PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   British Airways - 2 (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/276402-british-airways-2-a.html)

Taildragger67 17th May 2007 23:14

British Airways - 2
 
Airline Partners having a tilt at BA?

Story in the Sydney Morning Herald about the wunch of bankers who just got seen off from Qantas, possibly having a crack at BA. :yuk:

Don't these people ever learn? :ugh:

To the barricades, boys & girls!!

Feather #3 17th May 2007 23:58

Just be aware that it was a fundamental mistake that caused them to miss out, not the reaction of the general public and minority shareholders.

If they put their minds to it, the could well nail any company!

G'day ;)

Ultralights 18th May 2007 05:17

dont forget that APA owns a few international airport..... you own an airline, and a few airports, and you have a massive pricing advantage! charge fees to every other airline, and the fees paid by your airline go back into your other pocket.

Raggyman 18th May 2007 06:08

Geez, if you want to loose money big time, buy an airline. Just hope these guys aren't using my superannuation money.

But buying BA?

kingdee 18th May 2007 06:25

BA faces 350million pound fine
 
Over it,s fuel surcharges bbc business seems to be reporting this quite well,oh dear more problems for WW

Leofric 18th May 2007 07:45

What the BBC report I heard said was BA have made a £350m provision in their accounts (as required by International Accounting Standards) against POSSIBLE fines in the UK and US over fixing fuel surcharges in collaboration with other Airlines.

angels 18th May 2007 09:30

The important thing here is that BA have admitted that their staff broke price fixing regulations so a fine seems inevitable.`

MikeAlphaTangoTango 18th May 2007 09:49

BA's 737s on the way out
 
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...oeing-737.html

737s to be replaced by A319s at LGW

HZ123 18th May 2007 10:40

APA may be after British Airways

May 18, 2007

ITS bid for Australia's Qantas Airways now officially dead, rumours are circulating about Airline Partners Australia eyeing British Airways.
According to a report from London overnight, shares in British Airways gained 2.35 per cent on the London stock exchange on Thursday, to 501.50 pence.

The report states the share price rise comes ahead of the publication of the airline's annual results today, "amid rumours of a takeover by the consortium Airline Partners led by Macquarie Bank".

Taildragger67 18th May 2007 11:26

Interesting point in this might be the foreign-ownership restrictions on BA (as was with the Qantas caper).

Then again, Macquarie Bank said when announcing its latest results results recently that it was setting up a stand-alone operation in London, in order to get an EU 'passport'... so that might well be that hurdle jumped.

Dave Gittins 18th May 2007 12:27

Pretty big fleet considering BA didn't want Airbusses at all and only inherited them from B Cal. who'd ordered some.

green granite 18th May 2007 13:22

BA admits price fixing
 
British Airways admitted breaking price-fixing laws and set aside a surprise 350 million pounds to pay potential fines.
BA shares fell 3.7 percent by 12:57 p.m. as the provision -- more than half the year's profit -- accompanied a 13 percent decline in operating profit.

Full story here

Carnage Matey! 18th May 2007 13:57

Nice to see the managers have decided to take this cash out of the profits, which neatly drops them below the threshold at which the employees get some profit sharing. Still, management bonuses remain intact. Nice to see we're all still busting a gut to save a pounds worth of fuel when some overpaid numpty can blow £350M with a few phone calls.:mad:

PIGDOG 18th May 2007 14:03

Isn't it funny that BA are in trouble with price-fixing the fuel surcharge, when fuel is effectively price-fixed by OPEC. Wasn't it recently they decided that the current price was okey-dokey (for them), so there was no need to up production? Cowboys, the lot of them.

Skipness One Echo 18th May 2007 14:26

This is excellent news. I was becoming really concerned that BA would drop LGW entirely using the excuse that the capital outlay on new aircraft would not be worth it.
Good luck to all concerned at Gatwick and long may the alternative to the Orange Empire ( much as I do actually use 'em ) be available.

BUT is Gatwick gonna get the new aircraft ? I bet they go to Heathrow and Gatwick get the oldest A319s.......

BikerMark 18th May 2007 14:34

You know what the real problem is?

Somebody forgot to pay the Collusion Damage Waiver...

:mad: :ugh:

lovethesky 18th May 2007 16:31

ba are sending the new a320s to lhr, and lgw are getting the a319s from lhr. all of wh9ich are fairly new and are very nice clean aircraft. i will miss them!!! much better than the 737 ba has.

dogstar2 18th May 2007 16:34

Do you know when this will happen?

mojocvh 18th May 2007 16:39

Very, very good news. On my last flight to toulouse the 73s cabin was a right mess, overhead structure loose/misaligned and a sodding great hole where a kickpanel was missing by seat 24/25(?)A, very tired interior, these cabs seem to be nearing the end.

MoJo

M.Mouse 18th May 2007 17:06

Is it not also the case that another well known airline was involved but decided to offer evidence against BA to avoid being reprimanded/fined?

lotman1000 18th May 2007 17:10

CDW - Still laughing at that one...

Willie Walsh was unconvincing this morning about the reasons why he needs to reduce declared profits by £350m. The "expected fine" story might be partly true, but sure as hell it's not the whole truth.

Mind you he did a good job of clearing himself personally from any involvement in a cartel, just in case of a criminal prosecution.

