Gatwick-3
With Indigo having finally placed their long-rumoured widebody order for 30 A350-900s (plus a further 70 options) and following on from pre-Covid era media comments, London is likely to be among the first long-haul destinations the airline could (and IMHO very likely would) serve with a dedicated widebody fleet direct from Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore, given the extremely tight slot situation at Heathrow and that as an LCC (of sorts) with a track record of profitability and prudent management of its finances Indigo IMO is unlikely to shell out crazy sums for Heathrow slots it would struggle to recoup given the type of passenger it would most likely attract as well as Heathrow's high airport user charges (reportedly up to twice Gatwick's), this should make Gatwick Indigo's prime target (in preference to Stansted provided Gatwick has slots that are workable for the airline) re the London area airport from which to launch direct flights to Delhi / Mumbai / Bangalore. However, this won't be an imminent prospect as the first of the airline's just ordered A350s are not due to arrive until 2027.
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Emirates wants more Gatwick slots
I'd imagine that there is a reasonable chance of EK increasing LGW to 4 a day, but I reckon the additional rotation is more likely to be flown with the 77W, similar to the recently added LHR flight. STN is also being rumoured to go to 3 daily later this year. So they seem to be doing well in the London market
Nice to see a highly regarded long-haul airline recognise the value of Gatwick as a distinct catchment in its own right rather than a temporary Heathrow overflow and to fully commit to the airport for the long term. (Emirates have replicated this thinking at Stansted as well b.t.w., where its president Tim Clark has gone on record during a recent aviation industry get-together, saying that there is room for a third daily Emirates service at Stansted.) This not only makes me think that Emirates is going to revisit its pre pandemic plan to add a fourth daily Gatwick-Dubai frequency sooner rather than later, but my hope is also that more long-haul airlines will eventually come round to Emirates' point of view re Gatwick's value as a destination / point-of-origin in its own right.
IMHO, in addition to Qatar Airways, Air India is one of the airlines best-placed - over the medium to long term - to adopt Emirates' thinking on Gatwick, provided that they succeed in making India a hub for global air travel (centred on Delhi, Mumbai and Bengaluru) and adopt the MEB3 super connector model so successfully pioneered by Emirates over the past 15 years or so. Given that Singapore Airlines is slated to own 25.1% of Air India upon completion of the integration of Air India, Air India Express and Vistara (the Indian FSC originally established as a JV between the Tata group, the Indian tea to steel conglomerate whose founding family were the original owners of Air India and re-aqcuired the airline from the Indian government two years ago, and Singapore Airlines), my hope is also that Air India and Singapore Airlines will eventually integrate their operations along the lines of Air France - KLM, with Singapore Airlines not only contributing its Changi hub as the combined Air India - Singapore Airlines' fourth global hub, but also adopting Emirates' thinking on Gatwick.
"Gatwick as a catchment area in it's own right". What he means is that Emirates, as a quite exceptional carrier, can succeed where others fail. They can succesfully serve London from LHR, LGW and STN whereas most airlines cannot and should not even try. You scoffed at Lufthansa attempting to do this and blamed the carrier when in fact, it's a function of the market. Same goes for Aer Lingus, although I was surprised myself at that one. Delta run LGW-JFK on decades old B767s and LHR-JFK on factory new A339s with Delta One. That's a good example of the "Gatwick catchment area" vs. LHR waiting room, it's a relatively inferior offering. The growth in long haul with the Chinese carriers and Ethiopian is great BUT would up sticks and move to LHR tomorrow if they could get slots. As would Air Mauritius if they can get more slots, they didn't sell their LHR slots and given their cash situation, that's interesting.
Dedicated LGW long haul is BA, Norse, TUI, Emirates, Qatar and Icelandair. The rest would move out entirely if the market allowed them LHR access. Air India at LGW is a country mile from their own catchment area in London.
Dedicated LGW long haul is BA, Norse, TUI, Emirates, Qatar and Icelandair. The rest would move out entirely if the market allowed them LHR access. Air India at LGW is a country mile from their own catchment area in London.
