Ridiculous and Dangerous RT
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ridiculous and Dangerous RT
Hi All!
I wanted to get some opinions from you all about what seems to be a new epidemic on the radio. I speaking of the pilots who say ridiculous things like:
"Eh, London, from XYZ123, we're running a fair bit behind schedule this evening and are trying to make up as much time as possible. We would really appreciate if you could give us any direct routings."
AAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!
Is it just me or this just the most condescending and patronising thing possible. Do they really think that by saying they are late will make ATC give a direct routing where they otherwise wouldn't??? And what about using up A LOT of valuable air time.
The other day I heard the worst one so far:
"Eh, we have some passengers on board who are hoping to connect to the BA123 from Manchester later this evening, but we don't expect to be there till XX:XXpm, so it'll be too tight for them. Is there any chance you could give us a more direct routing, so we can try to help them out?"
Apart from anything else, they were on London freq at the time. Considering how far they had left to fly, direct bloody Manchester could only have saved them a max of 2 minutes!!!
Can anyone please explain the way these peoples brains work? Surely ATC will give you what direct routings they can. If you don't think they are, a simple "request direct XYZ" will do??
Tomorrow, I'm going to say:
"Eh, London, we've been early all day now and it looks like we'll be at least 15 minutes ahead of schedule this evening. Is there any chance we could hold at Goodwood for let's say, 2 laps, before we carry on???"
Thanks. I needed to get that off my chest.
I wanted to get some opinions from you all about what seems to be a new epidemic on the radio. I speaking of the pilots who say ridiculous things like:
"Eh, London, from XYZ123, we're running a fair bit behind schedule this evening and are trying to make up as much time as possible. We would really appreciate if you could give us any direct routings."
AAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!
Is it just me or this just the most condescending and patronising thing possible. Do they really think that by saying they are late will make ATC give a direct routing where they otherwise wouldn't??? And what about using up A LOT of valuable air time.The other day I heard the worst one so far:
"Eh, we have some passengers on board who are hoping to connect to the BA123 from Manchester later this evening, but we don't expect to be there till XX:XXpm, so it'll be too tight for them. Is there any chance you could give us a more direct routing, so we can try to help them out?"
Apart from anything else, they were on London freq at the time. Considering how far they had left to fly, direct bloody Manchester could only have saved them a max of 2 minutes!!!
Can anyone please explain the way these peoples brains work? Surely ATC will give you what direct routings they can. If you don't think they are, a simple "request direct XYZ" will do??
Tomorrow, I'm going to say:
"Eh, London, we've been early all day now and it looks like we'll be at least 15 minutes ahead of schedule this evening. Is there any chance we could hold at Goodwood for let's say, 2 laps, before we carry on???"
Thanks. I needed to get that off my chest.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: swanlake
Age: 54
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree with you on this one. Lost count how many times been asked. Minor issues like a great big danger area in way or military activity.
Try to give direct whenever possible(subject to traffic and airspace restrictions).
Try to give direct whenever possible(subject to traffic and airspace restrictions).
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
May seem odd Capt Paddy, but recently with some pretty massive tailwinds over the pond we have done exactly what you said!
"Any chance we can slow down with 200 miles to go so we don't get there too early!!!"
"Any chance we can slow down with 200 miles to go so we don't get there too early!!!"
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hate this. It's common for EGPH departures now. Checking in on an already busy frequency "Eh Scottish good morning ehh poshjet123 ehh we appreciate your busy but ehh were running late and it really would help us an awful lot if ehh you could see your way clear to ehh letting us cut the corner a bit thank you kindly"
It's a waste of r/t time,pure and simple. I ignore it,no point wasting more time berating someone. I'm always as expeditious as the traffic and airspace allows me to be. As if the fact that a flight is late will influence my decision!
It's a waste of r/t time,pure and simple. I ignore it,no point wasting more time berating someone. I'm always as expeditious as the traffic and airspace allows me to be. As if the fact that a flight is late will influence my decision!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Eh, London, we've been early all day now and it looks like we'll be at least 15 minutes ahead of schedule this evening. Is there any chance we could hold at Goodwood for let's say, 2 laps, before we carry on???"
