Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

AUGUST 24th - QANTAS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Aug 2011, 04:46
  #641 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: With Ratty and Mole
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetstar Costs ?

"You figures may well be correct, just imagine though how much more profit Qantas could be making if they managed to reduce all their costs down to the level of Jetstar."
When is a cost not a cost?
When its a Jestar cost.
When mainline picks up the tab Jetstar effectively has no costs.
All revenue,profit but no costs.
I'd like me some of that.What a great business model
Mainline probably provides the muffins and peanuts gratis to boot.
packrat is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 05:53
  #642 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 10,000 feet
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would appear that if QF really wanted the best return on capital, they would pour as much capital as possible into QF domestic to make even better returns.
It could even be argued there is a clear case for Jetstar domestic to be reduced and QF domestic expanded as it makes more money from the available seats it puts into the market.
I think these comments ignore (or at least overlook) some fundamental/basic economics. Just dumping more and more capital into QF domestic is unlikely to make 'even better returns' - in fact, doing so is likely to reduce the actual ROI figures in the short term (because you increase capex but don't necessarily improve revenue).

Likewise, shifting seats from Jetstar to QF domestic is also unlikely to improve the return on each seat sold. Surely there is price discrimination going on to eke out as much from each segment of customer demand as is possible? The people flying Jetstar aren't automatically going to shift to QF domestic - in fact, they're likely to shift to V or T.

I'm not sure what the argument is here? Kill Jetstar and hope QF domestic is able to pick up the pax? Not convinced its going to work.
BaronB is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 06:05
  #643 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aug 24 Day press print media

An update, Steve Creedy's point of view today, (News Ltd's of course)
Just a small point Steve, I didn't see a 8% bounce today for the shares Steve, was that yesterday when you recorded this possibly?




Below is the Sydney Morning Herald version from Ch 10 news, A very solid performance but we must change...... a proud Australian spirit..... (that doesn't fly to LHR via BKK anymore...)



posted for the record, for this thread
.

Last edited by TIMA9X; 24th Aug 2011 at 06:50.
TIMA9X is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 07:16
  #644 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
watch this space
GAAM, Fly Lease

Now to some fancy flying by a stellar cast of local investors who have been the force behind the country’s second-biggest aircraft leasing business Global Aviation Asset Management and have now managed to sell it to US-listed FLY Leasing for $US1.4 billion. FLY is the former Babcock and Brown aviation leasing business and boasts former B&B execs Trevor Lowensohn and Phil Brown as its advisors. The merry cast at GAAM cashing in on the deal include former Qantas boss Geoff Dixon, his former CFO and former Leighton CFO Peter Gregg, former Allco boss David Coe, John Singleton and private equity investor Mark Carnegie. This team is now looking at multiple investment opportunities and Dixon has told The Australian Financial Review that they are looking to put together a bid to take over the management of the $6 billion portfolio of RBS Aviation Capital, the fourth-largest aviation leasing company in the world.
MR WOBBLES is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 07:17
  #645 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny QLD
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Baron,

I'm not sure what the argument is here? Kill Jetstar and hope QF domestic is able to pick up the pax? Not convinced its going to work.
If you take a look at the relative prices of the two, often there is very little to separate the two airlines. Often QF is cheaper on the same route at the same time!. So I imagine killing jetstar would cause people to go to QF, as it is often just as cheap.


On another note, can someone explain to me how Qantas FF makes a profit? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't a FF scheme...passnger takes a flight..gets some points....uses them later to buy another flight. Where's the profit? Surely it's a liability?
ejectx3 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 07:18
  #646 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So what was the big announcement? I was expecting something huge....thought these boards would have gone off by now if there was.

Seems like same old hum drum again!
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 07:25
  #647 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny QLD
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Already happened few weeks ago.....
ejectx3 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 07:29
  #648 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know too much about Mr Wobbles up above...

but, if he knows as much as he says he does, I would be a bit concerned...

so, over to you Mr Wobbles!

Give us some more!
amos2 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 07:49
  #649 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 620
Received 157 Likes on 50 Posts
BaronB, from one Baron to another I think the crux of the point that The The is making is where is the investment in the most profitable part of the QF Group??

Internal memo states the international loss was $216 million while total 'Qantas' profit was $228 million, so domestic must account for a $444 million profit. This far exceeds any other section of the business. Jetstar Asia made a paltry $14.3 million profit. Yet Jetstar's further international forays and a new Asia based A320 operation are having billions of dollars of investment capital thrown at them.

