Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

bmiBaby threads (merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

bmiBaby threads (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Apr 2012, 08:43
  #221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Wales
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We can only expect a Baby announcement after the sale of BMI has been completed with IAG in my opinion. What happened to the two interested parties that were rumoured a while ago, one was a EU based one and one was Welsh if i recall ?
AirGuru is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 10:39
  #222 (permalink)  
Just a numbered other
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 72
Posts: 1,169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

FR

It is really quite simple.

Since October last year we've been told we'll all know in two weeks.

In two weeks time, when we know nothing we'll be told after another 14 days.

After 14 days when we are told Jack sh1t we'll know after a further fortnight.

Simples
Arkroyal is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 13:09
  #223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Out of a bag
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently the Welsh lot were preferred buyers until they realized they had their sums wrong. DLH went back to the EU group with an unrealistic timescale to complete. it'll probably complete after IAG take possession, but then again could happen before that.
Flying Wild is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 14:29
  #224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Wales
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you Flying Wild ! Hmm, yes that does now look possible then ! So there aren't any current bidders then, at least not speculated by the media. I believe that the welsh ones involved previously wanted to set up their own airline, but must have made some serious miscalculation when it came to Baby !
AirGuru is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 14:49
  #225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Out of a bag
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wind back the clock several months and both the Welsh and EU groups were in the frame (probably the two term sheets previously mentioned). Two bids were submitted to DLH, one significantly lower than the other. DLH in their collective wisdom went with the unknown Welsh quantity and look where we are now.
If they'd taken advice from those in the know and hadn't just gone with the cheapest option, perhaps we wouldn't be in this situation now and Baby would have an idea of it's future... As it is they had to go cap in hand to the EU group and ask them to proceed.
Flying Wild is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 14:55
  #226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Wales
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cant have looked very good for the Baby representatives then !
I just do not understand, why DLH went with the lower offer ? And then why the welsh group pulled out. Surely, if you had the intention, you would just put your head down and go for it. But that doesnt seem the case ?
AirGuru is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 15:06
  #227 (permalink)  
sjm
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the rumours at baby are true, you couldn't make it up, if it wasn't mine and others futures on the line I would find it funny....it amazing that a company the size of LH didn't know what a shower this lot were.

Disclaimer : I have no factual evidence to back this up( purely hearsay) no animals were hurt.

You haven't seen me right!

Standing by for the incoming phone call .........
sjm is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 15:22
  #228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the directors of the company was declared bankrupt before the term sheet was signed.........you'd think that Lufthansa would have noticed.
runway30 is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 16:38
  #229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If folks like INKJET are to be believed .Baby has a heap going for it.......why not a staff buyout?
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 16:52
  #230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Wales
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, indeed R30, i would have thought that any potential buyers were financially checked out by DLH before any term sheet was signed ! True shame, i thought that they could have done well at Baby, but hey ho, im sure baby will find a buyer.
Then again, the only thing going for it is its amazing staff members, and its established brand and route network. Other than that, there are severely outdated aircraft still in operation, and a huge saddle of debt for any buyer to jump onto ! If i was interested in getting an airline, i would rather start afresh than to acquire baby, if im honest. Whereas an established airline could say the same, why would we need baby's fleet etc. where we have our own, and are quite capable of expanding by 14 Aircraft. But as i said, FR and EZY among others would love to see the demise of baby, to hook into the market at baby's bases.
Personally though, i wish they are saved, a good, historic British airline with British bias and great staff who i have dealt with before. Don't want to see them gone to waste !
AirGuru is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 17:20
  #231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Out of a bag
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AirGuru
Cant have looked very good for the Baby representatives then !
I just do not understand, why DLH went with the lower offer ? And then why the welsh group pulled out. Surely, if you had the intention, you would just put your head down and go for it. But that doesnt seem the case ?

My Bold. I understand that they may have neglected to factor in the massive maintenance costs which are looming on the horizon for the classic 737s.
Sounds like a pretty basic thing to get wrong.

From my perspective, Shame on DLH for not looking into the background of prospective takers. They've wasted several months now and it isn't helping morale.
Flying Wild is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 17:26
  #232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Somewhere on a dodgy name badge
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
eastern wiseguy

What a brilliant plan

If folks like INKJET are to be believed .Baby has a heap going for it.......why not a staff buyout?
There are enough staff to make it viable

Over to Inkjet for the reasons why not
Justin Cyder-Belvoir is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 17:27
  #233 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can I suggest that some recent posters who clearly know nothing but speculate a lot just do everyone a favour and shut up? I refer particularly to AirGuru - or should we call you Aviation Wales, Benjiman or what? - and FlyingWild - several posts of speculation based around a speculative newspaper article adds up to nothing.

Let those who are involved do what they need to do; you aren't involved, those that are will be under serious NDAs and won't be writing on here, and all you are doing is adding to the tension amongst people with a career interest in this affair. Stop it.

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 21:28
  #234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's a lot of total nonsense been posted recently about Baby by people who really do seem to know naff all.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 21:39
  #235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: up north
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumour Network?
MANTHRUST is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 22:08
  #236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would use a phrase that more closely resembled "Rollocks Network" rather than Rumour in this case.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2012, 07:33
  #237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North, UK
Age: 67
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a subtle difference between rumour and speculation, unfortunately I suspect there has been more of the latter.
pwalhx is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2012, 09:38
  #238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: gate 67 JFK
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The BR may lift a little tomorrow!
INKJET is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2012, 12:34
  #239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lifting it a little won't help, from the general mood amongst the troops it needs to go ways up.
nitefiter is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2012, 14:08
  #240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The sale of BD to IAG is on track to be completed in just over a week. Under the terms of the deal LH must sell WW by the start of May. If they fail to do so then they are required to pay compensation to IAG to cover the cost of disposing of WW.

According to the following article IAG have already a drawn up a plan of what to do with WW should LH fail to sell it.

What future for Bmi Regional and Bmibaby? | ABTN

I am guessing that the IAG plan to do one of three things:

1. They have a buyer lined up already

2. Pay another carrier to take WW of there hands as they did with BACON to BE

3. Close the airline down and dispose of it's assets
BAladdy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.