PDA

View Full Version : UK - NATS Pay negotiations - latest rumours


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]

Rocket_Science
16th Jul 2011, 11:03
I was under the impression that holding trainee ATCO's at Swanwick already do ATSA tasks?

Also the case at Prestwick; TATCs are being trained to undertake ACPO and FSS tasks. PCS have been all too accommodating with local management and only seem interested in protecting the operational roles - which, lets face it, are the roles that are dead in the water!

Frank Disclosure
16th Jul 2011, 14:22
Standard Noise
And we'll notice how?

I'd imagine the first things to start causing problems would be radars.

Scot Cabin
16th Jul 2011, 14:48
AG comms would progressively get less and less resilient/robust.

10W
16th Jul 2011, 16:20
Also the case at Prestwick; TATCs are being trained to undertake ACPO and FSS tasks. PCS have been all too accommodating with local management and only seem interested in protecting the operational roles - which, lets face it, are the roles that are dead in the water!

Presumably Prospect agreed to this as well ? If so, why ? It's the thin end of a wedge.

BDiONU
16th Jul 2011, 16:39
Presumably Prospect agreed to this as well ? If so, why ? It's the thin end of a wedge.
I would suggest it's a pragmatic use of resource. There are no UVC's running whilst the unit gear up for EFD OCT2, so no 'work' for TATCs. There is a shortage of ACPO and FSS for OCT2 so why not make use of the available resource and pay them a decent wage. Once OCT2 is finished the UVCs start again and the TATCs can then do what they were employed to do.
It's a short term solution for a short term problem.

BD

10W
16th Jul 2011, 16:50
Next thing you know, you'll have non ATSA staff coming in from Projects and the like to do the ATSA job because management cocked up by letting ATSAs go before EFD was fully operational ....... maybe the canteen chef, the receptionists, and the cleaners, could get a quick ATSA 'validation' and help out too ?

A short term solution ?

ZOOKER
16th Jul 2011, 18:22
EFD OCT2?
Sure sounds like fun, enlighten us BD, as this acronym is new to this discussion.

ZOOKER
16th Jul 2011, 18:56
BD,
Are we facing a resurgence of activity on the 'EFD at Scottish' forum perchance? :E

BDiONU
16th Jul 2011, 20:33
Next thing you know, you'll have non ATSA staff coming in from Projects and the like to do the ATSA job because management cocked up by letting ATSAs go before EFD was fully operational
Be expensive on T&RE bringing up non PC staff.
maybe the canteen chef, the receptionists, and the cleaners, could get a quick ATSA 'validation' and help out too ?
Previously ATSA posts have been filled by contractors responding to jobcentre vacancies, if you've got the necessary aptitude anyone can be trained.

My earlier response to your post was my own humble opinion <shrugs>

BD

Rocket_Science
16th Jul 2011, 21:21
It's a short term solution for a short term problem.

A problem created by management haste and greed which could have been avoided. Even when EFD was proving it could not be relied upon, management agreed to more ATSA redundancies. Genius!

:rolleyes:

fisbangwollop
18th Jul 2011, 09:44
Did someone say EFD was a short term problem???? :rolleyes:

kats-I
18th Jul 2011, 17:26
BD...Previously ATSA posts have been filled by contractors responding to jobcentre vacancies, if you've got the necessary aptitude anyone can be trained..

Time..Money..(such a shortage!!) and who will do the training??:ugh:

BDiONU
18th Jul 2011, 18:53
Time..Money..(such a shortage!!) and who will do the training??:ugh:
Does depend on when OCT starts :E

BD

On the beach
18th Jul 2011, 21:23
"Does depend on when OCT starts"

Isn't it on the first of OCTober? :E

ZOOKER
18th Jul 2011, 21:46
OCT2, according to post 2315.

Ceannairceach
3rd Aug 2011, 18:24
I see Mr Mills and a couple of executive cohorts have "left NATS with immediate effect" today.

Connected to the ongoing pay shambles perhaps?

Air.Farce.1
3rd Aug 2011, 20:30
Would that be the same one who was " widely acknowledged as an expert in project management development and deployment." and who said in 2009 that EFD would be fully operational by November 1st 2010 ?

Minesapint
3rd Aug 2011, 20:31
Big shame that, he will be missed :E

Ceannairceach
3rd Aug 2011, 21:19
I bet he walks away with a few quid. I look forward to finding out exactly how much.

Use the Force
3rd Aug 2011, 21:20
It is a shame when people lose their job :sad:

Do you think it was the ATCO's who got payed too much or the ATSA's and Engineers who did not get payed enough?

Ceannairceach
3rd Aug 2011, 21:24
A combination of the two (plus ATSS) and EFD I'd think - and hope.

