Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

The problem with QANTAS is...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jan 2005, 09:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eimeverywhere.
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow The problem with QANTAS is...

....a shortage of lames to achieve the day to day assignments, without resorting to have them do o/t - resulting in excessive down time of aircraft, very upset clients, and loss of customer confidence.

....a shortage of F/A's, (as reported by Crikey) - resulting in passengers being offloaded, and loss of customer confidence.

....a shortage of pilots to crew the JetStar Asia operation - resulting in cancellation of services, and massive under utilisation of expensive equipment, and loss of customer confidence.

....a drastic change to the QANTAS FF'er scheme - resulting in some very p!ssed of people, and a loss of customer confidence.

QANTAS is on a BIG downhill slide, imho.

Geoff, you've screwed your staff about as much as you can, to try to keep the shareholders happy.
But you've rooted a good airline for the the forseeable future, because by screwing your staff (Congrats on your new Fatherhood, by the way ) you've "managed" to screw the business. The people who pay the bills have had a gutsfull, and are deserting in droves - from a multiplicity of areas...not just passengers.

In my opinion, you've really dicked QF, Dicko!

Eimar Moron.
Eimar Moron is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2005, 21:39
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question

When does the change to the F. F`er point system come into effect (is it May)?
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2005, 22:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....greed,

....greed,

.... and more greed.
Uncommon Sense is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 00:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The changes to the FF scheme were always going to happen, the accumulating points debt was always goign to be unsustainable.

(this is a worldwide issue; given the state of the industry in the US however its a little harder to bite the bullet over there just yet)
ftrplt is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 00:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Up north Qld
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up SQ

Bring on SQ domestic for some real service and competition.
pizza is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 01:41
  #6 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
....a shortage of lames to achieve the day to day assignments, without resorting to have them do o/t - resulting in excessive down time of aircraft, very upset clients, and loss of customer confidence.

....a shortage of F/A's, (as reported by Crikey) - resulting in passengers being offloaded, and loss of customer confidence.

....a shortage of pilots to crew the JetStar Asia operation - resulting in cancellation of services, and massive under utilisation of expensive equipment, and loss of customer confidence.

....a drastic change to the QANTAS FF'er scheme - resulting in some very p!ssed of people, and a loss of customer confidence.
Add to this list:

....a shortage of customer service staff, who if they call in sick, are'nt being replaced. Leading to longer turnarounds, very pi$$ed off clients and loss of customer confidence.

Cheers, HH.

Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 03:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And no shortage of obstructive unions and indulged employees that have been on the gravy train for far too long!

Run of the mill flight attendants earning 85K. CSM's earning well in excess of 100K. Second officers earning 150K. Ridiculous!

Geoff Dixon, you are the best CEO in Australia. The aviation world is changing and you have the courage to make the hard decisions BEFORE the red ink starts flowing. As for your $6m pay packet, I consider it just reward to operate a 24/7/365 business that turns over in excess of $12 bn per year and employs almost 40000. Some sort of responsibility that.

As for the alleged "squillions" Qantas make, and the "greed" which drives it, has anybody considered that the margin on turnover is around 4.5%. Yes, QF are rolling in it. They make 4.5 cents for every dollar of revenue. Every $100 ticket makes it $4.5, and every $1000 ticket makes it $45. Wafer thin margins in the most capital intensive industry in the world. How do you fund multi billion dollar re-equipment purchases on those kind of earnings? With experienced, intelligent people who need to be offered significant packages, otherwise their skills will walk out the door and vest with an organisation prepared to pay what they're worth.

I far prefer the proactive QF management team, who are effective agents of change, to their counterparts in the US. In that country, employees require the threat of bankruptcy to realise they are clinging to a world of pay and conditions and work practices that became unsustainable long ago.

Let my now assume the brace position for the usual spray of invective and vitriol...
Flying Tiger is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 04:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No vitriol required.

The commerical success of current decisions will determine the existence or otherwise of QF in the future, not your defence of the current executive.

