UK - NATS Pay negotiations - latest rumours
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: southampton
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You could always go in to work on a day off for a briefing, as you expect your Union Reps to do. How many briefing are they expected to give? How much of their spare time are they expected to give up? And you can't be bothered to give up an hour or two of your own time.
Just plain lazy!
Just plain lazy!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FFS you guys need to start getting more aggressive in your negotiations. "Working together" was a managment con in our company - it's the same in yours, wake up and realise that it's only going to lead to poorer Ts and Cs. What have ATCOs got out of the relationship? Getting screwed over in your last pay deal whilst that TCPB took a nice pay rise, Mrs PB earning £130k for work for one of the board and mgmt taking a decent payrise after you'd agreed to your shafting.
This plus the blatant lies told which lead to your capitulation over pensions, even now they're looking at new ways of disadvantaging anyone that takes part time.
Just look across at the going rates over in the EU and see how far you've been left behind.
This plus the blatant lies told which lead to your capitulation over pensions, even now they're looking at new ways of disadvantaging anyone that takes part time.
Just look across at the going rates over in the EU and see how far you've been left behind.
Last edited by Bucking Bronco; 14th Apr 2010 at 15:08.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: swanwick
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't expect my union reps to do it on their days off. Being a rep is voluntary, just like the meetings. Nothing lazy about it.
btw...I didn't go to any meetings, they all coincided with my tea breaks.
btw...I didn't go to any meetings, they all coincided with my tea breaks.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are your Reps not credited for Union duties by NATS?
Don't Tell him Pike - spot on. Unbelievable that people can't be bothered to go to meetings/briefings, it's this apathy that plays directly into the hands of management. A compliant apathetic workforce that can't be bothered to be educated on issues that effect their Ts and Cs - a manager's wet dream. With attitudes like that you reap what you sow.
Don't Tell him Pike - spot on. Unbelievable that people can't be bothered to go to meetings/briefings, it's this apathy that plays directly into the hands of management. A compliant apathetic workforce that can't be bothered to be educated on issues that effect their Ts and Cs - a manager's wet dream. With attitudes like that you reap what you sow.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: swanwick
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are your Reps not credited for Union duties by NATS?
Don't Tell him Pike - spot on. Unbelievable that people can't be bothered to go to meetings/briefings, it's this apathy that plays directly into the hands of management. A compliant apathetic workforce that can't be bothered to be educated on issues that effect their Ts and Cs - a manager's wet dream. With attitudes like that you reap what you sow.
We don't get a say, just told what has been decided. (ref over time rates/conditions) I choose not to work overtime because I enjoy being at home. There are plenty of people that will come in on days off though which is why the rate hasn't changed from that of 2000/02 while training for Swanwick.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: swanwick
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
even now they're looking at new ways of disadvantaging anyone that takes part time.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ref: even now they're looking at new ways of disadvantaging anyone that takes part time.
I believe this refers to the changes the company wish to bring in to the pension scheme, even though we were told that after closing the scheme to new entrants we wouldn't be asked to make any more changes.
As I understand it, apologies in advance I don't have any exact figures to hand:
ATCO A works full time, after returning from maternity leave they go part time (for arguments sake 50%) for 5 years for child care reasons, then return full time.
Under current terms ATCO A can at a later date buy back those 2.5 years to make up their pension at the same rate (defined benefit) as their colleagues who continued to work full time. The company want to change this so that ATCO A would buy back years in to a defined contribution scheme similar to the pension scheme for new entrants instead.
This would affect anybody who reduced their working hours for any amount of time due childcare, illness, looking after eldery relative, etc.
I believe this refers to the changes the company wish to bring in to the pension scheme, even though we were told that after closing the scheme to new entrants we wouldn't be asked to make any more changes.
As I understand it, apologies in advance I don't have any exact figures to hand:
ATCO A works full time, after returning from maternity leave they go part time (for arguments sake 50%) for 5 years for child care reasons, then return full time.
Under current terms ATCO A can at a later date buy back those 2.5 years to make up their pension at the same rate (defined benefit) as their colleagues who continued to work full time. The company want to change this so that ATCO A would buy back years in to a defined contribution scheme similar to the pension scheme for new entrants instead.
This would affect anybody who reduced their working hours for any amount of time due childcare, illness, looking after eldery relative, etc.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't Tell Him Pike, you are an
3 of the 4 were days off ie the briefings notice was posted while I was NOT in work so I didn't see there were any briefings until I came into work on the day that the last briefing was taking place. On that day I was in the simulators examining, the final exercise completely clashed with the briefing so there was no chance of being released to go to it. We couldn't move the last exercise due to the emergency DD&C as the simulators had to be handed to the system engineers to start reconfiguring it. What's the point of jumping down someone's throat, could you not just post what you know about the briefings? Would have saved you being thrown a shovel load back.
I'm still not much wiser even since talking to my colleagues, they were in the same boat, only knew about the briefings on the final day & not many could be released from the ops room. The union really do need to be shaken up as the standard of their work is getting embarrassing.
5 Miles
You could always go in to work on a day off for a briefing, as you expect your Union Reps to do. How many briefing are they expected to give? How much of their spare time are they expected to give up? And you can't be bothered to give up an hour or two of your own time.
