Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

All borders to reopen.

Old 10th Feb 2021, 13:13
  #3581 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,324
Received 157 Likes on 74 Posts
Originally Posted by 601
If you test positive while in HQ in Qld, you are transported to a Covid ward at a hospital. You do not stay in HQ.
Not in WA you don't. And you can also develop symptoms between the test a couple of days in and the ~10 day test.

Originally Posted by currawong
Virus is airborne; it gets around fine with or without help...
Yes, clearly evidenced elsewhere. But likely the nebuliser helped it spread significantly.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 13:15
  #3582 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 72
Posts: 896
Received 31 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by 601
If you test positive while in HQ in Qld, you are transported to a Covid ward at a hospital. You do not stay in HQ.
Seems eminently sensible.
WingNut60 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 14:15
  #3583 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: McLimitVille
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The (Christmas) Northern Beaches outbreak, source remains undetermined.
As has been pointed out so many times, a targeted lock down of a couple of LGA's NOT a whole city and NOT for a single case.
McLimit is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 18:38
  #3584 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 91 Likes on 34 Posts
One of the Holiday Inn infected is in ICU and not doing well - 38 years old.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 19:32
  #3585 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 1,015
Received 106 Likes on 52 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
One of the Holiday Inn infected is in ICU and not doing well - 38 years old.
This is the same person that owned the nebuliser, who would already have medical issues may asthma something unknown to the public. Nothing too see here cant blame every ICU case on C-19

Last edited by SHVC; 10th Feb 2021 at 19:43.
SHVC is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 19:35
  #3586 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by compressor stall
Re the MEL Holiday Inn outbreak. To be fair, the same nebuliser driven outbreak (assuming that's what happened) could have happened in any other state undertaking hotel floor Q ( NT, not looking at you ). Personal baggage from your flight is certainly not searched in WA. Had he sick man arrived into Perth with his nebuliser, the same infection would have happened to a similar number of people and they may have been worse off with (until last week) no community mask wearing and limited testing.

SOPS - if you read the fine print of most the states, such exemptions have always been in the fine print. I'm not as intricately familiar with SA's as I have been with every other state, but I'd be surprised if it was different.

In the early days of the pandemic nebulisers were banned for use in many hospitals, as were 'aerosol generating procedures'. I doubt in this case it could have been avoided. Someone got sick, maybe they already had respiratory issues and had their own nebuliser, which they used, leading to this spread in a place not designed to contain aerosols.

If however, the scenario was that the patient tested positive, became unwell and then was GIVEN this treatment by authorities... then that is a massive clusterf*ck on behalf of the VIC Health team/ whoever manages HQ at the moment, seemingly against their own hospital procedures.
lc_461 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 20:20
  #3587 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 72
Posts: 896
Received 31 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by McLimit
As has been pointed out so many times, a targeted lock down of a couple of LGA's NOT a whole city and NOT for a single case.
So I'll ask again, if not for a single case then what is the correct number?
Please cite your expert reference for the correct number.

"More than one" is a meaningless but nefarious answer.
WingNut60 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 21:20
  #3588 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,232
Received 132 Likes on 67 Posts
Well, considering the WA CHO testified in court that their health system can successfully manage 500 new cases per day the answer is obviously not "1". That would utilise 650 hospital and 124 ICU beds, but would remain within the capability of the WA health system. That being the case, I would say anything more than 500 new cases per day, based on a population of 2.66 million should be the trigger to require a lockdown, because anything less than 500 can be managed by the (existing) health system. Your reference is Palmer v Western Australia (No 4) [2020] FCA 1221 [86].

If you want to extrapolate that to other states, on the assumption all health systems have the same capacity, that is 1,200 cases a day for Mexico and 1,500 for NSW. And that's per day remember....
KRviator is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 21:43
  #3589 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Mycenae
Posts: 508
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
That would utilise 650 hospital and 124 ICU beds, but would remain within the capability of the WA health system.
given the WA health system only has 111 ICU beds Iím not sure this would allow the system to carry on in itsí usual form. The WA health COVID response plan suggests that ward closures and the use of private hospital capacity would be required to ramp up the ICU capacity and hospitals have plans to implement COVID/Non-COVID areas. This means routine operations and treatment may have to be cut back, I presume thatís what he meant by
substantially increase the burden upon the health system.
.
Pretty sure most WA residents would rather see their Aunty Doris have a hip replacement than 500 new cases per day.
StudentInDebt is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 22:04
  #3590 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Al's Diner
Age: 64
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by currawong
The (Christmas) Northern Beaches outbreak, source remains undetermined.

"Also, you lot from other States wonder why NSW shakes their heads at you lot."

Indeed.

undetermined or covered up?
Potsie Weber is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 22:32
  #3591 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 72
Posts: 896
Received 31 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by KRviator
...........I would say anything more than 500 new cases per day, based on a population of 2.66 million should be the trigger to require a lockdown, because anything less than 500 can be managed by the (existing) health system. ........
You forgot to mention the other half of the quoted sentence, the bit that mentions 70 deaths.
But then, that'd be OK, wouldn't it?

