Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Non-standard flight levels and coordination

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Non-standard flight levels and coordination

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 08:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Non-standard flight levels and coordination

Last week, heading east via REDFA with London, I found myself in and out of a lightly icing stratocu layer at FL90. Being unpressurised I didn't want to go to FL110, so I requested, and was offered without comment, FL100 -- which would conventionally be a westbound level.

By contrast, I remember a similar occasion a couple of years ago heading south east via SASKI, asking for FL100 and being told that only FL90 or FL110 were available in that direction.

Does a non-semicircular flight level require special coordination with adjacent ACCs? Always, never, or does it depend on the adjacent FIR?
bookworm is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 08:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lymington
Age: 59
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have found in recent years that westbound and eastbound levels are more commonly being used for the "other" direction. This may be bad practice, but as long as everybody is aware of the use of these "non standard" directional levels there should not be a problem. Maybe there was already traffic at FL100 making it easier for you to cruise at 90 or climb through to 110?
Caesartheboogeyman is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 10:49
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Maybe there was already traffic at FL100 making it easier for you to cruise at 90 or climb through to 110?
It was a while ago, but my recollection of the conversation left me with the impression, perhaps incorrect, that it was more to do with approaching the FIR boundary (might have been KONAN rather than SASKI, I forget) than traffic.
bookworm is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 13:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in the middle
Age: 42
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That could have been a reason for not giving you clearance for FL100.some coworkers are really hard to work with!
iraatc777 is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 19:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southampton,hampshire,england
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the necessary co-ordination has been carried out with the relevant agency, particularly if the flight is in regulated airspace, it poses no problem. In certain UK sectors it is not at all unusual to utilise "opposite direction" levels [or ODLs] as a matter of routine. It enables a large amount of traffic to cruise at or fairly close to optimum economy level. During the early part of the morning, for example, most jet levels are used for the eastbound Atlantic rush......about mid-morning there is a switch to using most jet levels [irrespective of directional convention] for the westbound Atlantic rush.
In your specific case a controller will always make the extra effort if you have an icing problem. In other parts of UK airspace the airway base may be so high as to preclude choice of "unpressurised" levels....the use of ODLs allows best and efficient use of airspace to the benefit of all users.
055166k is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.