Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

DONCASTER/SHEFFIELD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 18:13
  #181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The one business flight it has is poorly performing..
Mostly due to the fact that the flight times are poor...not DSA's fault.
Shaheen, whilst being unreliable so far, have opted for LBA over DSA!!!
Rightly so...West Yorkshire has a MUCH bigger asian population than South Yorkshire...Bradford!
Don't forget, DSA is not even three years old, and has grown substantially in that time, now doing over 1m passengers a year. How many passengers did EMA/LBA have after that time?!
ryansf is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 18:32
  #182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: west yorkcestereshire
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can't really compare passenger figures like that.
There has been a huge change with lowcost flights that were never offered when lba etc were 3 years old.

It looks like it will become more and more competative in the future and it will be interesting when jet2 have to renegotiate, same as when thomsonflys welcome deal finishes.

The airline bosses are ruthless and think nothing of pulling out at short notice, just look at teeside.
sparkshy is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 18:41
  #183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Devon
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I assume the 'poor performing' route which people are making reference to is BHD?
ADC2604 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 19:02
  #184 (permalink)  
pug
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,375
Received 89 Likes on 53 Posts
I assume the 'poor performing' route which people are making reference to is BHD?
Yes BHD, though Peel claim to be in talks regarding reinstating the AMS and Paris flights, im assuming that will be Flybe also. If so could that be down to their downsizing at LPL and the need to see out a contract? They will operate the Jersey next year, but only once a week!

Rightly so...West Yorkshire has a MUCH bigger asian population than South Yorkshire...Bradford!
Don't forget, DSA is not even three years old, and has grown substantially in that time, now doing over 1m passengers a year. How many passengers did EMA/LBA have after that time?!
As has been said, growth due to low cost operators has totaly accelerated in the last ten years. LBA and EMA were both handling over 1mppa before they gained low-cost operators...

I think people look at what has happened with LPL and expect the same at DSA, Peel got in LPL at the right time, it was Easyjet who did their homework... In the Doncaster Freepress Mr Ryall claims that they are hoping to make DSA a long-haul hub, either hes putting a positive spin on the previous 'pull out' story or hes being naive.

[QUOTET]The airport has asked Doncaster Council for five years of business rates relief, backdated until April 2005 citing "financial hardship"
[/QUOTE]

Apparantly to make them more competative...
pug is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 19:10
  #185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: On the move
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think LBA can be compared with DSA.In the past LBA has always attracted a large percentage of business passengers. When LBA was at 1m pax I think about 80% were main line scheduled flights.A much higher percentage even than Luton.On the other side of the coin,LBA was always underserved by IT flights.A lot of airport growth in general was in scheduled flights and these tended to give slow increases in passenger numbers.
From memory,LBA was 11th in the league tables at the time and airports like Liverpool were nowhere to be seen.Now LBA I think is about 16th and below Liverpool at 12th despite the rapid growth by Jet2.
An airport can expand rapidly when a big IT programme is implemented or a loco opens a base.The business can also be lost just as quickly so in conclusion,a much more volatile market.
wawkrk is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 19:38
  #186 (permalink)  
pug
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,375
Received 89 Likes on 53 Posts
That is my point, LBA has a stable business base from which to grow. Not all eggs in the same basket. I believe because of the large catchment area and the expanding city of Leeds (its like a mini manhattan now) will be the only viable long-haul airport this side of the hills...

Though i was against DSA initialy, i dont want it to fail now it is opened, pointless... Just a bit sad to think that the region, bar LBA, could go into saturation because of it.
pug is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 19:46
  #187 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The lo co phenomenon is around a decade old. The IT market lasted around 25 years as a reasonably mass entity so it depends on where the market goes next. The IT industry grew because it was less highly regulated than scheduled services. Once scheduled services were deregulated, they expanded rapidly. Now people can, at least on short to medium haul, fly more or less where they want for a reasonable price so it's hard to see how you can improve on that. Long haul liberalisation is just a variation on a theme and will have little effect on the existing lo co industry. The future is probably lower capacity point to point (which is the market that Boeing is hanging its hat on). Unless of course there is a war, mass terrorism or the treehuggers get their way......

