GATWICK
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: any town as retired.
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Moscow SVO v DME
When DME was privatised, and Swiss became the first International carrier it was fantastic, then other International carriers were attracted.
It had a light interior, the terminal was modern, baggage belts that worked, customs that worked too.
Any in those days 5 mins walk from car park to terminal entrance.
SVO was the pits in the terminal, and on the runways and taxiways, to say nothing about the ramp.
The Business route to airside in DME was excellent, facilities excellent too.
Thats wht DME became popular, not withstanding that the airport charges were reasonable.
Then the direct train service opened and passengers could get to the airport reasonably easy, and no taxi rip offs.
Only downside at DME was the Airport hotel..... The only hotel when at breakfast you could not see across the room due to crew smoking. The only consumable that I would touch was the nescafe.... in a BIG tin. I would walk to terminal for a fantastic coffee and danish....
Thats why DME took SVO's business.
It had a light interior, the terminal was modern, baggage belts that worked, customs that worked too.
Any in those days 5 mins walk from car park to terminal entrance.
SVO was the pits in the terminal, and on the runways and taxiways, to say nothing about the ramp.
The Business route to airside in DME was excellent, facilities excellent too.
Thats wht DME became popular, not withstanding that the airport charges were reasonable.
Then the direct train service opened and passengers could get to the airport reasonably easy, and no taxi rip offs.
Only downside at DME was the Airport hotel..... The only hotel when at breakfast you could not see across the room due to crew smoking. The only consumable that I would touch was the nescafe.... in a BIG tin. I would walk to terminal for a fantastic coffee and danish....
Thats why DME took SVO's business.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aegean
Will no longer transfer the daily LCA to LGW, it will remain at LHR and operate 6 weekly as of 28th Oct. (A320)
The planned 4 weekly ATH flights from LGW will now operate Daily (A321)
LHR-ATH reduced to 11 weekly vs 24 weekly last winter (A320/A321)
Aegean Airlines Further Revises Planned London Operation in W12 | Airline Route – Worldwide Airline Route Updates
The planned 4 weekly ATH flights from LGW will now operate Daily (A321)
LHR-ATH reduced to 11 weekly vs 24 weekly last winter (A320/A321)
Aegean Airlines Further Revises Planned London Operation in W12 | Airline Route – Worldwide Airline Route Updates
Last edited by adfly; 8th Aug 2012 at 16:07.
Moscow
BA and Aeroflot are both authorised to operate 21 services each week between London and Moscow under the current Air Service Agreement. BA have had three flights per day between LHR and DME for several years though not always seven days a week. But since the start of S12 they are using their full allocation with 1 x 747 and 2 x 767 daily.
Temporarily they are also running the two daily ex-BMI A321s.
I agree with the previous posters that SVO is (or was when I was last there) a dump, one of the most depressing airports I operated to, even worse than LAX.. So why is BA proposing to try it again ? I think Aksai Oiler is right, it's partly catchment area and partly connections. But the extra factor may be the Air Service Agreement which I believe is due for re negotiation. Russia recently liberalised its bilaterals with France and Italy and Transaero are expanding aggressively in those markets. BA could be positioning itself for a similar outcome to the UK negotiations.
And why LGW not LHR ? Perhaps they do not want to allocate any more longhaul capacity to what is really a shorthaul route, and using LGW helps differentiate the product. And they could be hoping for a new feed to those LGW leisure routes.
Temporarily they are also running the two daily ex-BMI A321s.
I agree with the previous posters that SVO is (or was when I was last there) a dump, one of the most depressing airports I operated to, even worse than LAX.. So why is BA proposing to try it again ? I think Aksai Oiler is right, it's partly catchment area and partly connections. But the extra factor may be the Air Service Agreement which I believe is due for re negotiation. Russia recently liberalised its bilaterals with France and Italy and Transaero are expanding aggressively in those markets. BA could be positioning itself for a similar outcome to the UK negotiations.
And why LGW not LHR ? Perhaps they do not want to allocate any more longhaul capacity to what is really a shorthaul route, and using LGW helps differentiate the product. And they could be hoping for a new feed to those LGW leisure routes.
Last edited by Tagron; 8th Aug 2012 at 21:45. Reason: Add Title
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems to operate weekly until December when it increases to 2 weekly. Would have thought WOW would have stayed at STN with little competition there (2 weekly Iceland Express) whereas @ LGW they have a daily Iceland Express flight and 2 weekly Icelandair to worry about.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BACF and Titan operating for BA ex LGW this weekend!
BA have once again had to call on Titan Airways to operate some of there services ex LGW. BA are using a Titan Airways 737 (G-POWC) and it's 757 (G-ZAPX) to operate flights to a number of different destinations. The aircraft are planned to operate:
737-300
10AUG - LGW-BOD-LGW-EDI-LGW-BOD-LGW
11AUG - LGW-FCO-LGW-MRS-LGW
12AUG - LGW-MAN-LGW-GLA-LGW-JER-LGW-AMS-LGW
13AUG - LGW-BOD-LGW-MAN-LGW-VCE-LGW
14AUG - LGW-EDI-LGW-GLA-JER-LGW-PSA-LGW
15AUG - LGW-EDI-LGW-GLA-JER-LGW-PSA-LGW
16AUG - LGW-NCE-LGW-RAK-LGW
17AUG - LGW-GLA-LGW-PSA-LGW
The 737 appears to be operating in a one class 130Y config
757
10AUG - LGW-NAP-LGW-AGP-LGW
11AUG - No Flights shown
12AUG - LGW-IBZ-LGW
13AUG - LGW-PFO-LGW-IBZ-LGW
14AUG - LGW-AGP-LGW-BOD-LGW
15AUG - No flights shown
16AUG - LGW-NAP-LGW-AGP-LGW
17AUG - LGW-PFO-LGW-VCE-LGW
The 757 has be configured to offer a 2 class (CE/ET) service
There is the possibility that over the next week that the G-ZAPX may be swapped with G-POWH and the 737 G-POWC with one of the other Titan 737's.