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Age: 53
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Gatwick as a catchment area in it's own right". What he means is that Emirates, as a quite exceptional carrier, can succeed where others fail. They can succesfully serve London from LHR, LGW and STN whereas most airlines cannot and should not even try. You scoffed at Lufthansa attempting to do this and blamed the carrier when in fact, it's a function of the market. Same goes for Aer Lingus, although I was surprised myself at that one. Delta run LGW-JFK on decades old B767s and LHR-JFK on factory new A339s with Delta One. That's a good example of the "Gatwick catchment area" vs. LHR waiting room, it's a relatively inferior offering. The growth in long haul with the Chinese carriers and Ethiopian is great BUT would up sticks and move to LHR tomorrow if they could get slots. As would Air Mauritius if they can get more slots, they didn't sell their LHR slots and given their cash situation, that's interesting.
Dedicated LGW long haul is BA, Norse, TUI, Emirates, Qatar and Icelandair. The rest would move out entirely if the market allowed them LHR access. Air India at LGW is a country mile from their own catchment area in London.
Dedicated LGW long haul is BA, Norse, TUI, Emirates, Qatar and Icelandair. The rest would move out entirely if the market allowed them LHR access. Air India at LGW is a country mile from their own catchment area in London.
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Making LGW work for FSCs
"Gatwick as a catchment area in it's own right". What he means is that Emirates, as a quite exceptional carrier, can succeed where others fail. They can succesfully serve London from LHR, LGW and STN whereas most airlines cannot and should not even try. You scoffed at Lufthansa attempting to do this and blamed the carrier when in fact, it's a function of the market. Same goes for Aer Lingus, although I was surprised myself at that one. Delta run LGW-JFK on decades old B767s and LHR-JFK on factory new A339s with Delta One. That's a good example of the "Gatwick catchment area" vs. LHR waiting room, it's a relatively inferior offering. The growth in long haul with the Chinese carriers and Ethiopian is great BUT would up sticks and move to LHR tomorrow if they could get slots. As would Air Mauritius if they can get more slots, they didn't sell their LHR slots and given their cash situation, that's interesting.
Dedicated LGW long haul is BA, Norse, TUI, Emirates, Qatar and Icelandair. The rest would move out entirely if the market allowed them LHR access. Air India at LGW is a country mile from their own catchment area in London.
Dedicated LGW long haul is BA, Norse, TUI, Emirates, Qatar and Icelandair. The rest would move out entirely if the market allowed them LHR access. Air India at LGW is a country mile from their own catchment area in London.
Re Delta's old 767s on LGW-JFK vs. their state-of-the-art 339s (and 359s) at LHR (with superior on-board products). True. But DL also fly the same, decades-old, clapped-out 767s on many of their other European routes, incl. routes serving capital cities with only one airport. Even United fly decades-old, clapped-out 767s on many of their prime TATL routes serving LHR! While these may have better on-board products than those 767s DL use to serve LGW and other secondary, seasonal European routes, they're still old, obsolete aircraft nonetheless, a bit like putting lipstick on a pig to disguise the fact that it is a pig.
Lastly, re LGW being miles from Air India's [west] London catchment around LHR, you are mistaken if you think that Indians and people of Indian origin in the UK only live around LHR despite their heavy concentration in the area. In fact, many Indian care home and IT workers in the UK actually work and live in LGW's catchment as well; in the case of IT workers, many of these people are in Crawley itself and nearby Horsham, working for companies like Thales and Royal Sun Alliance, respectively, for example; in the case of care home workers, many of these people are scattered across the entire Gatwick Diamond business region stretching from Brighton in the south to Croydon in the north and also stretching from the Portsmouth area in the west to the Eastbourne area in the east along the South Coast. And this is before even factoring in the region's diaspora (those settled in the area served by LGW for several generations). What this means in the context of AI's current four LGW routes serving Ahmedabad, Amritsar, Goa and Kochi for example is that only as far as Amritsar in the northwestern Indian state of Punjab is concerned, almost all users actually live in LHR's catchment; re Ahmedabad, while there are many people in LHR's catchment who originally came to the UK from the western Indian state of Gujarat (or whose descendants had migrated from there to East Africa during the colonial era before coming to the UK as well), there are also many people from this region of India in LGW's catchnent; as far as Kochi in the southwestern Indian state of Kerala is concerned, many more people using this service actually work and live in LGW's catchment than LHR's catchment, with many among them being care home workers, so LGW - rather than LHR - being the ideal airport for this route in particular; Goa, by comparison, doesn't have a big diaspora, especially in the Southeast (there is a bigger Goan community in the Midlands), with AI's LGW-GOX route primarily used by price-sensitive Brits for whom the London area airport is not the main consideration. Even AI's originally planned but now postponed LGW-BLR route, while unlike the other, more leisure- / VFR-focused LGW routes being more business-focused, will be well patronised if served from LGW rather than LHR given the large number of IT workers in LGW's catchment, many of whom are from Bengaluru, India's primary IT capital, or are settled there. Therefore, if there is an airline ideally suited to follow in Emirates' footsteps, i.e., adopting the MEB3 super connector global hub-and-spoke business model, incl. serving multiple London area airports, Air India must surely be a prime candidate for this role.
