Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Southampton-3

Old 6th Dec 2020, 14:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 50+ north
Posts: 861
Originally Posted by RW20 View Post
Good points
The runway application will be rejected .......​
Can we assume that this is a personal viewpoint and that we can retain faith in the legal planning process?
TCAS FAN is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2020, 14:50
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Age: 40
Posts: 546
stewyb

I agree Wizz are probably now the most likely to open some routes after the works are completed. Easy are probably still the best match for SOU but Wizz seem to be riding out the Covid crisis much better than them. Wizz’s links to Eastern Europe would also be perfect to serve the huge Easter European population in the south. I happen to know quite a few who travel as far as Luton to use Wizz. They are clearly also targeting sun routes that use to be served by Thomas Cook.

in terms of Southampton council objecting to the planning, this is hardly surprising when there are militant labour Councillors in charge that are ruining the city by making it only possible to get in and out on a bicycle. Their so called green city charter basically means they have tied their hands behind their back when it comes to supporting anything that goes against the deluded Eco-mentalists. The ridiculous thing is that they partly objected on the basis of noise despite the fact SOU have offered to implement a noise cap which currently doesn’t even exist. Also ironic that they are happy for the docks to start building a fifth cruise terminal when the boats are one of the biggest polluters in the city. There is still a glimmer of hope that Eastleigh Council will agree to give planning as it means jobs for their constituents but it is looking more likely that SOU will have to go down the appeal route. I fully expect SOU to win on appeal as the extension is crucial to their business and they have done enough to address noise/environmental concerns.
Rivet Joint is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2020, 09:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 662
It's a shame that Southampton hasn't approved it. I still don't understand why the airport doesn't approach the issue differently, as a way of keeping it's existing operators planes fuller - this is an environmental benefit. If they avoid talking about 320's and 737's then the discussion becomes keeping existing business sustainable with an extension. I don't understand their thinking. Telling everyone they're going to attract more planes, louder planes, bigger planes is creating their own problems locally.

shamrock7seal is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2020, 09:44
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 662
Good point Rivet Jet on the sou cruise terminal. Cruise/shipping in general is one of the worst polluters of carbon ever! Cruise industry is probably throwing money at the council. Double standards!!
shamrock7seal is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2020, 10:45
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,552
Is the cruise industry throwing money at the council? I thought that the cruise industry existed offshore and famously didn't pay taxes anywhere. No fuel duty, no VAT, no social security levies, next to no corporation tax.
inOban is online now  
Old 7th Dec 2020, 18:31
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 662
It's a manner of speaking. I don't mean literally. The associated infrastructure and businesses supporting cruise passengers must be massive in and around Southampton - I'm thinking hotels, shops, restaurants, transport, before and after their journey etc etc... it's more that the council have dollar signs in their vision when making decisions about a cruise terminal (ignoring pollution) but don't veiw SOU's runway in the same way (despite the lower emissions of aircraft versus cruise industry)
shamrock7seal is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2020, 16:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: London
Posts: 42
What you say about cruise ships and pollution is certainly true in respect of most of the older ships but massive steps are being made to tackle this problem with most new build ships having much cleaner propulsion systems.
Jamesair1 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2020, 17:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: bishops stortford herts
Posts: 1,722
Planning decision delayed until 2021 (no date)...Southampton Airport to submit additional info...
southside bobby is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2020, 18:35
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Age: 40
Posts: 546
inOban

It's worse than that, tax payer money is being used to build the new terminal. Whilst it looks like it is going to have shore power it is a bit ironic that the council are happy for a fifth cruise terminal and all its associated polution but not a small extension to its airport's runway.

Shamrock7seal: Good point, I guess the cruise industry does contribute more to the city. Surely any aspirational city requires a successful airport though. I guess it is indicative of the truly mad world we find ourselves in where double standards apparently don't exist.

Jamesair1: That is true but there is a brand new one in at the moment that has had smoke pouring out of it for a few days now. It seems the shipping industry is supported whereas aviation is blamed for everything. If it was supported better maybe there would be more investment in developing hydrogen/electric planes.
Rivet Joint is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2020, 18:47
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southampton
Posts: 350
southside bobby

It is just going to go on and on ,and the longer it goes on then there will be more opposition,and less appetite for any airline to commit to SOU. The pressure of new needed housing will transmit to selling the airport land for development.
RW20 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2020, 22:06
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dorset
Posts: 323
Curious - Southampton has appeared in the drop-down menu on ba.com within the last few days. Anyone know what's afoot?
Albert Hall is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2020, 22:34
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 140
No idea but have seen rumours of a U.K. airport running a summer seasonal programme with BA Cityflyer!?
SKOJB is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2020, 22:54
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: inv
Posts: 321
Loganair code share with BA Loganair fly to SOU
scr1 is online now  
Old 8th Dec 2020, 23:06
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,178
Pessimistic - BA codeshare on some existing routes - maybe Loganair/Blue Islands? But not sure how that would benefit BA, the only obvious connections being to Aer Lingus via DUB/MAN(assuming the latter goes ahead).
Optimistic - BA Cityflyer flying some weekend sun routes next summer as they have from other airports - ALC/AGP/PMI/FAO, possibly Greece too?
Up in the clouds - BA Cityflyer basing a few E170/190's flying a mix of European city and sun routes.

