Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas to cancel 787

Old 26th Jun 2009, 07:58
  #61 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Prison Island (WA)
Posts: 1,361
BA have some freshly painted Triplers sitting on the flight line in Seattle.

Could we sling the poms some cash, put a Roo on the tail and take them off their hands? I'm sure they could do with the money.
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2009, 09:26
  #62 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Devonport Tasmania Australia
Posts: 1,837
This is the spin from the Industry site Travel Mole.

Usually non sensationalist and with good insight.

Qantas delivers fresh blow to Boeing-26 June, 2009

If the hypelink doesn't come up, just cut and paste into your addy line.

Best regards

Eastwest Loco is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2009, 10:34
  #63 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,742
Although I'd love to see the Trippler in QF colours, I interpret the decision to cancel 15 B787's as meeting a requirement to conserve cash at a time when no more capacity is required. I think that the existing fleet is all they need for the near future.
Going Boeing is online now  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 01:43
  #64 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 57
first 15 787's gone - just the beginning?

All over the news now about the cancelled 15 787's for QF.....maybe they are having a rethink about the new 777. Boeing reported last week it was to decide soon on either a stretched version of the 787 or re-wing the 777 to counter the A350. I think the Big B knows they are going to have further serious development problems with the 787 project. Nice pic green goblin.
emu787 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 02:48
  #65 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,898
Well if you think about it they have 30 odd 747's and 30 odd 767's. They are replacing these with 50 787's of which they will be deployed between both airlines and 20 A380's. There is a large gap between a 787 and an A380 and them 747's are getting old!
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 08:25
  #66 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: An old flying boat station on Moreton Bay
Age: 80
Posts: 292
Reading wine glass sediment after two glasses of inferior SSB.

It may be that the cancelled 15 were replacements for some 747 and 763 which can now be let go without replacement because expansion has become contraction.

Mid 2013 for 787 suggests no significant cash flow until 2012/2013, which sits right with a 2009/2010 which will be breakeven and no dividend at best, and two further years repairing the balance sheet.

So I doubt you'll see the tripler as a replacement for late 787s. The tripler has, in my opinion, always been about the "hub-buster" ultra long range aircraft which is the Airbus A350 or 777 tweak, or even 787-10.

From my point of view there is no pleasure to be taken from problems that both manufacturers have had in recent years. I'm a fan of both, and as an airline person I like new aircraft to come in on time and over performance.
Wod is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 15:41
  #67 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 63
Triplers??? U guys are still dreamin' bout that old chestnut eh??
Best Rate is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.