Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER - 7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2010, 19:32
  #3201 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will the 23R ILS be CAT3 when the jet-powered 'Deux Ponts' commences operation?
Typical Manchester Airport.. Lots of publicity and spin when the service starts.
Nothing heard when the service is withdrawn 9 months later.
egs
QANTAS
Gulf Air
South African
Austrian
Alitalia
Malev.
Cathay pax
etc, etc.
A 'Cornish Wafer'? NOT ARFF!
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 19:41
  #3202 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seeing that they've been operating 2 daily since 2003, any withdrawal of the A380 will see EK17/18 revert back to 77W. And then we can start talking the 3rd daily service. Or the alternate scenario....they keep plodding along with the 3-class A380 pending the arrival of the 2-class A380.
Ringwayman is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 20:08
  #3203 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: manchester
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I assume this means that the Airbus House A380 will be making an apperance at MAN sometime before the EK launch?
ZRH, BOS, LHR, SYD etc all had to have it in to test the airport, and before you say it was purely publicity, the BOS visit wasnt widely known about until the dunlops hit the tarmac.
Also, I know we had a flypast a few years ago, but weve had a new ILS installed since then, and given we are going to be one of the smallest airports to see a regular A380, Id have thought they may want to make sure everything runs smoothly.
We will have to wait until stand 12 is complete however, otherwise the visit will be pointless.
wanna_be_there is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 20:20
  #3204 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: manchester
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also to add, the A380 is now in the online timetable of emirates.com. Stating arrival time of 12:25, departure time of 14:10. (I would expect this time to be altered though, as with the taxiing shennanigans, it could take up to 15 minutes each way to get to/from the gate/runway as it is)

Its not been loaded into the actual booking engine as of yet though.

EK17/18 will offer First (private suites), business and Economy, EK19/20 will still offer just Business and economy. No upgrade to a 3 class B777 as suggested, which is very sensible in my opinion.
wanna_be_there is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 21:23
  #3205 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Zooker
See post 3146 re the ILS (Keep up).
doublesix is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 22:47
  #3206 (permalink)  
PQC
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NW England
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
£10M

Think that you might find that this investement will enable other possible services / carriers to come to MAN. Once you are Code F capable, you are Code F capable - end of!
PQC is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 06:49
  #3207 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't see the fuss over 1st class. Most of the people who can afford to use it don't anyway. It's no longer much of a measure anymore. QFA are even removing it completely, times are changing, and most J class offerings have made F class obsolete.
AUTOGLIDE is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 08:08
  #3208 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK17/18 will offer First (private suites), business and Economy, EK19/20 will still offer just Business and economy. No upgrade to a 3 class B777 as suggested, which is very sensible in my opinion.
I would agree that it is a sensible decision in terms of passenger numbers as swapping the evening service for a 3 class aircraft would end up seeing an overall reduction in capacity which would obviously then mean a 3rd daily needed.

However, do EK operate any other route with a mixed service, as in one flight is 3 class and one is 2 etc? I can't think of any and for that reason I think it will change and an A330 (or A343 as mentioned) could end up filling in the gap in capacity.

If there are any destinations that have two or more flights with different cabins (F/J/Y v J/Y) then I apologise as I cannot think of any.
MUFC_fan is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 08:10
  #3209 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yields must be satifactory or else this move does not make sense.
Other airline's yields Mickeyman, other people's will suffer as Emirates can drive down costs due to the high number of seats on a very modern aeroplane. This has nothing to do with Heathrow, as has been stated many times, no one douobts the regions can support long haul so long as they hub at the non UK end.

Can we stop wittering on about First please? There's barely a market in London anymore never mind Manchester....
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 08:12
  #3210 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Other airline's yields Mickeyman, other people's will suffer as Emirates can drive down costs due to the high number of seats on a very modern aeroplane.
The beauty of capitalism and the competitive nature that a mixed/open economy craves...
MUFC_fan is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 08:45
  #3211 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just looking into the cargo situ, re EK, and EK17/18 only on SkyCargo schedule until 31 Aug. EK19/20 no change.