ZOOKER
3rd Aug 2011, 22:12
Ceannairceach,
interesting to note that all trace of Mr. Mills has been removed from the NATS website this evening.
Will this post be advertised externally? I have no experience in management type things, but I have a lower second in Geology/Geography and would like to work in an office overlooking Goatfell. :ok:

Cuddles
4th Aug 2011, 18:51
'Night of the long knives' in NERL.....

I wonder how many 'work' mobiles were left in the car today?

Ceannairceach
4th Aug 2011, 21:10
A couple of the protagonists were in a rather important meeting with NTUS on the night of the long knives which was duly interrupted by some nice people from security who proceeded to escort said people to their desks to clear up, then off the premises.

I really hope the truths when it comes to the why's comes out....

PeltonLevel
5th Aug 2011, 11:46
Zooker
interesting to note that all trace of Mr. Mills has been removed from the NATS website this evening.And, at the time of this post, Ian Hall's biography still mentions his previous role as Director, International Operations (which I always imagined was a pre-retirement post)!:confused:

And Elvis's songwriter seems to have a bigger role now!

Frank Disclosure
5th Aug 2011, 12:53
I'm not in work today so haven't read NATS net to see the reasons given or exactly who has gone along with Ian Mills, could someone enlighten me?

Me Me Me Me
5th Aug 2011, 14:25
I'm not in work today so haven't read NATS net to see the reasons given or exactly who has gone along with Ian Mills, could someone enlighten me?

Directors of HR (NERL) and Supply Chain & Business Services went with him.

I very much doubt they will be the last...

ZOOKER
5th Aug 2011, 14:55
Is that Phillip James? I thought he had already left. If it was his replacement, then it was a very short time in post.

Me Me Me Me
5th Aug 2011, 15:08
Is that Phillip James? I thought he had already left. If it was his replacement, then it was a very short time in post.

Philip was NATS HR Director... This is NERL HR Director.

I know...

Frank Disclosure
5th Aug 2011, 15:28
"left NATS with immediate effect"

That is a phrase I usually associate with people being dismissed. Were any reasons for these 'changes' given?

Roffa
5th Aug 2011, 16:09
No real reasons given on NATSNET, all a bit ambiguous.

Were the three just gone all Baron appointees?

Air.Farce.1
5th Aug 2011, 18:50
Quote from Barron in 2005



NATS chief technology and programmes officer steps down - 3/18/2005 - Computer Weekly (http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2005/03/18/208933/NATS-chief-technology-and-programmes-officer-steps-down.htm)

Barron, said, “The success of our company is inextricably linked to our ambitious £1bn modernisation plan and the 350 engineering projects that support it.
“We will be moving swiftly to find the right capability for this task and I have every confidence in the ability of Nigel Horne and Ian Mills to manage this effectively in the interim.”

BDiONU
5th Aug 2011, 19:38
Quote from Barron in 2005
But then he was talking about programmes and the prophesy came true. Mills pwned programmes and made them his biatch. When he stepped up to CEO it was a slightly different story with the Ops Directors, he blinked first.

PeltonLevel
5th Aug 2011, 21:57
NATS chief technology and programmes officer steps down
I seem to recall that the internal release could have been read as:
NATS chief technology and programmes officer stepped on!

Frank Disclosure
8th Aug 2011, 11:49
Must have come as a shock to some of NATS's senior managers this morning when they realised they do actually need Engineers.

Ceannairceach
8th Aug 2011, 16:48
And the assistants at PC did all of the flight plan inputting too.

Rocket_Science
8th Aug 2011, 21:31
Why are you falling for managements stalling tactics? Why has notice not yet been given to NATS of intention to ballot members on industrial action? At my unit, I can tell you the will to fight is definitely there. Yes, NATS say they cannot negotiate" with a gun to their head" but they're the one's who put the bullets in the gun with their insulting and divisive offer. I for one would be more than happy to see my union negotiate with NATS from such a position of strength. It will certainly focus a few minds!

I also hope there is no truth in the rumour that NATS cannot offer more because Prospect ATCOs were told there is no more money. Sorry NATS, that is a rod you have made for your own back! But incredibly (I believe) PCS seem to have bought the idea that we have to "sell" more of our T&Cs to fund any further offer. Do you not think we have been insulted enough already?

Please, PLEASE don't make the same mistake as Prospect ATSS and weaken our position by recommending a piddly little token increase of an offer and say this is best you're going to get. It will only demonstrate what can be achieved when the "gun" is not held to the head. And no, I'm not after as much as we can get. I just don't want a pay cut, just a fair RPI deal.

Surely, if we do not stand firm now then more of our T&Cs will be used to fund future pay rises (and not necessarily for PCS grades).