Nothing unusual there. A well known British airline used to do this at Heathrow quite often until we put a stop to it. Something to do with the stands not being ready..
Nothing unusual there. A well known British airline used to do this at Heathrow quite often until we put a stop to it. Something to do with the stands not being ready..
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many years ago I had a Bae 146 inbound from EGPH,in class G direct to a 6 mile final 34 at EGPD.A straighter line cannot be drawn.Speed about Warp 9.This Air P ''UK '' ey said ''I see we are taking the scenic route tonight''.
I was tempted to say unless you start slowing down then you'll end up in Overton Scrap yard as well. Running off the end is a common problem with 146's and Aberdeen.
I just said Roger,and vectored him out for 15 miles instead.
I was tempted to say unless you start slowing down then you'll end up in Overton Scrap yard as well. Running off the end is a common problem with 146's and Aberdeen.
I just said Roger,and vectored him out for 15 miles instead.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester
Age: 79
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Expedition
ATC has always tried to expedite traffic as much as possible and controllers take pride in being able to do so. When busy ATC does not need these requests which use up valuable RT time. When not busy the controller will usually offer something more expeditious. Of course the other tactic is to ask for something to "avoid weather." Naturally, what is asked for will usually also be a more expeditious route!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Phew!
Thank goodness it's not just me! I've mentioned this to a few of my colleagues but they've never seemed to be bothered by it. It drives me crazy!
My vote is for the next time you guys get a stupid request like this on a quiet evening, you should politely point out the fact that they are wasting valuable air time and that they have already been given the most direct routing available considering other traffic.
It reminds me of those who incessantly ask whether they can expect holding approaching DAYNE or MIRSI at MAN despite the fact that ATC are already at capacity. THE STAR SAYS DAYNE/MIRSI IS THE CLEARANCE LIMIT! I only assume that it takes less physical exertion to push the PTT than it takes to push the three buttons required to enter the hold on the FMS! Before you fuelaphobics have a go, every single crew I've heard ask this question and then subsequently be given multiple laps of holding have never complained or mentioned fuel at all. They obviously had enough to do it in the first place.
This really is becoming a great counselling session for me! Thanks!
Thank goodness it's not just me! I've mentioned this to a few of my colleagues but they've never seemed to be bothered by it. It drives me crazy!
My vote is for the next time you guys get a stupid request like this on a quiet evening, you should politely point out the fact that they are wasting valuable air time and that they have already been given the most direct routing available considering other traffic.
It reminds me of those who incessantly ask whether they can expect holding approaching DAYNE or MIRSI at MAN despite the fact that ATC are already at capacity. THE STAR SAYS DAYNE/MIRSI IS THE CLEARANCE LIMIT! I only assume that it takes less physical exertion to push the PTT than it takes to push the three buttons required to enter the hold on the FMS! Before you fuelaphobics have a go, every single crew I've heard ask this question and then subsequently be given multiple laps of holding have never complained or mentioned fuel at all. They obviously had enough to do it in the first place.
This really is becoming a great counselling session for me! Thanks!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southampton,hampshire,england
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
captainpaddy
doesn't do any real harm if we aren't busy......R/T loading will be a good guide. We can make extra effort [increased co-ordination] subject workload.
If the same airline, or even same pilot, makes a habit of it.........different outcome! Do you recognise regular controller voices like we recognise pilots?
We did have "Request Air" [not real ident of course] some years ago.....Our initial response to check-in was jokingly..."go ahead with request".....it can be particularly non-productive.
On the "is there much holding?" question......no harm in asking if R/T load fairly low......in fact I view that as a reasonble request.....and if it does not disrupt my primary function I will respond as accurately as my available data permits.[Especially for oceanic inbounds].
doesn't do any real harm if we aren't busy......R/T loading will be a good guide. We can make extra effort [increased co-ordination] subject workload.
If the same airline, or even same pilot, makes a habit of it.........different outcome! Do you recognise regular controller voices like we recognise pilots?
We did have "Request Air" [not real ident of course] some years ago.....Our initial response to check-in was jokingly..."go ahead with request".....it can be particularly non-productive.