Last edited by FlyGatwick; 4th May 2024 at 22:52.
Flygatwick
I do appreciate your efforts, enthusiasm and input regarding London Gatwick Airport. You make some interesting points.
But if I could just make these polite remarks.
Your posts would be far easier to read and much more informative if your paragraphs weren't so long. Sentences lasting forever before a full stop. I give up reading the entirety of your posts as they come across as totally disconbobulated.
You have a lot of enthusiasm, which is obvious from your posts but please make them more reader friendly 😀
I do appreciate your efforts, enthusiasm and input regarding London Gatwick Airport. You make some interesting points.
But if I could just make these polite remarks.
Your posts would be far easier to read and much more informative if your paragraphs weren't so long. Sentences lasting forever before a full stop. I give up reading the entirety of your posts as they come across as totally disconbobulated.
You have a lot of enthusiasm, which is obvious from your posts but please make them more reader friendly 😀
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My comments to FlyGatwick.
1. LH - How many slots do you think are now available at LGW? None for a full day in Germany. Easyjet have tried all sorts of German cities, they do not make good money.
2. AI - How you been to Airports in India? They are nothing in comparison to ME3 carriers. Once India builds some new Airports, which they will do then they can look to some of those transit markets. I suspect if they get more slots at LHR, then they will transfer. The AI operation at LHR is well established and will always be the primary end game if slots become available. They are part of the Star Alliance so will want to be closer to UA, LH & TK at LHR.
1. LH - How many slots do you think are now available at LGW? None for a full day in Germany. Easyjet have tried all sorts of German cities, they do not make good money.
2. AI - How you been to Airports in India? They are nothing in comparison to ME3 carriers. Once India builds some new Airports, which they will do then they can look to some of those transit markets. I suspect if they get more slots at LHR, then they will transfer. The AI operation at LHR is well established and will always be the primary end game if slots become available. They are part of the Star Alliance so will want to be closer to UA, LH & TK at LHR.
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LGW slot availability & state of Indian airports / AI's future at LGW
My comments to FlyGatwick.
1. LH - How many slots do you think are now available at LGW? None for a full day in Germany. Easyjet have tried all sorts of German cities, they do not make good money.
2. AI - How you been to Airports in India? They are nothing in comparison to ME3 carriers. Once India builds some new Airports, which they will do then they can look to some of those transit markets. I suspect if they get more slots at LHR, then they will transfer. The AI operation at LHR is well established and will always be the primary end game if slots become available. They are part of the Star Alliance so will want to be closer to UA, LH & TK at LHR.
1. LH - How many slots do you think are now available at LGW? None for a full day in Germany. Easyjet have tried all sorts of German cities, they do not make good money.
2. AI - How you been to Airports in India? They are nothing in comparison to ME3 carriers. Once India builds some new Airports, which they will do then they can look to some of those transit markets. I suspect if they get more slots at LHR, then they will transfer. The AI operation at LHR is well established and will always be the primary end game if slots become available. They are part of the Star Alliance so will want to be closer to UA, LH & TK at LHR.
As far as the state of Indian airports vis-ŕ-vis their counterparts in the Gulf is concerned, it depends to which airport you specifically refer. The standards vary widely. The one I have experienced at Bengaluru (Kempegowda Airport) - especially the new Terminal 2 - is world-class. In fact, in some aspects it's arguably ahead of DXB and not very far behind Singapore Changi. And then there is the brand-new airport at Navi Mumbai (New Bombay), which is set to open its doors later this year or early next. It'll be a two-runway airport from the start, and therefore will lend itself as a hub (unlike the current BOM airport, which like LGW is operated as a single-runway airport).
