Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Network Aviation PIA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Dec 2023, 10:57
  #1361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 57
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by framer
There are a lot of variables in there that have to go your way. I’m pretty sure that Jetstar NZ still do 2 sector BOC flying, they’re a QF group Airline flying A-320’s as well, if it was easy I imagine they would drop it quick smart. It just seems that now is the time to protect it. If it’s not that likely then you should get the protections with little fuss.
So why not include international again? If it’s that easy let’s cover off all bases with this single EA.
I Need Of A Change is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 10:58
  #1362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,100
Received 495 Likes on 133 Posts
I’ll again ask for any EA reference from an Australian airline that comes close to this? All of them largely point to the approved FRMS…
Cant help sorry. Maybe there are some Jetstar NZ pilots following this that can advise what they have in place?
framer is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 11:07
  #1363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,100
Received 495 Likes on 133 Posts
So why not include international again?
Because you said earlier that Network can’t do International with its AOC.
​​​​​​​If you want Short Haul pay then expect the conditions that go with it
SH won’t do 2 sector BOC though.
I’m going to retire from the conversation for the night. I hope that drawing attention to the difficulties of mixing BOC with a domestic flying is useful in some way.
Best of luck.
framer is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 11:09
  #1364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 57
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by framer
Because you said earlier that Network can’t do International with its AOC.
Maybe, they not so long ago didn’t have an area AOC and now do.
I Need Of A Change is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 11:12
  #1365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 57
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by framer
SH won’t do 2 sector BOC though.
I’m going to retire from the conversation for the night. I hope that drawing attention to the difficulties of mixing BOC with a domestic flying is useful in some way.
Best of luck.
I agree but it’s not the EA that stops QF Short Haul or JQ from doing 2 sector BOC.

The management of BOC and fatigue lives in an FRMS at all comparable airlines and as such if that’s the issue at Network then maybe focus on that.
I Need Of A Change is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 11:14
  #1366 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Australians
Posts: 32
Received 31 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigredsky
I think international sectors are a bit too far outside what is probable so we don’t need to waste time there. Domestic BOTC sectors are a real possibility especially out of mine sites. It’s no secret most of the big mining companies want direct flights from the WA mines to the east coast. So much so I believe SH are doing 1 already. Combine that with no available parking or gates at Perth it certainly seems this type of flying will be on the horizon. Signing on at a mine site, Brisbane return BOTC and pax home on the flight to and from Perth. Remember paxing at the end of a duty isn’t duty time.

Stating “wow Darwin and Hobart” I’m not sure the point you are trying to make. Sign on at 8am and sign off at 1800 for a Hobart is pretty easy. What happens if it’s now sign on at 8pm and sign off at 6am? All of a sudden the “easy” Hobart return isn’t so easy is the point I was trying to convey.
So can you do a Hobart return signing on at 6pm can you? Upwards of 8 hours flight time from what I’m told. Hmmm.. let’s see… one hour sign on, 40mins turn around… then 15 mins sign off. Add traffic holding and, well crap, you’re over pal. 10 hour max. If you knew your limits you’d know it most likely can’t be rostered. Knowledge is power.

IF, however, you worked for another AOC it would perhaps be possible as their limits allow for longer duties at afternoon sign on. NAA FRMS is in fact quite limiting for BOC ops. Don’t let that fact get in the way of imagination though.
TooManyPineapples is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 30th Dec 2023, 19:47
  #1367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 279
Received 48 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by I Need Of A Change

By asking for a clause or reference from another EA that covers off what you’re asking for I’m trying to portray that no similar airline within Australia has anything like what you’re asking for within an EA. These are managed to varying degrees of success within an FRMS. Maybe improving the reporting rate of fatigue would help resolve the issue for Network Pilots.

If you want Short Haul pay then expect the conditions that go with it. Some of the protections in the proposed deal around other rostering clauses do not exist within the QF Short Haul or JQ EA.

Please do not take my word for it but rather go and read the full documents that are readily available through Fairwork and possibly your union (they are for AFAP members).
Virgin have their work rules embedded into their EA.

