![]() |
Crikey, I’d thought I’d woken up on April 1st this morning reading all the recent postings of Flybe’s latest route announcements. They must have some seriously deep pockets as they're going to lose a shed load of cash with this latest foray. I’m genuinely struggling to see what their business plan and strategy is, it’s just so scattergun it’s difficult to see where they’re going with the business (apart from squandering a whole load of cash)
Very interesting times ahead! |
Originally Posted by Atlantic Explorer
(Post 11300669)
Crikey, I’d thought I’d woken up on April 1st this morning reading all the recent postings of Flybe’s latest route announcements. They must have some seriously deep pockets as they're going to lose a shed load of cash with this latest foray. I’m genuinely struggling to see what their business plan and strategy is, it’s just so scattergun it’s difficult to see where they’re going with the business (apart from squandering a whole load of cash)
Very interesting times ahead! |
Is the common denominator trying to keep hold of LHR slots, NQY and IOM/BHD replacing LBA?
|
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11300701)
Is the common denominator trying to keep hold of LHR slots, NQY and IOM/BHD replacing LBA?
|
Only guessing but I just cannot see them making money at present. Coupled with an almost definite recession on the horizon, flybe v2 looks precarious.
I hope it works out as a business so that the crews still looking for work get a chance of re-employment if business expands. |
I agree with others they appear to be making the same mistakes. As a new business it is never a good idea to instantly go after the competition. They should be focusing on routes with no competition and then when they are stronger start picking fights. I would love to know the logic on focusing so much on BHD when Emerald were already setting out their stool there and with the backing of EI.
when it comes to competition surely it would make sense to focus on the routes LM use the 145 on as it’s cramp and not the most efficient. I think most would take the Q400 over one of those as it’s nearly as quick, more space and tickets would be cheaper. |
I would take the jet over the Q400 (which isn’t particularly Q) any time.
|
Originally Posted by willy wombat
(Post 11302415)
I would take the jet over the Q400 (which isn’t particularly Q) any time.
|
Originally Posted by Rivet Joint
(Post 11302366)
I agree with others they appear to be making the same mistakes. As a new business it is never a good idea to instantly go after the competition. They should be focusing on routes with no competition and then when they are stronger start picking fights. I would love to know the logic on focusing so much on BHD when Emerald were already setting out their stool there and with the backing of EI.
when it comes to competition surely it would make sense to focus on the routes LM use the 145 on as it’s cramp and not the most efficient. I think most would take the Q400 over one of those as it’s nearly as quick, more space and tickets would be cheaper. when will CAA figures be released to show the comparison? |
The much debated May pax figures on the CAA have been updated on the 22/9/22 as below.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....f88aba73c8.jpg |
[QUOTE=cavokblues;11303031]The much debated May pax figures on the CAA have been updated on the 22/9/22 as below.
Thise figures look a lot better / more accurate than the original ones |
53% of capacity - but one would hope that would build as the brand re-establishes itself
|
Originally Posted by JobsaGoodun
(Post 11301808)
Almost certainly, otherwise they’d need to hand them back to IAG.
|
Originally Posted by Hearmenow
(Post 11303595)
I see VA have joined SkyTeam.
|
Originally Posted by allan1987
(Post 11303730)
Possibily Flybe might codeshare with airlines that are in SkyTeam?
These alliances have strict entrance criteria to meet, it's not automatic. https://www.skyteam.com/en/about/air...r-requirements |
You can codeshare without coming a member but there will be hoops to be jumped through (I think SkyTeam have announced that they aren't accepting anybody else anyway).
Also, didn't VS lose on mk 1, and are no longer involved? |
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11303782)
You can codeshare without coming a member but there will be hoops to be jumped through (I think SkyTeam have announced that they aren't accepting anybody else anyway).
Also, didn't VS lose on mk 1, and are no longer involved? To operate a codeshare flight you have to be fully safety audited and have customer service standard equal to or great than the company whose code you wish to use. Very tough. On domestic UK flights BMI got circa £50 pp for codeshare pax, one of reasons they went under. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:45. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.