PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   Flybe-9 (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/599822-flybe-9-a.html)

Richard Taylor 5th Apr 2019 17:22

Within 18 months there may be no Flybe.

Reversethrustset 5th Apr 2019 17:32

Well yeah, that's your opinion, that's fine.

ZULUBOY 5th Apr 2019 21:17


Originally Posted by OltonPete (Post 10439929)
I can only see BHX and MAN housing the remaining 7 E175's of which 3 will be used on the CDG if the arrangement with Air France continues and as they are more inter-linked *(Virgin-Delta-Skyteam) there is a chance it will.

The others will be used on BHX & MAN MXP if these routes remain and perhaps BHX-STR TXL and again if these routes remain although these are often Dash 8's as well these days.

This brings me on to six-sixty's excellent post and the only minor point I have to add is that BHX-BHD is only a 175 on a Saturday and it is to get the aircraft there to fly BHD-SZG or INN (can't remember which one), the more perplexing use of the 175's is the regular MAN-NQY, MAN-SOU and MAN-BHD. The jets at BHX in the main do operate routes with decent business take-up or are a little longer than the norm or the extra seats are filled such as MXP, STR, TXL, LYS, AMS etc. If you see one in the week on domestic it is usually covering for the Dash which gain Six Sixty is spot on.

Most at BHX seem to be thinking that MXP, STR, TXL, HAM, HAJ, LYS, DUS might not be around in 12 months and also expecting changes on CDG and AMS.

Pete

Blimey Pete, there isn't much left if they all go. For personal reasons I wouldn't want TXL to go as we use it for visiting relatives there

DC3 Dave 5th Apr 2019 21:28

It's getting interesting. At what point would Virgn / Stobart have been better served letting Flybe go under and cherry picking the best bits from the administrator, rather than take the business on - debts and all - and face all the costs associated with sorting out a sorry state of affairs?

Alteagod 5th Apr 2019 21:38

When are they expecting to transition to Virgin

AirportPlanner1 5th Apr 2019 21:47


Originally Posted by DC3 Dave (Post 10440207)
It's getting interesting. At what point would Virgn / Stobart have been better served letting Flybe go under and cherry picking the best bits from the administrator, rather than take the business on - debts and all - and face all the costs associated with sorting out a sorry state of affairs?

When the costs involved start far outweighing the financial and operational value of the assets, in particular slots at Heathrow.

SpeedyProp 5th Apr 2019 22:00

But if Flybe went under, then no UK AOC, which is in large what they bought. Add in Brexit, then it would really get difficult, if not inpossible for a UK operation to be set up from scratch on an Irish (EU) AOC (cherry picking or not).

As soon as the EU competition part of the sale process is done, I would think things will move quickly, both for rebranding and new management – I believe the plan is for one board covering VS as well as Connect Air (whatever brand name that ends up under).

corsaman 5th Apr 2019 22:31


Originally Posted by southside bobby (Post 10438829)
Actually the HS748 was the "Budgie".

ref post #1971, precisely.

crewmeal 6th Apr 2019 05:58


Most at BHX seem to be thinking that MXP, STR, TXL, HAM, HAJ, LYS, DUS might not be around in 12 months and also expecting changes on CDG and AMS.
Do any of these routes make money? If not then I guess they won't be around for much longer.

southside bobby 6th Apr 2019 06:59

Re "Budgies".
Ooops...Apologies,did not spot that post re the Autair HS748`s.

ZULUBOY 6th Apr 2019 07:11


Originally Posted by crewmeal (Post 10440439)
Do any of these routes make money? If not then I guess they won't be around for much longer.

May be naive of me but lots of these routes are longstanding. If they weren't making money I would have assumed they'd have been gone a long time ago

ssflyer 6th Apr 2019 08:06


Originally Posted by ZULUBOY (Post 10440464)
May be naive of me but lots of these routes are longstanding. If they weren't making money I would have assumed they'd have been gone a long time ago

BHX/LYS runs only on weekdays, geared to mainly business traffic, is an AF codeshare,and has an average load of 77% so it is probably viable

SS

Doc Q 6th Apr 2019 08:18

Criminal how such incompetence could have been allowed to bring what is likely to be the eventual demise of a great airline, I can’t see how they now dig themselves out this hole , Th amount of negative propaganda now out there on social media is going to destroy the brand .

