Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

A380 to Fat for LAX.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2009, 12:07
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: mascot
Age: 57
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380-800 driver,
sorry mate we were having some fun but I've got a couple of questions for you.
Whats a "warries" and how are they malicious and I'm glad you don't have any landing probs with the dugong.

What do you think about the stories about fuel leaks on ours?
roamingwolf is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2009, 14:59
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fieldsworthy
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Maybe now is as good a time as any to re-introduce Aussie flighties to the pprune Cabin Crew forum. The perfect place for hosties to slag off pilots and each other or even just get into a high-brow discussion of the "thickest" passenger comment or most famous celebrity ever carried.

Reading the fantasies of what certain miserable or embittered hosties wish they'd said or done to pilots gets can be amusing sometimes but does tend to get pretty boring after a while. Mods... if it's true the Aussie peanut-pushers were thrown out of the CC forum for being intolerable, even by their own kind, why should WE have to put up with them?

Thanks in advance!
Eclan is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2009, 18:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet another degenerated thread that highlights why professional pilots have pretty much abandoned D & G Reporting Points.....
Ron & Edna Johns is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2009, 20:24
  #24 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eclan & Ron & Edna Johns....

To be fair this all started when Fun Bags ( a supposed professional pilot ) made this unprovoked statement about myself...
Don't bother responding to lowerlobe. He's a retired flight attendant who seems to be a world expert on anything and everything.
Now,Fun Bags has made the same unsolicited & provocative type of comments in Cabin Crew threads for a long time and instead of responding in kind I made a joke out of it....then a few other guys went along with it.....

I agree with you about the peanut pushers (as you put it Eclan) that do the same as Fun Bags and instead of contributing to a debate only wish to incite trouble.....but then again I have my doubts that some Peanut Pushers are Cabin Crew at all and actually have an agenda to cause trouble.....

If you want to post a comment in a Cabin Crew thread then by all means do so but make it constructive not argumentative and inflammatory as the Peanut Pushers and Fun Bags do....

Remember that the D & G areas are as the owners put it...
Dunnunda & Godzone
An independent family of forums covering all aspects of the Australian/NZ aviation scene.
Note that it say's ALL aspects of aviation.....not just flight deck crew...
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2009, 22:07
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Dunnunda & Godzone
An independent family of forums covering all aspects of the Australian/NZ aviation scene.
Note that it say's ALL aspects of aviation.....not just flight deck crew...
With the name of the forum "Professional Pilots Rumour Network"
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2009, 22:17
  #26 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Green Goblin....Within that network there are various areas including...D&G

So apparently, the 'ALL ASPECTS OF AVIATION' has escaped your attention !!!!

Or do you think pilots are the only ones involved in aviation....there are no cabin crew,no engineers,no groundstaff,no admin,no ATC,no refuellers....the list goes on.

I think it's best to get back onto the topic of this thread though....
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2009, 22:32
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: QLD
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lower

Go start up your own website. Call it PFARUNE.

It is, as the name suggests, a pilot network.

Retire gracefully. Golf, boating, lawn bowls perhaps!
funbags is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2009, 22:52
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
funbags,
It's time you let go of your blinkered anti cabin crew attitude.Lobey has just as much right to post here as you do or any of us.This is not just a parochial club for a few small minded egotistical pilots.You spend much of your time in cabin crew threads so you have to expect others to read and participate in other threads as well.
Lobey is right,what part of all aspects of aviation don't you get.There is a lot more to the world and of aviation than the flight deck.

