Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Height Issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jul 2005, 18:38
  #81 (permalink)  
GT3
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To let him pass all of that and then turn him down on medical grounds is quite criminal in my opinion.
So if there had been another medical reason to fail should someone sue NATS then? After all it is their fault that this other medical problem was uncovered
GT3 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2005, 21:33
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Up yer clunge .....
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil .... industrial injury ??

In a similar vein (cough cough ahem ) due to another size issue. I keep bruising myself on the underside of the desks whenever a certain young lady enters the ops room in her short skirt and bends over the strip printer.....

Should I get 'reduction' surgery before NATS cottons on that I might sue them for an industrial injury?

The other consideration is CRATCOH, because there's no way you can unplug and walk easily across the ops room with a huge boner !!

.... so you end up being plugged in (so to speak) for extra time.

Good luck Ben
Jobby Wheecher is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2005, 21:43
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if there had been another medical reason to fail should someone sue NATS then? After all it is their fault that this other medical problem was uncovered
GT3, Am I missing something here? The guy didn't have a dodgy heart defect, or other such thing that would only be picked up by a thorough medical exam. He's 6'10......now I wear glasses and contact lenses. I'm not a doctor but I can see when someone is taller than average. You're trying to say that the height of Ben was missed for his initial aptitude tests, then his interview and was then only picked up by a doctor examining him?!?
Vampy is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2005, 22:02
  #84 (permalink)  
GT3
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah fair enough but to sue NATS cause they didnt notice you were tall!

The newspaper reports (I do not believe they are 100% accurate) claim that ATC "was his dream job". He got one with eurocontrol in the end. Should that not be enough.

How about if I apply to BA for a pilots job, they discover I get airsick and then let me go. Can I sue them because people with red hair are more succeptible to it????
GT3 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2005, 22:08
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT3 Fast-car-wannabees with ginge hair should never be allowed to sue!!

(you coming to Brands?)

On a serious note - I am not sure NATS are being sued as such. At least he got a job elsewhere. He doesn't seem to have acted too ungentlemanly to me.
AlanM is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2005, 08:13
  #86 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nottingham
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi guys,

As you may of gathered its been a bit manic recently. I had no idea that there would be so much interest in this story, and so was caught a little off guard with all the attention.

I would like to thank everyone for there support so far, as I believe that this case will run on for sometime yet.

Off the record GT3 - You raise some interesting points. But why can't I be an ATCO and you can. I don't have a dodgy heart condition, or bad eye sight, I am just taller. I have fulfilled the same conditions for selection, so why should I be treated differently. There are also a lot of facts that aren’t reported here - it took over a year from the NATS medical to a DSE assessment. I was never told that my job was subject to completing this assessment but that it was to see if modifications should have been made. In total NATS wasted over 2 years of my life………..is it therefore unreasonable to ask for some compensation but more importantly make sure that this doesn't happen to anyone else and to change NATS perception towards tall people.

Once again I thank you all for your support, and will let you know the result as soon as I know (But you'll probably read about it before then!!!)

Cheers guys.

Ben

(P.S. I see that I am sueing them, I'm not, I am asking for the pay lost through this whole thing. The figure I believe is 11,000 pounds, not much I think you'll agree)
hc003540 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2005, 08:14
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Costa del Hampshire
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The point of a tribunal is to gain some form of compensation (be it monetary or by way of apology) for the upset caused from what appears to be an unfair decision by the company concerned.

It is also so that the company does not do such things again and can put in place procedures in case they find themselves in a similar position.

Yes, Ben has managed to get a job in Luxembourg but this has meant that he has had to move to spend more time looking for a job, interviewing etc, and then move to a new country in order to take the position. NATS acted unfairly, in a lot of peoples opinions, and Ben therefore has every right to demand some for of reccompence.
Barry Cuda is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2005, 08:19
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ben, did NATS help you with your EuroControl Application?

