Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Emirates-2

Old 10th Apr 2024, 17:37
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Emirates marks 20 years of service to Glasgow. Sounds like it was a bit of a jolly for those attending. No news (or questions asked?) about the return of the 2nd flight or in the wider Scottish context, the return of EDI.

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/...asgow-airport/


The world’s largest international airline is celebrating two decades of flying to and from Glasgow Airport.

To mark the 20-year milestone on Tuesday, Emirates flight EK027, served by its iconic A380, arrived at Glasgow Airport, with a celebration including a Bagpiper.

The flight was flown by Paisley-born Pilot FO Lewis Ferguson, who worked his way up from the airport’s security team to a First Officer for Emirates.

In the 20 years since its inaugural flight on April 10, 2004, Emirates has carried more than 5.62 million passengers on 18,990 roundtrip flights to and from Dubai.

As well as facilitating inbound tourism and contributing to the local economy, Emirates operations from Glasgow Airport see hundreds of tonnes of cargo transported each week. In 2023 alone, Emirates transported more than four million kgs of cargo via its daily service to Dubai.

Richard Jewsbury, Emirates divisional vice president in the UK, said: "We’re proud to have served Scotland via Glasgow for more than 20 years, connecting millions of passengers and facilitating valuable trade across our global network.

"We have seen significant growth over the last two decades and forward bookings for this route were up 51% year-on-year in 2024.

"We’d like to sincerely thank all our stakeholders including the local community, customers, businesses, suppliers, ground handlers, the Scottish Government, local authorities, Glasgow Airport and travel agents for their unwavering support over the past two decades as we reach this milestone.

"Glasgow remains a key market from both passenger and cargo perspectives and is a hugely popular destination for our passengers around the world.

"We look forward to continuing to provide our best-in-class services and greater connectivity to Scotland."

Ronald Leitch, interim chief operations officer at AGS Airports, added: "The Glasgow Dubai service has been a resounding success story for Glasgow and the wider region.

"It was Scotland’s first route to the Middle East and remains the country’s only direct service to Dubai.

"Both airport and airline have celebrated so many milestones during the last two decades, such as the opening of the stunning Emirates’ lounge in 2014, the first visit of the A380 that same year and then the introduction of the world’s largest passenger aircraft into daily service in 2019 and again last year.

"Despite being a daily occurrence, the arrival and departure of Scotland’s only A380 service still captures the imagination of passengers, the public and our airport colleagues.

"I remember vividly the first Emirates’ flight coming in to land all those years ago.

"In the ensuing years, this service has been instrumental in connecting Scotland’s leisure and business travellers through the world’s busiest international airport in Dubai. Equally, the service also plays a significant role in ensuring hundreds of thousands of tonnes of Scotland’s finest goods are exported globally each year.

"To mark 20 years of this hugely important service at Glasgow Airport is a tremendous honour and achievement for Scotland."
Breathe is offline  
Old 6th May 2024, 12:34
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With Emirates announcing Edinburgh as one of their first A350 routes I wonder what other opportunities there may be in the UK?

I'm thinking Bristol in particular but not sure an A350 would still be the right equipment and whether that could happen once their 787's arrive perhaps?

Could other airports maybe see some A380/B777 rotations replaced with A350/B787s in the future, but perhaps with additional frequency?

There's also the 777X on the way too eventually. I would guess that non A380 capable airports where Emirates would ideally like to fly them, and indeed some current A380 services will most likely see these as a future replacement.
FRatSTN is online now  
Old 6th May 2024, 13:33
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Uk
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FRatSTN
With Emirates announcing Edinburgh as one of their first A350 routes I wonder what other opportunities there may be in the UK?

I'm thinking Bristol in particular but not sure an A350 would still be the right equipment and whether that could happen once their 787's arrive perhaps?

Could other airports maybe see some A380/B777 rotations replaced with A350/B787s in the future, but perhaps with additional frequency?

There's also the 777X on the way too eventually. I would guess that non A380 capable airports where Emirates would ideally like to fly them, and indeed some current A380 services will most likely see these as a future replacement.
I can see a 4th daily MAN once they move into the soon to be extended T2. Probably a 77W for added freight capability.