Back to the thread and does anyone here know if it is possible to build another runway at Los Angeles so it can handle the new larger aircraft and do other airports in Europe have any problems with the A-380?
jungle juice is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2009, 23:27
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: AUS
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JJ.
In the very early days of the B707 operations, they towed the aircraft out to the runway threshold before take-off because they feared the jet engines would hurl molten bitumen across the tarmac. With experience, those fears faded, just as they will with the A380. The runways in LA are already big enough. It's just that they are narrow spaced paralell runways. Everything in LA is tight. Building another runway, if it is possible, which I doubt, would just make it tighter.
Back Seat Driver is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2009, 23:51
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: QLD
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jj

When I post on CC forums, I don't profess to tell them how to run their meal service or deal with irate passengers. They are the experts there.

lower seems to want to tell pilots everything about piloting stuff. He seems to be the font of knowledge on everything aviation. Just wondering why he worked in the cabin then, and wasn't a rocket scientist or something!

Maybe he should stick to the weak black tea and lemons!
funbags is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 00:26
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Land Down Under
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilots Forum

PPruNE may have started off as a pilots forum but is has since morphed into something else.
Remove all non pilots from the forum and you would be left with 50 posters staging a pissing contest.
argusmoon is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 01:03
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back Seat Driver,
Thanks for your reply and here's another question for you.Does anyone operate the A-380 into JFK?

I wasn't going to reply to fun bags but I think this needs to be said.

Originally posted by fun bags
I don't profess to tell them how to run their meal service or deal with irate passengers. They are the experts there.
fun bags your post shows how mendacious you are.In fact looking at your previous posts the majority are in the cabin crew threads and you are a pilot.Why is that fun bags?
You tell us everything from how to vote in OUR EBA to calling us arrogant and telling us we have no qualifications unlike pilots.It seems that your entire purpose is to provoke a fight with cabin crew and get them kicked out of PPrune by having their threads closed down.Yet at the same time you had this to say.
I am not trying to get anyone kicked off. Cabin crew and anyone else aviation related are entitled to post anywhere they see fit on this site
This contradicts your last post for a start
It is, as the name suggests, a pilot network.
but let's look at a few others from fun bags.
The arrogance of Syd based LHCC continues to astound
The "what's in it for me" factor will ensure that the EBA is voted up by a huge majority. I just pity the poor B-Scalers that have to fly with you guys and gals, on much poorer pay and conditions as a result of this EBA.
What you have to understand is that Qantas LHCC thinks themselves to be the best flight attendants in the world, and everyone else is second rate. Just look at their attitude
lower seems to want to tell pilots everything about piloting stuff
funbags,I have not seen lobey telling you how to fly an aircraft but you don't have any problems telling cabin crew how to do their job and how to run their lives.
fun bags ,I think you should keep to your sphere of influence and let bygones be bygones.
jungle juice is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 02:14
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Right Here
Age: 76
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Runways At LAX

LAX did in fact build another runway. 25L was completely dug up, and then moved I believe about 50 yards further south. This project was completely done before the A380 went into service. The reasoning was to provide additional wing tip clearance for all, as well as making the High Speed Exits usuable for the A340-500 without their butt or nose sticking out onto an active runway.

The North Complex has always been available to the A380. I was there the first day that one arrived. Airbus brought one over from France to test the new gates and ground movement. It landed on 24R...the most northern runway.

The article that was quoted in the original post kind of sounds like sour apples on someones part to me. But I have no real knowledge of how the LAX ATC people really feel about the A380.

Just my 2 cents.
NG ExPat is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 02:38
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fieldsworthy
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Not sure what that has to do with the topic. Anyway I heard the A180 was pulled off the JFK route and replaced with the B777.
Eclan is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 03:08
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Emirates flies into JFK with the 380.
Not sure what that has to do with the topic
Eclan,since this thread is about the A-380 being too large for LAX I was asking if they operated into JFK.This is because JFK seems to be a fairly congested airport as it is and I was wondering if it could/has coped with the A-380?
Anyway I heard the A180 was pulled off the JFK route and replaced with the B777.
Does this mean that airbus has made it's own SP version of the A-380 ?
jungle juice is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 07:46
  #36 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,428
Received 204 Likes on 115 Posts
Not again?

tail wheel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.