Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

What do you know about SACTA???

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

What do you know about SACTA???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2006, 19:32
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One point worth considering concerning the number of shutdowns/DD&C is conntected to the rate of systems change, which is simply phenominal. You want to upgrade something you gotta shut it down.

To quote a colleague who works there the Maastricht system is "garbage"; again for France, Merde! Guys, you ops controllers are all the same! You do a terrific job but FDP is as much of a job as being a controller - its ^&%$)(g complicated stuff. When a system does not meet your needs offer to make it better, suggest improvements. If 'management' won't let you - write to the chief exec and let him know.......... If he fails to listen then we are doomed!

I like what (I have heard) the Swiss are doing. They are chopping their change programme down to a managable level comensurate with their available resources. What a wonderful idea! If NATS did that we could go back to having one job each instead of my current four!
Minesapint is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2006, 22:02
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Valencia (Spain)
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I work with the SACTA everyday. If you have any practical questions, I may help, but I am not a technician, just an ATC whith basic software/hardware knowledge.

Regards from the sun,

Á.

PD. By the way, I like the system. We have two nights ago changed (at the same time in the whole country besides Canary Islands !) from version 3.4 to 3.5, and there were some local problems, but worked well.

One pic:


Last edited by Plumaveloz; 21st Sep 2006 at 22:40.
Plumaveloz is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 00:31
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canarias, Spain
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Plumaveloz
besides Canary Islands !) from version 3.4 to 3.5
...because we already had the 3.5 version installed in Canarias, Angel

Best regards.
Sonnendec is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 00:36
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Valencia (Spain)
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonnendec
...because we already had the 3.5 version installed in Canarias, Angel
Best regards.
I knew it. You told me

Besos compi.

Á.
Plumaveloz is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 10:41
  #85 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by BDiONU
As the Spanish seem to be retreating from any hint of collaboration we could go direct to INDRA and have SACTA in time for PC As for FDP we could buy the version DFS are working on with INDRA There's a common thread developing here that doesn't include the letters L or M
BD

I just love optimism. In the meantime, I'm quite happy with the stuff we already have.
 
Old 30th Sep 2006, 09:14
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know about SACTA - its boned!!!
Minesapint is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2006, 09:20
  #87 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Minesapint
I know about SACTA - its boned!!!

Sorry, I thought that there had only been an adjustment to the 'roadmap'.
 
Old 30th Sep 2006, 09:42
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, adjusted so much its boned ... Maybe another system for Prestwick, now what's it called again
Minesapint is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2006, 09:54
  #89 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is is NAS, EDDUS or both.......?
 
Old 30th Sep 2006, 10:25
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Moon
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least when the Manch boys ( and girls ) come to PC they wont have to learn a new system because they will be bringing their old one with them

Well done NATS. ATC in the 21st Century.

Can we have the locus 16 back please????

AyrTC
AyrTC is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2006, 15:29
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NAS is round 33 years old - if you take the original. Its in 21 (I think?) centres in the USA and has been continually developed to deal with the busiest airspace in the world.

SACTA is 20 years old and has not.

That is why its boned.

Its a bit competing in the Porshe GT series in a Mondeo diesel.
Minesapint is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2006, 21:49
  #92 (permalink)  
I'm Just A Lawnmower
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Over the hills and faraway
Age: 62
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Love the way that our earstwhile managers have tried to put a positive spin on it - this is good news as the Manchester boys won't have the stress of retraining to add to the stress of moving 200 miles north.

If I were a Manchester controller, I'd be seething - not only would I have to move somewhere I would rather not be but when I got there I'd be using the same old pishy equipment that I'd left behind. So what exactly is the point of moving?

Still, we are told the canteen will be nice
BALIX is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 12:10
  #93 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by London Mil
Is is NAS, EDDUS or both.......?
FDP through NAS Midi (eliminates the shelf problem), Scottish Mil will probably now get EDDUS, RDP through node. Nice shiny new kit though, workstations and flat screens

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 14:52
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Be interesting to see what the airspace design will look like, the shelf may be retained but managed differenly in system terms.
Minesapint is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 11:07
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Destination 22
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BDiONU
NATS and NERL are a business someone is held accountable.
BD
I look forward to the announcements about who is being held accountable over this farce. If any ATCO/ATSA did their job as badly as the people running this we'd be out on our arses.
Brand new flagship centre - one half of NATS' 2 centre strategy and we get to use archaic equipment.
Stupendous Man is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 11:12
  #96 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It may be archaic, but from a mil perspective we quite like NAS/EDDUS . Does this mean we will still have to go 'sectorised'? Great for civil ops but a right royal pain in the more 'unpredictable' military environment.
 
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 11:33
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Destination 22
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I meant archaic as in old suites, displays and equipment. How long has that kit been at TC?

Sadly it'll still be better than the stuff we have to use at Scottish at the minute (costs too much to use anything from the 1980s onwards you see - especially when we are getting a nice shiny new building and equipment therein......oops).

Still at least we'll all feel valued and recognised when we get our hand-me-downs sent up in an aid parcel.

And what are the plans for the future? Or are we going to be left with the TC/MACC kit??
Stupendous Man is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 13:27
  #98 (permalink)  
I'm Just A Lawnmower
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Over the hills and faraway
Age: 62
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not so sure it is any better than what we've got at Scottish at the moment. Sure, the size of the display is better than the dreadful Skyline displays we have but I'd rather see the new place equiped with the BARCO displays we have on the TMA and Deancross. They are more user friendly than the Node displays for a start.

Still, that's progress for you...
BALIX is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 13:30
  #99 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stupendous Man
I meant archaic as in old suites, displays and equipment. How long has that kit been at TC?
Sadly it'll still be better than the stuff we have to use at Scottish at the minute (costs too much to use anything from the 1980s onwards you see - especially when we are getting a nice shiny new building and equipment therein......oops).
Still at least we'll all feel valued and recognised when we get our hand-me-downs sent up in an aid parcel.
And what are the plans for the future? Or are we going to be left with the TC/MACC kit??
Uuummm, its the wiggly amp bit behind the glass which will remain the same in PC. For the ATC user you'll have the new workstations which have large flat screens for the radar and smaller flat ones for auxiliary information. New voice comms interface, new support information systems etc. For ATC it'll Essentially be all new, you can see a prototype of the workstation with all its displays,strip printer etc at Prestwick. Not sure why people think that old equipment from previous units would be re-used.

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 13:42
  #100 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
BD, I suppose the real question should be - does the change of system affect the manner in which we will do business? Certainly for the military, SATCA was going to generate a new CONOPs/MOPs; will this have to be re-visited?
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.