QTR 18th May 2007 17:11

:D Nice one! Can't remember if the guys who did the collusion lost their jobs or not. Whatever, hanging is too good for these muppets. :mad:

flyguy235 18th May 2007 17:23

BA announces a replacement of 14 of their oldest 737's
 
BA have announced the replacement of 14 737's with airbus 319's. Of course, these are old LHR aircraft, not new ones, the new airbus's go to LHR. This opens up a can of worms at LGW as there will, for some time, be a dual fleet operating alongside each other. Is it going to be a dual-base airbus fleet - which asks, bid-line or carmen? And presumably that would also mean all the few nightstops LGW has would have to be given to tours on the airbus?

lovethesky 18th May 2007 17:26

British Airways has ordered eight new Airbus A320 family aircraft for delivery 2008-2010.

The airline said the move is the first step towards a single shorthaul fleet across British Airways’ network.

The airline will also upgrade the Gatwick shorthaul fleet by replacing the oldest 14 Boeing 737s with Airbus A319 aircraft.

Willie Walsh, British Airways’ chief executive said: “We’ve made considerable progress at Gatwick, particularly on costs. Gatwick is an important part of our shorthaul strategy and replacing the older Boeing 737 fleet with Airbus aircraft will give us flexibility across both airports.”

British Airways will place a major order for replacement and growth widebodied aircraft later this year for delivery in the next decade.

British Airways currently has a shorthaul fleet of 67 Airbus aircraft. The order will boost the Airbus shorthaul fleet to 79 aircraft as a further 13 are on order and nine older A320s are due to leave the fleet in 2007-2008.

At Heathrow, the airline has the following shorthaul fleet: 33 Airbus A319 aircraft, 26 Airbus A320 aircraft, 8 Airbus A321 aircraft, 13 Boeing 757 aircraft and seven Boeing 767 aircraft.
document.writeln(botNextPrev);

Fargoo 18th May 2007 17:52

Most of these 319's will be 9 years old before they get to Gatwick, whilst fresher than some of the 737's they're hardly new.

flyguy235 18th May 2007 17:55

ok fine i didnt see that till afterwards - however my questions in post pose a different theme. but thanks for pointing it out

Stampe 18th May 2007 19:59

As a regular BA LGW shorthaul punter I,d rather have a 20 year old Boeing than a new Airbus.

Big Kahuna Burger 18th May 2007 21:57

Where does it say that they admit to price fixing....? A link to the admission would be nice.

I would not disagree that the seem to be preparing for the worst and they might well be guilty, but the title is factually incorrect.

TheGorrilla 18th May 2007 23:11

Hmmm...

So it's only BA who are hit by the rising fuel charges!!!!

Really.



Come on and live in the real world!

HZ123 19th May 2007 04:53

The interiors of many of the A319's are already tired and as someone stated will be even worst by 2010. It is a shame that LGW has been treated`as`second class again and probably the residue of aircraft will be more second hand from LHR. At least it appears to ensure some future.

kite 19th May 2007 07:31

Big Kahuna Burger

The link is in the very first post.


In the results statement, BA admitted staff had broken competition laws over fuel surcharges
I haven't checked the actual results statement but the admission should be in there somewhere.

rubik101 19th May 2007 09:08

So every penny they made from the fuel surcharge is going to pay the fine for introducing an illegally derived fuel surcharge, brilliant!
If they had just come up with an arbitary figure and applied it, all well and good but no, they have to ring around everyone else and find out how much the opposition is going to charge.

robo283 19th May 2007 11:29

Any of these 737s going spare? Some lo-cos are looking for capacity (if they buy a 737 can you throw in a 757 as well?) :E

Phoenix_X 19th May 2007 14:03

Maybe they'll finally get rid of one of the most stupid charges ever conceived after this. Fuel charge schmuel charge.

If I get a ticket on the train I expect it to cover the cost of train/track/station maintenance, staff costs, admin charges and the electricity/diesel used by the train. I don't pay for the fuel when I catch a cab, it's included in the fare. Why should aviation be different?

I could start an airline where you fly for free! Oh, of course I would charge a maintenance surcharge, a cabin crew surcharge, a pilot surcharge, a seat surcharge (refundable if you choose to stand :E ), airways surcharge, aircraft devaluation surcharge, security surcharge and a management bonus surcharge.

That'll be 350 pounds please. Oh, plus tax of course! But the ticket is free. Staff get 50% discount cause I'm nice.

Rwy in Sight 19th May 2007 14:18

Phoenix_X,

You are too late mate. A certain very western european airline in Blue yellow and I thikn white makes a lot of mine in this way.

By the way, the fine is paid to whom and does the SLF (who supposely (sp) paid higher fares) benefit in any substantial way?

Rwy in Sight

What The 19th May 2007 14:52

APA, coming your way!

BOAC 19th May 2007 15:09

Maybe the doubtless 'generous' severance packege pots for the two and perhaps any 'ex gratia' company money thrown into said pension pots could be recovered and go a little way to passing SOME profit share to those who have actually WORKED for the customers and a little cheer to shareholders?

Anyone know how big the 'parachutes' are?

Wonkavater 19th May 2007 16:11

Bet Jet2 are first in the queue to snap them up!

Chief Whip 19th May 2007 16:34

The question is, are these A319's going to be operated by BA or GB?:oh:

GZip 19th May 2007 18:24

Since Iberian peninsular BA routes (& OneWorld) are projected as 757 ex-T3 once T5 opens, it seems likely that we will see mainline take LHR-AGP etc. whilst a blend of Airbii do it from LGW.

Club loads and load factor might even see a 767 on part of the LHR schedule...

Dangerous to allow logic to creep into the plan though!


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:13.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.