And it was all avoidable .

PDXCWL45 6th Apr 2019 08:25


Originally Posted by ZULUBOY (Post 10440464)
May be naive of me but lots of these routes are longstanding. If they weren't making money I would have assumed they'd have been gone a long time ago

I've also seen complaints that prices are quite expensive as well but even if they do make money they might not fit into Flybe future strategy assuming they have they have one!

Brigantee 6th Apr 2019 08:39

The big bad wolf has stated yesterdy he is going to base extra aircraft at the airports Flybe are deserting and ones where the E Jets are being withdrawn from as he thinks correctly that pasengers are not going to happy having to fly on archaic slow old prop jobs when in the past they have flown on the jets


speedrestriction 6th Apr 2019 08:47


Originally Posted by brian_dromey (Post 10439492)
I think it's being a bit revisionist to say that flyBe 'over ordered'.

Actually I would agree with the sentiment. The 14 E195s were basically a replacement fleet for the old 146s and as a like for like replacement they made a lot of sense with significantly lower fuel burn. Back then a lot of the Embraer work was in and out of LGW and continental European routes out of SOU and EXT. The significant over ordering was for the 175 model which was never a good fit. For years the Q400s had been flying around with a load factor of 60-70 percent on a good day. The fare structure and revenue management was not geared towards filling the aircraft on the day of operation as many of the proper locos do. As pilots we were scratching our heads when we were then told the company was getting 40 odd 175s plus a daft number of options. I am still waiting for anyone to explain up-gauging a fleet when the existing fleet was running somewhere between 30 and 70 percent empty on a normal day. Not alone was there additional unneeded capacity but it came at a 60% higher fuel burn than the dash. Totally daft fleet decision.

Copenhagen 6th Apr 2019 09:02

Embraer orders resulted in the demise of two UK airlines - Flybe and the original BMIR.

virginblue 6th Apr 2019 09:14


Originally Posted by OltonPete (Post 10439929)
Most at BHX seem to be thinking that MXP, STR, TXL, HAM, HAJ, LYS, DUS might not be around in 12 months and also expecting changes on CDG and AMS.

Isn't DUS served from the DUS base? Which, unless I missed something, is still around and has somewhat surprisingly survived the cull.

To be honest, I think DUS is in slightly another league than the other destinations mentioned as it has been around for ages and is served up to 4 times daily. Passenger numbers on BHX-DUS in total are, if I remember correctly, higher to or almost as high as to Frankfurt and Munich as hub airports. The only reason to pull it that I can see would be that yields have deteriorated massively as a result of Eurowings now deploying large Airbus jets on the route (for the lack of smaller 100 seaters)

Alwayslistening 6th Apr 2019 09:28


Originally Posted by jethro15 (Post 10439857)
E195 - Fleet for disposal
E175 - 04 a/c for disposal
E175 - 04 outstanding orders canx

jethro's

This is my understanding as well. The 4 E175s for disposal...

When Virgin took over they stated to the effect that they would be focussing on long haul feed. To that end CWL and DSA do not fit the mould. However that does not mean the two bases are not viable, the load factors are very good and along side the subsidies I find it hard to believe the bases are not profitable.

So far in the new connect airways what have Stobart added or indeed gained from this arangement?

I wonder if we’ll see Stobart take the surplus E175s and deploy as they see fit.. now I wonder where they could go....

One thing is for certain, this is a massive farce/stitch up and I feel sorry for all staff on the ground who haven’t had the luxury of feathering their own nest like certain management.

virginblue 6th Apr 2019 09:43


When Virgin took over they stated to the effect that they would be focussing on long haul feed.
I am not really buying that. Flybe has 70+ or so aircraft. Virgin has its long-haul base at LHR and LGW. It is virtually impossible to shift any decent number of airframes to routes that would feed those hubs simply because there are no slots available at any of those airports that would allow a decent hub-and-spoke operation with suitably timed slots. So unless Virgin massively beefs up its small Manchester longhaul operation and adds more Flybe routes to MAN, how can they repurpose Flybe to a longhaul feeder?

chaps1954 6th Apr 2019 09:54

Manchester Virgin is the same size as Gatwick with 6 aircraft this summer

Ian

PDXCWL45 6th Apr 2019 11:06


Originally Posted by Brigantee (Post 10440515)
The big bad wolf has stated yesterdy he is going to base extra aircraft at the airports Flybe are deserting and ones where the E Jets are being withdrawn from as he thinks correctly that pasengers are not going to happy having to fly on archaic slow old prop jobs when in the past they have flown on the jets


Who is the big bad wolf?

