B717 Fleet to increase to 20.
Bottums Up
Thread Starter
Hey Clarrie. Having moved south from those tropical routes you once stalked are you now looking to return there?
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: aviation heaven, australia
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"If Qantas take over Cobham"......haha, never laughed so hard. Thanks for making my week. has anyone thought that maybe Cobham don't want the B717s.? I'd say it will all go to Qlink. Let us not delude our selves here, Eastern and Sunstate (Qlink) are not and will never be Qantas.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 400 Orchard Rd
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Qantas has not yet made a decision on who will operate the 2 aircraft coming into service in February.
Last time I checked Network, Eastern, Sunstate, Jetstar, Qantas, Jetconnect, Jetstar Hong Kong, Jetstar Bangladesh DON'T have 717 on their AOC so why would that change in the near future?
Enjoy the extra 2 frames guys!
Last edited by Ted Nugent; 25th Jul 2015 at 15:08.
If these things are going to arrive in Feb next year, then it is a reasonable bet that they are going to cobham, at least in the first instance.
Getting the aoc, whichever one it is, amended to support the 717 is not a quick thing, particularly if you need to build a check and training system from scratch.
Regardless if eastern/QantasLink has an ex Jetstar guy as HOFO, he is only one man and he doesn't wholly embody the experience required in order to successfully establish a check and training system for a new type, let alone transitioning a turboprop operation into a jet one. He may well be the seed from which this experience grows, but he cannot possibly do it all himself, there just isn't that many hours in the day.
Alternatively they might go to mainline, but again they would need to divert resources from the 737 fleet in order to do so. If that project isn't already under way then it is probably too late. The rumour mill is too good to have allowed that to get underway without someone letting something slip I would have thought.
None of this doesn't mean that cobham will keep the operation forever, just that I suspect it is unlikely that in the short term another operator will pick up a couple of stray airframes
Getting the aoc, whichever one it is, amended to support the 717 is not a quick thing, particularly if you need to build a check and training system from scratch.
Regardless if eastern/QantasLink has an ex Jetstar guy as HOFO, he is only one man and he doesn't wholly embody the experience required in order to successfully establish a check and training system for a new type, let alone transitioning a turboprop operation into a jet one. He may well be the seed from which this experience grows, but he cannot possibly do it all himself, there just isn't that many hours in the day.
Alternatively they might go to mainline, but again they would need to divert resources from the 737 fleet in order to do so. If that project isn't already under way then it is probably too late. The rumour mill is too good to have allowed that to get underway without someone letting something slip I would have thought.
None of this doesn't mean that cobham will keep the operation forever, just that I suspect it is unlikely that in the short term another operator will pick up a couple of stray airframes
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought QLink had just 'in-sourced' line and heavy maintenance for the B717?
Is there not a jet rate in the Sunstate pilots EBA significantly below the current Cobham rates?
Whilst Qantas staff have gone through 18 month pay freezes, redundancies and transformation, what have Cobham done?
What makes people so sure that QLink could not 'in-source' the whole lot?
I am not suggesting anything other than to be fat, dumb and lazy on this one would be a very dangerous proposition.
To assume makes an ass of u and me...........
Is there not a jet rate in the Sunstate pilots EBA significantly below the current Cobham rates?
Whilst Qantas staff have gone through 18 month pay freezes, redundancies and transformation, what have Cobham done?
What makes people so sure that QLink could not 'in-source' the whole lot?
I am not suggesting anything other than to be fat, dumb and lazy on this one would be a very dangerous proposition.
To assume makes an ass of u and me...........
Suggest you take another peep at the jet rate Part121 and this time add in all the extra bits and pieces the Cobham guys don't get. I think you will find the numbers add up quickly, the Qlink contract also includes proper staff travel.
What have COBHAM done you ask? A bloody good job under some woefully unrealistic expectations from up top. Cobham have given quite enough thank you, especially the frontline staff.
Where the next aircraft go is a fait accompli with the decision having been made many months ago (like all of QFs decisions ). Management are now delighting in their favourite blood sport, that being, watching while people worry about their mortgages-Hunger Games anyone?
All the best
What have COBHAM done you ask? A bloody good job under some woefully unrealistic expectations from up top. Cobham have given quite enough thank you, especially the frontline staff.
Where the next aircraft go is a fait accompli with the decision having been made many months ago (like all of QFs decisions ). Management are now delighting in their favourite blood sport, that being, watching while people worry about their mortgages-Hunger Games anyone?
All the best
Just reading between the lines after speaking to a few ppl in the know, it sounds like Cobham is still the preferred jet operator with the additional flying/aircraft ex-SYD and HBA.
Sorry GG, I don't think you'll see them in the west.
Sorry GG, I don't think you'll see them in the west.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: aviation heaven, australia
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Qlinks so called "In source" of line and heavy you say. Well here are the facts. Qlink have in sourced the heavy maintenance and relocate it to Canberra starting first check in October. ALL staff are being employed by Korr under the sham "independent contractor" contract whereby you get no annual leave, no sick leave, no benefits. You may be lucky and get a uniform. Superannuation is part of your hourly rate and you must pay your own. You have to have an ABN. Do a little research and you'll be well surprised how they can get around the fair work laws. The only job that has been advertised by Qlink was the managers job, all others are Korr. There are lots of good people losing their full time jobs in Adelaide as a result. Korr is no different to Sigma, and it really sums up a lot about the ALAEAs priority given that these 2 companies are not on top of their list. Maybe we should ask Bill.
As for line maintenance, Qlink have taken over Canberra only and are training people for Sydney and Melbourne. What's next, who knows. Cobham still have the Part 42 Camo for all B717's so Qlink is in theory working for Cobham whos operating QF leased aircraft. Cobham are often overlooked and passed off as some second rate company but as for what I've seen I'd rather a Cobham engineer over an Eastern or Sunstate one that's for sure.
I can't wait to see the next 6 months play out, how exciting.
As for line maintenance, Qlink have taken over Canberra only and are training people for Sydney and Melbourne. What's next, who knows. Cobham still have the Part 42 Camo for all B717's so Qlink is in theory working for Cobham whos operating QF leased aircraft. Cobham are often overlooked and passed off as some second rate company but as for what I've seen I'd rather a Cobham engineer over an Eastern or Sunstate one that's for sure.
I can't wait to see the next 6 months play out, how exciting.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oztraya
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ALL staff are being employed by Korr under the sham "independent contractor" contract whereby you get no annual leave, no sick leave, no benefits. You may be lucky and get a uniform.
This is the EBA which covers Eastern's Sydney, Melbourne and Canberra bases.
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/doc...a/AE897608.pdf
It quite clearly states that contractors can only be used for short term peak workloads or to replace permanent Employees absent for a specific period of time.
And those contractors must be employed under the same terms and
conditions of employment as equivalent permanent Employees
Pretty simple and all in black and white - so I don't know how this has been allowed to happen.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: clouds
Age: 39
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ALAEA will only act on your behalf. If there is representation in the work place and you require a submission to FWA disputing the use of contractors against the EA. Those who work for EAA need to instigate the dispute!
If the contractors have an inferior deal, they are undercutting the EA conditions which is bad news for the full time staff!!!
If the contractors have an inferior deal, they are undercutting the EA conditions which is bad news for the full time staff!!!
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: clouds
Age: 39
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So Korr, Sigma and EA engineers working in a Qantaslink hangar signing for and on behalf of EA on a 71 or a Dash all carrying out the same duties has no relationship???