Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Doncaster/Finningley (Merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Doncaster/Finningley (Merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Nov 2004, 11:04
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: On the move
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Picked this up from the LBA spotters site:
An interesting article on BBC1 about Sheffield
Airport. Peel Holdings, who also own Finningley, during the last 2 years four operators have approached the airport about starting scheduled services and have been refused for various reasons by the airport. Peel have also submitted a planning application to SHORTEN the runway.
Apparently if Peel can prove the airfield is not profitable they have an option to buy the land for £1.00 at the end of 2007 for conversion to a business park, which no doubt would net them a fortune. Already some of the terminal has been converted to office space. A local pilot who has been campaigning to promote the airport has been given notice to remove his aircraft next January. They also interviewed local councillors who accused Peel of running down the airport so they can promote Finningley.
wawkrk is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2004, 19:15
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: There's no place like home!
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting discussion. Anyone got any pics of the airport?
EastCoaster is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2004, 22:36
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: doncaster
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pics-finninglet

Eastcoaster- try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/donnyairport/manage
terrywilcox is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2004, 21:01
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: There's no place like home!
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that Terry, very impressive looking. Let's hope it takes off like it promises to (if you'll excuse the pun!!)

EastCoaster is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2004, 11:52
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: here there and everywhere
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi GJK22
Now for the really exciting bit. The airfield will be open to private flights from 3rd Jan 2005. The airfield will at that stage be unlicensed and without RFFS. The airfield will have ATC cover however.
Just wondering what level of ATC cover will be in place then.
Ta
RPMcMurphy is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2004, 18:40
  #106 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The word on the street that it will be a FISO service at Sheffield, not ATC service.

The Doncaster/Robin Hood ATZ was notamed as active from today (I think), active daylight hours only initially (that's from 10am to 2pm in Yorkshire ), callsign "Doncaster by eck Tower".

Last edited by niknak; 10th Nov 2004 at 18:39.
niknak is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2004, 07:54
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: here there and everywhere
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been out of the scene for a while so I may be wrong, but I thought an airport had to be licensed in order to provide an AFISO service.
RPMcMurphy is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2004, 20:03
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: EGLL
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it will have to be licensed for any service even air/ground.
I've also heard the two atco's will be self training, and not providing a service, from january until the airport goes into full service in march and then providing full tower and approach procedural services.
ILS 119.5 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2004, 06:03
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Changing the subject 'how will the local population or the owners take to Flying Training Organisations wanting to 'muscle in on the facilities' and keep the ATC busy with their eternal circuits and ILS approaches not to mention the odd night flying? Or will the owners want them? There is a world of difference between the big shiny jets dropping in over Bawtry or Lindholme with one approach and the noisy pistons droning around for ever in the sky. I have a vested interest in the answer of course. Any airfield that will accept 'Flying Trainers' is in my book looking to the future and to refuse them is shortsighted. We all have to train somewhere and it is getting more and more difficult.
40 yearflyer is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2004, 08:36
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 6 miles 14
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe they are saying there will be no based flying club but they will accept private aircraft movements! What exactly this means is still to be seen but my guess is if you own a B200 or a C550 and are going to do one approach, land and pay parking/handling fees then you're ok. Time will tell but Peel have invested a lot of money here and it's primarily and Airport so don't expect it to be too freindly to your avearge PPL holder.
HOODED is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2004, 23:17
  #111 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not so Hooded.
There is a dedicated G/A building at the airport, next to the proposed FBO facility, which will handle all of the the non scheduled flights.
Whilst it's true that Peel seem to be only keen on one "Flying Training Organisation" being based at Robin Hood, they are encouraging as much G/A as capacity will permit, and make no secret of the fact that there may come a time when such movements may be severely restricted, but those who have made the commitment to establish and stay will have a unique opportunity.
Personally, I believe that that time is some time away, and those who get in now will be the ones who will reap the long term benefit.

As is often the case with UK businesses, it's a question of who has the balls to make a long term commitment - if this was the U.S., Peel would have been stampeded in the rush.
niknak is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2004, 06:51
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 6 miles 14
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for clarifying that Niknak, I was told that there would be NO based flying club. If this is untrue then someone who went to a recent meeting with peel got the wrong end of the stick. I wonder if the future of Gamston is not too rosy now then? I know most local flying clubs/gliding clubs are very worried about future airspace expansion curtailing a lot of their activities. Time will tell but I think the place will be a success which will severely restrict private aviation in the future.
HOODED is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2004, 09:39
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: doncaster
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
finningley

I see light now. Many of us campaigners wondered about the motives of Lord Kirkham and Kevin MacDonald (of Polypipe),both of whom seriously funded opposition to Finningley.
I believe they are owners,or certainly have an interest in Gamston. Strangely they joined forces with Friends of the Earth,and others of that ilk. Self interest makes for odd bedfellows eh.

I just hope that Peel remember their friends and can I say enemies,in their future plans.
terrywilcox is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2004, 18:34
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Terry - do you mean that you didn't know about their links with Gamston? They have ownership interests and aircraft based there. I too hope that Peel will remember their actions when they eventually want to move their aircraft to Finningley.
flybe.com is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 11:20
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: doncaster
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
doncaster finningley

Strong rumours re Virgin and an American airline interested in Finningley. Can anyone throw light on this please.

By the way,planes landing and taking off,from this Friday,testing lights etc,over 3 days.
terrywilcox is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 11:25
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: doncaster
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New base for Virgin ?

We have strong rumours that Virgin and an American airline are interested in flying from Finningley,Doncaster. Can anyone throw more light on this please. Also aircraft are landing and taking off from Finningley from this Friday,for 3 days,testing lights etc.
terrywilcox is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 12:10
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I presume you're talking Virgin Atlantic???

Would that really be a logical move for them? yes, they do have extra aircraft coming, but wouldn't they want somewhere which can sell from both ends, and it being a major airport/city etc? Why wouldn't they add to their MAN-Orlando service before Robin Hood Doncaster Sheffield somewhere-in-the-UK with many names airport?????
no, no, no is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 12:17
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: doncaster
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
new base for virgin ?

I said it was a strong rumour,but it is a fact that people from Virgin were in talks with Peel 2 weeks ago.

Coming from London,yo may not know,but Yorkshire people generally do not like making the trek over the pennines. It may not look far on the map,but it can be an arduous journey.
terrywilcox is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 12:26
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brighton, England
Age: 43
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really dislike the phrase 'strong rumour'. The word 'strong' is useless, and implies that that particular rumour is more likely than others, which is total rubbish. IF Virgin go into DSA, I will be VERY VERY surprised, likewise with AA.

Regards

Mike
aeulad is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 12:36
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: doncaster
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NEW BASE FOR VIRGIN

With all due respect,I regard the rumour as "strong",because of it's very reliable source. I appreciate what you say about the semantics,but I would not put,what I would call "unreliable" rumours on the site. It would be quite silly and unproductive.
terrywilcox is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.