SwanFIS
10th Aug 2011, 14:45
'And the assistants at PC did all of the flight plan inputting too'

That is stretching the facts a tad :=

FLSV
11th Aug 2011, 17:12
Being from a smaller country in Europe it is interesting to see what is happening in the bigger ATC-countries.
I haven’t read the all posts but it seems like many countries providers have had an aggressive tone the last few years.
The one thing I have realized is that if we stay focused and united they will never be able to break us. Older ATCOS knows that but younger does has some difficulties to understand. Hopefully they learn after seeing what happens in countries that stay united.
Spain, Germany, England, Finland, Iceland and many other countries have had a very tough situation. I'm glad to read that some of you understand the importance of staying united.
There is always going to be those who think that we are paid too much and that we don’t deserve more, even among ourselves. They think that airlines will stop complaining about ATC-costs if we don’t get pay rise. They will never stop complaining! NEVER!
Maybe they (airlines) should charge their passengers more! Maybe the solution to the problems that airlines have isn’t always pay cut after pay cut for their staff and cutting ATC-costs. Maybe the problem can be found somewhere else! Maybe it has to cost more to fly!
And also providers must realize that an aggressive tone will NEVER be the answer to solving problems during negotiations! NEVER! :=

Dan Dare
11th Aug 2011, 21:07
FLSV welcome to PPRuNEThere is always going to be those who think that we are paid too much and that we don’t deserve more, even among ourselves. They think that airlines will stop complaining about ATC-costs if we don’t get pay rise. They will never stop complaining! NEVER!

Very sage words in your maiden speech. We MUST all rember this. It is not holding the travelling public to ransom, it is having respect for difficult tasks, which not everyone can do and not everyone wants to do. Tasks which must be done right every time - even when the equipment provided to us does not work (AGAIN!). I sometimes think that our problem is that we make the impossible look easy and observers go away believing that it actually is.

BDiONU
12th Aug 2011, 09:13
ATSA pay deal out now for consideration. 4.2% this year on pay and allowances + £400 bung. Next year capped at 4.8% on pay only.

Rocket_Science
12th Aug 2011, 17:33
Please, PLEASE don't make the same mistake as Prospect ATSS and weaken our position by recommending a piddly little token increase of an offer and say this is best you're going to get.

It would appear my Jedi powers were strong on Monday night!

Oh dear :uhoh:

Ceannairceach
12th Aug 2011, 19:45
If I was an ATSA I'd be disgusted with that tbh.

SR71BlackBird
15th Aug 2011, 10:51
The PCS deal is better than the ATSS one.

Scot Cabin
19th Aug 2011, 18:14
Prospect ATSS ballot paper arrived in the post today. Not too sure which way to vote, feel a bit let down by our union again. Same old same old.

Rocket_Science
21st Aug 2011, 21:17
My ballot paper and PCS newsletter arrived this weekend. I have to say I find the whole thing quite unpalatable.

In a nutshell, NATS have got nasty and threatened to withdraw from the agreement to avoid compulsory redundancy. Rather than stand up to this blatant bully boy tactics, PCS decided to negotiate with the gun now pointing firmly at their head.

The latest offer, somehow, feels inferior to the original one, with more terms being sold off. It also divides its own membership as VCA and PTAS contract staff will get less than those on standard contracts.

It's down to the members vote now. I've voted no, but I fear I will be in the minority.

fisbangwollop
21st Aug 2011, 21:22
Well that's two of us...a very big NO...!!

Flybywyre
21st Aug 2011, 22:58
Make that three.............................

EGLL19791986
22nd Aug 2011, 05:14
Four!!!!!!!

Rocket_Science
22nd Aug 2011, 16:54
Blimey! It's a mutiny! :ok:

eastern wiseguy
22nd Aug 2011, 17:18
I've yet to see a mutiny on PPrune translate to a NO vote. You'll take it...you know you will...:E

Me Me Me Me
23rd Aug 2011, 08:58
Very little mention anywhere of how 2011 leavers get shafted in the deal... No arrears will be paid to people who left between January and July.

That's a first time - and unwelcome - addition :bored:

Scot Cabin
23rd Aug 2011, 13:19
Very little mention anywhere of how 2011 leavers get shafted in the deal... No arrears will be paid to people who left between January and July.

Is this applicable to all Nats be they ATCO, ATSA, ATCE etc?

Me Me Me Me
24th Aug 2011, 09:55
Only PCS grades

Frank Disclosure
25th Aug 2011, 11:12
I voted no. Management clearly do not value engineers. On my own personal work to rule and overtime boycott now.

DC10RealMan
26th Aug 2011, 07:14
I am happy to be corrected, but I understood that the no compulsory redundancy agreement was more an "understanding" than a formal agreement.