On the "is there much holding?" question......no harm in asking if R/T load fairly low......in fact I view that as a reasonble request.....and if it does not disrupt my primary function I will respond as accurately as my available data permits.[Especially for oceanic inbounds].
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: England
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CaptainP,
I agree with you totally. I am a FO and when it is not my leg i hate being asked to make dumb RT requests to ATC when the Captain says so. This is not a blanket dig at captains by the way, so do not take it as such. But, back to the point, when a captain says "just ask him this, that and the other", you feel a right frozen Christmas turkey, but what can you do!?
Half the time when either they, or me when forced, asks about holding at MIRSI (EGCC) then they say "ill just find out". Sometimes the information isnt obvious to them, because perhaps its in the next sector. Why not just wait, have it in the FMS anyway, and have a look at TCAS which sometimes paints a nice picture if your that bothered. Besides, its fairly obvious when there is going to be holding at EGCC - most mornings! I have never held for more than a few laps anyway, so its harldly a disaster.
Rant over!
I agree with you totally. I am a FO and when it is not my leg i hate being asked to make dumb RT requests to ATC when the Captain says so. This is not a blanket dig at captains by the way, so do not take it as such. But, back to the point, when a captain says "just ask him this, that and the other", you feel a right frozen Christmas turkey, but what can you do!?
Half the time when either they, or me when forced, asks about holding at MIRSI (EGCC) then they say "ill just find out". Sometimes the information isnt obvious to them, because perhaps its in the next sector. Why not just wait, have it in the FMS anyway, and have a look at TCAS which sometimes paints a nice picture if your that bothered. Besides, its fairly obvious when there is going to be holding at EGCC - most mornings! I have never held for more than a few laps anyway, so its harldly a disaster.
Rant over!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
055166K,
Fair enough I suppose! If you feel that way, then I guess it may not be the big issue I think it is. However, regarding holding, I am referring to the busy days. Even if it was quiet, I have always been given instructions for leaving the holding fix before reaching it, or, completed at least one lap before moving on. This would suggest that we weren't holding just because ATC forgot about us, which is the only reason I can think of for asking in the first place.
Also, you had said
"We can make extra effort [increased co-ordination] subject workload."
Surely you don't mean that you make an extra effort just because they said they were running late? Wouldn't a simple request like "request direct XYZ" get the same extra effort? My whole point is that it seems that these guys think that they'll get direct somewhere out of sympathy! I feel that is extremely insulting to ATC!
Fair enough I suppose! If you feel that way, then I guess it may not be the big issue I think it is. However, regarding holding, I am referring to the busy days. Even if it was quiet, I have always been given instructions for leaving the holding fix before reaching it, or, completed at least one lap before moving on. This would suggest that we weren't holding just because ATC forgot about us, which is the only reason I can think of for asking in the first place.
Also, you had said
"We can make extra effort [increased co-ordination] subject workload."
Surely you don't mean that you make an extra effort just because they said they were running late? Wouldn't a simple request like "request direct XYZ" get the same extra effort? My whole point is that it seems that these guys think that they'll get direct somewhere out of sympathy! I feel that is extremely insulting to ATC!
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: The best in the world... of course!!!
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ridiculous and dangerous R/T
Dear Captainpaddy ,
I have read with interest your comments, about the ridiculous requests on ATC.
This is we can call the “new breed pilots” flying around, and providing “very safe” operations to the general public.
If we analyze such ludicrous requests by CRM point of view, these people display that they seriously lack of Situational Awareness.
If we try to see it from the professional aspect or point of view, many of us is already used to these “company saviors” who do anything , to improve production , without any regard to safety, without any concern who are the other traffics around, ANYTHING WATSOEVER !
Provided they look good on the Boss eyes, and climb the ladder quickly.
They will fly, even without fuel or wings, if it was possible.
It is not only ridiculous, but shameful a so called grown person, to trigger the button, and try to explain his passengers are getting a connecting flight, and for that the ATC, should collaborate to expedite them to gain 2 MINUTES!
Like the ATC does not collaborate, or even implying that the operational problem of certain airline, becomes an ATC problem, this is ridiculous.
