Unity
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Wow, I love Pprune forum logic. It's so twisted with vitriol and agenda's that it's almost flawless.
I thought this thread was about allowing VB pilots access to Qrewroom, which I think is a fantastic idea
. From previous posts I am given the impression that this wont be allowed until a group opportunity list is approved by QF management. Not really sure of the link. Have read the EBA twice but still can't find this bit. Must be missing something. Maybe I'll look in the index for Qrewroom 
.
I thought this thread was about allowing VB pilots access to Qrewroom, which I think is a fantastic idea
. From previous posts I am given the impression that this wont be allowed until a group opportunity list is approved by QF management. Not really sure of the link. Have read the EBA twice but still can't find this bit. Must be missing something. Maybe I'll look in the index for Qrewroom .
Thread Starter
Nunc est bibendum
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 5,596
Likes: 37
From: Sydney, Australia
This from the administrator of Qrewroom.
PM me if you don't know the address. I don't want it out publicly for every man and their dog to register....including the automated bots.
A good start.
Please let your Virgin mates know that they can now access Qrewroom by registering at .....
I would appreciate if you would remind them to use their real name when registering. Virgin members will have access to their own forum plus all the "public" forums of Qrewroom.
I would appreciate if you would remind them to use their real name when registering. Virgin members will have access to their own forum plus all the "public" forums of Qrewroom.
A good start.
Whispering "T" Jet
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 669
Likes: 2
From: Melbourne.
I know what the title of the thread is dude 
however, allowing only Virgin crews to access Qrewroom doesn't quite ring true with Keg's statement (of Unity)
Why not include NJS, RFDS, Air North, Skywest, Oz Jet etc,. as those Companies employ "various pilots" in this industry, who I'm sure are willing to work together to reduce the spin of their respective managements.
however, allowing only Virgin crews to access Qrewroom doesn't quite ring true with Keg's statement (of Unity)
What I would like to see is the various pilots in this industry working together to reduce the spin of the various managements and reducing the times of being played off against each other due to lack of interaction.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Mostly at home
Guys,
Before the conspiracy theories get out of control ....
Qrewroom is run privately, through the generosity of one of the QF aircrew. Over the years, he has expanded it to include (at present) tech aircrew from the QF Group. His major concern with expanding membership is in making sure that people registering are who they say they are.
It appears that he has solved this problem with regard to Virgin Crew.
A step forward and he deserves congratulations for his efforts, not half-arsed slagging off. I would suggest any other group that desires access approach him NICELY and see what can be arranged.
N
Before the conspiracy theories get out of control ....
Qrewroom is run privately, through the generosity of one of the QF aircrew. Over the years, he has expanded it to include (at present) tech aircrew from the QF Group. His major concern with expanding membership is in making sure that people registering are who they say they are.
It appears that he has solved this problem with regard to Virgin Crew.
A step forward and he deserves congratulations for his efforts, not half-arsed slagging off. I would suggest any other group that desires access approach him NICELY and see what can be arranged.
N
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
Joined: Apr 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 222
From: Back home again after another fantastic time in Japan; once again back to the 'real world' and continuing the seemingly never ending search for a bad bottle of Red.
If AIPA and the AFAP could extract their collective digits and get on with the job of amalgamating we'd all be a lot better off
Any seconders to the motion????