BRS is probably the only other real ‘hole’ in the UK network, but would it hamper BHX loads?

I could also see NCL maybe going double daily on a smaller a/c when they come online replacing the 77W. Giving more options on another bank of connections
azz767 is offline  
Old 6th May 2024, 13:50
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,112
Received 318 Likes on 185 Posts
BHX perhaps getting the third daily restored with 1 x 380 and 2 x 359? The 350 has the advantage of not having a first class cabin ( according to another posting) so might be ideal for BHX where for whatever reason first doesn't appear to work.
ATNotts is online now  
Old 6th May 2024, 14:06
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,610
Received 98 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by ATNotts
The 350 has the advantage of not having a first class cabin ( according to another posting) so might be ideal for BHX where for whatever reason first doesn't appear to work.
How does the 359 compare to the 773 for cargo capacity. I understand that the 380 is inferior to the 773 for cargo lift?
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 6th May 2024, 14:22
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stafford
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don’t think BHX going double daily A380 and a reinstated morning service with the A350 is beyond the realms of possibility.
chinapattern is offline  
Old 6th May 2024, 18:29
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: GB
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The EK23/24 flight number pairing, which was previously the third BHX, is now the seventh LHR. Appreciate this is nothing concrete, but with ‘lower’ pairings to use, it seems odd that they went for this one. I would interpret that as a third BHX off the cards for now. 2nd A380 is much more likely.
laviation is offline  
Old 6th May 2024, 18:34
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warwickshire
Age: 53
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laviation
The EK23/24 flight number pairing, which was previously the third BHX, is now the seventh LHR. Appreciate this is nothing concrete, but with ‘lower’ pairings to use, it seems odd that they went for this one. I would interpret that as a third BHX off the cards for now. 2nd A380 is much more likely.
The third daily flight from BHX was EK41/42
Budfrey27 is offline  
Old 6th May 2024, 18:37
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 43
Posts: 1,580
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laviation
The EK23/24 flight number pairing, which was previously the third BHX, is now the seventh LHR. Appreciate this is nothing concrete, but with ‘lower’ pairings to use, it seems odd that they went for this one. I would interpret that as a third BHX off the cards for now. 2nd A380 is much more likely.
EK41/42 is the new LHR rotation.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 6th May 2024, 19:08
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: GB
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My mistake! Mix up with the new EDI numbers. EK41/42 was the third BHX rotation anyway.
laviation is offline  
Old 6th May 2024, 20:42
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stafford
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laviation
I would interpret that as a third BHX off the cards for now.
I’m sure you would
chinapattern is offline  
Old 7th May 2024, 05:40
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: GB
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chinapattern
I’m sure you would
Is that your only argument against my point?
laviation is offline  
Old 7th May 2024, 06:32
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,112
Received 318 Likes on 185 Posts
Originally Posted by laviation
Is that your only argument against my point?
Unless I misunderstood your post you didn't make an argument, but made a simple mistake over flight numbers that you accepted.

Since BHX hasn't yet returned to pre-Covid passenger volumes talk about a third rotation imminently is nonsense, but it is a prospect for the medium term. I imagine that IF there were a third BHX service whether the mix included one or two A380s the requirement for cargo uplift would be an important factor.
ATNotts is online now  
Old 7th May 2024, 06:41
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: GB
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATNotts
Unless I misunderstood your post you didn't make an argument, but made a simple mistake over flight numbers that you accepted.

Since BHX hasn't yet returned to pre-Covid passenger volumes talk about a third rotation imminently is nonsense, but it is a prospect for the medium term. I imagine that IF there were a third BHX service whether the mix included one or two A380s the requirement for cargo uplift would be an important factor.
My point was that the old BHX morning flight numbers are now the seventh LHR service - as I say, this may not mean anything, but the fact that they specifically used the 41/42 pairing, suggests to me that they’ve shelved a third daily for now while the extra Heathrow slots are there.

Long story short - 3rd BHX isn’t coming back for a while if they can hold on to this 7th LHR.

laviation is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.