Or even making sarcastic comments, like as “scenic route” meanwhile they still keeping warp 9 on a traffic pattern were the legal speed, suppose to be already the one, in the STAR chart, and class airspace.
Therefore, if they are over speeding, they should be served with a nice ticket to make them to cool down.
I wish to conclude with the following statements:
It is a long time I am in aviation, and had to live with idiots, triggering the button without even asking or explaining, before to make these kinds of requests to ATC.
Likely, my airline had the “right medicine “for them on that time.
Whenever approaching or departing out of UK, always I was given the best of the ATC could give me, and this is my view until today.
Whenever I needed to change my heading for WX reason, they always tried to accommodate my request.
Several times, I had to deal with late departure or late arrival, due to several reasons, with many passengers on connecting flights at destination.
However, the mater it was dealt with the company’s concern department, even giving much up to date information by radio or ACARS, so they could themselves make the required arrangements to accommodate the transiting passengers.
This is NOT, by all means the responsibility of the ATC, but of a professional pilot, with a professional attitude.
Safe flying to all
Mercurius
I have read with interest your comments, about the ridiculous requests on ATC.
This is we can call the “new breed pilots” flying around, and providing “very safe” operations to the general public.
If we analyze such ludicrous requests by CRM point of view, these people display that they seriously lack of Situational Awareness.
If we try to see it from the professional aspect or point of view, many of us is already used to these “company saviors” who do anything , to improve production , without any regard to safety, without any concern who are the other traffics around, ANYTHING WATSOEVER !
Provided they look good on the Boss eyes, and climb the ladder quickly.
They will fly, even without fuel or wings, if it was possible.
It is not only ridiculous, but shameful a so called grown person, to trigger the button, and try to explain his passengers are getting a connecting flight, and for that the ATC, should collaborate to expedite them to gain 2 MINUTES!
Like the ATC does not collaborate, or even implying that the operational problem of certain airline, becomes an ATC problem, this is ridiculous.
Or even making sarcastic comments, like as “scenic route” meanwhile they still keeping warp 9 on a traffic pattern were the legal speed, suppose to be already the one, in the STAR chart, and class airspace.
Therefore, if they are over speeding, they should be served with a nice ticket to make them to cool down.
I wish to conclude with the following statements:
It is a long time I am in aviation, and had to live with idiots, triggering the button without even asking or explaining, before to make these kinds of requests to ATC.
Likely, my airline had the “right medicine “for them on that time.
Whenever approaching or departing out of UK, always I was given the best of the ATC could give me, and this is my view until today.
Whenever I needed to change my heading for WX reason, they always tried to accommodate my request.
Several times, I had to deal with late departure or late arrival, due to several reasons, with many passengers on connecting flights at destination.
However, the mater it was dealt with the company’s concern department, even giving much up to date information by radio or ACARS, so they could themselves make the required arrangements to accommodate the transiting passengers.
This is NOT, by all means the responsibility of the ATC, but of a professional pilot, with a professional attitude.
Safe flying to all
Mercurius
Ohcirrej
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a great one the other day from a certain major customer's last flight to a German destination:
"Delivery, this is ABC123, we're running late tonight and we require to be airborne by time 10, otherwise we will get caught by the jet ban. We'll be ready just before the hour"....
This was from LHR T1 for a 09R departure.
"ABC123, roger. I'm afraid that sounds impossible. I don't think there's any way you'll get airborne within ten minutes from that stand."
"No, you don't understand (always a good one saying that to ATC!), we require [my emphasis] priority to get away before time 10"
"Roger"
Of course, no priority was shown.
I was expecting him to request 27R for departure!
It's not the first time this has happened for this flight, either.
"Delivery, this is ABC123, we're running late tonight and we require to be airborne by time 10, otherwise we will get caught by the jet ban. We'll be ready just before the hour"....
This was from LHR T1 for a 09R departure.
"ABC123, roger. I'm afraid that sounds impossible. I don't think there's any way you'll get airborne within ten minutes from that stand."
"No, you don't understand (always a good one saying that to ATC!), we require [my emphasis] priority to get away before time 10"
"Roger"
Of course, no priority was shown.
I was expecting him to request 27R for departure!
It's not the first time this has happened for this flight, either.