Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jet* NZ OTP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jun 2009, 00:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AH
What sort of turn times are you looking at with your operation?

Jetstar are aiming for 25 - 30 minutes

Last edited by c100driver; 15th Jun 2009 at 05:30.
c100driver is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2009, 04:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The frozen wastelands
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On time performance. HaHa!

Flew Jetstar this weekend.
Delayed 1 hour one way and 2 hours the other. Because of the return delay nearly didn't get home because of Fog.
Ok, they will be having teething problems, but it hasn't gotten better from day 1.
Because of the delays the terminals and security can't cope with the extra people having to hang around for hours. There are no staff in the departure areas and the monitors display times and gates that must be just guessed at.
Once on board the crew were friendly and everything went as planned.
Qantas managed to hold on to some loyal business travellers while they cancelled lots of flights, Jetstar while be losing them fast. From the comments floating around they are not earning themselves any repeat business.
I read a report that reckons PacBlue will be out of NZ in 18 months.
If Jetstar doesn't sort it out soon they will be gone with Pacblue and ANZ the big winners!
17171a is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2009, 07:01
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay Watch
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like a mudguard - glossy gray surface, crp underneath.
Pamelah Andersen is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2009, 23:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well as someone who has flown with them 6 times already domestically, I thought that I'd point out a few little things Ive most certainly noticed:

Firstly, their turnaround times, they really do need to be around 45 minutes. From what I can tell, the big delay seems to be cleaning and catering the aircraft. Disembarkation takes around 6 mins (normal) and boarding takes around 14 (well above average- air nz take 15 to do 133 pax, could be the dual processing they do at the gate...) That leaves 10 minutes for cleaning, and essentially 16 minutes for safety checks to be done under the current routine which should be do-able...but for whatever reason its not.

Then there is this mysterious paperwork which seems to hold everything up once everyone is seated (that will probably shorten the turnaround once the kinks have been ironed) - The cans issue, while they were an issue on the 1st flight, dont seem to be causing much of an issue now, they are generally locked and loaded while pax are still boarding, and havent so far been delayed due to them.

Now the reason im rambling on about all of these things is that currently my 'average' delay time is around 75minutes (longest being 4 hours on the first day). And to add insult to injury, I have arrived at Chistchurch Airport 45 mins before my flight is scheduled to leave and only to see my plane landing on the previous turnaround, that is it has to do an auckland return trip before coming to fetch me. The jetstar ground crew are also very unwilling to shift a jetflex passenger as 'check in closed 2 hours ago for that flight because that was when it was scheduled to leave' Yup. so if you check the website and see your flight is delayed by 3 hours and are smart enough to go to the airport two hours later, your gonna miss that flight. Think they shall be waiving goodbye to many business contracts in the near future.

On the other hand, everything goes very smoothly, no big hassles at check-in (so long as you meet all the conditions),boarding is orderly, and flights are uneventful (ill let you know when i first get diverted away from queenstown (15 trips there in next two months on them...sure to come a cropper at least once!))and you wouldnt know most people have only been working for a week. Very professional in that sense. Just been notified of their new-new schedule...will be an interesting phonecall trying to reorganise 84 sectors....
flyingspikes is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2009, 08:40
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: allover
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New-new schedule..... ah. That would explain the last 2 days AKL-CHC return being cancelled? (Just what one of the radio stations throws in as part of the traffic report).
goodspeed is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2009, 10:45
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, well as reported this morning by stuff.co.nz:
Thousands caught in Jetstar rejig | Stuff.co.nz

Fair Use:
"Jetstar chief executive Bruce Buchanan said the new schedule was part of a refining process and would be "more robust and convenient for passengers".

Flights in and out of Wellington would be moved by between five minutes and 1 1/2 hours. The 4.15pm service to Christchurch would now leave at 2.45pm.

However, some Auckland passengers who had booked in to fly direct to Christchurch were in for a five-hour wait, with the 11.40am service moving to 4.40pm."