Air India's future at LGW will depend not only on LHR slot availability, but what their ultimate strategy pending a successful turnaround of the airline will be, i.e., whether they'll adopt the MEB3 global super connector business model. If that's the case, even though their main focus will always be on LHR, It'll actually make sense to link their Indian hubs to multiple London area airports, just like EK and QR do. The fact that AI are part of the Star Alliance should IMO not be an obstacle here. Further in this context, I actually disagree with you that being closer to its Star Alliance partners at LHR is an end for AI in itself, without taking into consideration whether the connections these partners can offer at LHR are actually sensible. If AI wants to enable its passengers to connect seamless to and from destinations in Germany to which it doesn't fly with its own metal, it will surely be far more efficient to do this via the LH hubs in FRA and MUC as connecting to / from Germany at LHR involves significant backtracking. And as far as facilitating TATL connections at LHR via AI's Star partners UA and AC is concerned, although these don't involve backtracking unlike in the case of Germany, encouraging AI passengers to transfer at LHR to / from UA and AC actually results in a revenue loss for AI's non-stop India-US and India-Canada flights, undermining the profitability of these ultra long-haul services - reportedly, AI's most profitable routes. This is therefore not in AI's interest (with the same applying to AI passengers changing at FRA or MUC onto LH / UA / AC TATL flights). Lastly, there is also the geopolitical factor impeding closer collaboration between AI and TK (apart from transferring between AI and TK flights at LHR involving even more backtracking than transferring between AI and LH flights at LHR, and TK's fast-growing IST hub being viewed with the same suspicion as EK's and QR's respective hubs at DXB and DOH by AI's top managenent). Turkey has traditionally been viewed in India as a friend of Pakistan, India's long-standing rival and foe. This is a widely held view amogst Indians, even at board level, and let's not forget in this context that AI's ultimate owners, the Tatas, are after all born and have lived in India for all of their lives despite their carefully crafted, highly polished cosmopolitan appearance. As well in this context, we need to remember that the current AI CEO, New Zealand national, ex-Scoot CEO Campbell Wilson, only got this role after his short-lived predecessor, a former TK CEO who is a Turkish national (and whose name I can't remember now) resigned in the face of strong public opposition in India to what was widely viewed as the appointment of a national of an unfriendly country, who had also gone on record previously as supporting his country's endorsement of the official Pakistani position on Kashmir, to the top job of a company many Indians regard as one of the jewels in their industrial crown.
Last edited by FlyGatwick; 5th May 2024 at 16:06.
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Air Peace 777-300 operating today's LGW-LOS flight
As much as I dislike the antics of the Air Peace CEO / chairman / founder / owner, the airline's livery looks absolutely stunning, especially on the 777-300. IMHO, easily the best livery of any airline currently operating at Gatwick.
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: St Albans
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IIRC it’s a reinstatement of a previous route. I certainly remember flying with them LGW to RVN pre-COVID.
Seems a lot of capacity to RVN, what with easyJet, Ryanair and the numerous ‘charter’ flights thrown in as well. I guess they’ve got to fly those jets somewhere in winter and the winter sun destinations are probably maxed out as well
Seems a lot of capacity to RVN, what with easyJet, Ryanair and the numerous ‘charter’ flights thrown in as well. I guess they’ve got to fly those jets somewhere in winter and the winter sun destinations are probably maxed out as well
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Surrey
Age: 36
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JetBlue LGW cut to summer seasonal service.
LHR routes still operate year round.
https://onemileatatime.com/news/jetb...lantic-flying/
LHR routes still operate year round.
https://onemileatatime.com/news/jetb...lantic-flying/
Last edited by strawberry Ribena; 9th May 2024 at 18:22.
LGW cut to summer seasonal service.
LHR routes still operate year round.
https://onemileatatime.com/news/jetb...lantic-flying/
LHR routes still operate year round.
https://onemileatatime.com/news/jetb...lantic-flying/
With competition from British Airways, Delta and Norse on the LGW to JFK route it makes me wonder whether STN would have been a better option for Jetblue.
