Monarch Scheduled goes Low Cost?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Monarch Scheduled goes Low Cost?
It was announced today that apparently with effect from July all pax will have to pay for all meals and drinks on Monarch Scheduled flights.
Obviously things arent quite the 'happy ship' that certain insiders would have us all believe...
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=124923
If this is true, then it really will be a shame and a worry. I have used the ZB's on many occassion as this is one of the elements that always kept Monarch ahead of the Low Costs! The worrying side is that we are only 7 days into the Summer season, and if things are that drastic that they need to try and save such minimal costs, then maybe things are worse than they seem?
What's going to keep passengers booking on what was once 'the jewel of their business' when EZY offer higher frequencies at the same price - surely not just allocated seating???
Has the 'crown' finally fallen off I wonder...
Obviously things arent quite the 'happy ship' that certain insiders would have us all believe...
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=124923
If this is true, then it really will be a shame and a worry. I have used the ZB's on many occassion as this is one of the elements that always kept Monarch ahead of the Low Costs! The worrying side is that we are only 7 days into the Summer season, and if things are that drastic that they need to try and save such minimal costs, then maybe things are worse than they seem?
What's going to keep passengers booking on what was once 'the jewel of their business' when EZY offer higher frequencies at the same price - surely not just allocated seating???
Has the 'crown' finally fallen off I wonder...
Last edited by Chidken Sangwich; 7th May 2004 at 22:34.
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a rather large advert on the London underground (which I saw yesterday) explaining that although they are low cost, pax don't have to pay for their meals. The slogan is 'how low cost should be', or something like that.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: U.K
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ooh dear - not good news . The best thing MON had - i.e. the ZB's which is/was a GREAT product and which in it's field is unbeatable - and PB chooses to ruin it. At risk of upsetting the moderators and i apologise if i do - is this guy being paid to wreck it a la Air Liberte. ??
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's a link to the Monarch scheduled Menu Page giving details of what will be available for purchase.
My parents use ZB quite frequently to/from their Spanish home, and will probably continue to do so. Monarch get them there safely, affordably, usually on time and with a minimum of fuss, but without all the loco aspects of FR/EZ that can make flying so unpleasant. I've found ZB to be a fairly slick operation.
My parents use ZB quite frequently to/from their Spanish home, and will probably continue to do so. Monarch get them there safely, affordably, usually on time and with a minimum of fuss, but without all the loco aspects of FR/EZ that can make flying so unpleasant. I've found ZB to be a fairly slick operation.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stansted
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tight Slot I work for FR and we also tend to get our passengers there "safely, affordably, usually on time and with minimum fuss". Which aspects are you refering to which make flying FR/EZY "so unpleasant"
Just curious!
Its these throw away comments about LoCo's that p**s me and other FR/EZY off.
Tight Slot - ZB may be "a fairly slick operation" but I can assure you FR IS a slick operation. I work with it every day it has to be or the schedule with 25 min turnrounds would collapse.
Rant over!
Just curious!
Its these throw away comments about LoCo's that p**s me and other FR/EZY off.
Tight Slot - ZB may be "a fairly slick operation" but I can assure you FR IS a slick operation. I work with it every day it has to be or the schedule with 25 min turnrounds would collapse.
Rant over!
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Say Mach Number Apologies - my phrasing was obviously a little loose. I wouldn't wish to suggest that FR/EZ or other UK loco's were not safe, affordable on time and lo-fuss. I'm also sure that FR are also very slick. Reading back on my post, I can't immediately see that any of this is what I did suggest, but perception is king. I'm aware that FR in particular take a great deal of stick on some boards and that some of it is unwarranted. It would not be surprising if some FR crew were to become defensive. In this particular instance, you're taking offence at something that was not intended to be offensive.
My specific irritations with LoCo's that you ask about? -
My specific irritations with LoCo's that you ask about? -
- No Seat Allocation
- Boarding By Numbers
- Baggage Restrictions
- The Attitude of Some Staff
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Say Mach Number
I think what Tightslot may have been refering to was the fact that Monarch don't treat their passengers like sheep with a mass hearding/scramble to race for a seat when the flight is called at the gate...for one thing. If I had a wife and family, I would prefer it if we all were able to sit together instead of the mass free-for-all.....