Waiting for system update or more news to come?
Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 09:51
  #3212 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like they are to operate a 517 seater aircraft on the DXB run - does anyone know how this configuration will differ from the others?
MUFC_fan is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 09:55
  #3213 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stockport
Age: 69
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn`t have the long range crew beds


Ian B
Ian Brooks is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 09:58
  #3214 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,501
Received 169 Likes on 91 Posts
Why would EK operate a 340 on MAN-DBX??

That makes no sense at all.

The 3rd daily is a dead duck now. Move on.
TURIN is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:05
  #3215 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn`t have the long range crew beds
Thanks.

Why would EK operate a 340 on MAN-DBX??

That makes no sense at all.
1. It's DXB...
2. Layover time
3. Cargo
4. Extra capacity
5. Better connections

The 3rd daily is a dead duck now.
Unlike many carriers, EK has the facilities to invest and believes in the regions (NCL is the most brightest of jewels for that argument) and where capacity is needed, they will deliver nine times out of ten.

If MAN needs MORE than 150 extra seats per day, then I am pretty sure that EK will deliver. I don't expect it in the short term, but medium wouldn't surprise me.

Also, could anybody explain the cargo variations between the 77W and A380? Thanks
MUFC_fan is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:08
  #3216 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The beauty of capitalism and the competitive nature that a mixed/open economy craves...
Given that most guys on here welcome a large variety of tails lined up at T2 it has an inherent danger here. It was the same capitalism that created the Alliances which saw QANTAS, Air Canada and Cathay disappear without losing the ability to carry passengers from MAN. Great for the travelling public though.

EK has the facilities to invest and believes in the regions (NCL is the most brightest of jewels for that argument)
This is a commonly applied attribute which has no basis in commercial relaity. Emirates don't believe in the regions, they carry passengers from them to their hub, as do BA, BMI, KLM, Air France and Lufthansa. The only difference is that the hub is a little further afield and so the aircraft is bigger, hence the excitement in the trouser department and shrieks of "Blimey look at the size of that one." I can't believe you're being so romantic about a open-ended, bottomless pit, funded foreign company.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:12
  #3217 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Solihull
Age: 60
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK config

MUFC

The first few EK 380's delivered were 489 seats and mainly destined for
the longer flights (YYZ/SYD etc). This is the same F & J layout as the
517 but less economy. Note the EK website does now mention a 600
seat two class HD density (but not on offer yet).

Apparently they already have at least three 517 seat aircraft in 14/76/427
config and they operate mainly the LHR & Saudi routes (probably CDG aswell).
I know Heathrow do in fact get a mix and I am sure a 489 seater is en route
CDG now but you need to know reggies to be sure which ones are which.

Three out of the next five to be delivered are 517 configs per another
forum.

In spotters there is a post stating the 13th EK 380 has now flown.

Pete

Last edited by OltonPete; 31st Mar 2010 at 10:13. Reason: spelling
OltonPete is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:13
  #3218 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given that most guys on here welcome a large variety of tails lined up at T2 it has an inherent danger here. It was the same capitalism that created the Alliances which saw QANTAS, Air Canada and Cathay disappear without losing the ability to carry passengers from MAN. Great for the travelling public though.
Completely agree with the latter, great news for the public.

However, in the long term, if EK do push out a lot of the carriers it will become more of a monopoly going East than a competitive market.

With QR, EY, BA, AY, LH, AF, KL, SK, SQ etc. still at the airport, I cannot see that happening any time soon...
MUFC_fan is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:14
  #3219 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: manchester
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The main one to look out for is a cargo service.
This is the first time in years that the EK17/18 has prioritised PAX rather than cargo space (in terms of even if the pax loads were light, cargo made up the defecit), and as said earlier, you cant book cargo space on that service after 31st Aug.

EK love thier cargo operations in the UK, so I would fully expect a 3-4 weekly skycargo service to be announced on the back of this, but we will have to wait and see.
wanna_be_there is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:44
  #3220 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SQ etc. still at the airport
I think this will be the one to watch actually.
Skipness One Echo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.