No it’s not that obvious Normanton, they go sick after a few weeks ground school then 2 years sick pay....🤭
|
Ahhhh, my mistake.
|
And then the company refers them to a specialist who says your can’t fly with that ailment you need an operation. But of course you can’t let the facts get in the way of a good story can you.
|
Originally Posted by Angle of Attack
(Post 10865613)
No it’s not that obvious Normanton, they go sick after a few weeks ground school then 2 years sick pay....🤭
|
Come on Dragonman maybe a case or two but everyone knows how many have rorted the system........It’s ridiculous...
|
Originally Posted by Angle of Attack
(Post 10865818)
Come on Dragonman maybe a case or two but everyone knows how many have rorted the system........It’s ridiculous...
Really , so a thousand repetitions equal the truth. Hear it often enough and you believe it. Everyone knows so I assume that includes you, so how many then? |
Originally Posted by dragon man
(Post 10865856)
Really , so a thousand repetitions equal the truth. Hear it often enough and you believe it. Everyone knows so I assume that includes you, so how many then?
".............. |
Dragon man, were all these over 65’s planning on bidding back to short haul pre-Covid or are they just hanging on now to milk it due to a serendipitous loophole?
If the latter, do you not think in the company’s current crippled state and given they can walk away having had virtually no ill effect on their career from Covid (unlike all of their colleagues), it is a bit selfish? |
Originally Posted by Beer Baron
(Post 10865890)
Dragon man, were all these over 65’s planning on bidding back to short haul pre-Covid or are they just hanging on now to milk it due to a serendipitous loophole?
If the latter, do you not think in the company’s current crippled state and given they can walk away having had virtually no ill effect on their career from Covid (unlike all of their colleagues), it is a bit selfish? Not at all I’m sure they would all have taken VR except for the age discrimination |
It's not age discrimination if it's legal dragon_man. Put your money where your mouth is and take them to court. Yeah just what I thought, take the package and enjoy the retirement.
|
Originally Posted by normanton
(Post 10865899)
It's not age discrimination if it's legal dragon_man. Put your money where your mouth is and take them to court. Yeah just what I thought, take the package and enjoy the retirement.
|
Originally Posted by dragon man
(Post 10865893)
Not at all I’m sure they would all have taken VR except for the age discrimination
Not one of these pilots over the age of 60 joined after the retirement age for both Qantas and legal retirement age became over 60. Anything they have got is a bonus. The unscrupulous who bid for a B737 slots after age 65 and then go sick have no other motivation than to cut out their unused sick leave at B747 hourly rates. Most of them never intended to take up the B737 training. They are dishonest pilots..Sick leave is for pilots who are sick or injured, not the unscrupulous. |
Originally Posted by wombat watcher
(Post 10865916)
You need to update yourself on what age discrimination actually is.
Not one of these pilots over the age of 60 joined after the retirement age for both Qantas and legal retirement age became over 60. Anything they have got is a bonus. The crooks who bid for a B737 slots after age 65 and then go sick have no other motivation than to cut out their unused sick leave at B747 hourly rates. Most of them never intended to take up the B737 training. They are dishonest crooks.Sick leave is for pilots who are sick or injured, not crooks. I would strongly suggest that you ask the moderators if they are ok with language you have chosen to use.I would suggest it is libellous. |
Originally Posted by dragon man
(Post 10865922)
I would strongly suggest that you ask the moderators if they are ok with language you have chosen to use.I would suggest it is libellous.
I have modified the words anyway. |
Originally Posted by wombat watcher
(Post 10865916)
You need to update yourself on what age discrimination actually is.
Not one of these pilots over the age of 60 joined after the retirement age for both Qantas and legal retirement age became over 60. Anything they have got is a bonus. The unscrupulous who bid for a B737 slots after age 65 and then go sick have no other motivation than to cut out their unused sick leave at B747 hourly rates. Most of them never intended to take up the B737 training. They are dishonest pilots..Sick leave is for pilots who are sick or injured, not the unscrupulous. ***** your colleagues too. charming |
Originally Posted by dragon man
(Post 10865922)
I would strongly suggest that you ask the moderators if they are ok with language you have chosen to use.I would suggest it is libellous.
|
DM think you might need to go back to law school he hasn't identified anyone
& secondly he has just expressed a view that someone who claims sick leave monies when they are not sick are doing something wrong, many people would think you might be breaking some kind of law doing that The former Whitlam Minister Clyde Cameron used to write about this kind of behaviour in the Public Service . Way back in the day up until mid - 80s it was a popular sport in the PS for mid to Senior managers to "go sick" for their last 6 to 12 months to exhaust any sick leave before retirement Pretty amazing if it is still going on in a commercial business 40 years later , if it is occurring it's just greed and entitlement culture of former Govt Airline. & also bumped someone from doing an upgrade course - but that likely didn't factor so much into their thinking |
Yep I know 13 that have done it in the last 10 years, it’s all about Numero uno, ie themselves! It is totally ridiculous, and yes the Company has tried to take them on, but it’s a hard case when they bring Barristers for defence. Extremely easy to prove legally your unfit to fly, extremely hard to prove legally your rorting the system.
|
Anyway it isn’t going to be happening the next few years anyway, there will be no spots regardless.
|
Originally Posted by dragon man
(Post 10865908)
You really are a f##kwit. As usual you open your mouth and put your foot in it. There are two actions happening . I’m sure you have read the AIPA legal opinion, then gone thru the act and look at the exemptions and finally got independent legal advice. I’ll bet you havnt?
AIPA actions? If so, I’m out. Don’t waste my dollars on those who’ve already seen so many extra benefits in their career. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:40. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.