Interestingly havent hear anything from JQ themselves despite one of my flights leaving next week, tho sure enough looking on their website, and I only have 1 return Wellington flight that the schedule has stayed the same on!
flyingspikes is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2009, 05:46
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: NEW ZEALAND
Age: 62
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All this talk of a new schedule is strange as they have had these changed flight times out since 23/04/2009 as I have had a list of them for ages. I have the new schedule which runs from 24 June through til the 24 October. Looking through the changes outlined by their CEO there are also changes made to the revamped timetable so even that cant be correct.


Cheers Bazza
BAZZA BOEING is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2009, 09:33
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Jetstar chief executive Bruce Buchanan said the new schedule was part of a refining process and would be "more robust and convenient for passengers".
How stupid does Mr Buchanan think the travelling public is?

Jetstar took over from Qantas, surely they already knew what schedule was already working. Why would they need to refine it to "make it more robust and convenient"?

Talk about spin.
27/09 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2009, 09:53
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: out there somewhere
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OTP, wouldn't have anything to do with crap wx in eNZed, and lack of frequency for JQ...

Oh and is eNZed really big enuff for 3? And no, I do not work for any of them!

Just an interested observer.
float flyer is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 00:33
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: at home
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re that chap going to Queenstown all those times, from what I understand:
- Jetstar regulated by CASA so their procedures/operation not monitered by NZCAA
- Hold CHC as the alternate instead of the usual Invercargill (4-5 hr bus ride compared to 2 hrs from Invers)
- Minimums much higher I am guessing.
- Not a lot of local experience into ZQN; terrain, wx, local traffic.

So I would choose AirNZ for all those reasons no matter what the price difference.
When the weather is good, either operator OK I guess
murdoch_disliker is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 11:14
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks very much for your reply!

Unfortunately these tickets were booked rather far in advance(ticketed now as Qantas flight 4544 I believe now), and will probably end up biting the bullet and staying down there, was scheduled to commute every other day(with winterfest coming up and all), but with a track record and potential for meltdown, think money saved from flights could be put the well use at a local pub and a nice hotel room.

Only 5 months to go before our domestic contract with Qantas ends, and then its off to Air NZ for me. Was even told by one wiseguy from Qantas over the phone that I could expect comparable service to Qantas by Jetstar...all there was to ask was if he meant the delays!

Have fun everyone,
Sorry for hijacking a pilot forum for this!
flyingspikes is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 00:04
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Downunder
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying Spikes,

in relation to earlier question on turn times....

in Oz we do the turns in 25-30 min over a hundred times a day...so it can be done. This is probably more about new operation and new staff etc (from Ground staff to cabin crew and some pilots....all getting familiar with the system). I hope this begins to improve in coming weeks. The containerised aircraft is faster to turn than bulk loaded unless of course there is almost no load for a bulk load type.

The paperwork is probably the pilots doing the load sheet etc at the end of the turn...on NZ for example this comes from a seperate load control department.

With delays....my understanding is that when flights are delayed they remain open until the same time as normal (eg -30 or -45 etc) prior to the new estimated time. So if you were within these timelines you should be able to get on. All of this will evolve as so many brand new staff/operations on 10Jun begin to get familiar with all the technicalities.

ZQN will be a problem with wx until the aircraft are fitted with the all the goodies they need.
TMAK is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 00:50
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: turn L @ Taupo, just past the Niagra Falls...
Posts: 596
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TMAK
ZQN will be a problem with wx until the aircraft are fitted with the all the goodies they need...
Horse-hockey.

What they need are experienced and proficient crews. QF were cancelling flights in & out of NZQN with a bit of wx hanging at the head of the lake, around NZGY and NZQN CAVOK. Utter nonsense. That wx could take 4-5 hours or more to get down the lake -if at all, but that was the basis upon which flights were being diverted/cancelled as recently as Mar. to my personal knowledge.

Some bizarre approaches too. One flight I was on extended "downwind" to NZLX!!! Have a look at the AirNZ drivers. Once they're in the Wakatipu basin, the flight is contained within that geographical area with no need to make these nonsensical approaches.