BA will also use a BACF E170 on the LGW-MAN route tomorrow in place of the usual LGW based 737. The 76 seater E170 is showing as operating the following flights:
BA2902 LGW 06:40 MAN 07:40
BA2903 MAN 08:20 LGW 09:25
BA2906 LGW 10:25 MAN 11:25
BA2907 MAN 12:00 LGW 13:05
BA2908 LGW 15:50 MAN 16:50
BA2909 MAN 17:25 LGW 18:25
Does anyone know if this is all down to serviceability problems with the 737 fleet or is it operational problems with crew??
737-300
10AUG - LGW-BOD-LGW-EDI-LGW-BOD-LGW
11AUG - LGW-FCO-LGW-MRS-LGW
12AUG - LGW-MAN-LGW-GLA-LGW-JER-LGW-AMS-LGW
13AUG - LGW-BOD-LGW-MAN-LGW-VCE-LGW
14AUG - LGW-EDI-LGW-GLA-JER-LGW-PSA-LGW
15AUG - LGW-EDI-LGW-GLA-JER-LGW-PSA-LGW
16AUG - LGW-NCE-LGW-RAK-LGW
17AUG - LGW-GLA-LGW-PSA-LGW
The 737 appears to be operating in a one class 130Y config
757
10AUG - LGW-NAP-LGW-AGP-LGW
11AUG - No Flights shown
12AUG - LGW-IBZ-LGW
13AUG - LGW-PFO-LGW-IBZ-LGW
14AUG - LGW-AGP-LGW-BOD-LGW
15AUG - No flights shown
16AUG - LGW-NAP-LGW-AGP-LGW
17AUG - LGW-PFO-LGW-VCE-LGW
The 757 has be configured to offer a 2 class (CE/ET) service
There is the possibility that over the next week that the G-ZAPX may be swapped with G-POWH and the 737 G-POWC with one of the other Titan 737's.
BA will also use a BACF E170 on the LGW-MAN route tomorrow in place of the usual LGW based 737. The 76 seater E170 is showing as operating the following flights:
BA2902 LGW 06:40 MAN 07:40
BA2903 MAN 08:20 LGW 09:25
BA2906 LGW 10:25 MAN 11:25
BA2907 MAN 12:00 LGW 13:05
BA2908 LGW 15:50 MAN 16:50
BA2909 MAN 17:25 LGW 18:25
Does anyone know if this is all down to serviceability problems with the 737 fleet or is it operational problems with crew??
LGW runway temporary closure 18 Aug?
Gatwick's main runway 26L was shut for half an hour or so on 18th Aug. Does anyone know why? I know they are digging parts up at night, but not in the day surely!
Any info? Thanks
Any info? Thanks
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to my KLM piloting friend it was due to a small hole discovered on the runway. He was diverted to LHR.
Last edited by lenhamlad; 20th Aug 2012 at 08:01.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New at LGW. In Departures at the South Terminal, after you have scanned your boarding pass, had your photo taken and passed through the barriers, you have to hand your boarding pass to the conveyor belt people as well.
Unfortunately, you don't learn about this while you are on the queue waiting your turn. By the time they hear about it some people have already put their passes back in their hand-baggage while queueing and now have to go rummaging in the trays thus slowing down the queue even more.
Unfortunately, you don't learn about this while you are on the queue waiting your turn. By the time they hear about it some people have already put their passes back in their hand-baggage while queueing and now have to go rummaging in the trays thus slowing down the queue even more.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DJ, LGW doesn't do the simple things very well.
I couldn't understand why this procedure was necessary but a fellow passenger to whom I spoke while waiting to board said that he was told by one of the conveyor people that this new rule was brought in because "someone jumped the barriers". Hard to believe but that's what he was told.
I couldn't understand why this procedure was necessary but a fellow passenger to whom I spoke while waiting to board said that he was told by one of the conveyor people that this new rule was brought in because "someone jumped the barriers". Hard to believe but that's what he was told.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is what they do at T3 MAN as well. Slows everything down, all for the sake of not paying ONE human being to check boarding cards at the correct time.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought it was how they accurately measured the queuing time at security? They were caught out a couple of years back I seem to remember by not telling the full story on queue times (which is one of the measured service quality indicators).
Of course it only works if someone scans your boarding pass at the conveyor, but I've certainly seen that happening recently. They then have the time your boarding pass was scanned at the entrance to the security area, and the time you got to the front of the Q
Of course it only works if someone scans your boarding pass at the conveyor, but I've certainly seen that happening recently. They then have the time your boarding pass was scanned at the entrance to the security area, and the time you got to the front of the Q
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is what they do at T3 MAN as well. Slows everything down, all for the sake of not paying ONE human being to check boarding cards at the correct time.