While you, Clive and Beryl may agree, apparently the Federal Court of Australia did not.
WingNut60 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2021, 23:35
  #3592 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,232
Received 132 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by WingNut60
You forgot to mention the other half of the quoted sentence, the bit that mentions 70 deaths.
I didn't forget, nor intentionally omit it. You asked for a specific number of cases, I gave what I consider to be a reasonable number of cases based on testimony from a state CHO - incidentally the same one who also champions "28 days COVID free" to allow his state border to reopen to the rest of the country, and to hell with the socio-economic cost of that 28-day delay.
Originally Posted by WingNut60
But then, that'd be OK, wouldn't it?
To me, YES, it would! I make no secret of that fact, nor apologies for it. But in saying that, I am happy to accept personal responsibility for my health, and tolerate minor inconveniences (masks/social distancing/hand sanitiser on entry, for eg) to allow life to continue as normally as possible, as it does in NSW (who has kept borders open almost entirely throughout...). By the same token, I don't smoke so, personally, I don't consider the 8,000-odd deaths from preventable lung cancer a year as being "OK". But hey, the rest of Australia seems to think that killing 8,000 citizens a year by the sales of tobacco products is perfectly fine! So who's right?

My point is, if the Government has had a financial model for acceptable risk (including death) v reward for decades, and they threw it out the window for COVID. However, the Government - of all persuasions - is happy to rake in the billions of dollars from tobacco excise, despite knowing it is one of the leading causes of preventable deaths in Australia.

You can't have it both ways.
KRviator is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 01:17
  #3593 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Mycenae
Posts: 508
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
I didn't forget, nor intentionally omit it. You asked for a specific number of cases, I gave what Iconsider to be a reasonable number of cases based on testimony from a state CHO
You gave based on the summing up of his testimony by the court, the full paragraph ends
These numbers would remain within the capacity of the Western Australian health system to manage, but would substantially increase the burden upon the health system.
StudentInDebt is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 01:23
  #3594 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,232
Received 132 Likes on 67 Posts
Yes I did, and yes it does.

What is your point?
KRviator is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 01:42
  #3595 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Perth
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The issue with having active covid cases, regardless of borders, is that it kills demand. People are generally not willing to take the risk - especially so for corporate travel. Without corporate travel the golden triangle - and many other routes would be half, if not less, their standard capacity - and we can forget about yield
jrfsp is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 01:50
  #3596 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Mycenae
Posts: 508
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by KRviator
Yes I did, and yes it does.

What is your point?
That your figure of 500 new cases per day should not be used as a threshold for a lockdown as youíve taken it in isolation from the rest of the summation. There would be a significant impact on the provision of WAís health services well before that figure is reached.
StudentInDebt is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 01:54
  #3597 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,349
Received 464 Likes on 251 Posts
Originally Posted by jrfsp
The issue with having active covid cases, regardless of borders, is that it kills demand. People are generally not willing to take the risk - especially so for corporate travel. Without corporate travel the golden triangle - and many other routes would be half, if not less, their standard capacity - and we can forget about yield
Yep. Air travel has been decimated in nations where borders have remained open too, so I donít know why people here think open borders would suddenly mean a return to normality. I remember in March before any borders were closed passenger numbers were plummeting, the free market was choosing not to travel whilst this pandemic is active.

This slowdown of aviation is because of a worldwide health crisis and itíll be over when the health crisis is no longer an issue, not borders.
dr dre is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 03:28
  #3598 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 91 Likes on 34 Posts
Lets get one thing straight...

Since the prohibition on cruise ships and an isolated case or two on cargo ships, there is only one other way that the country is now subjected to receiving infected individuals - international air travel.

That firstly means that bleating by international pilots and airlines is just that - self interested crap. The Federal Government and the states have already been overly generous, in my opinion, in permitting any international arrivals of passengers at all.

Given that generosity, it is even worse when we hear International pilots carping about lockdown conditions, etc., when the need for such measures is directly caused by their employers activities.

It should also be of interest to domestic RPT pilots because without the constant stream of infected individuals from overseas we would have beaten this virus by now and could have reopened the whole domestic RPT and tourism market

My suggestion is that there should be only two quarantine locations Christmas and Manus Islands. No one gets to land here unless they are tested Covid free for fourteen days.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 03:32
  #3599 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KRviator
Well, considering the WA CHO testified in court that their health system can successfully manage 500 new cases per day the answer is obviously not "1". That would utilise 650 hospital and 124 ICU beds, but would remain within the capability of the WA health system. That being the case, I would say anything more than 500 new cases per day, based on a population of 2.66 million should be the trigger to require a lockdown, because anything less than 500 can be managed by the (existing) health system. Your reference is Palmer v Western Australia (No 4) [2020] FCA 1221 [86].

If you want to extrapolate that to other states, on the assumption all health systems have the same capacity, that is 1,200 cases a day for Mexico and 1,500 for NSW. And that's per day remember....
"Can manage", but why would you want to?

As long as this thing is allowed to replicate, like in Europe it can and will mutate (remember not that long ago viewed as unlikely) and possibly come up with something that can defeat our efforts at vaccination.

Then its back to square one.

I don't want to go all the way back to square one. Do you?
currawong is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 04:37
  #3600 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 617
Received 76 Likes on 31 Posts
Sunfish accusing other people of ‘bleating’ and ‘carping’ has just made my day.
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.