Secondly, most of the occasions I have had the "pleasure" of flying with FR, a glance at a safety card that didn't look like it had just been used in the toilet would have been nice.
Thirdly, IMHO, the speed at which I have sat in the rear end and been taxied around, especially arriving into Dublin is certainly verging on the unsafe. Possibility of a catering truck or similar cutting you up, gear stresses through taxiing and increased brake temps for the next sector are just one or two considerations that I think certain FR Captains pay no attention to whilst they are on the gound....maybe just after that on-time bonus I guess....
Do I need to go on...?
I think what Tightslot may have been refering to was the fact that Monarch don't treat their passengers like sheep with a mass hearding/scramble to race for a seat when the flight is called at the gate...for one thing. If I had a wife and family, I would prefer it if we all were able to sit together instead of the mass free-for-all.....
Secondly, most of the occasions I have had the "pleasure" of flying with FR, a glance at a safety card that didn't look like it had just been used in the toilet would have been nice.
Thirdly, IMHO, the speed at which I have sat in the rear end and been taxied around, especially arriving into Dublin is certainly verging on the unsafe. Possibility of a catering truck or similar cutting you up, gear stresses through taxiing and increased brake temps for the next sector are just one or two considerations that I think certain FR Captains pay no attention to whilst they are on the gound....maybe just after that on-time bonus I guess....
Do I need to go on...?
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i worked for monarch last year on the zb's. at the end of the season, they started seeing how long things took to do and seeing how they could reduce their costs and services. ie no more hot towels, only 1 tea and coffee, only veg and kosher as special meal requests. we had to record how long it took us to do anything, such as dealing with a pax query, how long it took to get them a pillow that type of thing. the spec meal requests were getting out of hand because people didnt have to pay eg half the flight wanted low fat, no salt, gluten free, kosher, kids etc. it took forever to get these meals sorted out. also the complimentry drinks took forever, i mean can you really drink 4 gand t;s and 2 wines on a 2 hour flight. we spent mre time arguing that it wast a free bar but complimently( sorry i thought they meant the same) monarchs policy is 2 drinks per passenger, but this isnt printed on anything.
if they start to treat their pax like their staff then they wont have any left.
if they start to treat their pax like their staff then they wont have any left.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Presumably as a frequent flyer with ZB I'll be getting an email soon saying 'For your comfort and convenience and due to customer demand your in flight meal service is cancelled'.
Is the clock ticking on lounge access for Gold Vantage members?
Is the clock ticking on lounge access for Gold Vantage members?
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MAN
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I understand their statement, Monarch Scheduled is going to start charging for food and drinks for bookings made after 10 May 2004.
Quite ironic that, at the same time, MyTravelLite has just introduced allocated seating at check-in and the ability to purchase extra legroom seating at check-in. MyTravelLite is also in the process of getting prebookable seating onto their website; is about to introduce a menu of quality prebookable d’lish meals; and apparently there are other service enhancements in the pipeline.
If both airlines continue to follow these trends, they’ll meet in the middle. Who’d have thought that Monarch Scheduled and MyTravelLite could end up with equivalent service levels?
Quite ironic that, at the same time, MyTravelLite has just introduced allocated seating at check-in and the ability to purchase extra legroom seating at check-in. MyTravelLite is also in the process of getting prebookable seating onto their website; is about to introduce a menu of quality prebookable d’lish meals; and apparently there are other service enhancements in the pipeline.
If both airlines continue to follow these trends, they’ll meet in the middle. Who’d have thought that Monarch Scheduled and MyTravelLite could end up with equivalent service levels?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stansted
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tight Slot I cannot disagree with any of the reasons you gave for not flying with FR/EZY as you say its not for everyone and its individual choice.
My rant was more specifically at the use of the word 'safety' which intended or not seems to come up with monotonous regularity when FR is mentioned.
I am a Captain of over 5 years in the company (medals gratefully received) and despite what the perception maybe my experience is that safety has never been allowed to be compromised.
As for mondrivers 'on time bonus' - I WISH!
Cant remember the last time I was late. I would be coining it in.
Just another example of a FR mistruth.
My rant was more specifically at the use of the word 'safety' which intended or not seems to come up with monotonous regularity when FR is mentioned.
