Bad day at Manchester?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Down south and up north
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am under the impression that at Manchester the decision for the runway inspection is undertaken by the Airport Authority. The controller cannot delay it to make his life easier.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There might have been nothing on final if the inbounds had been taken into the holds to provide the 5-minute gap, so there could have been quite a few on the APP freq just starting into the radar circuit, all also burning several t/hr.....
The inspections require six minutes.
The planned times are published.
The actual time is flexible (within reason) and is coordinated with the watch manager in advance to avoid/reduce disruption.
The planned times are published.
The actual time is flexible (within reason) and is coordinated with the watch manager in advance to avoid/reduce disruption.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Over the hill and far away
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I could be missing something here ... but doesn't Manchester have Dual Rwy Ops .... normal mode of operation 1 for Arrivals and 1 for Deps?
Therefore no need to take into consideration any inbound traffic (unless non dependent dual rwy ops would be comprimised) and with nobody else taxiing out for departure, the most logical solution would be to delay a Rwy inspection by 2 mins rather than the EK dep for 5 mins.
Just a thought.
Therefore no need to take into consideration any inbound traffic (unless non dependent dual rwy ops would be comprimised) and with nobody else taxiing out for departure, the most logical solution would be to delay a Rwy inspection by 2 mins rather than the EK dep for 5 mins.
Just a thought.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps the request for a PIREP concerning the weather after departure was a factor in the Emirates pilots angst at being delayed for the runway inspection. Thunderstorms? Just a thought!
Luvverley!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: --
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hm, I suspect we've all had bad days, and allowed that to be conveyed very occasionally in transmissions. The Manc guy just kept on going with it. I, personally, wouldn't.
Yes, certain runway inspections are required, but in MY opinion, only when they can be reasonably accommodated in full. Otherwise, piecemeal is it.
That's the way it works at my place, and we all rub along with that theory quite amicably.
Yes, certain runway inspections are required, but in MY opinion, only when they can be reasonably accommodated in full. Otherwise, piecemeal is it.
That's the way it works at my place, and we all rub along with that theory quite amicably.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the requirement is to have a more detailed runway inspection, lasting five minutes or whatever, to take place, wouldn't it make more sense to have two Ops vehicles to do the inspection. They could position themselves at either end of the runway and meet up in the middle, thereby reducing the delay to a/c by half. Just a thought.
daring theory...
Runnway inspections have alway fitted around traffic unless there were specific safety reasons to give them more priority. Runway inspections are one of the only regular events where vehicles come close to the runway. It was then seen that the majority of runway incursions and incidents involving vehicles were during runway inspection - runway inspection must therefore be dangerous.
Rather than looking at why these incidents were occuring and ensuring that everyone complied with the procedures already in place which have evolved over decades to work very well someone in an office in Manchester decided it would be much safer to mandate that all runway inspections should be completed all in one go (ensuring only one clearance to enter the runway) and that all arriving and departing traffic should be delayed in to a big bunch so that the controllers will be busy. This seemed like such a jolly wheeze that it was brought to a Middlesex airport near you with the arrival of a wave of new management brought in from Manchester along with the end to conditional clearances. It looks as though it will spreead further until the next clique of management have other ideas...
The controller in question appeared to me to be inviting official comment from UAE - perhaps with the motivation of getting silly rules recinded. Perhaps his motivation was lost in the exchange due to the communication limitations of the radio, but increased blood pressure via the RTF is never a good idea. Sometimes we do all have bad days though, so give the guy a break!
thanks for reading this far - its very cathartic to get rants like this off my chest. Almost makes me feel like there is chance of changing our silly systems
Rather than looking at why these incidents were occuring and ensuring that everyone complied with the procedures already in place which have evolved over decades to work very well someone in an office in Manchester decided it would be much safer to mandate that all runway inspections should be completed all in one go (ensuring only one clearance to enter the runway) and that all arriving and departing traffic should be delayed in to a big bunch so that the controllers will be busy. This seemed like such a jolly wheeze that it was brought to a Middlesex airport near you with the arrival of a wave of new management brought in from Manchester along with the end to conditional clearances. It looks as though it will spreead further until the next clique of management have other ideas...
The controller in question appeared to me to be inviting official comment from UAE - perhaps with the motivation of getting silly rules recinded. Perhaps his motivation was lost in the exchange due to the communication limitations of the radio, but increased blood pressure via the RTF is never a good idea. Sometimes we do all have bad days though, so give the guy a break!
thanks for reading this far - its very cathartic to get rants like this off my chest. Almost makes me feel like there is chance of changing our silly systems
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The planned times are published
No, they are NOT...They are "advised".