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not surprised by this announcement whatsoever. A decision I was half expecting, and it makes perfect sense for Jetblue to go seasonal at LGW and concentrate operations at LHR.
With competition from British Airways, Delta and Norse on the LGW to JFK route it makes me wonder whether STN would have been a better option for Jetblue.
With competition from British Airways, Delta and Norse on the LGW to JFK route it makes me wonder whether STN would have been a better option for Jetblue.
When Cambridge South station opens for the biomedical campus that too should be a big draw for a direct US service again from STN, particularly Boston. There will also be a north/east London catchment for US flights which will favour a STN service. Emirates see this already with their Dubai connections. I think the main issue is most airlines perceive STN's customer experience exactly as it is and see the slots they get at congested airports as high value assets, so if they can get into LHR or LGW they will.
I've always thought LGW is too much the default for LHR overspill rather than it being a chosen alternative on a solid business case as such. Hopefully the future planned improvements at STN, and indeed LTN to some extent, will help put them on a more level playing field in providing some more healthy competition with LGW.
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this the beginning of the end of JetBlue thanks to Carl Icahn?
I am not surprised by this announcement whatsoever. A decision I was half expecting, and it makes perfect sense for Jetblue to go seasonal at LGW and concentrate operations at LHR.
With competition from British Airways, Delta and Norse on the LGW to JFK route it makes me wonder whether STN would have been a better option for Jetblue.
With competition from British Airways, Delta and Norse on the LGW to JFK route it makes me wonder whether STN would have been a better option for Jetblue.
Recalling what Icahn did to TWA, I wouldn't be surprised at all if making JetBlue's Gatwick routes and its second daily Paris CdG service (from / to JFK I presume) seasonal are just opening gambits for his end game, which would see JetBlue's Heathrow slots being sold for top dollar - just like he sold TWA's Heathrow slots to American 30-odd years ago, with JetBlue's remaining TATL service progressively run down and - depending on how the airline recovers from the costly fallout of its abandoned merger with ULCC Spirit, what will remain of it either being sold off to some one else or being shut down altogether.
On Thursday morning London Gatwick South Terminal was evacuated due to a fire alarm.
I won't go into the details as they are easily accessible elsewhere.
But one photo which got my attention is the one that I have attached.
It looks as if passengers were on the former viewing balcony. With the view of Pier 2 and the tails of the aircraft it certainly looks like it was taken from the former viewing balcony.
If by any chance there was actually a fire I'm surprised that the passengers and I'm assuming staff as well would be directed to the roof of the building.
The other thing that got my attention was the view from the former viewing balcony. It doesn't look too unchanged from when it was previously open to the public. It's a shame that the former viewing balcony couldn't reopen.
I was always under the impression that the view was mostly obscured with all the construction since it was closed but obviously not going by the photo. If indeed it was taken on the former viewing balcony.
I won't go into the details as they are easily accessible elsewhere.
But one photo which got my attention is the one that I have attached.
It looks as if passengers were on the former viewing balcony. With the view of Pier 2 and the tails of the aircraft it certainly looks like it was taken from the former viewing balcony.
If by any chance there was actually a fire I'm surprised that the passengers and I'm assuming staff as well would be directed to the roof of the building.
The other thing that got my attention was the view from the former viewing balcony. It doesn't look too unchanged from when it was previously open to the public. It's a shame that the former viewing balcony couldn't reopen.
I was always under the impression that the view was mostly obscured with all the construction since it was closed but obviously not going by the photo. If indeed it was taken on the former viewing balcony.
Last edited by Sotonsean; 10th May 2024 at 01:52.
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not surprised by this announcement whatsoever. A decision I was half expecting, and it makes perfect sense for Jetblue to go seasonal at LGW and concentrate operations at LHR.
With competition from British Airways, Delta and Norse on the LGW to JFK route it makes me wonder whether STN would have been a better option for Jetblue.
With competition from British Airways, Delta and Norse on the LGW to JFK route it makes me wonder whether STN would have been a better option for Jetblue.
We are now almost halfway through the year, and LGW has had several airline successes so far. I for one am very excited to see the inaugural SQ service to Singapore next month. Although Lufthansa are leaving (2nd time now) and Aer Lingus are no longer serving LGW. I wonder who we can expect next, both on the short and long haul front?