I am a Captain of over 5 years in the company (medals gratefully received) and despite what the perception maybe my experience is that safety has never been allowed to be compromised.
As for mondrivers 'on time bonus' - I WISH!
Cant remember the last time I was late. I would be coining it in.
Just another example of a FR mistruth.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stansted
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MANAGP can only speak for myself but FR taxi limits are 30kts in a straight line and no more than 10kts in the turn. These are straight out of Boeing.
Had it once at STN where an EZY 737 was in one of the cul-de-sacs and we were taxing on one the main taxiways enroute to the hold for R05. The taxiway from our stands is virtually the full length of the runway in a straight line.
He was to give way to us and taxi out. The cheeky s*d read back the clearance and threw in "after the speeding Ryanair"
A glance at the PFD showed I think about 20kts. Hardly excessive on a straight mile and a half taxi.
Everything is not always at it seems!
Have myself said as an aircraft blurs past on the taxiway- "he aint hanging about" but have said about a lot ofl airlines. As for FR 30kts in the right place is ok by the company.
Had it once at STN where an EZY 737 was in one of the cul-de-sacs and we were taxing on one the main taxiways enroute to the hold for R05. The taxiway from our stands is virtually the full length of the runway in a straight line.
He was to give way to us and taxi out. The cheeky s*d read back the clearance and threw in "after the speeding Ryanair"
A glance at the PFD showed I think about 20kts. Hardly excessive on a straight mile and a half taxi.
Everything is not always at it seems!
Have myself said as an aircraft blurs past on the taxiway- "he aint hanging about" but have said about a lot ofl airlines. As for FR 30kts in the right place is ok by the company.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: loncon
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Barbiegirl, the point of this thread is not what RyanAir do (or don’t do). It’s about Monarch.
And the real hand brake turn is their marketing.
One minute their USP is the quality of their full-in flight service – then before this campaign has properly ended, hey ho its time to pay for your sandwiches.
So question:
Is the sudden change down to shortcomings in their marketing department?
- and lets be honest here, the Monarch web site is frankly pretty cheesy. The poster campaign plastered over many of Manchester’s trams “Always better, often cheaper” - is a classic example of damming yourself with feint praise.
Or is it a sign of desperation?,
And the real hand brake turn is their marketing.
One minute their USP is the quality of their full-in flight service – then before this campaign has properly ended, hey ho its time to pay for your sandwiches.
So question:
Is the sudden change down to shortcomings in their marketing department?
- and lets be honest here, the Monarch web site is frankly pretty cheesy. The poster campaign plastered over many of Manchester’s trams “Always better, often cheaper” - is a classic example of damming yourself with feint praise.
Or is it a sign of desperation?,
Having experienced Monarch charter a few years back, I was a little anxious about booking my flights with them again this year. I had no need to worry.
I contacted them back in November to book my tickets from Luton to Malaga for June 2004. A seemless process over the net, in fact the tickets arrived about a week later.
As Mrs Elpus is a nervous flyer and likes everything in place before we get on board, I e-mailed their customer services department to see if I could pre arrange some seats for both flights. Within 20 minutes I received an e-mail back with allocations for both legs, which I think you'll agree is excellent service.
Hopefully, the Monarch Crown experience will be better than the Monarch Charter one, it couldn't be worse...surely!!
I contacted them back in November to book my tickets from Luton to Malaga for June 2004. A seemless process over the net, in fact the tickets arrived about a week later.
As Mrs Elpus is a nervous flyer and likes everything in place before we get on board, I e-mailed their customer services department to see if I could pre arrange some seats for both flights. Within 20 minutes I received an e-mail back with allocations for both legs, which I think you'll agree is excellent service.
Hopefully, the Monarch Crown experience will be better than the Monarch Charter one, it couldn't be worse...surely!!
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Evanelpus,
Not sure whether this will be a plus or not. On most occasions the crew go to work with no real knowledge of whether they are flying a charter or schedule. They are a very well trained and motivated group. I know many people in all depts and you will not find a more proffesional company!
Not sure whether this will be a plus or not. On most occasions the crew go to work with no real knowledge of whether they are flying a charter or schedule. They are a very well trained and motivated group. I know many people in all depts and you will not find a more proffesional company!