Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

REX AIRLINES Trading Halt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th November 2025 | 05:04
  #1681 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 275
Likes: 152
From: Australia
This announcement has just come through:


Australian Government supporting Air T’s bid to acquire Rex

The Albanese Government is delivering on its commitment to support a successful sale of Rex.

Today, the Government is announcing the details of the financing that it will provide to support the proposal put forward by Air T, Inc. (Air T) to the Administrators of Rex in connection with their bid to acquire Rex.

The Government will restructure Rex’s existing debt to the Australian Government. Approximately $90 million of existing debt will be carried forward and a new commercial loan of $60 million will be provided to Rex.

This will supplement the $50 million being contributed by Air T towards the recapitalisation of the business.

In exchange for this financing and to ensure value for taxpayer money, Air T has agreed to a range of commitments aimed at preserving essential regional aviation connectivity and improving governance arrangements.

This will include returning more aircraft to service and increasing the frequency of profitable flights across the Rex network.

To safeguard this public investment, the Government will retain its security over all Rex’s aircraft and simulator. This will ensure Rex’s Saab fleet cannot be sold without the Government’s permission and will continue to service communities across regional and remote Australia.

Separately, the Government is also announcing today that it will establish a new program capped at $5 million for local government and regional and remote airports that supported Rex through the voluntary administration process.

This new program will mitigate financial barriers to these organisations continuing to provide essential services to their communities. Eligibility will be based on the amount owed to the organisation by the Rex regional business when it entered voluntary administration.

This program is a separate Australian Government initiative and is not part of the negotiations with Air T for its acquisition of Rex.

This builds on the vision outlined in the Aviation White Paper for the benefits of aviation to be shared across regional and remote Australia, and the extension of Regional Airports Program in the 2024-25 Budget with an additional $40 million for two further funding rounds.

For more information visit: Support for Air T Factsheet

From: https://minister.infrastructure.gov....id-acquire-rex
AnotherFSO is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2025 | 05:19
  #1682 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 1,183
From: Aus
Its clear even the Government think it's dodgy, as they are paying another $60 mil directly to Rex, however how stupid do they think people are in regard to the airport pay outs. They are trying to claim that $5 million paid to each airport owed money is not related to the amount of bailout the government is providing, that could add up to well over $100 million in itself. So now we are talking $300+ million of tax payer funds used to bail out a company worth at most $50 million. This is owed money, not extra capital to help the airports. Pretty sure this is going to bite somebody very hard in the future, I hope they have career insurance.

There's still way too much that does not make sense. Going forward the company can not be profitable, without cash to buy new fleet, and a significant increase in pay and conditions to attract and retain crew, which will further dent any profit aspirations, there is no hope the airline will continue for more than a few years at best. Maybe there is some hidden plan for new planes and a vault full of pilots that have been waiting eagerly for the opportunity to fly for Rex.

PS sounds like Alliance might be in trouble now, hope the government has some more millions ready.

Last edited by 43Inches; 4th November 2025 at 05:31.
43Inches is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2025 | 07:25
  #1683 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,419
Likes: 853
From: Brisvegas
So now we are talking $300+ million of tax payer funds used to bail out a company worth at most $50 million.
​​​​​​​These Labor ministers know a thing or two about running a business (into the ground).
Icarus2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2025 | 08:09
  #1684 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
These Labor ministers know a thing or two about running a business (into the ground).
Icarus: Huh? You will have to explain. In this case, the ALP hasn't run Rex into the ground, rather that seems to have been entirely in the hands of those who 'ran' the business. If there are any political connections, then they would be John Sharp's association with the National Party (https://www.rex.com.au/AboutRex/OurC...directors.aspx).