That sort of procedure/behaviour is quite simply going to lose custom. Pax waiting for a flight that has been cx/diverted "due wx" are still on the ground watching the airline they didn't book on making their schedule with ease. Guess who they're going to book with next time!
RadioSaigon is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 02:43
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: awstrukinfailure
Posts: 88
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down Here we go again

Airline leaves All Blacks fans stranded - National - NZ Herald News

Seems like the Kiwi's will need educating the 'Jetstar' way.

Not good press to get just as they are starting the new brand. I was amused at the somewhat aggresive stance of the Jet* PR person.

Interesting they were able to get on PB at a reasonable fare - looks like there is a bit of spare capacity.

Plainmaker

Last edited by plainmaker; 21st Jun 2009 at 02:46. Reason: Spelling
plainmaker is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 03:19
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Downunder
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radio...

I guess you are aware then that the NZ aircraft are fitted with more advance RNP equipment to allow them down below 4,000 where JQ and probably Jetconnect aircraft do not have this equipment as yet.

Hence any wx below this prevents the airlines from legally being allowed to proceed. Some JQ or NZ pilots can probably give a more advanced technical perpsective on this.

Its not a case of inexperienced pilots...I think many pilots are from JQ in Aust at moment...so you will find quite high experience levels in many cases.
TMAK is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 05:28
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting they were able to get on PB at a reasonable fare - looks like there is a

Would have thought $180 pp quite steep these days
jism is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 05:30
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: turn L @ Taupo, just past the Niagra Falls...
Posts: 596
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TMAK
...you will find quite high experience levels in many cases...
No doubt, quite experienced in the airframe, IFR and RPT -but mountain flying? Flying into areas with severe terrain limitations? Strikes me that perhaps not. If JQ expect to compete in that area, then they have to have pilots that are able to step up to the plate. Once they've finished the procedure over SH, they need to be able to play in that environment, as their competitors do. From what I've seen, they're a fair way away from that. Extending all the way out to NZLX before making a "base" turn is not going to cut the mustard -unless they're prepared to get down & dirty in the gorge with a low ceiling, the ATR's and the VFR traffic. Can't see that happening. Likewise, cancelling/diverting because of a little wx at NZGY isn't doing it -and all the boxes of tricks in the world ain't going to make you look any better when it's severe CAVOK at NZQN.
RadioSaigon is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 09:53
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 480 Likes on 129 Posts
No doubt, quite experienced in the airframe, IFR and RPT -but mountain flying? Flying into areas with severe terrain limitations? Strikes me that perhaps not.
Saigon ,A lot of those captains at JC have massive amounts of experience into queenstown, several of them have been doing it in 737's since 737's first ever went in there. One of them designed the figure 8 visual pattern that is still in use today. Most of them have been flying all over NZ for many many years. Just because it's a red tail doesn't mean they're Ausi's fresh off the boat.
Once they've finished the procedure over SH, they need to be able to play in that environment, as their competitors do
Their competitors are doing a different approach using RNP.They can legally remain IMC much longer. When JC/ J* get to 4000ft they have to be able to remain visual for the entire figure 8 pattern , not just a track to the field.
What they need are experienced and proficient crews.
No, what they need is modern equipment to allow them lower minimums. The current min viz required is 15km and thats in all directions in that basin.
Pretty cock-sure attitude from someone who obviously doesn't operate that equipment into that environment.
regards, Framer.
framer is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 11:49
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bottom half of the world...
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I have heard, many of the J* crews have plenty of experience in mountainous areas. ( quite a few of the J* nz guys have operated into Qtown anyway) To make comments about needing "experienced" crews is just rubbish.
blacksmoke is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 23:04
  #40 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: at home
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Framer, you have hit the nail on the head. Many JC crews have been flying into ZQN consistently for many years now.
It is quite arrogant and dismissive of J* that they did not require these people's services (ie not allowing JC CHC based crew to take same positions in J*, they had to interview etc like anyone off the street).
So with the exception of a few ex-Ansett NZ and maybe 1 or 2 ex-JC crew, no real experience into ZQN.
If the operation was overseen by NZCAA would have been a bit tricky to get this operation approved I am guessing
murdoch_disliker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.