High College Failure Rate?
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newcastle
Age: 38
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you must have done something right it if your leaving a 33k a yr job and your only 21 mate! p.s. check your pm's roberts
Last edited by richyinnewcastle; 24th Apr 2007 at 22:06.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"but those that fail an SVC or after only 100 hours live? Should they really have been there in the first place?"
I can name numerous names that fit this criteria who are now competent valid controllers at other units.
I can name numerous names that fit this criteria who are now competent valid controllers at other units.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would have thought it would make more economic sense to extend the course make it more encompassing equipping students with a greater knowledge not only of procedures but of how the whole system works prior to sending them to units this should also mean any failures were down to not being suitable rather than the possibility they didn't have enough time to learn what they need to.
The old courses had a much greater pass rate, recourses were not the norm as more passed their exams. Not everything that was done in the past was bad i would say it was an improvement of todays courses but with bean counters in charge its all about de skilling not producing a rounded student ATCO.
The old courses had a much greater pass rate, recourses were not the norm as more passed their exams. Not everything that was done in the past was bad i would say it was an improvement of todays courses but with bean counters in charge its all about de skilling not producing a rounded student ATCO.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swanwick, England
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I disagree.
On a recent SVC one student had three times as much "live" time as another guy yet when it came to the svc the guy with the least amount of time was equally as good as the guy with more time.
It all comes down to the quality of instruction and not just being sat there and being left to get on with it as I have witnessed.
Plus, I have offered pre-svc guys live time and they refused so what happens then?
Also, I must ask you, when you were working the wings and an early go came up did you take it or hang around for some live time?
On a recent SVC one student had three times as much "live" time as another guy yet when it came to the svc the guy with the least amount of time was equally as good as the guy with more time.
It all comes down to the quality of instruction and not just being sat there and being left to get on with it as I have witnessed.
Plus, I have offered pre-svc guys live time and they refused so what happens then?
Also, I must ask you, when you were working the wings and an early go came up did you take it or hang around for some live time?
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chorley
Age: 49
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RO13ERTS - I too start training in September and am leaving a fairly well paid job. Reading the posts here on failure rates is worrying though, the recruitment process seems robust enough, but it sounds like even with the correct positive attitude, dedication, and ability there's still a big chance of failure.
The 10K is added pressure for some poeple (depends on personal circumstances) ie. if you have a wife, child and mortgage!! Ah well that's my little problem.
See you in September.
The 10K is added pressure for some poeple (depends on personal circumstances) ie. if you have a wife, child and mortgage!! Ah well that's my little problem.
See you in September.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Southampton
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ppdude
"but those that fail an SVC or after only 100 hours live? Should they really have been there in the first place?"
I can name numerous names that fit this criteria who are now competent valid controllers at other units.
But would they have validated at that other unit if they had come straight from the College? We'll never know, but the time they spent at LACC will have had some extra training benefit. Scottish and Manch have refused to take SVC failures from us for some time now.
SVC failures are not common at present. Yahoo must have been at LACC before we began formal preSVC training and in that respect may have been unlucky, however the emphasis in the first cycle on any SVC is knowledge of the Sector and procedures - not their application. The quickest way to fall behind on an SVC is to not know the bookwork and that is all down to the individual. This may or may not have been the case on Yahoos SVC, only he or she knows, but shouldn't occur anymore.
I have some sympathy for Trainees that refuse live time out of the blue. I don't think it is a good idea to turn it down but, with no live R/T experiance prior to starting at LACC, I can see why some wouldn't be too keen to try without a bit of notice!
"but those that fail an SVC or after only 100 hours live? Should they really have been there in the first place?"
I can name numerous names that fit this criteria who are now competent valid controllers at other units.
But would they have validated at that other unit if they had come straight from the College? We'll never know, but the time they spent at LACC will have had some extra training benefit. Scottish and Manch have refused to take SVC failures from us for some time now.
SVC failures are not common at present. Yahoo must have been at LACC before we began formal preSVC training and in that respect may have been unlucky, however the emphasis in the first cycle on any SVC is knowledge of the Sector and procedures - not their application. The quickest way to fall behind on an SVC is to not know the bookwork and that is all down to the individual. This may or may not have been the case on Yahoos SVC, only he or she knows, but shouldn't occur anymore.
I have some sympathy for Trainees that refuse live time out of the blue. I don't think it is a good idea to turn it down but, with no live R/T experiance prior to starting at LACC, I can see why some wouldn't be too keen to try without a bit of notice!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chorley
Age: 49
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MancBoy - don't see that as any problem whatsover, I have total respect for anyone with knowldege I can learn from. Besides my 3 yr old tells me what to do most of the time!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: solihull
Age: 38
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BAZZALA,
Congrats, I will look forward to seeing you there. I have no problem with failure if I am simply not of said mindset for the job, only if I myself cause the failure.
Couldn't help but notice you live in Chorley, is that Chorley as in Manchester?
Congrats, I will look forward to seeing you there. I have no problem with failure if I am simply not of said mindset for the job, only if I myself cause the failure.
Couldn't help but notice you live in Chorley, is that Chorley as in Manchester?
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wherever I happen to be at the time
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coming in your ears!
From what I hear, the college is seriously understaffed, with instructors and assistants being asked to work overtime in order to train new instructors etc. Sounds like they're so stretched they might not even be able to fulfil NATS own training requirements soon.
I do wonder how far the house of cards is from collapse?
Are the beancounters aware of the oucome of their 'improvements'
From what I hear, the college is seriously understaffed, with instructors and assistants being asked to work overtime in order to train new instructors etc. Sounds like they're so stretched they might not even be able to fulfil NATS own training requirements soon.
