UK - NATS Pay negotiations - latest rumours
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: 29 Acacia Road
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To continue from del prado's post
there wont be any shortfall in budgets! That was supposed to be the whole point behind capping the pensionable pay remember? The figures are already based on RPI +.5 fixed for 15 years, so the required amount is known. It will reduce if there is no pay rise of course, but then it will also have reduced somewhat because they have stopped the scheme for newcomers.
That post is either a mistake on your part egnlyt, or spreading of misinformation and scaremongering...
an increase in pension costs would only add to the apparent shortfall in the CP2 budget
That post is either a mistake on your part egnlyt, or spreading of misinformation and scaremongering...
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern England
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there wont be any shortfall in budgets!
Not scaremongering, just the way it is and slightly irrelevant because we voted Yes. I was only countering those who argued that we should have voted No.
Shortfall? We've been making 50 million profits for each of the last 5 years. I can't wait until this year's financial results are published.
Although it has been making profits it has spent most of that money on the capital investment programme and reducing its debt.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And an alleged £50 million dividend this year to the airlines... but even after the dividend has been paid clear profits are rumoured to be in excess of another £50 million plus...
Be careful not to confuse budget shortfall with loss, you can make a profit and still have a shortfall in your budget
BTW, the 10% reduction you are quoting, is that flights or revenue?
The higher revenue flights are not down by nearly as much as the less lucrative traffic.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern England
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And an alleged 13% pay rise for our glorious leader let's not forget.
And an alleged £50 million dividend this year to the airlines
BTW, the 10% reduction you are quoting, is that flights or revenue?
The higher revenue flights are not down by nearly as much as the less lucrative traffic.
The higher revenue flights are not down by nearly as much as the less lucrative traffic.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 5116N00044W
Age: 76
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW, the 10% reduction you are quoting, is that flights or revenue?
The higher revenue flights are not down by nearly as much as the less lucrative traffic.
The higher revenue flights are not down by nearly as much as the less lucrative traffic.
(see EUROCONTROL - Service Units Forecast )
The latest predictions were due last week but still haven't been posted - don't expect too much cheer when they are issued.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dividends
When we talk about invstors/shareholders not having had an adequate return on their investment, we need to remember that this return does not need to be in the form of dividends. An increase in the value of your shares is also a return, and one which can be reflected in the individual shareholders company accounts. I would say a return where ones share value has increased from approx £0.80 to £2.50 in 8yrs isn't so bad. That equates to the FTSE increasing by 300% over the same period. Not such a bad return really!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern England
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Be careful not to confuse the artificial price set to allow a pseudo trade in the employee share holding with the actual value of NATS or its shares.
Some of the airlines which form the Airline Group are not public companies so it's quite hard to see what value they put on their Airline Group shareholding and some don't put a figure in their Annual Reports. Those that do seemed to assume a value last year of about £10.5 million on an original investment of £6.6 million. Not bad but well down on the 300%. As FTSE shares have fallen about 30% since those reports it would be reasonable to assume some adjustment in NATS share valuation based on likely future income and dividend will be reflected in their 2008/2009 reports when they are published. Their shareholding value is probably just a little bit more than they paid for it but as there's no real market nobody knows for sure.
Some of the airlines which form the Airline Group are not public companies so it's quite hard to see what value they put on their Airline Group shareholding and some don't put a figure in their Annual Reports. Those that do seemed to assume a value last year of about £10.5 million on an original investment of £6.6 million. Not bad but well down on the 300%. As FTSE shares have fallen about 30% since those reports it would be reasonable to assume some adjustment in NATS share valuation based on likely future income and dividend will be reflected in their 2008/2009 reports when they are published. Their shareholding value is probably just a little bit more than they paid for it but as there's no real market nobody knows for sure.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Introduction of Mode S
In reply to ImnotanERIC's earlier post....
Can any one recall what happended when Mode S was first introduced into OPs. Was there a smooth transition? Was it well received by the Ops room?
Can any one recall what happended when Mode S was first introduced into OPs. Was there a smooth transition? Was it well received by the Ops room?
Last edited by xzulu; 1st Mar 2009 at 20:27. Reason: clarity
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South of UK
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Assuming you mean Mode S Tools in the ops room, it was extremely well received if I recall, although there had to be a new RDP build pretty much straight afterwards as some minor assumptions made in simulations weren't quite the same as reality when it came to the levels of Mode S equipage in the transponder population and some related indications - if I've got that wrong I'm sure an LTC bod will say so. No where near as bad as AMAN's introduction.