Good luck fella. As said: If nothing it highlights that there should be procedures in place to stop this from happening.
AlanM is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2005, 09:25
  #89 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nottingham
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hiya AlanM,

NATS sent an email with my selection results to Eurocontrol. I don't know how much this helped, but I still had to undergo the same selection tests as everyone else, and as far as I could tell was treated no differently than anyother applicant.

Ben
hc003540 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2005, 10:42
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK - hope it works out or you. As I said, if it stops someone having to go through similar turmoil in the future then something has been achieved.

For a company who's only real asset is it's people we should probably try harder!
AlanM is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2005, 14:29
  #91 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nats is making work stations adaptable for taller people and hopes to have the changes in place by 2012
probably requires a complete console redesign. Might be easier to bung some housebricks under them to raise them, might double the value of the system though.

FWIW The consoles at Maastricht, where he will end up, were designed as "one size fits all". Nothing too complicated really; the ideal height for the eyes is marked beside the screen and you raise or lower the seat to reach this if you wish. The worktable and footrest heights can then be adjusted elecrically until you feel comfortable

Good luck in IANS, just duck as you enter the building.
Lon More is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2005, 15:16
  #92 (permalink)  
Master Baiter
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about ATCO's like 10W who are only 2'3"? What provision for them?

I have been told that the engineers at his centre knocked him up a little station out of mdf all for himself!
Nearly Man is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 18:28
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: escaped from NERC
Posts: 210
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Just posted on the BBC News website -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4227752.stm

Ben lost his case at the employment tribunal
Numpo-Nigit is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 21:59
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: IOM
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn, double damn!!

Sorry to hear about the tribunal, Ben.

With regards to a post on the previous page, about the fact he still got a job with EuroControl, and isnt that enough;
Well, say you wanted a job with BA, and it was your dream to work for them, but instead they reject you and you end up working for another company.
Still a good company, yet not the one you always hoped of working for. Yes it's still the same type of job, but in a different manner, it's not what you had planned, and not what you were hoping for.

And Ben, met you up at the IFC in July mate (I was the one confused at which 'Ben' of Vatsim-UK you were, gawd your taller than me! Didnt think that was possible !! Take care mate, all the best at EuroControl!

Regards,
RR
Ronaldsway Radar is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2005, 06:49
  #95 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nottingham
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good Morning guys,

I am still awaiting the offical decision, I will update you as soon as I know what is going on........

Ben
hc003540 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2005, 06:59
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bad news. To be judged and rejected on the basis of height is bad, very bad.

Hope things go well at Eurocontrol instead.
eal401 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2005, 16:02
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bad news. To be judged and rejected on the basis of height is bad, very bad.
Height isn't the real issue here. It's the fact that Ben falls outwith the safe physical parameters for NATS' workplace. (it could be height, weight, one arm, one leg etc..)

Ok, it's probably not something NATS had thought about before - and probably now have a height limit in place (do they?).

I never believed that this was really 'indirect sex discrimination' and I'm glad it was proved not to be.

Mr Sargeaunt-Thomson said: "I will fight this as far as I can because I do believe I should not be discriminated against because of my height in the same way as you cannot discriminate against someone in a wheelchair.
Quite right, but not putting someone in a job because it may damage them or they are physically unable to operate the equipment is not discrimination. It's showing consideration for the indivduals welfare.
VectorLine is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2005, 17:22
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Swanwick
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Ben... been following your case here and in the news - i nearly asked if you intended taking it to a higher court but resisted in case people thought I was making a bad pun.

Is it worth keeping up the fight or are you just ready to move on from all the hassel? good luck whatever you decide, and keep us all posted on how you are getting on...

Mart
MartinInTheMiddle is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2005, 18:44
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: swanwick
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite right, but not putting someone in a job because it may damage them or they are physically unable to operate the equipment is not discrimination. It's showing consideration for the indivduals welfare.
I'm glad we're not quite down the same 'compensation culture' road as The Americans just yet, common sense prevails.

This is not a spiteful comment, I wish you all the best.
Enjoy Eurocontrol
roger is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2006, 15:12
  #100 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Height Issue

I understand that there was no happy ending as his training at IANS has been terminated
Lon More is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.