Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

EAST MIDLANDS - 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jun 2006, 19:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Midlands Airport (EMA)
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lite
Any more news regarding Menzies?
I've been really surprised with how badly Menzies have been doing, especially when you consider the fantastic job they did when they were just doing ramp for bmibaby when they first arrived in 2002. They had motivated staff who did a really amazing job at keeping things ontime & friendly, which is why they had their contract extended. Yet as soon as they expanded into doing more than one airline, as well as starting other functions, the company's performance has gradually declined to the levels that they're at now, which is incredibly disappointing.

Needless to say, without things improving, it's highly likely that the bmi group will not want Menzies handling them next summer.
bmibaby.com is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 10:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Westwood
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys and girls,

I have been studying the pis of the new apron and I have been wondering about a few things.

a) why wasnt the apron extension just added to the original main apron?
b) has it been designed so that a pier can be built between the 2 offering air bridges for the new apron????

Whats peoples views on that???

Regards

Stu
UPS@EMA is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 10:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by UPS@EMA
a) why wasnt the apron extension just added to the original main apron?
Only guessing, but:

That would have given you less stands, as the current central apron cul-de-sac would have just been extended. That would also have meant less aircraft able to pushback at the same time - an important consideration during the peak periods.
b) has it been designed so that a pier can be built between the 2 offering air bridges for the new apron????
Lo-Co's don't like air bridges as they add a few minutes to the turnround. However, a ground level pier (terminal extension) has been talked about with walk out access to the stands.
Chilli Monster is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 10:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Westwood
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lo-Co's don't like air bridges as they add a few minutes to the turnround. However, a ground level pier (terminal extension) has been talked about with walk out access to the stands.
I was meaning as a asset for the airport attracting long haulers or more BACON by offering the the opportunity of air bridges.

Regards
UPS@EMA is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 11:28
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DE74
Age: 49
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA at EMA

I strongly doubt that we will see much expansion of BACON from EMA as they are so strong down the road - but, I do see that GB Airways, in the guise of BA or BACON have a market from EMA for all the Canaries, Maderia, and North Africa - RAK is becoming a hot weekend destination.

Could bmibaby bring back BCN? or how about MAD - GB or easy or baby could do that one.
egnxema is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 15:22
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody know the reason why the FCA flight to Punta Cana has got a severe delay on it today ? Dropped friends off this morning and now been stuck all day in terminal. I expect its a tech problem but just thought I would try and clarify.
737James is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 16:00
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737James

Latest news I have is that it has a tech problem and can't get the part shipped in until tomorow, so dont expect much movement before then!
magpie1159 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 16:33
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh dear thats what i expected must be something fairly unusual as FCA have stocks of most parts with eginerrs a at Man only short way away.
737James is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 19:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Out on the bike in Northumberland
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
reason that the two aprons do not meet is the levels-take a look at the ramps up to the new stands-it would have been a lot more expensive to match them up, and for no great benefit-as Chilli says the present layout is also more beneficial from an operational standpoint anyway!
this is the same reason that the central and east aprons are seperate entities
almost professional is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 21:05
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The FCA 763 went tech yesterday too before flying to Sanford. I believe was a hydraulics problem, the engineers were poking around behind the main undercarriage when i saw them. Today just as it was towed to the main apron from the UPS ramp it had one of its undercarriage flaps down, presumably the problem was around this area? lots of unhappy pax both hear and Mexico if its not fixed till tomorrow

Anybody know what set the fire alarm off this morning? They were let in the terminal 5 mins before the Thonsonfly 767 came on stand! could have been an interesting moment! hehe!
Flyboy543 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2006, 21:38
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im not sure if its Mexico i think its off to Orlando again in morning but i would imagine FCA will bring in either another company aircraft or a sub charter to operate the Orlando flight on thurs.
737James is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 10:26
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: scotland
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has had a knock on effect @ Glasgow where the 767 which normally arrives from EMA for the SFB flights is now a FCA 757-200 routing via Bangor
afterdark is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2006, 22:01
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
easyJet have released their winter 06/07 NEMA seats...nothing new but it appears ALC and CIA have switched times.
phil_2405 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2006, 11:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Westwood
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
anything new on the horizon?
UPS@EMA is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2006, 11:29
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read on another fourm that easyjet have 3xdaily slots at GLA for a EMA service!

Is thee any truth in EZY restarting the route?

Any roumurs at the EMA end?
WOWBOY is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2006, 11:44
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 1234
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would doubt it very much as bmibaby do this route 3 times a day.

The route was dropped almost 2 years ago, and I don't think they would go back into direct competition with bmibaby on domestic routes.
easyboy is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2006, 16:19
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone got any updates on the CUSS machines yet? July and their still not working, haven't really seen or herd anything about them lately.
Flyboy543 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2006, 16:22
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Midlands Airport (EMA)
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flyboy543
Anyone got any updates on the CUSS machines yet? July and their still not working, haven't really seen or herd anything about them lately.
Flew out of Manchester the other day, and I have to say that they took away all of my skepticism of introducing them here at EMA, they were dotted everywhere and seemed to allow people to bypass some of the lengthier queues. I think the problem with the EMA ones (or what I heard about May) was that the IT systems from the various companies hadn't been smoothed out, that one prominent airline no longer wanted to be involved with them and working with the handling agents about bag drops hadn't been organised either. Hopefully they'll be ready to smooth out some of EMA's huge queues shortly.
bmibaby.com is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2006, 17:27
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: nottingham
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nema passenger for june

hey all i see the passenger figures for june where up 16% let the passenger figuers keep on increasing cheers paul
paul atkins is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2006, 17:43
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bmibaby.com
one prominent airline no longer wanted to be involved with them
Any idea which one this might be?
phil_2405 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.