Their back of clock (or Late Night Operations) can be summarised as:
- An LNO is more than 90mins between 23:00 - 05:30
- After an LNO, the pilot has 30 hours rest in home base, or if at an outport the rest can be less than 18 hours but the next duty can only be one sector (max of 2.5 hours)
- Paxing after LNO limited to 2 hours (ie no operating a red eye to east coast and then paxing back to Perth)
- Signing on after 10pm has max FDP of 10 hours
-These rules essentially mean you can only do one sector LNO (ie no red eye returns)
- In the 36 hour period prior to 3 early starts in a row, you can’t have done an LNO.
Colonel_Klink is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 20:15
  #1368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Australia
Posts: 46
Received 69 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by TooManyPineapples
So can you do a Hobart return signing on at 6pm can you? Upwards of 8 hours flight time from what I’m told. Hmmm.. let’s see… one hour sign on, 40mins turn around… then 15 mins sign off. Add traffic holding and, well crap, you’re over pal. 10 hour max. If you knew your limits you’d know it most likely can’t be rostered. Knowledge is power.

IF, however, you worked for another AOC it would perhaps be possible as their limits allow for longer duties at afternoon sign on. NAA FRMS is in fact quite limiting for BOC ops. Don’t let that fact get in the way of imagination though.
So you are certain the FRMS can’t be changed? The company controlled document.
Bigredsky is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 20:47
  #1369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 364
Received 120 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigredsky
So you are certain the FRMS can’t be changed? The company controlled document.
Only with CASA approval…….tick
C441 is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 21:21
  #1370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Australia
Posts: 46
Received 69 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by C441
Only with CASA approval…….tick
Jesus man, really? That’s hard to get. “We are trialing a new 11 hour duty”
Bigredsky is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 21:37
  #1371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,087
Received 159 Likes on 70 Posts

What you have described appears to be the system working even if it takes regulator input (which is part of an FRMS under trial) if the clauses are stipulated in the EA then your only chance to change them if they aren’t working would be the next negotiation.
CASA taking enforcement action is NOT FRMS or any system ‘working’. It’s a failure of that system and shows what management think of it. That is why you need iron clad EAs
neville_nobody is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 30th Dec 2023, 21:55
  #1372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 57
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by framer
Because you said earlier that Network can’t do International with its AOC.

SH won’t do 2 sector BOC though.
I’m going to retire from the conversation for the night. I hope that drawing attention to the difficulties of mixing BOC with a domestic flying is useful in some way.
Best of luck.
Originally Posted by Bigredsky
Jesus man, really? That’s hard to get. “We are trialing a new 11 hour duty”
If those partaking (rostered) in the trail all find it fatiguing and report it accordingly what are the chances of it being a permenant fixture on your roster?

Last edited by I Need Of A Change; 30th Dec 2023 at 22:08.
I Need Of A Change is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 22:35
  #1373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,100
Received 495 Likes on 133 Posts
If those partaking (rostered) in the trail all find it fatiguing and report it accordingly
I spent thirty five years thinking like that. Ie I had faith in systems and their ability to deliver the intended results. It wasn’t until I had seen the systems failing, and had given the benefit of the doubt many times, that I realised I needed to be a fraction more cynical in my assessments.
The thing I wasn’t factoring in was human nature. All along the path individuals are motivated by different things and take action ( or don’t) to meet their own ends. Like I said earlier, the head of safety won’t see an increase in fatigue reporting as a fatigue problem, they will se it as an improved reporting culture because it suits their end goals. It’s not even a conscious thing, it’s human nature. The fatigued F/O will roll the dice that they can get through another BOC without incident, rather than come to the attention of the person they need to impress to get a command interview.
​​​​​​​what are the chances of it being a permenant fixture on your roster?
From experience I would say that it will continue to be rostered until the majority of the pilot group are refusing to do it and that will take years. There will be lots of pilot fatigue reports, a group of older Captains that quietly refuse from early on, fatigue committee meetings with sleep specialists from Universities, and their opinions, even when captured in the minutes, will be ignored. All under CASA, and all under QF, no problem.
Its not my contract and not my vote, maybe you’re right that it should be dealt with at a later date if it becomes a problem, just putting my experience out there in case some Network pilots have not considered how significant the possibility of BOC flying is.
framer is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 30th Dec 2023, 23:07
  #1374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 324
Received 371 Likes on 115 Posts
Originally Posted by framer
No earlies prior to BOC duty and then a rest day ( not one of your days off) following the BOC, and then no earlies as first duty after BOC.
Basically some protection against having to make large adjustments to your circadian rhythm. As it stands now is there anything to stop them rostering something like this;
Monday-Early duty
Tuesday into Wednesday - BOC
Thursday- Day off
Friday- Early duty
If it’s possible for the computer to spit out something like that then it’s my opinion that it will happen ( operational requirements etc) and that most pilots will end up using their days off to recover and often not succeeding. If your protections already prevent it then great.
Let me fix this for you: Tuesday you’ll be working. Potentially signing off the same time you sign on Wednesday for the BOC. This isn’t uncommon at QF.

