Thomas Cook
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ainsdale
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How come Tommy cook are getting another aircraft i thought they were trying to get rid of aircraft.
They have an A330-200 due before the end of they year and an A321 due from Condor in February and also some more A321's on order
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ainsdale
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The A330-200 for Thomas Cook is due to be delivered on 1st October 2013 and will be registered as G-CHTZ
Source: Thomas Cook Airlines
Source: Thomas Cook Airlines
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Age: 53
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Suggested elsewhere last month
http://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf...ok-condor.html
http://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf...ok-condor.html
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well it's certainly been an expensive weekend for TCX at EMA
I counted at least 6 flights with >4hr delays, plus the 'downrange' flights which would also have been delayed >4hrs, plus the engineering costs, plus 2 sets of c.180 passengers put up in the on-site hotels.
I counted at least 6 flights with >4hr delays, plus the 'downrange' flights which would also have been delayed >4hrs, plus the engineering costs, plus 2 sets of c.180 passengers put up in the on-site hotels.
Well here is G-WWBM freshly painted into it's new livery. Soon to be G-CHTZ.
I never realised that a change of reg was even possible. Why would anyone change a reg please?
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: stockport
Age: 69
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are many reasons operators change reg, to reflect airline or initials
of board or to cover it`s recent past ( previous operator went bust) or previous
operators personalised registration ie: Monarch or Virgin
That is only an idea orf reasons
Chaps
of board or to cover it`s recent past ( previous operator went bust) or previous
operators personalised registration ie: Monarch or Virgin
That is only an idea orf reasons
Chaps
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well it's certainly been an expensive weekend for TCX at EMA
I counted at least 6 flights with >4hr delays, plus the 'downrange' flights which would also have been delayed >4hrs, plus the engineering costs, plus 2 sets of c.180 passengers put up in the on-site hotels.
Burnie5204 is online now Report Post Reply
I counted at least 6 flights with >4hr delays, plus the 'downrange' flights which would also have been delayed >4hrs, plus the engineering costs, plus 2 sets of c.180 passengers put up in the on-site hotels.
Burnie5204 is online now Report Post Reply
Last edited by Mr Angry from Purley; 28th Aug 2013 at 17:28.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well one of them had just got running, operated an outbound flight then hit a flock of racing pigeons on landing back in blighty making it AOG until they could get a new radome delivered and fitted as well as a new windscreen that had cracked.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thomas Cook confirms Flybe partnership
Well it seems they have publically confirmed the partnership today for the 'mini-hub' at Manchester.
Flybe will be able to connect customers from it's UK domestic services to and from Manchester onto longhaul flights operated by Thomas Cook Airlines from next summer...
Thomas Cook confirms Flybe partnership
Flybe will be able to connect customers from it's UK domestic services to and from Manchester onto longhaul flights operated by Thomas Cook Airlines from next summer...
Thomas Cook confirms Flybe partnership
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Essex, SE England!
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just reading through the previous page I noticed MCO was mentioned and wondered if this was correct or a typo?
I fly to MCO/SFB all the time and its only BA & VS that use MCO although TOM did briefly a few years back. It would seem a bit strange if they were flying to both airports as opposed to just SFB.
Or are TCX leaving SFB for MCO & if so why?
I fly to MCO/SFB all the time and its only BA & VS that use MCO although TOM did briefly a few years back. It would seem a bit strange if they were flying to both airports as opposed to just SFB.
Or are TCX leaving SFB for MCO & if so why?
Last edited by Matty J; 10th Sep 2013 at 10:47.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or are TCX leaving SFB for MCO & if so why?
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Wales
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Smartlynx A320 has apparently been confirmed at CWL for Summer 2014 by another source. Its based A321 is going to Stansted along with the flight deck crew. CWL will maintain its TCX cabin crew.