If your criticism is about the extent to which the current ALP federal government is bankrolling the survival of Rex, then that is another matter. But shouldn't you then likewise be critical of the former coalition government for bankrolling Rex without sufficient conditions over how federal government financial support was to be used?
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2025 | 08:23
  #1685 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,419
Likes: 853
From: Brisvegas
helispotter you are being too literal in your attempt to defend Labor MPs. The government is being very generous with taxpayer money for a dubious result. This airline should have gone the way of Ansett, Compass, Skyairworld, Air Australia, Jetgo, Bonza, Brindabella, Tiger, Ozjet et al. A federal government should not being supporting it but should support the other operators to operate the routes.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2025 | 08:36
  #1686 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
helispotter you are being too literal in your attempt to defend Labor MPs. The government is being very generous with taxpayer money for a dubious result. This airline should have gone the way of Ansett, Compass, Skyairworld, Air Australia, Jetgo, Bonza, Brindabella, Tiger, Ozjet et al. A federal government should not being supporting it but should support the other operators to operate the routes.
OK, but then be consistent in criticism of either side of politics. You can bet that if the ALP had just let Rex collapse without funding support, the coalition (and in particular the National party) would have been up in arms about the government not supporting 'the regions' and doing some political point scoring. I wasn't defending Labour MP's, just trying to get more balance. Was the coalition also being too generous with its handouts to airlines during COVID?
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2025 | 08:38
  #1687 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,419
Likes: 853
From: Brisvegas
Were the Nationals up in arms at the demise of Bonza, a regional airline?

Yes the Covid cash was too generous but it was given to all.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2025 | 09:50
  #1688 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
Were the Nationals up in arms at the demise of Bonza, a regional airline?

Yes the Covid cash was too generous but it was given to all.
OK, so for consistency: "These coalition ministers know a thing or two about running a country (into the ground)?"

My guess is Bonza didn't have the necessary political connections on either side, didn't have routes that couldn't otherwise be served by the other carriers, and wasn't a long established business. But I am no politician and I don't really know how they tick (on either side).
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2025 | 10:23
  #1689 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 2
From: mildura
Bonza was a 'luxury' - a leisure airline.

Rex is - somewhat incorrectly - regarded as an 'essential service' ... I totally beg to differ ... they're a business, that flies regional routes ... some being regulated / subsidised routes for two State Governments.

QF is the same.

Realistically, given the volume of routes that Rex fly competitively against other airlines, they should have done a deal with VA - that would have strengthened VAs credentials, built some scale for VA, and gone some way to re-establishing a nation-wide competitor to QF.

However - all of that - in hinesight, and given what had occured when AN collapsed - the then Federal Government should have gone out on a limb and done whatever they could to keep AN afloat (Tesna, VA merger, whatever) - we then wouldn't even be in this Rex conundrum.
antzzz is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2025 | 10:43
  #1690 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 8
From: in a house
My Question now is, with none of Rex’s ordinary unsecured creditors receiving anything, these include airports, refuelers, ground handlers etc why do they now, not allow rex to use the airports, don’t sell them fuel etc?

The government can pay PAG out, a company who knew the risk when signing the dotted line, but leave all other investors out in the cold. This would then leave the government with egg on its face.

Last edited by assasin; 4th November 2025 at 12:55.
assasin is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 01:23
  #1691 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 224
From: Sydney Australia
I'm a little confused, how exactly is Air T going to make money out of this deal? REX's profitability has been systematically destroyed from the minute the clowns running the show decided that the future of the company rested with a domestic Jet operation. In doing so they all but abandoned the regional side of the business. The core strength of the regional business, the low debt/equity ratio, the lack of competition on their golden routes, and a strong relationship with the regional centres they service, have been lost forever.

With over $100M in Taxpayer donations, how much profit has the airline made in the last 18 months Sam. I can't seem to find that in the Fact sheet!

There's been much speculation that Air T are only interested in REX for the aircraft and converting them into spare parts. It appears that this may be more than speculation. The Government have placed a caveat on the aircraft to stop them from doing just that. Coincidence, I think not. If the government doesn't trust Air T to make a go of it without parting out the fleet, then I ask the question again. How is Air T going to make money out of this?

For those of you who remember, Lindsay Fox and Soloman Lew had all but signed the deal to save Ansett when the Government instructed the Administrators to remove the airport terminals from the sale and sell them to private operators. The rest as they say is history.
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 03:25
  #1692 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,146
Likes: 1,262
From: Australia/India
There were pats on the back, all round, 5 minutes ago in the House of Reps question time, for the government having saved Rex. Clearly the government and the opposition believe that Air T is going to run the airline as an airline rather than part the aircraft out.
Lead Balloon is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 05:16
  #1693 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 171
Likes: 12
From: Australia
Those clowns couldn’t run a choko vine over the s&#t house.
Don Diego is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 20:03
  #1694 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,146
Likes: 1,262
From: Australia/India
Fast forward to 1:10:

They make it sound as if spending taxpayers' money is complicated.
Lead Balloon is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 21:05
  #1695 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 532
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
Fast forward to 1:10: House of Reps Question Time 5 Nov 25
.
Well it's gong to be an interesting creditor's meeting. The government is going to subsidise the councils for money lost to REX so I guess that removes them from the creditor's equation. They are also going to take control of the fleet to stop any fire sale if it goes through

Albanese is obviously impressed with the outcome because it does two things; it shows that the Labor party is "looking after country people" by using tax payers money to subsidise country airline operations and hopefully win a few country votes. Also in his mind it proves that government interference in the market shows that there are some things that the government does better than business which is a hobby horse of his.

The fact that they have burnt hundreds of millions of tax payer's dollars subsidising a foreign commercial operation who took unreasonable amount of risk with taxpayer's money during Covid and failed seems lost on him.

They are now stacking the deck for the creditors meeting which hopefully gets waived through with even more tax payers dollars. The government is going to give Air T favorable terms with tax payers money and subsidise local councils also with tax payers money. That now sets it up for other creditors to get their begging tins out with the threat of a no vote
neville_nobody is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 21:39
  #1696 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 224
From: Sydney Australia
Australian Aviation are reporting that Air T will purchase Rex for $172.5M! Has the cheque cleared?

Something definitely doesn’t add up?
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 21:46
  #1697 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 532
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by KRUSTY 34
Australian Aviation are reporting that Air T will purchase Rex for $172.5M! Has the cheque cleared?

Something definitely doesn’t add up?
And they don't own the aircraft......
neville_nobody is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 21:53
  #1698 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 532
From: Somewhere
And so it begins. Every airline in Australia will have its cap out soon

The Regional Aviation Association of Australia (RAAA) has called on the federal government to support a wider range of regional airlines in the wake of Rex’s buyout.

In a statement, the peak body for regional aviation welcomed the government’s “commitment to regional Australia”, but called on it to “support all Australian regional airline operators, not just Rex”. It comes as Transport Minister Catherine King announced financial aid for Air T’s purchase of Rex.


“The announcement means that the Government has provided over $220 million in support of Rex. We are asking the Government to also assist all hardworking Australian regional airlines. Assistance through government backed loans, government guarantees, or tax incentives would potentially help,” Rob Walker, chief executive of the RAAA, said.
“Without action on the key issues now the future looks increasingly bleak for regional and remote aviation services. Regional communities across Australia risk losing critical aviation services without urgent political and policy action.

“RAAA member airlines operate regionally with similar sized aircraft and the same operational costs as Rex. We are asking Government to help secure the future viability and sustainability of aviation by supporting all regional airlines and the communities they serve.
“The people who run and work in regional aviation businesses love what they do and are doing their utmost to support their communities – now they need the right support from government.”

The federal government is extending another $60 million in financing to Rex on top of the money it is already owed, with an existing $90 million to be repaid over time in a profit-sharing arrangement, under the proviso that Air T continues operating its regional services.

There will also be a relief package of $5 million to airports owed money by Rex, which, as unsecured creditors, are set to receive nothing from the Air T purchase.
“Our members are committed to providing world-class aviation services to the regional communities we serve and remind all stakeholders that there is more than one regional airline operating in Australia,” Walker said.

“We also welcome the Government’s commitment to support the regional airports who have been impacted by Rex’s voluntary administration. The $5 million support program will provide vital relief for those airports who as unsecured creditors have continued to support Rex.”

Rex’s creditors are set to vote on whether to approve the buyout at a meeting on 11 November, which the government, as its largest creditor, said it would support.
neville_nobody is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 22:09
  #1699 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2025
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 17
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
And they don't own the aircraft......
They own them but can't sell them without Govt approval I think the statement says. Its a good clause based on all the rumours of parting them out, isn't that what you all wanted to hear?
Frequentflyer13 is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2025 | 22:38
  #1700 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 532
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by Frequentflyer13
They own them but can't sell them without Govt approval I think the statement says. Its a good clause based on all the rumours of parting them out, isn't that what you all wanted to hear?
Sure, good move by the government but $172 Million seems like alot for not much
neville_nobody is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.