Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Merged: Tiger Tales

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jun 2010, 08:46
  #561 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wheels Down
Forget the 319's, stick with same capacity all round for flexibility. Keep it simple and they'll be the only one who has resisted temptation to diversify from the low cost model. This is what will bring VB undone over time.
SN
PPRuNeUser0161 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2010, 10:37
  #562 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on guys, I know there was a meeting today. Let us know what's happening.
SN
PPRuNeUser0161 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2010, 11:43
  #563 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: @ CloudBase!
Age: 40
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even the pilot group dont know yet, ease up it'll come out in the wash soon enough!


go_soaring! instead
go_soaring is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2010, 07:14
  #564 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, BUT the CAA in Singapore don't like FAA licences. Pilots with FAA certificates have been employed before in Singapore, however you will have an uphill run converting it compared to someone with a JAA licence.
Metro man is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2010, 08:53
  #565 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Co have offered FO's $108,301K, not sure if they have increased offer to captains. The Co is still banging on about the flexi roster. Anyone know what they are after here?
SN
PPRuNeUser0161 is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2010, 07:25
  #566 (permalink)  
Whispering "T" Jet
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Melbourne.
Age: 68
Posts: 654
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Co is still banging on about the flexi roster. Anyone know what they are after here?
Hmmmm......................what are the Company "after here" by wanting a flexi roster?

Well I’ll break it down for you:

1. If we need you to work a day off – you’ll do it.
2. If we need you to extend a tour of duty – you’ll do it.
3. If we need to recall you from leave – you’ll do it.
4. If we need to change your existing roster so you can’t get to your child’s 6th birthday party, the dinner organised for your wedding anniversary, your best friend’s wedding etc,. Etc,. – you’ll do it (AND with a smile for this one!)

Shall I continue or do you get the idea?
3 Holer is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2010, 08:55
  #567 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
With a rigid 5/2/5/4 pattern it may not be possible to cover the flying program without employing additional pilots and flying everybody a bit less ie you won't do, and get paid for max hours. Company has the costs of additional staff.

If pilots could volunteer to work on their off days and get paid extra for it everybody wins. Those who want more money get it, those who prefer the time off can have that and the company save on additional staff.
Metro man is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2010, 10:16
  #568 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eden Valley
Posts: 2,155
Received 92 Likes on 41 Posts
If pilots could volunteer to work on their off days and get paid extra for it everybody wins. Those who want more money get it, those who prefer the time off can have that and the company save on additional staff
Maybe the F/O's lose out as there are 10% less commands required with Captains working on their days off.
Gnadenburg is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2010, 11:23
  #569 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Beech or the Office.
Age: 14
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"If pilots could volunteer to work on their off days and get paid extra for it everybody wins. Those who want more money get it, those who prefer the time off can have that and the company save on additional staff"

That's what every company project its crewing numbers on BTW.

As stated, the losers are the F/O's WRT this.
Normasars is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2010, 01:40
  #570 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Doing a pre flight inspection
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now going to charge you to queue at the airport.

http://www.news.com.au/travel/news/now- ... t+news_rss
VBPCGUY is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2010, 05:50
  #571 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd like to bypass the check in queue if I could. When travelling low cost, fewer counters are open for less time resulting in a wait while the whole flight checks in together en masse, instead of spread out over a longer time with more counters.

Be a savvy traveler and SHOP AROUND. You may find a full service airline is actually cheaper for what you want to do, especially if they have a special deal on the route or you have a family and need lots of luggage and meals.

If you're on your own, flexible with timing, only carry hand luggage and pack your own lunch the savings can be considerable. Travel search engines are your friend here.
Metro man is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2010, 06:08
  #572 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: deepest darkest recess of your mind
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And just as it has done at the other airlines who charge for bags, cabin crew cop it in the neck. I don't have a problem with getting charged for bags, I have a problem with people attempting to bring on bags that should for weight and size be checked bags. Test them all before they pass check in. Don't make the cabin crew into the bad guys for refusing obviously oversize and weight bags being brought on board. It's a joke these days, the limits are there for a reason.
porch monkey is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 09:29
  #573 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Whanganui, NZ
Posts: 279
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Carry-on bags

"Test them all before they pass check in."

Ah yes, reminds me of one of the best industrial campaigns I was ever a victim of.
The TAA (yes, it was a long time ago - maybe Adelaide about 1982?)
cabin crew were having some kind of ding-dong with management, so they decided to "enforce safety regulations"
"No, of course we're not taking industrial action, that would be illegal. No, no, we're just making sure our high safety standards are maintained"
But, every single carry-on bag was being weighed and measured against the frame thingy. "sorry, sir, too big / heavy, we'll just pop it in the hold for you" "sorry madam, only one piece of carry-on plus your hand-bag, which ones would you like us to put down in the hold"
Absolute chaos at the gate, flight delayed massively, etc.
IIRC, TAA gave in within a week
kiwi grey is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 13:16
  #574 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good Gosh

Making a point, within safety/security requirements so non-contestable, and winning.

Should have been a history lesson for AFAP '89 - sadly not.

Cheers
galdian
galdian is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2010, 03:16
  #575 (permalink)  
Whispering "T" Jet
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Melbourne.
Age: 68
Posts: 654
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Should have been a history lesson for AFAP '89 - sadly not.
That dispute had nothing to do with safety/security and the AFAP never said it did. So what "history lesson" are you talking about galdian?
3 Holer is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2010, 01:42
  #576 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 Holer

Apologies, saw an obvious and went fishing, shouldn't have but...such is life.

Wasn't aware I said anything about safety.

The history lesson - I suppose tactics, and winners, and losers.

Now.....back to tales of Tiger!

cheers!
galdian is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2010, 02:08
  #577 (permalink)  
Whispering "T" Jet
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Melbourne.
Age: 68
Posts: 654
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good Gosh

Making a point, within safety/security requirements so non-contestable, and winning.

Should have been a history lesson for AFAP '89 - sadly not.
.................short term memory loss perhaps?

I do agree.......back to the Tales.
3 Holer is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2010, 16:32
  #578 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: All over
Posts: 635
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like the tale about someone from Tiger Sing coming down to Oz to look at setting up their International AOC..........
b.
boocs is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2010, 10:27
  #579 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard they are bleeding crew to the sand pit (about 20). Anyone confirm?
SN
PPRuNeUser0161 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2010, 01:13
  #580 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In The Dark
Age: 35
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard that they are losing up to half of their SIN Captains.
Down in Oz rumour has it that CASA has a magnifying glass out and that folks at the top don't understand why crew aren't attracted to work for them.
scorcher is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.