Just plain lazy!
You could always go in to work on a day off for a briefing, as you expect your Union Reps to do. How many briefing are they expected to give? How much of their spare time are they expected to give up? And you can't be bothered to give up an hour or two of your own time.
Just plain lazy!
I'm still not much wiser even since talking to my colleagues, they were in the same boat, only knew about the briefings on the final day & not many could be released from the ops room. The union really do need to be shaken up as the standard of their work is getting embarrassing.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Home
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5miles
The union really do need to be shaken up as the standard of their work is getting embarrassing.
The union really do need to be shaken up as the standard of their work is getting embarrassing.
blueskythinking
I am sure the previous two posters think it is a good deal. Can't really be bothered to get into an argument about it as you were probably happy to wave goodbye to your pension rights too. Any deal that gets you less money for the same thing as we did ten years ago can't be seen as driving a hard bargain. Simple enough for you?
I am sure the previous two posters think it is a good deal. Can't really be bothered to get into an argument about it as you were probably happy to wave goodbye to your pension rights too. Any deal that gets you less money for the same thing as we did ten years ago can't be seen as driving a hard bargain. Simple enough for you?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Me Me Me Me - bored of hearing people say "get involved". I haven't got time, I do many of those other unpaid jobs that are needed instead. I pay my monthly subscriptions to Prospect therefore I expect to be properly represented. Its a shame there isn't a decent alternative as I'd soon move.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Costa del Swanwick
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm still not much wiser even since talking to my colleagues
You could even request a copy of the agreement if you want one from your rep-even I understood it so it can't be too complicated.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wimborne
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i am so sorry
me me me me - i can only apologise for causing the worst recession in living memory!! There was me thinking it was predominantly caused by sub prime borrowing in the US and over leveraged buyouts of dotcom companies! I will immediately seek out my union rep ( will be fairly easy as he will be in our management suite ) and offer to increase my subscriptions. Alternatively I could continue to view things from a more realistic viewpoint and see that once again our union ( and yes it is my union too as I suspect I have spent at least as long as you funding it as well as five years as a rep ) have been conned by a slippery management team. Am I the only one who has noticed our reps answering every question with a sentence beginning with ' so ' . Now who else does that??
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The attitude of some amazes me:
On the third day of the unprecedented complete shutdown of air transport in the UK at least one individual refused to cancel his rostered AAVA and sat in the AC Ops Room with blank radar screens. I bet he'll be the first to complain if his 'rights' are infringed in any negotiations.
Wasn't you was it, 5 miles?
On the third day of the unprecedented complete shutdown of air transport in the UK at least one individual refused to cancel his rostered AAVA and sat in the AC Ops Room with blank radar screens. I bet he'll be the first to complain if his 'rights' are infringed in any negotiations.
Wasn't you was it, 5 miles?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Costa del Swanwick
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guess what, they want to interface EFD to AMAN.
at least one individual refused to cancel his rostered AAVA
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Home
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
blueskythinking
me me me me - i can only apologise for causing the worst recession in living memory!! There was me thinking it was predominantly caused by sub prime borrowing in the US and over leveraged buyouts of dotcom companies! I will immediately seek out my union rep ( will be fairly easy as he will be in our management suite ) and offer to increase my subscriptions. Alternatively I could continue to view things from a more realistic viewpoint and see that once again our union ( and yes it is my union too as I suspect I have spent at least as long as you funding it as well as five years as a rep ) have been conned by a slippery management team. Am I the only one who has noticed our reps answering every question with a sentence beginning with ' so ' . Now who else does that??
me me me me - i can only apologise for causing the worst recession in living memory!! There was me thinking it was predominantly caused by sub prime borrowing in the US and over leveraged buyouts of dotcom companies! I will immediately seek out my union rep ( will be fairly easy as he will be in our management suite ) and offer to increase my subscriptions. Alternatively I could continue to view things from a more realistic viewpoint and see that once again our union ( and yes it is my union too as I suspect I have spent at least as long as you funding it as well as five years as a rep ) have been conned by a slippery management team. Am I the only one who has noticed our reps answering every question with a sentence beginning with ' so ' . Now who else does that??
You find yourself being offered a tidy chunk of change, on top of a good salary, to turn up for training on a day off that you will also be given back to take later... All this at a time of global financial turmoil and significant cost-cutting. No really something to be complaining about is it.
For what it's worth, I've also had my issues with how our reps at a central level have handled things. I believe they were out-played on the pension debate and also rather gullible on the last pay deal. I am a rep though, so I also sympathise with what a difficult job it can be at times.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Down South
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the third day of the unprecedented complete shutdown of air transport in the UK at least one individual refused to cancel his rostered AAVA and sat in the AC Ops Room with blank radar screens. I bet he'll be the first to complain if his 'rights' are infringed in any negotiations.
I know there's not much give from management usually, but there's got to be a bit of give and take in circumstances like these
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don't actually say what your response was...
Based upon the time of your post I suspect it was the honourable thing. If not, you were being paid extra money by NATS to contribute to PPRuNE!!
Based upon the time of your post I suspect it was the honourable thing. If not, you were being paid extra money by NATS to contribute to PPRuNE!!