The customers will decide - not an apologist for the mismanagement.
Uncommon Sense is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 04:41
  #9 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,971
Received 97 Likes on 56 Posts
Hmmm... interesting subject. Two completely different viewpoints put forward in a rational manner.
Any chance at all that this issue will be debated reasonably and without the invective and vitriol anticipated by Flying Tiger?
I sincerely hope so!!

You only live twice. Once when
you're born. Once when
you've looked death in the face.
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 06:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PH 298/7.4DME
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I'm not that familiar with the economics of it all, but I have to say, I travelled on QF today and was impressed, despite the zero personal space that they allow per seat, which is the case on most airlines in economy anyway. Dunno how much money they made on the $249 that I paid, but they seem to be doing ok. For now.

Departure and arrival on time, food actually worth sniffing at, friendly crew and generally a good impression, unlike NJS and a few others.


Why are NJS crews always so obviously grumpy?


520.
Continental-520 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 06:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: CRM re-hab
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are NJS crews always so obviously grumpy?
I've (in my limited experience) always found NJS to be quite pleasant in the cabin... but, as in most areas, you inevitably get the grumpy ones... who become amicable at best after polite smiles etc...
oh well....
Captain Can't is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 06:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,297
Received 332 Likes on 126 Posts
Flying Tiger presents an interesting view point. I disagree with his/her representation of what various trades earn. I have always thought that if you can earn a lot for minimum effort - hats off. Market forces take care of the rest. One shouldn't be denigrated for having the temerity to do a job which requires apparently little effort but pays well. Not affecting the bottom line is it?
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 06:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree Flying Tiger.

But as QF is a Full Service airline, when will QF differentiate themselves and start to increase the yield instead of competing with itself (Jetstar) and VB for revenue. That way the excellent conditions enjoyed by the current staff can still be excellent.

After-all David Jones doesn't sell itself as Kmart...
rescue 1 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 07:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Geoff Dixon, you are the best CEO in Australia. The aviation world is changing and you have the courage to make the hard decisions BEFORE the red ink starts flowing. As for your $6m pay packet, I consider it just reward to operate a 24/7/365 business that turns over in excess of $12 bn per year and employs almost 40000. Some sort of responsibility that.
there are lot of just as good CEO's running Bigger companies, with twice or more staff than QF, and they earn far less than Dicko!

from an ex insiders point of view, QF seam to be sacrificing the medium term future for short term gain! i was offered(forced) a redundancy, and now on a regular basis, they are ringing me back asking if i would like to return!

there is no way im taking a $30K pay CUT to go back to that nuthouse on shift work.


sure, QF are doing well, but we all know what happens to a company in the longer term with a vast majority of very unhappy employees!
Ultralights is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 09:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Harbour City
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I far prefer the proactive QF management team, who are effective agents of change, to their counterparts in the US. In that country, employees require the threat of bankruptcy to realise they are clinging to a world of pay and conditions and work practices that became unsustainable long ago.

Here, here.
Mr Qantas is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 10:27
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the correct way of saying it is:

"Hear, Hear".

On what you are praising however, I think it is

"Jeer, Jeer"
Uncommon Sense is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 10:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, isn't that an interesting first post from Moron?

And doesn't he have an interesting name?
amos2 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 11:04
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1998
Location: somewhere in the nth of Oz, where it isn't really cold
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
food actually worth sniffing at
after just recently clocking up quite a few miles on quite a few flights, I was mightily unimpressed with the catering. That is, until my last flight which was an Intl flt as a domestic pax .. and that was quite a different matter all together. Palatable and enticing, a far cry from the previous offerings.

But I guess if that was all I had to grumble about, QF did OK.
The Voice is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 20:24
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Sorry Tiger, 4.5% is a pretty healthy margin.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 21:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whinging about it on hear wont fix it. All it will do is create a new bashing thread, with pro and anti airline supporters.

Why not find out an important persons mail address in QF and send them your whinges, in a polite well thought out letter. Of course I doubt it will change anything either, but surely it has a better chance than on here.
blueloo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.