Dreaming if you think you’ll get that Tuesday off to rest
soseg is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 23:09
  #1375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Australians
Posts: 32
Received 31 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigredsky
So you are certain the FRMS can’t be changed? The company controlled document.
Certain? I haven’t commented on hypothetical future events here mate, purely looking at the current facts. Could something change, well yes. Currently, however, the fanciful BOC Hobart return I keep hearing about is just that, fantasy.

They could change the limits to similar to short haul, for example. But good luck doing many of our other, very profitable, early morning starts with their limits.
TooManyPineapples is online now  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 23:32
  #1376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,100
Received 495 Likes on 133 Posts
Let me fix this for you: Tuesday you’ll be working.
Sorry Soseg, I probably didn’t make it very clear, what I meant was something along the lines of;
Monday- sign on 0400 sign off lunch time
Tuesday- Sign on 7pm
Wednesday - sign off 5am
Thursday- Day off
Friday- sign on 0400 sign off lunch time

​​​​​​​Dreaming if you think you’ll get that Tuesday off to rest
I wasn’t suggesting Tuesday would be off at all, I meant to show that Tuesday evening you would sign on to do a BOC which signs off on Wednesday morning.
Is the above explanation any clearer? And more to the point, do you think the above would be sustainable if you were rostered that twice a month for a year?
Keep in mind that I don’t know the Network flying well and am just trying to point out situations to be weary of.


framer is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2023, 23:49
  #1377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,909
Likes: 0
Received 259 Likes on 113 Posts
and am just trying to point out situations to be weary of.
​​​​​​​I love a good pun. Be very wary.
Icarus2001 is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by Icarus2001:
Old 30th Dec 2023, 23:50
  #1378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NSW
Posts: 271
Received 191 Likes on 61 Posts
Originally Posted by framer
Sorry Soseg, I probably didn’t make it very clear, what I meant was something along the lines of;
Monday- sign on 0400 sign off lunch time
Tuesday- Sign on 7pm
Wednesday - sign off 5am
Thursday- Day off
Friday- sign on 0400 sign off lunch time


I wasn’t suggesting Tuesday would be off at all, I meant to show that Tuesday evening you would sign on to do a BOC which signs off on Wednesday morning.
Is the above explanation any clearer? And more to the point, do you think the above would be sustainable if you were rostered that twice a month for a year?
Keep in mind that I don’t know the Network flying well and am just trying to point out situations to be weary of.
This **** happens at JQ all time. Simple solution. Call in fatigued. I never work these kinds of patterns. Just don't turn up to work. When enough people don't it gets fixed.
cLeArIcE is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 31st Dec 2023, 01:38
  #1379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 57
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by framer
The fatigued F/O will roll the dice that they can get through another BOC without incident, rather than come to the attention of the person they need to impress to get a command interview.
The F/O should not be concerned at Network. They did away with the requirements for a Command Interview.

If they operate fatigued and have an event online that brings their standards into question then that might hurt their chance of being successful.
I Need Of A Change is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2023, 01:50
  #1380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,100
Received 495 Likes on 133 Posts
If they operate fatigued and have an event online that brings their standards into question then that might hurt their chance of being successful.
Yes I understand that and we could go around and around all day with examples. I think I just have a different expectation of how the majority of people ( pilots, rostering administrators, pilot managers, General Managers, Regulators, and Executive Managers) will behave when push comes to shove.
In a slightly disconcerting way your posts remind me of me….ten years ago.
​​​​​​​Best of luck as always.
framer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.