Meanwhile, back on thread..............
Meanwhile, back on thread..............
Last edited by Radarspod; 1st Mar 2009 at 20:58.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Xzulu
Mode S was very well received in the Ops room. There were some moans about some superfluous information causing excess clutter on the radar, and they got fixed immediately.
There will always be some moans when new kit etc is introduced - it's what comes naturally to an ATCO - the time ATCOs don't whinge when something new has been introduced is the time to sit up and worry.
The difference is the whinges about Mode S were done and dusted after about a week. Thereafter there were MORs put in because some airline operator were seen to be deviating from what was condered should have been the norm.
Mode S was very well received in the Ops room. There were some moans about some superfluous information causing excess clutter on the radar, and they got fixed immediately.
There will always be some moans when new kit etc is introduced - it's what comes naturally to an ATCO - the time ATCOs don't whinge when something new has been introduced is the time to sit up and worry.
The difference is the whinges about Mode S were done and dusted after about a week. Thereafter there were MORs put in because some airline operator were seen to be deviating from what was condered should have been the norm.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Coast
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pay. I hear that the Union bods walked out on Fri. There must be a union announcement soon.
Less than RPI is a cut in our conditions after accepting all the recent changes. That is of course last years RPI.
Less than RPI is a cut in our conditions after accepting all the recent changes. That is of course last years RPI.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southampton,hampshire,england
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Communication
The union is well aware of deficiencies in its communication with the membership.....or so I was led to believe! I am concerned at the lack of touchy-feely union/membership chats to gauge the willingness or otherwise of the workforce to consider industrial action.......and exactly what level of offer would be needed to persuade worker opinion against a strike vote.
Bit too much going on in little secret rooms with no feedback for my liking!
Bit too much going on in little secret rooms with no feedback for my liking!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my garden shed
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If Nats are offering 0%, then I expect to meet them half way and get 3%, at the very least
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RPI is historical data - i.e. prices have already gone up by that amount. Anything below RPI is a pay cut in real terms, so 3% is indeed a pay cut in real terms and thus should stick to no less than RPI - Aug08 or Sep08 figures, whichever we normally use - not latest
...The most popular cuts of lamb, pork and beef are up by as much as 59% in a year, putting enormous pressure on household budgets...
It's in the Mirror - it must be true!
A pay award of last Augusts RPI (a reflection of the year up to August 2008) would in effect be a standard of living freeze at best, and a standard of living cut in some opinion.
August 2009 RPI+1 is what we should be aiming to get - we should be claiming initially for higher to ensure we get it...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LACC - the Premier Centre
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
055166K
Couldn't agree with you more. O.K. so the reps walked out of the pay meeting last Friday, I'm pretty sure management consider that a good result, no negotiations mean no pay rise, which is exactly what they want.
It's time to up the ante and start talking about industrial action unless a sensible offer is made my a certain deadline, scaremongering and propaganda works both ways. In the Profile magazine other similiar Professional groups managed a 3-4% pay rise, so why can't we negotiate the same?
Please can the Prospect reps organise some question and answer sessions so that they can give and receive ideas on how their members should proceed to get this deal through soon, because the longer we wait the worse position we will be in.
The Jan 2009 pay deal is based on August 2008 RPI and NOTHING ELSE, it must be stressed that current traffic levels and RPI must not be used in the negotiations by management. The August 2009 RPI will probably be negative for the Jan 2010 pay talks and that is why it's SO important to ensure we don't come away with nothing now.
Couldn't agree with you more. O.K. so the reps walked out of the pay meeting last Friday, I'm pretty sure management consider that a good result, no negotiations mean no pay rise, which is exactly what they want.
It's time to up the ante and start talking about industrial action unless a sensible offer is made my a certain deadline, scaremongering and propaganda works both ways. In the Profile magazine other similiar Professional groups managed a 3-4% pay rise, so why can't we negotiate the same?
Please can the Prospect reps organise some question and answer sessions so that they can give and receive ideas on how their members should proceed to get this deal through soon, because the longer we wait the worse position we will be in.
The Jan 2009 pay deal is based on August 2008 RPI and NOTHING ELSE, it must be stressed that current traffic levels and RPI must not be used in the negotiations by management. The August 2009 RPI will probably be negative for the Jan 2010 pay talks and that is why it's SO important to ensure we don't come away with nothing now.