Regarding the second scenario, while they'll never be able to offer LCC fares, BACF are probably best placed for flying any longer routes at least off the current runway - their LCY spec (i.e. powerful) E-Jets manage LCY-JSI and similar non stop. Believe they are limited to ~75-80 seats or so, but the 200m runway advantage at SOU vs LCY would probably allow a full 98 passengers on their E190. In fact, I remember it being quoted that FlyLolo were limited to 97 seats on the Flybe E195 which would support this assumption.

Looking at the third it initially seems absurd, but business travel is predicted to recover very slowly BACF may find an excess of capacity at LCY, even accounting for the leisure routes that have grown in recent years there. Outside of SOU there are not many airports that do not have any significant LCC competition on the main european routes, and the runway length works in its favour in this sense to maintain this. In this purely hypothetical scenario, I can't see them not wanting a slice of the major domestic and Irish routes - EDI, GLA, BHD, DUB so it could spell bad news for the likes of Loganair and Eastern.
adfly is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 10:34
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,099
BA City Flyer 11+ weekend routes from Southampton for summer 2021.

As reported on twitter: https://twitter.com/HeadForPoints/status/1336617753223041031?s=19
​​
  • Berlin starts 2nd May, Sunday out, Friday back
  • Edinburgh starts 16th May, Sunday out, Friday back
  • Bergerac starts 15th May, weekends plus Tuesday in peak season
  • Faro starts 1st May
  • Florence starts 1st May
  • Ibiza starts 2nd May
  • Limoges starts 15th May
  • Malaga starts 1st May
  • Mykonos starts 16th May
  • Nice starts 15th May
  • Palma starts 1st May

https://www.headforpoints.com/2020/1...routes-coming/
LBIA is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 10:52
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 5,645
Great news for the airport - any ideas on how many a/c will be required each weekend?!?
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 10:59
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,178
BA

Some very good news for SOU! The following seems to be bookable at the moment (some duplicate information from above...). All appear to be E190 operated, although some of the flight times seem a little lethargic for a jet (SOU-FAO is 3hrs!).

Berlin - out Sun/return Fri (positioning flight)
Bergerac - Tues/Sat/Sun
Faro - Sat
Florence - Sat/Sun
Edinburgh - out Sun/return Fri (positioning flight)
Ibiza - Sat/Sun
Limoges - Sat
Malaga - Sat/Sun
Mykonos - Sun
Nice - Sat
Palma - Sat/Sun

Looks like 3 aircraft needed Sat and 2 on Sun (the Edinburgh positioning flight departs in the morning).
adfly is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 12:09
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 212
looks like they’ve used LCY block times, should be at least 15 mins faster to/from SOU versus the odd routings in and out of LCY
AirLCY is online now  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 12:22
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 63
Posts: 202
Flybe's EMB 195 sat 118 pax so the JSI flights done for FlyLoLo were an awful payload penalty at 97 seats - and 1 or 2 flights still had to tech stop IIRC...

Someone mentioned above if an A321NEO can do TFS from SOU - answer is nope. Not even with the planned starter strip. The A321 has a higher risk of tail strike.
It can operate in/out of Skiathos but it will usually Tech stop on the way home.
An A320 maybe able to do SOU to Greece or the Canaries likely with a payload penalty of around 15-20 seats less.

The BACF program from SOU looks rather nice for summer 21.
Pray we have some normality back for our travel abroad to the Med by early summer, but if we don't then that lot will not happen in any quantity.

Needs around 3 aircraft both days -- unless W patterns are going to be happening>?
But W's on a SAT or a SUN originating at LCY are an issue with the LCY pm/am airport closures on those days.
So you cannot do LCY-JMK-SOU-JMK-LCY for instance.

The main major historical weekend charterer of BACF was Bar Head Travel in Scotland who did loads of holiday flights from GLA EDI and ABZ, but sadly they are not renewing their own BACF charter flight series for next summer after having to cancel all of their S20 programme.
This, I guess means BACF are going alone and having a stab at SOU...

The only other sunshine flights are with TUI packages to Palma on TUE and SATS (Volotea flying)
TUI cancelled the IBZ and MAH series.
rog747 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 12:56
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Mostly South of England
Posts: 35
A bit of good news for a change;
https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/189...ropean-cities/
Auxtank is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.