The inspections require six minutes.
The actual time is flexible (within reason) and is coordinated with the watch manager in advance to avoid/reduce disruption
The actual time is flexible (within reason) and is coordinated with the watch manager in advance to avoid/reduce disruption
To avoid "disruption"...Try talking to [ex] MACC ATCOS who have to hold the traffic miles away, especially when the Holds are full
The last "proper" Ops 3s left eons ago. The only one with any sense is R**, and he is often over ruled..
When ATC did the r/w inspections, there was very little delay...but money talks....unfortunately.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The "Inspection" can take up to 20 mins......
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I was a "Runway Controller" [ATCA11] at Manch, I was instructed to do FOUR runs on the Active Runway...Up and Down to the Left/Right of the centreline and same again to the opposite side. Two mile runway x 4 equals eight miles. At the posted "Airside speed limit of 15MPH" I think is "about" the 20 min mark. that does not include stopping/circling to look at "suspicious" objects...dark stains, etc
I also did the Taxyways and aprons...
I also did the Taxyways and aprons...
The "scheduled" runway inspections are based on a six minute run at a speed of approx 30 mph.
Prior to a sked inspection ops3/checker should currently be talking to the watch mgr 30 mins before to allow suitable planning and to be advised when a suitable actual time is available.
The normal scheduled inspections do not usually take 20 minutes on a runway... with two exceptions:
in the middle of the night when nothing is actually moving there is a detailed inspection which also involves driving up and down all the RET's/crossing points, shoulders etc... that one can take 20 mins .. but there's nothing actually using the runway at the time, not really difficult at night to find the time ... if there is it's broken off and resumed
The only time that might happen during daytime ops is if during an inspection something untoward is found.... but in that case it's technically a suspension of ops on that runway until it's declared OK again.
There are usually quite a few other inspections/bird runs which take place ... these runs can (and are) quite often be piecemeal and off/on...... but most of those doing the runs try to check the relevant traffic before calling up and will often use a phrase such as "traffic permitting" etc.
If, for example, a run is required for specific bird control/poss hazard etc then this again is usually identified in the call.
Any current watch manager/tower controller at EGCC knows all this already .....
wiccan I'm afraid your info is very out of date ... R** is actually ops1 these days and these are his requirements.
Personally I don't mind either way if it's one go or piecemeal .. that decision is for others to make.
I can also see that a/c may end up in the hold .. well that's for the folks that make the decisions
I've pointed out before there is a very simple local process for this being addressed if it really is a problem ... the procedures have already been modified this way before.
Prior to a sked inspection ops3/checker should currently be talking to the watch mgr 30 mins before to allow suitable planning and to be advised when a suitable actual time is available.
The normal scheduled inspections do not usually take 20 minutes on a runway... with two exceptions:
in the middle of the night when nothing is actually moving there is a detailed inspection which also involves driving up and down all the RET's/crossing points, shoulders etc... that one can take 20 mins .. but there's nothing actually using the runway at the time, not really difficult at night to find the time ... if there is it's broken off and resumed
The only time that might happen during daytime ops is if during an inspection something untoward is found.... but in that case it's technically a suspension of ops on that runway until it's declared OK again.
There are usually quite a few other inspections/bird runs which take place ... these runs can (and are) quite often be piecemeal and off/on...... but most of those doing the runs try to check the relevant traffic before calling up and will often use a phrase such as "traffic permitting" etc.
If, for example, a run is required for specific bird control/poss hazard etc then this again is usually identified in the call.
Any current watch manager/tower controller at EGCC knows all this already .....
wiccan I'm afraid your info is very out of date ... R** is actually ops1 these days and these are his requirements.
Personally I don't mind either way if it's one go or piecemeal .. that decision is for others to make.
I can also see that a/c may end up in the hold .. well that's for the folks that make the decisions
I've pointed out before there is a very simple local process for this being addressed if it really is a problem ... the procedures have already been modified this way before.
Fortunately our duty officers can spot things driving more than twice as fast :P
Wow .... have to say I'm a bit surprised at that speed for an inspection...
Debris or stuff fine ... that's generally OK to spot but how would you pick up on the start of surface deterioration or AGL fittings .......
spotting this stuff at the first signs of a possible problem allows it to be monitored and an early repair scheduled to avoid a more serious issue or disruption.
I agree a very quick run would work for checking wet/damp/dry or obvious FOD.