What about Qantas Domestic??? Nothing!!

I agree with you, the issue is not about replacing JQ domestic with with QF domestic as they are different products for different markets. However why not invest in the QF domestic product with;
1) Better interiors/service offerings - to fight of the growing Virgin threat, and
2) Rush the 787 in to replace the 767 - which will drive unit costs down with lower fuel and maintenance costs.
Investment that would sustain QF's competitive advantage/market share and increase profit margins.
Beer Baron is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 08:19
  #650 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,199
Received 35 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by ejectx3
Baron,

I'm not sure what the argument is here? Kill Jetstar and hope QF domestic is able to pick up the pax? Not convinced its going to work.
If you take a look at the relative prices of the two, often there is very little to separate the two airlines. Often QF is cheaper on the same route at the same time!. So I imagine killing jetstar would cause people to go to QF, as it is often just as cheap.
As much as I'd like to agree with you I don't think it would work like that. The marketing has worked, people just think jetstar = cheap fares. But I guess a large marketing scheme could work just as well as the way.
maggot is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 09:28
  #651 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The cloud
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fines exceed that of internationals losses...
Xcel is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 09:31
  #652 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the breakdown of the profit, I never saw the total for the cargo cartel fines & the compensation payouts to the Vietnamese! Just a cool couple hundred million I assume. Wasn't that what QF International lost?
bandit2 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 09:43
  #653 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
eject

FF programs are a great way to bleed revenue out of a business.

Punters earn miles by flying or by buying products from providers who buy points from the supplier to be a partner in a popular program...in this case QF.

QF FF then has to buy seats off QF for redemptions. The price differential is the margin made by the FF program.

So is QF decides to bleed money out of the airline into the FF program it just has to make that margin bigger. And if they wish to favour one part of the airline over another they can price differentially and basically give away seats to the FF program.

It would be interesting to see the numbers.

Certainly AJ would have you believe that the FF program would survive in its current form with a totally degraded QF International.

As to setting up a full service airline in Singapore with A320's...delusional.
Traffic is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 09:54
  #654 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A cheap seat at the front of a 777 :-)
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it's nearly the end of AUG 24 and the sky is still where it always has been, it hasn't fallen in yet as far as I can see
7378FE is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 10:10
  #655 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: australia
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
?rel=0" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen>
balance is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 10:11
  #656 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A pretty normal meeting wasnt it. Not the "slaughterhouse" that many of you had been hoping for in order to maintain your snivelling complaints against management. Good profits, route changes that will protect your employment rather than take it away. What happened guys? What conspiracy are you overpaid sheep all going to invent next in order to continue your mindless rants ??
victor two is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 10:14
  #657 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well we did learn that AJ is the most greedy & stupid CEO's in QF history. Who announces $550 million profit, tells everyone how we need more bums on seats. BUT Mum & Dad investors you'll get no dividend, for the 3rd year in a row. Now I'm sure there are proud retired Australians out there who, would have thought a great Australian company would be a good investment. On behalf of the staff at Qantas I'd like to appologize to you all. To say I am disgusted at AJ & the board is an understatement.
Sorry almost forgot AJ & the Board would like to thank you all for their yearly bonus's & god knows what other benefits these greedy pigs think they deserve!
bandit2 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 10:20
  #658 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At Least Ned Kelly had the manners to wear a mask when he robbed you.
Jethro Gibbs is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 10:28
  #659 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As we roll into the night the ABC News reported it like this,




The 24th is turning out to be a bit of a non event so far, just waiting for the report on Lateline that BB was seen singing with Elvis at Martin Place on his way home from Japan.




TIMA9X is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2011, 10:46
  #660 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think a lot of readers here would have had a squizz at the latest announcement and be a little familiar with the Qf Annual reports. Remember when International and Domestic were reported in separate segments? Not now of course. So then there was this statement from them today -

Mr Joyce and chief financial officer Gareth Evans hit out at critics, including unions and Senator Nick Xenophon, who have accused it of cost-shifting losses on to the international divisions to assist operations including Jetstar.


Mr Joyce said it was an "outrageous accusation'' which "baffled'' him.


Mr Evans said said each division of the airline operated on a separate "user pays'' basis for their own services and "there is no cost-shifting between Qantas and Jetstar.''


He said there was no separation in the accounts of the international operations, which the airline claims has suffered heavy losses, and the domestic Qantas operations due to the high crossover of costs involving aircraft and staffing.
If this is the case, HTF do they work out that International has lost $200m?
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  


Show Printable Version
Email this Page

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.