more importantly, the attitude behind it, that makes all the difference. If you say, or imply, that you're a complete know-all and God's gift to aviation and your every word should be taken as gospel, of course the student will react badly. If you just give advice, or even say, "To keep it simple, do it my way for this lesson, but I fully accept that mine may not be the only way", you might find you get a better response.
I'd now better go out and practice what I preach with the next know-all helicopter student who comes along.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is needed in the organisation is a system for students to record instructor differences.
Get the students to record what the difference is and who told them to do it that way. Exaplain that it is no relection on them but it ensures that instructors can get together and decide a common approach to the issue. If it really is a case of the student making it up then they will avoid naming the instructor or the instructor will clarify their misunderstanding.
Reasons for turning off the landing light at the hold on a light aircraft;
Avoid glare for other pilots on approah or lining up from the other side;
Increase bulb life and avoid overheating (reduced cooling airflow);
Reduced drain on the battery at low RPM where the alternator having just started the aircraft after some serious cranking is doing it's best to power nav lights, radios, internal lights etc while also being required to try and charge the battery.
At night on a grass airfield the landing light will not show creep forward until a speed has been acheived........better idea not to point at anything (point between the taxi lights) in the first place.
Checklists as others have said are not procedure lists or do lists. Learn the procedure but use the checklist after to check that the essential requirements have been carried out.
Finally what does this say about the two organisations (assuming that Flying For Fun is not a sole operator/CFI in his own organisation):
Flying For Fun: Well, I will do exactly what I'd like my students to do - take on board all opinions, and then decide which works best for me.....
or
The Baron: At my club we advocate.......
Regards,
DFC
Get the students to record what the difference is and who told them to do it that way. Exaplain that it is no relection on them but it ensures that instructors can get together and decide a common approach to the issue. If it really is a case of the student making it up then they will avoid naming the instructor or the instructor will clarify their misunderstanding.
Reasons for turning off the landing light at the hold on a light aircraft;
Avoid glare for other pilots on approah or lining up from the other side;
Increase bulb life and avoid overheating (reduced cooling airflow);
Reduced drain on the battery at low RPM where the alternator having just started the aircraft after some serious cranking is doing it's best to power nav lights, radios, internal lights etc while also being required to try and charge the battery.
At night on a grass airfield the landing light will not show creep forward until a speed has been acheived........better idea not to point at anything (point between the taxi lights) in the first place.
Checklists as others have said are not procedure lists or do lists. Learn the procedure but use the checklist after to check that the essential requirements have been carried out.
Finally what does this say about the two organisations (assuming that Flying For Fun is not a sole operator/CFI in his own organisation):
Flying For Fun: Well, I will do exactly what I'd like my students to do - take on board all opinions, and then decide which works best for me.....
or
The Baron: At my club we advocate.......
Regards,
DFC
Why do it if it's not fun?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DFC,
I don't know - please tell me what this says about my organisation? (No, I am not the sole operator/CFI.) The only thing I can see that it says about my organisation is that not every student who comes my way flies exactly the way I fly, or I teach my students to fly. Is there any instructor out there, at any organisation, who can say that every single student they've ever come across flies the same way??? 
FFB's original question indicates that this is not the case.
FFF
--------------
what does this say about the two organisations (assuming that Flying For Fun is not a sole operator/CFI in his own organisation)
FFB's original question indicates that this is not the case.FFF
--------------
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Baron,
Absolutely one should enjoy the experience. That is why we do what we do - be it work or pleasure. However, in no situation should enjoyment be at the expense of safety.
People who enjoy flying the most are often those that prepare and operate to the highest standards - not those that for example cant be bothered spending hours reading the AIP or NOTAMS Cause they are too difficult - only for their enjoyment to be spoilt cause they didn't check that there was temporary restricted airspace.
----
FFF,
Don't take it personally - it was simnply something that jumped off the page as I read your comments - something that I would make not of say in an interview!
Read my quotes again carefully...........there is no I in Team!
It may not be the case but your statement smacked of a pilot that does it his way not the organisations way!
Standardisation requires instructors to work as a team. If every instructor does it their way (even if it does suit their student) then problems are continually going to arrise.
As I said at the start - if students record differences and instructors agree a common approach then there will in time be minmal differences - or atleast no serious ones!
Regards,
DFC
Absolutely one should enjoy the experience. That is why we do what we do - be it work or pleasure. However, in no situation should enjoyment be at the expense of safety.
People who enjoy flying the most are often those that prepare and operate to the highest standards - not those that for example cant be bothered spending hours reading the AIP or NOTAMS Cause they are too difficult - only for their enjoyment to be spoilt cause they didn't check that there was temporary restricted airspace.
----
FFF,
Don't take it personally - it was simnply something that jumped off the page as I read your comments - something that I would make not of say in an interview!
Read my quotes again carefully...........there is no I in Team!
It may not be the case but your statement smacked of a pilot that does it his way not the organisations way!
Standardisation requires instructors to work as a team. If every instructor does it their way (even if it does suit their student) then problems are continually going to arrise.
As I said at the start - if students record differences and instructors agree a common approach then there will in time be minmal differences - or atleast no serious ones!
Regards,
DFC
The Original Whirly
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just been talking to a student who's almost finished his NPPL, at a school where he's tended to fly with three different instructors. He said he's found it useful that they did things different ways, as it gave him an insight into the different ways of doing things, and an idea of which things HAD to be done one way, and which had varying opinions etc. Another way of looking at this, perhaps? And useful for his future flying career, perhaps? Or is he non-typical student, who is exceptionally good at taking things positively?
Last edited by Whirlybird; 13th Feb 2005 at 14:50.