OltonPete 6th Apr 2019 11:11

DUS
 

Originally Posted by virginblue (Post 10440558)
Isn't DUS served from the DUS base? Which, unless I missed something, is still around and has somewhat surprisingly survived the cull.

To be honest, I think DUS is in slightly another league than the other destinations mentioned as it has been around for ages and is served up to 4 times daily. Passenger numbers on BHX-DUS in total are, if I remember correctly, higher to or almost as high as to Frankfurt and Munich as hub airports. The only reason to pull it that I can see would be that yields have deteriorated massively as a result of Eurowings now deploying large Airbus jets on the route (for the lack of smaller 100 seaters)

You are correct to single this route out due to the historical business connections and as far as I know nothing has changed. Also worth noting of course this can be serviced adequately by the Dash 8 and if profitable should survive.

However for many years it has been 4 a day and worked from the BHX base albeit there has been a night-stopping DUS aircraft until recently. However this summer and after the Connect Airways takeover the DUS night-stop early morning BHX inbound was moved to Manchester leaving it a three a day which has never happened on this route in the past but actually this flight had tailed off in respect of the inbound morning passengers and switching it to MAN is probably worth a go.

For clarity the majority of the frequencies on BHX-DUS have always been operated from the BHX base and this is the same now although this is only two services to one (last evening inbound retuns to DUS).

I think it is just reality setting in with those at BHX and we are not deluded like watchers at other airports where cuts and reductions are blamed on others rather than possible issues with the local market. We would like to think that the problem is wholly with the Flybe management but I suppose we will just have to wait to see what their plans are for BHX.

I would hazard a guess that most the European routes are marginal (reply to Crewmeal) at best using the Flybe model bar DUS/CDG but the domestics going by the fares charged should be profitable as 99% of them are operated by the Dash 8. If they are not profitable what the heck are they doing operating BHX -EDI-GLA and BHD at 7 daily in the week, even the most frequent business traveller could mange on 5 or 6 a day.

Pete

Hotel Tango 6th Apr 2019 16:18

I have nothing against the DHC-8, but if I have a choice between a Flybe Dash 8 and an Eurowings A319/A320 I'll almost always opt for the latter.

ajamieson 6th Apr 2019 16:28


Originally Posted by Doc Q (Post 10440501)
demise of a great airline, I can’t see how they now dig themselves out this hole , Th amount of negative propaganda now out there on social media is going to destroy the brand.

It was never a great airline and its brand has been a byword for unreliability and poor service for the best part of a decade. Also, customer experience on social media is not “negative propaganda,” it is real life!

But it’s correct to say that the current management has trashed whatever limited prospects the airline had in its current form. I hope the reshaping under new owners is more successful 👍🏻

Wycombe 6th Apr 2019 20:28


Also, customer experience on social media is not “negative propaganda,” it is real life!
Of course there are bad experiences, but it's also human nature to publicise when something goes wrong rather than when it goes right.

As an example, I've taken 8 return journeys with BEE over the last year and no problems at all. In fact, good service from the crews, as usual. But I haven't posted on any of their social media outlets to say so.

crewmeal 7th Apr 2019 06:07

All carriers have bad press. You only have to look at Ryanair to see the amout of negative comments there are on various sites, but folk still come back for more. Flybe is going through a difficult time with its future and the amount of cancellations the other day only magnify the problem. Like everything else in the world it is yesterday's news and those cancellations will soon be forgotton unless your an armchair pruner making it drag on for months!

ATNotts 7th Apr 2019 12:53


Originally Posted by crewmeal (Post 10441261)
All carriers have bad press. You only have to look at Ryanair to see the amout of negative comments there are on various sites, but folk still come back for more. Flybe is going through a difficult time with its future and the amount of cancellations the other day only magnify the problem. Like everything else in the world it is yesterday's news and those cancellations will soon be forgotton unless your an armchair pruner making it drag on for months!

Am I wrong, or were last weeks cancellations not that much worse than has happened on previous "bad days"? Clearly it's never good to mess around passengers at short notice, but as in all modes of public transport occasionally "sh1t happens".

