Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

New Thames Airport for London

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

New Thames Airport for London

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th May 2013, 08:17
  #1101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,364
Received 99 Likes on 41 Posts
In which, with a slip of the tongue, says infrastructure investment would cost the exchequer £30 million - faithfully then reported by the BBC without question
ETOPS is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 17:48
  #1102 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: L.A.
Age: 56
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.
Boris Johnson defends his Thames Airport proposals.

Boris Johnson Defends Estuary Airport Plan, Commons Committee Want Third Heathrow Runway
silverstrata is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 18:12
  #1103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is old news; over a month old. The Thames Estuary airport is (almost) officially dead. Poor old Boris is a joke, I'm afraid.
Barling Magna is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 10:16
  #1104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unfortunately he's anything but ...

if Dave falls under a coalition then Boris is favourite to replace him as Leader of the Party
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 11:21
  #1105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True, but the Tories have, as usual, shot their bolt as a result of internal party divisions and are probably set for another period in the wilderness. Whatever happens, the estuary airport idea is dead.
Barling Magna is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 12:29
  #1106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Coventry
Age: 48
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True, but the Tories have, as usual, shot their bolt as a result of internal party divisions and are probably set for another period in the wilderness.
All parties have factions and divisions, the problem voters have with the Tories is that they still haven't sorted out the mess the last lot created, but they aren't convinced the last lot will be able to come back and poop-scoop their 8 year old dry turd either.
jabird is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 15:11
  #1107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it'll be a Lab-Lib coalition I think
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 21:47
  #1108 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
jabird has nailed the prevailing view - as I see and hear it in my circle of friends.

The only certainty is that the politicos will continue to fudge it. Fudging means nothing happens. Not more LHR and certainly no Island. As has been stated, all the big votes and easy money are on the status quo - however stupid that may be. The reasons have been listed in this (and other) threads.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2013, 10:37
  #1109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All parties have factions and divisions, the problem voters have with the Tories is that they still haven't sorted out the mess the last lot created, but they aren't convinced the last lot will be able to come back and poop-scoop their 8 year old dry turd either.
True. Ed and Ed make a most unconvincing pair.

it'll be a Lab-Lib coalition I think
Yes, I think you're right.

What will the 2015 Airport review show? Expand LHR of course. Will it happen? Well................
Barling Magna is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 19:49
  #1110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote: "it'll be a Lab-Lib coalition I think"

Hope not, nothing could be worse! It would be all about irrelevant and unnecessary constitutional changes (that people don't want, as shown by the AV referendum) and to hell with the economy, unemployment, growth and growing gap between rich and poor.

To put it another way, it would be a "chattering classes"/Guardian readers' dream come true. An answer to an armchair "gucci" socialist's prayers.

In a hung parliament situation, a minority government (whether Conservative or Labour) would be infinitely better.


Quote: "True. Ed and Ed make a most unconvincing pair."

Exactly, so imagine them linked up with Calamity Clegg!

Last edited by Fairdealfrank; 14th Jun 2013 at 19:51.
Fairdealfrank is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 20:21
  #1111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Coventry
Age: 48
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote: "True. Ed and Ed make a most unconvincing pair."

Exactly, so imagine them linked up with Calamity Clegg!
I'd put money on Clegg losing his seat in 2015, giving there's a fair few students there to boot him out.

The Lib Dems are going to take some serious hits - except where they have very strong personalities who already have decent margins.

That really makes it a two horse race, but neither is a very strong runner. As if Ed is already bad enough, he is only there because he's not Dave, and if he wins in 2015, it will be because he's not Dave.

Now to get back to this thread, I don't care how daft Boris Island is, Boris himself would certainly stir things up - but I don't see him becoming an MP again before 2015, so I imagine he's waiting til Cameron is deposed at that time, then perhaps he hopes for a lame interim leader to be chosen in September 2015, then perhaps he looks for a safe seat after the London 2016 election?

For him to do anything sooner is not going to go down well with the London voters, of whom there are a mere few million!
jabird is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2013, 00:50
  #1112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dodging Flybe at EHASC
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not technically on topic but if jabird wishes to put their money where their mouth is, I will be willing to stand any bet that Clegg will retain his seat in 2015.

Boris Island is as dead as a dodo. In the gap regarding London the invisible hand of the market is already looking elsewhere....
Baltasound is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2013, 11:05
  #1113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with paxboy I suspect nothing will happen at BI or indeed LHR for that matter.
LHR should have had 2 runways 10 years ago.

The US market is dead most LHR flights are half empty anyway.

If you head East the horse has bolted via dubai.
Bagso is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2013, 11:18
  #1114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Just caught the end of an interesting interview/talk at the RIBA with Norman Foster, including references to the Beijing T3 project and, of course, the Thames Hub:

BBC iPlayer - Dream Builders: Norman Foster - The Gherkin
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2013, 11:50
  #1115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The US market is dead most LHR flights are half empty anyway.
What are you on about mate? Can you link to a stat that says a majority operate at a sub 50% load factor or did you just pluck that nonsense from thin air?

Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 16th Jun 2013 at 11:53.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2013, 12:20
  #1116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
LHR load factor May 2013: 74.7%.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2013, 14:16
  #1117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bagso,
"LHR should have had 2 runways 10 years ago".

Well . it's always had at least 2 runways as long as I have been interested in aviation, (and that goes back to 1967).
In fact, at the present time, EGLL has 4 runways, R/W09L, R/W09R, R/W27L and R/W27R.
At one time in the past, I believe it even had 12 runways, a bit like EHAM does today.
The Dutch are obviously well ahead here. Who needs runways, (where planes land and take-off from), when you can build HUGE terminals, where you can corral the 'punters', prior to departure, and get them to part with shedloads of money, that they don't actually have, on items they don't actually realise that they don't actually need?

Last edited by ZOOKER; 16th Jun 2013 at 14:23.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2013, 10:59
  #1118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
"Heathrow is better located than a new hub airport at Stansted or the Thames Estuary"

Latest broadside from the BAA (all 56 pages of it) in the war of words over the UK's hub airport:

http://mediacentre.heathrowairport.c...1507&SizeId=-1
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2013, 12:16
  #1119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TV programme Airport Live which started on BBC-2 yesterday for four consecutive evenings should give LHR some good publicity.......
Barling Magna is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2013, 16:47
  #1120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh come skippy you recognise irony!

But please outline who is making money across the pond.....?
Bagso is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.