I do wonder how far the house of cards is from collapse?
Are the beancounters aware of the oucome of their 'improvements'
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Arkady
You say that “...you need a certain something to be a controller. What that 'something' is no-one seems to have managed to pin down otherwise we'd have a 100% record on selection and training.” I’d argue that it is a combination of factors and circumstances but either way we are agreed that we are unable to select recruits who will definitely validate, thus some must be failed at some point. Let’s face it, if we had a perfect selection process we would simply be “failing” applicants rather than Students.
In the real world the first opportunity to see if an applicant has got your “certain something” is the college. If we could identify at that point who would definitely validate, any failures at the units could be seen as reflecting on the unit training rather than the individual Student. However we still can’t pinpoint the “certain something” at this stage so some Students who can cope at the College are going to progress to live units and fail there. Fact of life.
Within NATS, Area training is cumulative, it gets more demanding the further you progress. At some point, those without the “certain something” will find they can no longer cope. That is not the end (at least not at LACC) as the Student will then be given further time in which to reach the desired level of achievement. This is crunch time.
Whatever the circumstances the Student has to face the need to change something about the way they are approaching the task. Perhaps they are not methodical enough – they need to be more disciplined, maybe they are too cautious – they need to have faith in their decisions (and trust their mentors to catch their errors) or maybe they need to grasp the bigger picture to work better in the team. They will be given plenty of help to identify the problem and how to solve it. The one thing they cannot do is change nothing.
You are concerned that “…. you do not recognise that someone prepared to argue a professional point is showing all the signs of reaching a level of knowledge and confidence where the training is paying off.” The context of my comment was a Student who has continually shown all the signs of NOT reaching the level of knowledge and ability required. In fact, your comment is a perfect example of this sort of thing. You have made a perfectly good and valid general point but utterly failed to recognise that within the context of the specific situation your argument is irrelevant.
I reserve judgement on the new courses at the College until we see the Students themselves but if it is more difficult to get through that can only be to the benefit of those that pass and the units to which they are posted.
But at least Arkady will be able to say "Told you so".
Last edited by Spitoon; 30th Apr 2007 at 15:09. Reason: Spilling
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: England
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Relying on those doing the selection is one thing, alas applicants first have to get through a "non NATS" aptitude day first.
Could it just be that the apparent failure rate is in part caused by suitable applicants being rejected by a defective aptitude test system. In other words perhaps we are unintentionally rejecting suitable aplicants due to flawed external assessments....
Why not just bring the applicants in and stick them in front of a simple radar vectoring exercise in the sim (e.g. 3 a/c)??? Bet you can tell immediately if the applicant has the "spatial awareness" required for the job....
Just a thought.....
Could it just be that the apparent failure rate is in part caused by suitable applicants being rejected by a defective aptitude test system. In other words perhaps we are unintentionally rejecting suitable aplicants due to flawed external assessments....
Why not just bring the applicants in and stick them in front of a simple radar vectoring exercise in the sim (e.g. 3 a/c)??? Bet you can tell immediately if the applicant has the "spatial awareness" required for the job....
Just a thought.....
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: solent-on-sea
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So another slight discrepancy betwwen units then.
Here at TC students are not allowed any pre TVC RT anymore as it is against unit policy on safety grounds.
Go figure...
Here at TC students are not allowed any pre TVC RT anymore as it is against unit policy on safety grounds.
Go figure...
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by sector8dear
Relying on those doing the selection is one thing, alas applicants first have to get through a "non NATS" aptitude day first.
Could it just be that the apparent failure rate is in part caused by suitable applicants being rejected by a defective aptitude test system. In other words perhaps we are unintentionally rejecting suitable aplicants due to flawed external assessments....
Could it just be that the apparent failure rate is in part caused by suitable applicants being rejected by a defective aptitude test system. In other words perhaps we are unintentionally rejecting suitable aplicants due to flawed external assessments....
Why not just bring the applicants in and stick them in front of a simple radar vectoring exercise in the sim (e.g. 3 a/c)??? Bet you can tell immediately if the applicant has the "spatial awareness" required for the job....
So, at working level, we have to take what we are given - to rely on the selection process to provide the best that it can - and then do our best to get tose trainees up to a standard that will enable them to work on their own. I re-iterate my point that in training we should look at how to help trainees to succeed rather than look for ways to fail them.
P.S. - Apologies for that last bit to any current and future trainees for making them sound like a commodity!
Defruiter
You have already demonstrated your ability to a satisfactory standard in completing the rating (sic) course. That is a worthy achievement and do realise that you are well grounded now for OJT - the course is as realistic as possible and was very well designed - n'est-ce pas, Berni?
However, you do illustrate the concerns that many of us had in respect of the evident level of confidence and experience of trainees such as you. Unfortunately, the NATS beancounters cannot understand that concept.
You have already demonstrated your ability to a satisfactory standard in completing the rating (sic) course. That is a worthy achievement and do realise that you are well grounded now for OJT - the course is as realistic as possible and was very well designed - n'est-ce pas, Berni?
However, you do illustrate the concerns that many of us had in respect of the evident level of confidence and experience of trainees such as you. Unfortunately, the NATS beancounters cannot understand that concept.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: By the Sea-side
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gonzo - mostly correct
2 sheds - maybe they will if they read this thread..
2 sheds - maybe they will if they read this thread..
Last edited by Dances with Boffins; 8th May 2007 at 09:42. Reason: offended an innocent party