Rocket_Science
29th Aug 2011, 18:36
Dispute resolved through discussion - Latest Rail and Train Travel News from First TransPennine Express (http://www.tpexpress.co.uk/about-ftpe/media-centre/90/dispute-resolved-through-discussion.htm)

Congratulations to ASLEF and RMT who have demonstrated what a union with some nuts can achieve. Derisory 2% offer lifted to a 5% offer for ALL staff.

whitelighter
30th Aug 2011, 09:43
Yet at 5.2% and 5% next year our offer was crap?

Sometimes its worth accepting what is a sensible offer...

Ceannairceach
30th Aug 2011, 17:24
Any idea when the results are released?

Rocket_Science
30th Aug 2011, 17:46
Yet at 5.2% and 5% next year our offer was crap?

:=You seemed to have confused me for a greedy ATCO.

If I was offered the same, I would rip your hand off!

The offer on the table for PCS grades is the "crap" offer to which I refer. The same "crap" offer that has funded the more generous offer to another trade group by the wholesale reduction of our T&Cs.

autothrottle
7th Sep 2011, 09:26
Any news on PCS and ATSS ballots?

Akasaka
9th Sep 2011, 07:13
Any news on PCS and ATSS ballots?

Results are due today I believe - normally by midday ....

UPDATED:

For rejection of the offer - 15.3%
For acceptance of the offer - 84.7%
Total ballot papers received - 71.7%

Ceannairceach
9th Sep 2011, 13:57
Which branch are those figures for?

autothrottle
9th Sep 2011, 15:07
The result above was for PCS.

hold at SATAN
13th Sep 2011, 08:46
August RPI 5.2% :(

LEGAL TENDER
13th Sep 2011, 08:48
August RPI 5.2%



A GOOD DEAL BETTER ;)

Scot Cabin
13th Sep 2011, 15:46
So that equates to a real terms 0.2% pay cut for all NATS ATCOs and for NSL ATCOs previously in receipt of Met contingency payments a 2.2% real terms cut.

"RPI capped at a maximum 5% from Jan 1st2012 (August 2011 RPI
figure) on basic pay only;"

and NATS ATCEs get a real terms o.8% pay cut this year and a real terms 1.2% pay cut next year. Nice one Prospect.

Ceannairceach
13th Sep 2011, 16:34
A massive capitulation from the PCS membership there. Surprising.

Roffa
13th Sep 2011, 17:12
Inflation is still forecast to go higher as well.

If you voted yes to any of the deals though there's no point complaining now.

And don't blame the Union for putting a deal on the table, even if they recommended it. It's ultimately down to the membership to accept/reject.

EGLL19791986
13th Sep 2011, 17:35
I voted no (to the PCS deal), but I accept the result as we all live in
a demoracy don't we? (tongue in cheek that part!). However there are certain things that I've been involved in up until now that I won't be doing in future and managment can get an ATCO out of the Ops room to :mad: do them!

ToweringCu
13th Sep 2011, 18:03
Average pay rise this year in the private sector is 2.5 percent, pay freeze for most public sector workers. Maybe we should compare our pay deals with those figures rather than RPI.

ZOOKER
13th Sep 2011, 18:14
But NATS staff are not average.
According to the NATS website, they are "global leaders". :ok:

Ceannairceach
13th Sep 2011, 22:08
ToweringCu - most of those private sector organisations haven't made the profits that NATS have. And none are ATS providers. So you really can't make a comparison. It's like comparing chalk to cheese.

ToweringCu
13th Sep 2011, 23:00
The Manchester Group awarded it's ATCOs a 2.5% rise this year.

The Fat Controller
14th Sep 2011, 07:31
AVERAGE RPI over the 12 months to August 2011

5.083 %

Me Me Me Me
14th Sep 2011, 14:38
The Manchester Group awarded it's ATCOs a 2.5% rise this year.

Did the Manchester Group make over £100m in profit this year and pay tens of millions in shareholder dividends?

fisbangwollop
14th Sep 2011, 17:58
I knew my no vote would be like pissing into the wind!!! just as well I'm out of here in another 3 years....feel sorry for the folk with a few years left to do.......this is only the start of the sh1t from up above, but then again if the workforce are happy to accept the crap then hell mend them!!!:confused:

5milesbaby
15th Sep 2011, 22:39
<not to be named director> got somewhere in the region of 8%, based on that, we'll all be marched out of the building by next February.........

Rocket_Science
17th Sep 2011, 10:04
if the workforce are happy to accept the crap then hell mend them!!!

I'm with you fis, we have just condemned ourselves...and by quite a large majority too.

The membership have failed to grasp that they are in a well paid job that will give them a decent pension. In ten years time (when we are all up to our necks in dry powder) they'll be wondering why they did not stand up and fight for this when they receive very average salaries and a mediocre pension.

At least now the offer has been accepted no one will be made compulsorily redundant...and if you believe that!!! :eek:

LEGAL TENDER
18th Oct 2011, 10:02
September RPI 5.6%

"WITH YOU ALL THE WAY" ;)