What has been perhaps overlooked, and not reported is just how much notice BE has given of the closure of the bases, and the dropping of routes that are coming down the tracks at the start of the winter season. There is more than one large LCC that would have knocked services on the head a month's notice, rather than carrying on for 6 months - good on FlyBe for that.

shamrock7seal 7th Apr 2019 13:23

ATNotts I don’t think u meant to, but u just hit the nail on the head when it comes to the fundamental Flybe problem. BAD management.

Who announces bad news with so much notice?? It leaves customers confused and fills the media with negative news stories that you (the airline) are no longer in control of. Plus don’t forget it damages Sales out of the very base you are Downsizing/closing for that notice period given!

PDXCWL45 7th Apr 2019 13:38


Originally Posted by ATNotts (Post 10441509)
Am I wrong, or were last weeks cancellations not that much worse than has happened on previous "bad days"? Clearly it's never good to mess around passengers at short notice, but as in all modes of public transport occasionally "sh1t happens".

What has been perhaps overlooked, and not reported is just how much notice BE has given of the closure of the bases, and the dropping of routes that are coming down the tracks at the start of the winter season. There is more than one large LCC that would have knocked services on the head a month's notice, rather than carrying on for 6 months - good on FlyBe for that.

As the 2 bases that are being closed are Operation Blackbird bases I'd imagine that there was some sort of clause in the contracts as it would've been obvious once they released the winter schedule that they were closing and it could've opened up Flybe to possible legal action if they hadn't notified the airports.
What it does do is give the effected airports time to speak to other airlines to potentially get the lost routes back and attract new airlines to base and if Flybe do intend to carry on flying into those airports to negotiate new charges for landing and handling and such.

Sharklet_321 7th Apr 2019 14:39

According to a post on SOU thread TUI have pulled out of using Flybe at SOU for their summer 2019 programme. Does this mean Flybe are stopping their SOU summerERJ-195 service sooner than expected?

According to the post, only Mahon continuing on a Q400

caaardiff 7th Apr 2019 14:40

With the long notice period given to crews they will soon start to jump ship which could lead to crew shortages throughout the summer.
It's also been mentioned that crew in general are unhappy and looking elsewhere, that's going to put pressure on the operation as a whole, not just those bases that are closing.
Could be an interesting summer.

Alteagod 7th Apr 2019 15:41

Flybe will only add to what are always interesting in aviation...Summers

MARKEYD 7th Apr 2019 16:06


Originally Posted by Sharklet_321 (Post 10441576)
According to a post on SOU thread TUI have pulled out of using Flybe at SOU for their summer 2019 programme. Does this mean Flybe are stopping their SOU summerERJ-195 service sooner than expected?

According to the post, only Mahon continuing on a Q400

If you read the post , its additional capacity that TUI were using on Flybe scheduled routes , they have been doing it for a few years now

Flybe finish the EMB 195 aircraft finally on the 26 th Oct as per the summer schedule

Mahon on a Flybe DHC 8 is a stand-alone charter flight operated on behalf of TUI and is the second year of operating

Reversethrustset 7th Apr 2019 16:45

One would have to assume that with the winter schedule nowhere in sight there's more cuts to come in the coming weeks. That'll sort out any internal crewing issues.

TartinTon 7th Apr 2019 21:00

Crews will always be jumping ship from Flybe just as they do from Eastern and Loganair. They get 3 types of crew - Fresh new starters looking to build hours before they jump ship / Pilots who want to sleep in their own beds at night / Older pilots who still want to fly but are looking to wind down at the end of their careers but be based locally to where they live. There ain't many career pilots in regional flying in comparison to the flags.

plane-driver 7th Apr 2019 21:05

They are still recruiting at present however new starts are being placed in hold pools until they decide what is happening with current crews and bases. Leads to think that even management aren’t sure what’s going on

chaps1954 7th Apr 2019 23:08

I`m sure that when Connect get to grips when the EU confirms it is all OK the old management will soon know

bad bear 8th Apr 2019 05:18

there seems to be a few cancellations today again
bb

Brigantee 8th Apr 2019 10:40

Bookins gone through the floor by all accounts , Hardly surprising is it , What the hell are they playing at , They must be on some sort of suicide mission...

Who in there right mind given the choice of flymaybe and say easy or ryan choose them....


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:27.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.