I've often wondered what would have happened if Donny International had been built before Jet2 came on the scene, or if Church Fenton had been developed instead of Finningley.
robo283 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 19:56
  #188 (permalink)  
pug
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,375
Received 89 Likes on 53 Posts
Long haul liberalisation is just a variation on a theme and will have little effect on the existing lo co industry. The future is probably lower capacity point to point (which is the market that Boeing is hanging its hat on)
So could this mean that the 787 could open up new long-haul routes that would not be profitable with say a 757/767? That places such as DSA, BOH, EXT and those size airports could make flights to New York and Dubai viable?

I've often wondered what would have happened if Donny International had been built before Jet2 came on the scene, or if Church Fenton had been developed instead of Finningley.
Somewhere to the South or East of Leeds would almost certainly have been THE only airport for Yorkshire and Humber. Had one been built in the area of the M62/M1/A1, could have rivaled MAN easily...
pug is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 19:59
  #189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To quote my brother, who deals in such matters, "The 787 is simply a 767 with a new nose"....
robo283 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 20:09
  #190 (permalink)  
pug
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,375
Received 89 Likes on 53 Posts
So for airports like BRS, having CO with its 757's, it will have little difference? Unless markets can be developed for the smaller airports to join the long-haul network, people will still have to travel to MAN, BHX or the London airports for these routes?

I think people forget that we live on a small, albeit hugely populated, island... When compared to big nations like the USA, most of us in the UK can be at a major airport within a couple of hours down the motorway or on the train, which puts the need for long-haul from most regions into perspective? Correct me if im wrong here..
pug is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 20:46
  #191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: West Yorkshire Zone
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rightly so...West Yorkshire has a MUCH bigger asian population than South Yorkshire...Bradford!
Don't forget, DSA is not even three years old, and has grown substantially in that time, now doing over 1m passengers a year. How many passengers did EMA/LBA have after that time?!

Bradford's Bouncing Back

Don't get me started.....
BYALPHAINDIA is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 20:53
  #192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: South East England
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pug your spot on,I,m a 76/75 driver working for an operator with a large order for the 787.I can,t see what all the fuss is about its just a plastic 767 thats going to use less fuel and with a bit more range.As I already find the 767,s endurance greatly excedes my own personal range I,m secretly hoping to retire on the 767 without the pain of a conversion on to what is basically a very similar aeroplane.The crew bunks planned on the 787 are not that palatial either so no need to get excited on that front. Another wise saying is never fly the mark one of any aircraft type.Airline pilots "the asbestos workers of this age"VBR Stampe
Stampe is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 22:23
  #193 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Usually in a bar!
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just interested why so many people think that their local airport is going to get long haul routes or somehow should have them?
There are, like it or not, only a few airports in this country that will ever have a good selection of the illustrious long haul ops.
Its not my city/region is better than yours but stark reality based amongst others the catchment area and the economic size of the region within which the airport resides and not forgeting the ability to get premium passengers on board.
I really think some people need a reality check and accept that Doncaster, for example, while no doubt a success is not going to become a long haul hub and is far more likely to offer a good selection of destinations that will make money with mostly lower cost carriers.
Homo Simpson is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2007, 16:48
  #194 (permalink)  
pug
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,375
Received 89 Likes on 53 Posts
I hear LS have been to look around HUY in the last month or so, wonder if theyve done the same at DSA? Could be looking to replace TOM's city destinations...
pug is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 13:31
  #195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: bawtry
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warsaw

Wizzair announces 3 times a week to DSA staring 1.4.2008

idlejack is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2007, 17:40
  #196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't hear the details in full, but at least 2 reports on the local radio today of DSA being in crisis, with one allegedly 'in the know' big-wig chap saying that it faces closure if business doesn't pick up soon!
harrogate is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2007, 22:06
  #197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After watching Peel Holdings stick faithfully with the project from the very start, it would be such a shame to see things deteriorate so soon, but it has to be said that things have been a little slow at DSA.
RAFAT is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 07:31
  #198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Underhat
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds to me more like a bit of Peel spin designed to encourage further concessions from the local council?
isa kite is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 14:27
  #199 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Near MME, England, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know from what Peel said before DSA opened that they should be handling 5m pax per year heading towards 15m, but that sounds more like it could be the nearby Sheffield City Airport which Peel also own?
DTVAirport is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2008, 14:43
  #200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: bawtry
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airport MD to stand down

Posted on airport website

http://www.robinhoodairport.com/page...et=0&month=Jan
idlejack is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.